# Revival Gold Drills 2.8 g/t gold over 74 meters Including 8.0 g/t over 12 meters at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/RVG/news/6967200511905838/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2026-04-07T11:30:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Revival Gold Inc.

- Ticker: RVG

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Utah

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-08-21 00:26:46 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Revival Gold announced final results from its 2025 drilling program at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah, highlighted by a significant intercept of 2.75 g/t gold over 74.3 meters, including 8.04 g/t gold over 12.5 meters in hole RMC25-031. These high-grade results confirm the presence of Carlin-style ore shoots below the current pit designs, underscoring the project's exploration potential. The company plans to resume drilling at Mercur later this month to support a Pre-Feasibility Study targeted for Q1 2027.

Reasoning: Revival Gold reported exceptional and strong gold intercepts from its 2025 drilling program at the Mercur Gold Project, including 8.04 g/t gold over 12.5 meters and 2.75 g/t gold over 74.3 meters. These results confirm the presence of high-grade Carlin-style ore shoots below the current PEA design pits, highlighting significant exploration potential. While the grades and widths are highly positive, the low AuCN/AuFA ratios for these intercepts indicate a refractory component to the gold, which could impact processing economics. The company provided robust QA/QC disclosure.

- Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade \(8.04 g/t\) in a significant intercept \(12.5m\)

- Positive factor: Strong gold grade \(2.75 g/t\) over a continuous width \(74.3m\)

- Positive factor: High-grade intercepts confirm exploration potential for Carlin-style ore shoots below current pit designs

- Positive factor: Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure with accredited lab and QP sign-off

- Negative factor: Low AuCN/AuFA ratios for key intercepts suggest refractory gold, potentially increasing processing complexity

- Negative factor: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value

Facts used in scoring: 27

## Classification and evidence

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: The release mentions ALS Geochemistry as an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab and that the technical information was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, both QPs.

Evidence · text

> ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab. Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company.

**Compositing Transparent**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The release states that mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.

Evidence · text

> Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.

**Refractory Ore**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk.

Why it applies: Several intercepts show low AuCN/AuFA ratios \(e.g., 37%, 52%, 11%, 41%\), indicating a significant portion of the gold is not cyanide soluble and suggesting refractory ore.

Evidence · table

> 37

Context: 2.75

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Story-specific tag

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The drilling results are discussed in the context of supporting a planned Pre-Feasibility Study \(PFS\) and are compared to PEA design pits.

Evidence · text

> Data collected from drilling in 2025 and 2026 will support the Company's planned Pre-Feasibility Study targeted for release in Q1 2027

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 27. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (27)

### RM25-132

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-0)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-132
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.88
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.6 m
- From: 19.8 m
- To: 24.4 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 140 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.88 g/t\) over a narrow width \(4.6m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 96% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.88

Context: 4.6

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-132

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-1)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-132
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.4
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 21.3 m
- From: 45.7 m
- To: 67.1 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 140 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.40 g/t\) over a moderate width \(21.3m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 72% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.40

Context: 21.3

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-132

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-2)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-132
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.37
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 22.9 m
- From: 74.7 m
- To: 97.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 140 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.37 g/t\) over a moderate width \(22.9m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 89% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.37

Context: 22.9

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-132

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-3)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-132
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.25
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.6 m
- From: 102.1 m
- To: 106.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 140 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade \(0.25 g/t\) over a narrow width \(4.6m\), which is below the weak threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 88% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Very low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.25

Context: 4.6

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-132

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-4)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-132
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.33
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 6.1 m
- From: 115.8 m
- To: 121.9 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 140 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade \(0.33 g/t\) over a narrow width \(6.1m\), which is below the weak threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 84% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Very low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.33

Context: 6.1

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-146

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-5)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-146
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.49
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 7.6 m
- To: 10.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 100 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.49 g/t\) over a narrow width \(3.0m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 78% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.49

Context: 3.0

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-146

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-6)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-146
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.22
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.6 m
- From: 13.7 m
- To: 18.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 100 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade \(0.22 g/t\) over a narrow width \(4.6m\), which is below the weak threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 41% indicates poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting refractory gold.

- Negative factor: Very low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.22

Context: 4.6

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-146

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-7)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-146
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.54
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 38.1 m
- From: 22.9 m
- To: 61 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 100 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.54 g/t\) over a strong width \(38.1m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 82% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.54

Context: 38.1

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-153

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-8)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-153
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.45
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 33.5 m
- From: 4.6 m
- To: 38.1 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 145 °
- Dip: 60 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.45 g/t\) over a strong width \(33.5m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 95% indicates excellent cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.45

Context: 33.5

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-161

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-9)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-161
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.43
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 16.8 m
- From: 62.5 m
- To: 79.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 175 °
- Dip: 55 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.43 g/t\) over a moderate width \(16.8m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 72% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.43

