Revival Gold Intercepts 1.0 g/t Gold Over 30 Meters and Extends Mineralization at Mercur Project in Utah

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Revival Gold Inc.
Ticker
RVG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Utah
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-08-21 02:33:57 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Revival Gold Inc. announced drill results from its Mercur Gold Project in Utah, highlighting several near-surface oxide gold intercepts, including 1.0 g/t gold over 30.5 meters in hole RM25-165. The program successfully extended gold mineralization north of the Rover area and is designed to upgrade resources and support a pre-feasibility study. These results are consistent with the project's inferred mineral resource and metallurgical models, demonstrating continued prospectivity and de-risking for future development.

Reasoning: Revival Gold's latest drill results successfully extended gold mineralization outside the known resource area and delivered good grades for a shallow, oxide gold deposit, supporting the company's resource upgrade and pre-feasibility study objectives. The program is backed by robust QA/QC and indicates good leachability.

Positive factors

  • Resource extension beyond known limits
  • Grades are good for an open-pit gold deposit
  • Strong QA/QC procedures and certified lab
  • Results support planned pre-feasibility study
  • Good leachability indicated by AuCN/AuFA ratios

Negative factors

  • True width is an estimated range, not a precise value per intercept

Facts used in scoring: 28

Classification and evidence

True Width Disclosedpositive

Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.

Why it applies: The document provides an estimated range for true width, stating 'True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.'

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 70-100% of drilled width.”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The 'QA/QC Program' section details the insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks, mentions ALS Geochemistry as an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab, and names Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng. and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME as QPs.

Evidence · text

“Quality Assurance/Quality Control consists of the regular insertion of certified reference materials, duplicate samples, and blanks into the sample stream. ... ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab. ... Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The document clearly states that 'Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.'

Evidence · text

“Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drilling program was 'primarily designed to upgrade resources on the project'.

Evidence · text

“Revival Gold's 2025 drilling at Mercur was primarily designed to upgrade resources on the project”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The drilling 'extended gold mineralization outside the known Mineral Resource 1 north of the Rover area'.

Evidence · text

“drilling has extended gold mineralization outside the known Mineral Resource 1 north of the Rover area”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The document references a 'Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Mercur Gold Project'.

Evidence · text

“Preliminary Economic Assessment NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Mercur Gold Project”

Heap Leach Routeneutral · Story-specific tag

Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.

Why it applies: The 'AuCN/AuFA Ratio (%)' is presented as an 'indication of potential heap leach recoverability'.

Evidence · text

“AuCN/AuFA is the ratio of cyanide soluble gold assay to total gold in fire assay and provides an indication of potential heap leach recoverability for the material sampled.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 28. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (28)

RM25-143Mercur · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-143
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
30.5 m
To
45.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-143:30.5-45.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
120 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 15.2

RM25-148Mercur · goldGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-148
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.8 m
From
24.4 m
To
41.1 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-148:24.4-41.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
330 °
Dip
80 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 16.8

RM25-150Mercur · goldGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-150
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38.1 m
From
16.8 m
To
54.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-150:16.8-54.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
150 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a strong width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: 38.1

RM25-151Mercur · goldGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-151
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.57
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.3 m
From
9.1 m
To
27.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-151:9.1-27.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
150 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.57”

Context: 18.3

RM25-155Mercur · goldGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-155
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
59.4 m
To
70.1 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-155:59.4-70.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
40 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate width, extending mineralization outside the known resource.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: 10.7

RM25-155Mercur · goldGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-155
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.2 m
From
80.8 m
To
96 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-155:80.8-96.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
40 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong grade over a moderate width, extending mineralization outside the known resource.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 15.2

RM25-155Mercur · goldGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-155
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
141.7 m
To
152.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-155:141.7-152.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
40 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, extending mineralization outside the known resource.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension

Evidence · table

“0.48”

Context: 10.7

RM25-156Mercur · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-156
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38.1 m
From
12.2 m
To
50.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-156:12.2-50.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
315 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a strong width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 38.1

RM25-156Mercur · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-156
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
117.3 m
To
126.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-156:117.3-126.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
315 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 9.1

RM25-157Mercur · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-157
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.7 m
From
36.6 m
To
50.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-157:36.6-50.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
280 °
Dip
50 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, extending mineralization outside the known resource.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 13.7

RM25-157Mercur · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-157
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
54.9 m
To
61 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-157:54.9-61.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
280 °
Dip
50 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Low grade over a narrow width, extending mineralization outside the known resource.

Positive factors

  • Step-Out Extension

Evidence · table

“0.35”

Context: 6.1

RM25-158Mercur · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-158
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
19.8 m
To
22.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-158:19.8-22.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
145 °
Dip
75 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a narrow width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 3.0

RM25-158Mercur · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-158
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
62.5 m
To
71.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-158:62.5-71.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
145 °
Dip
75 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 9.1

RM25-158Mercur · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-158
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
115.8 m
To
120.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-158:115.8-120.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
145 °
Dip
75 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a narrow width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 4.6

RM25-159Mercur · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-159
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
19.8 m
To
22.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-159:19.8-22.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
80 °
Dip
70 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a narrow width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 3.0

RM25-159Mercur · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-159
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.6 m
From
71.6 m
To
108.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-159:71.6-108.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
80 °
Dip
70 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a strong width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 36.6

RM25-160Mercur · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-160
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
13.7 m
To
16.8 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-160:13.7-16.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
170 °
Dip
70 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a narrow width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 3.0

RM25-160Mercur · goldGrade: 0.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-160
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
48.8 m
To
59.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-160:48.8-59.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
170 °
Dip
70 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.27”

Context: 10.7

RM25-160Mercur · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-160
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
67.1 m
To
77.7 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-160:67.1-77.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
170 °
Dip
70 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 10.7

RM25-162Mercur · goldGrade: 0.72Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 36.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-162
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.72
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
36.6 m
From
4.6 m
To
41.1 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-162:4.6-41.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
295 °
Dip
55 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a strong width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.72”

Context: 36.6

RM25-163Mercur · goldGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-163
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30.5 m
From
13.7 m
To
44.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-163:13.7-44.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
185 °
Dip
60 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a strong width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.91”

Context: 30.5

RM25-164Mercur · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-164
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38.1 m
From
16.8 m
To
54.9 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-164:16.8-54.9
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
310 °
Dip
55 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a strong width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.74”

Context: 38.1

RM25-165Mercur · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-165
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30.5 m
From
25.9 m
To
56.4 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-165:25.9-56.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
135 °
Dip
65 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a strong width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“1.01”

Context: 30.5

RM25-170Mercur · goldGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-170
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.1 m
From
6.1 m
To
15.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-170:6.1-15.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
95 °
Dip
65 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.24”

Context: 9.1

RM25-170Mercur · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 39.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-170
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
39.6 m
From
25.9 m
To
65.5 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RM25-170:25.9-65.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
95 °
Dip
65 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a strong width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 39.6

RMC25-020Mercur · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-020
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19 m
From
60.6 m
To
79.6 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RMC25-020:60.6-79.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
0 °
Dip
90 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: 19.0

RMC25-022Mercur · goldGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-022
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.9 m
From
53.3 m
To
69.3 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RMC25-022:53.3-69.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
120 °
Dip
70 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 15.9

RMC25-023Mercur · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-023
Project
Mercur
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
14.8 m
From
18.4 m
To
33.2 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Group ID
RMC25-023:18.4-33.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Azimuth
65 °
Dip
70 °

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-02-10T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak grade over a moderate width, contributing to resource upgrade efforts.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 14.8

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.