# Revival Gold Intercepts 1.8 g/t Gold Over 26 Meters and Provides Update on Mercur Heap Leach Project in Utah

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/RVG/news/6039591815332835/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-01-07T12:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Revival Gold Inc.

- Ticker: RVG

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Utah

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results, Permitting

- Extracted: 2026-08-21 03:33:19 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Revival Gold Inc. announced positive drill results from its Mercur Gold Project in Utah, including 1.8 g/t gold over 25.9 meters and 1.3 g/t gold over 21.9 meters, confirming near-surface oxide gold mineralization and leachability. The company also provided a development update, highlighting progress on baseline biological studies, permitting discussions, and the initiation of column leach tests. Additionally, Revival Gold appointed Timothy S. Barnett as General Manager of Mercur to oversee site development and operations.

Reasoning: The document reports positive drill results with significant gold grades and widths, confirming the project's potential. It also provides a positive update on project development, including permitting, metallurgical test work, and a key management appointment, all contributing to advancing the Mercur Gold Project.

- Positive factor: significant\_gold\_grades\_and\_widths

- Positive factor: near\_surface\_oxide\_mineralization

- Positive factor: confirmation\_of\_leachability

- Positive factor: exploration\_upside\_opportunities

- Positive factor: progress\_on\_permitting\_and\_environmental\_studies

- Positive factor: initiation\_of\_metallurgical\_test\_work

- Positive factor: appointment\_of\_experienced\_general\_manager

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 25

## Classification and evidence

**True Width Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document states that 'True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.'

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: The release details the QA/QC program including insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks, and mentions ALS Geochemistry as an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.

Evidence · text

> Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream. Sample results are analyzed immediately upon receipt, and all discrepancies are investigated. Samples are submitted to the ALS Geochemistry sample preparation facility in Elko, Nevada. Gold analyses are performed at the ALS Geochemistry laboratory in Reno, Nevada or Vancouver, British Columbia, and multi-element geochemical analyses are completed at the ALS Minerals laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Technical information was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP.

Evidence · text

> Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company.

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: Mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.

Evidence · text

> Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.

**Heap Leach Route**

Polarity: neutral

Story-specific tag

Definition: Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: The project is referred to as the 'Mercur Heap Leach Project' and metallurgical test work includes 'column leach tests'.

Evidence · text

> Mercur Heap Leach Project

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: Drilling results are stated to be 'generally consistent with the Inferred Mineral Resource and metallurgical models developed for the Mercur Preliminary Economic Assessment' and some holes 'targeted the western edge of the PEA design pit'.

Evidence · text

> Drilling results collected to-date at Mercur are generally consistent with the Inferred Mineral Resource and metallurgical models developed for the Mercur Preliminary Economic Assessment \("PEA"\)

**Step-Out Extension**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Holes RM25-136 and RM25-137 are described as 'continue to the bottom of the holes and outside the current PEA pit shells', indicating extension drilling.

Evidence · text

> The holes are encouraging with long runs of mineralization that continue to the bottom of the holes and outside the current PEA pit shells.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 25. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (25)

### RM25-111

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-0)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-111
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.59
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 30.5 m
- From: 56.4 m
- To: 86.9 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 120 °
- Dip: 70 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, contributing positively to the project's resource potential.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

Evidence · table

> 0.59

Context: 30.5

### RM25-111

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-1)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-111
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.77
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6.1 m
- From: 120.4 m
- To: 126.5 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 120 °
- Dip: 70 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, adding to the overall mineralization.

Evidence · table

> 0.77

Context: 6.1

### RM25-121

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-2)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-121
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.38
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 21.3 m
- From: 102.1 m
- To: 123.4 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 325 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, indicating broad mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

Evidence · table

> 0.38

Context: 21.3

### RM25-124

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-3)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-124
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.77
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 18.3 m
- From: 24.4 m
- To: 42.7 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 300 °
- Dip: 50 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, contributing to the near-surface mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

Evidence · table

> 0.77

Context: 18.3

### RM25-128

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-4)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-128
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.27
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 7.6 m
- From: 0 m
- To: 7.6 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 170 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width at surface, indicating shallow mineralization.

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.27

Context: 7.6

### RM25-128

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-5)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-128
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.31
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 24.4 m
- From: 57.9 m
- To: 82.3 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 170 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, indicating broad mineralization at depth.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

Evidence · table

> 0.31

Context: 24.4

### RM25-130

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-6)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-130
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.27
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 68.6 m
- To: 71.6 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 200 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing marginally to the overall mineralization.