Context: 16.8

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-171

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-10)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-171
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.49
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 38.1 m
- From: 0 m
- To: 38.1 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 200 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.49 g/t\) over a strong width \(38.1m\) from surface, but it is explicitly noted as mineralized waste rock from historical in-pit backfill, not part of current resources. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 46% indicates poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting refractory gold.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

- Negative factor: Intercept is from mineralized waste rock from historical in-pit backfill, not current resources

Evidence · table

> 0.49

Context: 38.1

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-171

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-11)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-171
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.49
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 7.6 m
- From: 59.4 m
- To: 67.1 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 200 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.49 g/t\) over a moderate width \(7.6m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 78% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.49

Context: 7.6

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-171

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-12)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-171
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.63
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 91.4 m
- To: 94.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 200 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.63 g/t\) over a narrow width \(3.0m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 7% indicates very poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting highly refractory gold.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.63

Context: 3.0

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-172

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-13)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-172
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.39
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 16.8 m
- From: 0 m
- To: 16.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 140 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.39 g/t\) over a moderate width \(16.8m\) from surface, but it is explicitly noted as mineralized waste rock from historical in-pit backfill, not part of current resources. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 55% indicates poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting refractory gold.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

- Negative factor: Intercept is from mineralized waste rock from historical in-pit backfill, not current resources

Evidence · table

> 0.39

Context: 16.8

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-172

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-14)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-172
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.8
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 22.9 m
- From: 102.1 m
- To: 125 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RM25-172:102.1-125.0
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 140 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade \(1.80 g/t\) over a strong width \(22.9m\), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 91% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Positive factor: Moderate gold grade over a strong width

Evidence · table

> 1.80

Context: 22.9

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-172

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-15)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-172
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.05
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 4.6 m
- From: 117.3 m
- To: 121.9 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RM25-172:102.1-125.0
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 140 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows an exceptional gold grade \(6.05 g/t\) over a narrow width \(4.6m\), which is a very positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 92% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade

Evidence · table

> 6.05

Context: 4.6

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 6.05 g/t gold is above the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold.

Evidence · table

> 6.05

Context: 4.6

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-178

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-16)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-178
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.56
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 10.7 m
- From: 9.1 m
- To: 19.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 290 °
- Dip: 55 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.56 g/t\) over a moderate width \(10.7m\), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 66% indicates poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting refractory gold.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.56

Context: 10.7

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-179

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-17)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-179
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.77
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 32 m
- From: 0 m
- To: 32 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 290 °
- Dip: 85 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade \(0.77 g/t\) over a strong width \(32.0m\) from surface, which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 11% indicates very poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting highly refractory gold.

- Negative factor: Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

> 0.77

Context: 32.0

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-179

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-18)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-179
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.13
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 35.1 m
- From: 56.4 m
- To: 91.4 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RM25-179:56.4-91.4
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 290 °
- Dip: 85 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade \(1.13 g/t\) over a strong width \(35.1m\), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 78% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

- Positive factor: Moderate gold grade over a strong width

Evidence · table

> 1.13

Context: 35.1

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-179

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-19)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-179
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.24
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 3 m
- From: 80.8 m
- To: 83.8 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RM25-179:56.4-91.4
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 290 °
- Dip: 85 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade \(3.24 g/t\) over a narrow width \(3.0m\), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 98% indicates excellent cyanide recoverability.

- Positive factor: Strong gold grade

Evidence · table

> 3.24

Context: 3.0

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RM25-179

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-20)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RM25-179
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.36
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 7.6 m
- From: 109.7 m
- To: 117.3 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 290 °
- Dip: 85 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade \(1.36 g/t\) over a moderate width \(7.6m\), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 95% indicates excellent cyanide recoverability.

- Positive factor: Moderate gold grade

Evidence · table

> 1.36

Context: 7.6

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RMC25-031

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-21)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RMC25-031
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.75
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 74.3 m
- From: 90.9 m
- To: 165.2 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RMC25-031:90.9-165.2
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 135 °
- Dip: 80 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade \(2.75 g/t\) over a continuous width \(74.3m\), resulting in an exceptional grade-thickness product. This is a highly positive result, although the low AuCN/AuFA ratio of 37% indicates significant refractory gold.

- Positive factor: Strong gold grade over a continuous width

- Positive factor: High grade-thickness product \(204.3 g/t·m\)

- Negative factor: Low AuCN/AuFA ratio suggests refractory gold

Evidence · table

> 2.75

Context: 74.3

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RMC25-031

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-22)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RMC25-031
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 8.04
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 12.5 m
- From: 130 m
- To: 142.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RMC25-031:90.9-165.2
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 135 °
- Dip: 80 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows an exceptional gold grade \(8.04 g/t\) over a moderate width \(12.5m\), resulting in a strong grade-thickness product. This is a highly positive result, although the low AuCN/AuFA ratio of 52% indicates significant refractory gold.

- Positive factor: Exceptional gold grade

- Positive factor: High grade-thickness product \(100.5 g/t·m\)

- