# Revival Gold Intersects 1.65 g/t Gold over 30.5 Meters & 0.92 g/t Gold over 30.5 Meters at Mercur Project in Utah

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/RVG/news/8269501335707311/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-07-15T11:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Revival Gold Inc.

- Ticker: RVG

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Utah, U.S.A.

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-08-20 20:28:14 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.70 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Revival Gold announced initial drill results from its Mercur Gold Project in Utah, including 30.5 meters at 1.65 g/t gold and 30.5 meters at 0.92 g/t gold. These results are part of a larger drilling program focused on converting Inferred Mineral Resources to higher confidence categories for a Pre-Feasibility Study, as well as exploring for resource expansion opportunities. The company highlighted the potential for extending leachable material zones below the planned open pit.

Reasoning: Revival Gold's initial drill results from the Mercur Project include significant gold intercepts over broad widths, supporting the project's open-pit, heap-leachable potential and advancing it towards a Pre-Feasibility Study. The program aims for both resource conversion and expansion, with strong transparency in QA/QC and reporting.

- Positive factor: Headline intercepts show strong widths and good grades for an open-pit, heap-leachable gold project.

- Positive factor: Drilling supports both resource conversion for a PFS and potential resource expansion.

- Positive factor: Comprehensive QA/QC procedures are disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimates and compositing parameters \(cut-off grade, internal dilution\) are provided, enhancing transparency.

- Negative factor: True width is provided as a range \(60-95%\), not a single definitive value.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 18

## Classification and evidence

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: The release includes a detailed QA/QC Program section mentioning certified reference materials, duplicate samples, blanks, and an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab \(ALS\), with sign-off by Qualified Persons.

Evidence · text

> QA/QC Program Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream. Sample results are analyzed immediately upon receipt, and all discrepancies are investigated. Samples are submitted to the ALS Geochemistry sample preparation facility in Elko, Nevada. Gold analyses are performed at the ALS Geochemistry laboratory in Reno, Nevada or Vancouver, British Columbia, and multi-element geochemical analyses are completed at the ALS Minerals laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab. Gold assays are determined on reverse circulation drill cuttings by fire assay and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy \(AAS\) on a 30-gram nominal sample weight \(Au-AA23\). For samples containing greater than 100 ppb Au as determined by Fire Assay, gold content is also determined by cyanide leach with an AAS finish on a nominal 30-gram sample weight \(Au-AA13\). Multi-element geochemical analyses are completed on composites samples from selected drill holes using the ME-MS 41 method. Qualified Persons Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company.

**True Width Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document states that 'True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-95% of drilled width', providing an estimate for the actual thickness.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-95% of drilled width.

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The release explicitly states that 'Approximately 8,500 meters of infill RC drilling is planned for Mercur this year to convert Inferred Mineral Resources to the Measured & Indicated categories'.

Evidence · text

> Approximately 8,500 meters of infill RC drilling is planned for Mercur this year to convert Inferred Mineral Resources to the Measured & Indicated categories in support of a Preliminary Feasibility Study \("PFS"\) targeted for completion by the end of Q1-2027.

**Step-Out Extension**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The company plans 'An additional 2,500 meters of RC drilling, 1,200 meters of core drilling and 600 meters of auger drilling are planned for Mercur to pursue resource expansion opportunities'.

Evidence · text

> An additional 2,500 meters of RC drilling, 1,200 meters of core drilling and 600 meters of auger drilling are planned for Mercur to pursue resource expansion opportunities.

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The document specifies that 'Mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to two intervals of internal dilution'.

Evidence · text

> Mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to two intervals of internal dilution.

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The cut-off grade used for calculating mineralized intercepts is clearly stated as '0.17 g/t'.

Evidence · text

> Mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to two intervals of internal dilution.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 18. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (18)

### RM26-183

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-0)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-183
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.69
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 27.4 m
- From: 106.7 m
- To: 134.1 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 60 °
- Dip: -70 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a good width with a moderate gold grade, contributing positively to the project's resource conversion and expansion efforts, consistent with an open-pit, heap-leachable target. Transparency in QA/QC and reporting is high.

- Positive factor: Good width for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is moderate for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.69

Context: 27.4

### RM26-183

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-1)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-183
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.92
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 30.5 m
- From: 144.8 m
- To: 175.3 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 60 °
- Dip: -70 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This headline intercept demonstrates strong width with a moderate gold grade, which is positive for an open-pit, heap-leachable project. It contributes to the resource conversion and expansion objectives, with good transparency in reporting.

- Positive factor: Strong width and moderate grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is moderate for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.92

Context: 30.5

### RM26-183

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-2)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-183
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.76
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 16.8 m
- From: 175.3 m
- To: 192 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 60 °
- Dip: -70 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a moderate width and grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralization at Mercur. It aligns with the project's objectives for resource definition and expansion, with good reporting standards.

- Positive factor: Moderate width for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is moderate for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.76

Context: 16.8

### RM26-184

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-3)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-184
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.83
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 10.7 m
- From: 222.5 m
- To: 233.2 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 70 °
- Dip: -55 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a moderate width and grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralization at Mercur. It aligns with the project's objectives for resource definition and expansion, with good reporting standards.

- Positive factor: Moderate width and grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is moderate for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.83

Context: 10.7

### RM26-186

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-4)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-186
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.28
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 16.8 m
- From: 16.8 m
- To: 33.5 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 220 °
- Dip: -50 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width but a weak gold grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project. While contributing to the overall drill program, its individual materiality is lower.

