Revival Gold Intercepts 1.8 g/t Gold Over 26 Meters and Provides Update on Mercur Heap Leach Project in Utah
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Revival Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- RVG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Utah
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Permitting
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 03:33:19 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Revival Gold Inc. announced positive drill results from its Mercur Gold Project in Utah, including 1.8 g/t gold over 25.9 meters and 1.3 g/t gold over 21.9 meters, confirming near-surface oxide gold mineralization and leachability. The company also provided a development update, highlighting progress on baseline biological studies, permitting discussions, and the initiation of column leach tests. Additionally, Revival Gold appointed Timothy S. Barnett as General Manager of Mercur to oversee site development and operations.
Reasoning: The document reports positive drill results with significant gold grades and widths, confirming the project's potential. It also provides a positive update on project development, including permitting, metallurgical test work, and a key management appointment, all contributing to advancing the Mercur Gold Project.
Positive factors
- significant_gold_grades_and_widths
- near_surface_oxide_mineralization
- confirmation_of_leachability
- exploration_upside_opportunities
- progress_on_permitting_and_environmental_studies
- initiation_of_metallurgical_test_work
- appointment_of_experienced_general_manager
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 25
Classification and evidence
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: The document states that 'True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.'
Evidence · text
“True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release details the QA/QC program including insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks, and mentions ALS Geochemistry as an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.
Evidence · text
“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream. Sample results are analyzed immediately upon receipt, and all discrepancies are investigated. Samples are submitted to the ALS Geochemistry sample preparation facility in Elko, Nevada. Gold analyses are performed at the ALS Geochemistry laboratory in Reno, Nevada or Vancouver, British Columbia, and multi-element geochemical analyses are completed at the ALS Minerals laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia. ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Technical information was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP.
Evidence · text
“Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company.”
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: Mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.
Evidence · text
“Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.”
Heap Leach Routeneutral · Story-specific tag
Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.
Why it applies: The project is referred to as the 'Mercur Heap Leach Project' and metallurgical test work includes 'column leach tests'.
Evidence · text
“Mercur Heap Leach Project”
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: Drilling results are stated to be 'generally consistent with the Inferred Mineral Resource and metallurgical models developed for the Mercur Preliminary Economic Assessment' and some holes 'targeted the western edge of the PEA design pit'.
Evidence · text
“Drilling results collected to-date at Mercur are generally consistent with the Inferred Mineral Resource and metallurgical models developed for the Mercur Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA")”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Holes RM25-136 and RM25-137 are described as 'continue to the bottom of the holes and outside the current PEA pit shells', indicating extension drilling.
Evidence · text
“The holes are encouraging with long runs of mineralization that continue to the bottom of the holes and outside the current PEA pit shells.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 25. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (25)
RM25-111Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-111
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 30.5 m
- From
- 56.4 m
- To
- 86.9 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, contributing positively to the project's resource potential.
Positive factors
- significant_width
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 30.5
RM25-111Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-111
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.1 m
- From
- 120.4 m
- To
- 126.5 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 120 °
- Dip
- 70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a narrow width, adding to the overall mineralization.
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 6.1
RM25-121Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-121
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.3 m
- From
- 102.1 m
- To
- 123.4 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 325 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, indicating broad mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 21.3
RM25-124Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-124
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.77
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 300 °
- Dip
- 50 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, contributing to the near-surface mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
Evidence · table
“0.77”
Context: 18.3
RM25-128Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-128
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width at surface, indicating shallow mineralization.
Positive factors
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 7.6
RM25-128Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 24.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-128
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 24.4 m
- From
- 57.9 m
- To
- 82.3 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 170 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, indicating broad mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- significant_width
Evidence · table
“0.31”
Context: 24.4
RM25-130Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-130
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.27
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 68.6 m
- To
- 71.6 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 200 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width, contributing marginally to the overall mineralization.