Evidence · table

> 0.27

Context: 3.0

### RM25-131

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-7)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-131
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.72
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 29 m
- From: 21.3 m
- To: 50.3 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 310 °
- Dip: 70 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width near surface, contributing positively to the project's resource potential.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.72

Context: 29.0

### RM25-135

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-8)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-135
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.55
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 12.2 m
- From: 269.7 m
- To: 281.9 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 285 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a moderate width at depth, indicating continued mineralization.

Evidence · table

> 0.55

Context: 12.2

### RM25-136

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-9)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-136
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.33
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 16.8 m
- From: 25.9 m
- To: 42.7 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 305 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width near surface, indicating broad mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.33

Context: 16.8

### RM25-136

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-10)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-136
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.36
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 36.6 m
- From: 48.8 m
- To: 85.3 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 305 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very significant width, indicating broad and continuous mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

Evidence · table

> 0.36

Context: 36.6

### RM25-137

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-11)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-137
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.47
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 15.2 m
- From: 33.5 m
- To: 48.8 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 305 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width near surface, contributing positively to the project's resource potential.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.47

Context: 15.2

### RM25-137

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-12)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-137
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.33
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 13.7 m
- From: 53.3 m
- To: 67.1 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 305 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, indicating continued mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

Evidence · table

> 0.33

Context: 13.7

### RM25-139

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-13)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-139
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.32
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 7.6 m
- From: 22.9 m
- To: 30.5 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 130 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width near surface, indicating shallow mineralization.

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.32

Context: 7.6

### RM25-139

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-14)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-139
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.41
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 21.3 m
- From: 39.6 m
- To: 61 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 130 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, indicating broad mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

Evidence · table

> 0.41

Context: 21.3

### RM25-140

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-15)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-140
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.28
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 18.3 m
- From: 47.2 m
- To: 65.5 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 135 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, indicating broad mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

Evidence · table

> 0.28

Context: 18.3

### RM25-141

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-16)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-141
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.28
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 10.7 m
- From: 24.4 m
- To: 35.1 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 200 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width near surface, indicating shallow mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.28

Context: 10.7

### RM25-141

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-17)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-141
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.23
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 9.1 m
- From: 51.8 m
- To: 61 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 200 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, contributing marginally to the overall mineralization.

Evidence · table

> 0.23

Context: 9.1

### RM25-142

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-18)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-142
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.38
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 19.8 m
- From: 18.3 m
- To: 38.1 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 135 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width near surface, indicating broad mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.38

Context: 19.8

### RM25-144

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-19)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-144
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.75
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 25.9 m
- From: 6.1 m
- To: 32 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 190 °
- Dip: 70 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a significant width near surface, representing a highlight intersection and contributing significantly to the project's resource potential.

- Positive factor: strong\_grade

- Positive factor: significant\_width

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 1.75

Context: 25.9

### RM25-145

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-20)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-145
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.29
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 9.1 m
- From: 22.9 m
- To: 32 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 140 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width near surface, indicating shallow mineralization.

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.29

Context: 9.1

### RM25-147

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-21)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-147
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.64
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 9.1 m
- From: 30.5 m
- To: 39.6 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 130 °
- Dip: 55 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a moderate width near surface, contributing positively to the project's resource potential.

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.64

Context: 9.1

### RMC25-019

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-22)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RMC25-019
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.3
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 21.9 m
- From: 16.8 m
- To: 38.7 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 0 °
- Dip: 90 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a significant width near surface, representing a highlight intersection and contributing significantly to the project's resource potential.

- Positive factor: strong\_grade

- Positive factor: significant\_width

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 1.30

Context: 21.9

### RMC25-021

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-23)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RMC25-021
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 12.7 m
- From: 1.2 m
- To: 13.9 m

#### Classification

- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: open\_pit

#### Location

- Azimuth: 250 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, duplicates, blanks

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width at very shallow depth, indicating broad mineralization.

- Positive factor: significant\_width

- Positive factor: near\_surface

Evidence · table

> 0.40

Context: 12.7

### Fact 25

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-intercepts-1-8-g-t-gold-over-26-meters-and-provides-update-on-mercu--79feae55-b42a-46b7-8b05-fac1b9b52d26#fact-drill-facts-24)

Mercur Gold Project

#### Identity

- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Initiation of baseline biological studies and discussions with regulators for archaeological mitigation are positive steps towards project permitting.

- Positive factor: permitting\_progress

- Positive factor: environmental\_studies\_initiated

Evidence · text

> Revival Gold's lead environmental and permitting consultant, Stantec Consulting Inc. \("Stantec"\), has completed detailed work plans for baseline biological studies. Field work will commence in Q1 and is expected to be completed over the next twelve months. Discussions have been initiated with Utah regulators on the mitigation of historical mining-related archaeological sites.

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.