- Positive factor: Moderate width for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is weak for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.28

Context: 16.8

### RM26-187

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-5)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-187
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.25
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 16.8 m
- From: 3 m
- To: 19.8 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: -50 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width but a weak gold grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project. While contributing to the overall drill program, its individual materiality is lower.

- Positive factor: Moderate width for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is weak for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.25

Context: 16.8

### RM26-188

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-6)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-188
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.23
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 12.2 m
- From: 3 m
- To: 15.2 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 230 °
- Dip: -50 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width but a weak gold grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project. While contributing to the overall drill program, its individual materiality is lower.

- Positive factor: Moderate width for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is weak for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.23

Context: 12.2

### RM26-189

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-7)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-189
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.44
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6.1 m
- From: 85.3 m
- To: 91.4 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 195 °
- Dip: -75 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept features a strong gold grade, which is positive for an open-pit project, despite its narrower width. It contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit and supports the program's objectives.

- Positive factor: Strong grade for an open-pit gold project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Narrow width for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 2.44

Context: 6.1

### RM26-189

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-8)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-189
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.26
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 9.1 m
- From: 97.5 m
- To: 106.7 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 195 °
- Dip: -75 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width but a weak gold grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project. While contributing to the overall drill program, its individual materiality is lower.

- Positive factor: Moderate width for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is weak for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.26

Context: 9.1

### RM26-189

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-9)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-189
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.73
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 9.1 m
- From: 111.3 m
- To: 120.4 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 195 °
- Dip: -75 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a moderate width and grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralization at Mercur. It aligns with the project's objectives for resource definition and expansion, with good reporting standards.

- Positive factor: Moderate width for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is moderate for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.73

Context: 9.1

### RM26-190

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-10)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-190
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.26
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 25.9 m
- From: 4.6 m
- To: 30.5 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -65 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong width but a weak gold grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project. While contributing to the overall drill program, its individual materiality is lower.

- Positive factor: Strong width for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is weak for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.26

Context: 25.9

### RM26-190

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-11)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-190
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 10.7 m
- From: 73.2 m
- To: 83.8 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 270 °
- Dip: -65 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width with a strong gold grade, contributing positively to the project's resource conversion and expansion efforts, consistent with an open-pit, heap-leachable target. Transparency in QA/QC and reporting is high.

- Positive factor: Moderate width and strong grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 1.40

Context: 10.7

### RM26-194

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-12)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-194
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.89
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 10.7 m
- From: 50.3 m
- To: 61 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 40 °
- Dip: -70 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width with a strong gold grade, contributing positively to the project's resource conversion and expansion efforts, consistent with an open-pit, heap-leachable target. Transparency in QA/QC and reporting is high.

- Positive factor: Moderate width and strong grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 1.89

Context: 10.7

### RM26-195

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-13)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-195
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.23
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6.1 m
- From: 112.8 m
- To: 118.9 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 35 °
- Dip: -65 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a narrow width and weak gold grade, contributing minimally to the overall materiality of the drill program, though it aligns with the project's objectives and reporting standards are met.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Narrow width and weak grade for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.23

Context: 6.1

### RM26-195

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-14)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-195
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.65
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 18.3 m
- From: 140.2 m
- To: 158.5 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 35 °
- Dip: -65 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept provides a moderate width and grade, contributing to the overall understanding of the mineralization at Mercur. It aligns with the project's objectives for resource definition and expansion, with good reporting standards.

- Positive factor: Moderate width and grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is moderate for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.65

Context: 18.3

### RM26-196

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-15)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-196
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.39
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 21.3 m
- From: 19.8 m
- To: 41.1 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 245 °
- Dip: -55 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong width but a weak gold grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project. While contributing to the overall drill program, its individual materiality is lower.

- Positive factor: Strong width for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: Grade is weak for an open-pit gold project.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 0.39

Context: 21.3

### RM26-204

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-16)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-204
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.65
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 30.5 m
- From: 128 m
- To: 158.5 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 30 °
- Dip: -70 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This headline intercept demonstrates strong width with a strong gold grade, which is highly positive for an open-pit, heap-leachable project. It significantly contributes to the resource conversion and expansion objectives, with good transparency in reporting.

- Positive factor: Strong width and strong grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 1.65

Context: 30.5

### RM26-204

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intersects-1-65-g-t-gold-over-30-5-meters-0-92-g-t-gold-over-30-5-m--03556643-d970-4668-a722-7426cad4a89b#fact-drill-facts-17)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM26-204
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah, U.S.A.
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.61
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 10.7 m
- From: 158.5 m
- To: 169.2 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 30 °
- Dip: -70 °

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate width with a strong gold grade, contributing positively to the project's resource conversion and expansion efforts, consistent with an open-pit, heap-leachable target. Transparency in QA/QC and reporting is high.

- Positive factor: Moderate width and strong grade for an open-pit, heap-leachable project.

- Positive factor: Supports resource conversion and expansion goals.

- Positive factor: QA/QC disclosed, certified lab, QP sign-off.

- Positive factor: True width estimated and compositing parameters disclosed.

- Negative factor: True width is a range, not a single value.

Evidence · table

> 1.61

Context: 10.7

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.