Evidence · table
“0.27”
Context: 3.0
RM25-131Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-131
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.72
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 29 m
- From
- 21.3 m
- To
- 50.3 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 310 °
- Dip
- 70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width near surface, contributing positively to the project's resource potential.
Positive factors
- significant_width
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.72”
Context: 29.0
RM25-135Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-135
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.2 m
- From
- 269.7 m
- To
- 281.9 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 285 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a moderate width at depth, indicating continued mineralization.
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 12.2
RM25-136Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-136
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.8 m
- From
- 25.9 m
- To
- 42.7 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 305 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width near surface, indicating broad mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 16.8
RM25-136Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-136
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 36.6 m
- From
- 48.8 m
- To
- 85.3 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 305 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a very significant width, indicating broad and continuous mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
Evidence · table
“0.36”
Context: 36.6
RM25-137Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-137
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15.2 m
- From
- 33.5 m
- To
- 48.8 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 305 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width near surface, contributing positively to the project's resource potential.
Positive factors
- significant_width
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: 15.2
RM25-137Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-137
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.7 m
- From
- 53.3 m
- To
- 67.1 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 305 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, indicating continued mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 13.7
RM25-139Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-139
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 130 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a narrow width near surface, indicating shallow mineralization.
Positive factors
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 7.6
RM25-139Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-139
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.41
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.3 m
- From
- 39.6 m
- To
- 61 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 130 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a significant width, indicating broad mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
Evidence · table
“0.41”
Context: 21.3
RM25-140Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-140
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.3 m
- From
- 47.2 m
- To
- 65.5 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width, indicating broad mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 18.3
RM25-141Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-141
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.28
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.7 m
- From
- 24.4 m
- To
- 35.1 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 200 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width near surface, indicating shallow mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.28”
Context: 10.7
RM25-141Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-141
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 51.8 m
- To
- 61 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 200 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width, contributing marginally to the overall mineralization.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: 9.1
RM25-142Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-142
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.8 m
- From
- 18.3 m
- To
- 38.1 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 135 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width near surface, indicating broad mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: 19.8
RM25-144Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-144
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.75
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25.9 m
- From
- 6.1 m
- To
- 32 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 190 °
- Dip
- 70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a significant width near surface, representing a highlight intersection and contributing significantly to the project's resource potential.
Positive factors
- strong_grade
- significant_width
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“1.75”
Context: 25.9
RM25-145Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-145
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 22.9 m
- To
- 32 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 140 °
- Dip
- 65 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a moderate width near surface, indicating shallow mineralization.
Positive factors
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.29”
Context: 9.1
RM25-147Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RM25-147
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.1 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 39.6 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 130 °
- Dip
- 55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade over a moderate width near surface, contributing positively to the project's resource potential.
Positive factors
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 9.1
RMC25-019Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-019
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 21.9 m
- From
- 16.8 m
- To
- 38.7 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- 90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade over a significant width near surface, representing a highlight intersection and contributing significantly to the project's resource potential.
Positive factors
- strong_grade
- significant_width
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: 21.9
RMC25-021Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RMC25-021
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 12.7 m
- From
- 1.2 m
- To
- 13.9 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- 250 °
- Dip
- 60 °
- Loc. Confidence
- high
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, duplicates, blanks
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.17
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a weak gold grade over a significant width at very shallow depth, indicating broad mineralization.
Positive factors
- significant_width
- near_surface
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 12.7
Fact 25Mercur Gold ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mercur Gold Project
- Region
- usa_ut
- Reported Region
- Utah
- Ticker
- RVG
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-07T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Initiation of baseline biological studies and discussions with regulators for archaeological mitigation are positive steps towards project permitting.
Positive factors
- permitting_progress
- environmental_studies_initiated
Evidence · text
“Revival Gold's lead environmental and permitting consultant, Stantec Consulting Inc. ("Stantec"), has completed detailed work plans for baseline biological studies. Field work will commence in Q1 and is expected to be completed over the next twelve months. Discussions have been initiated with Utah regulators on the mitigation of historical mining-related archaeological sites.”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.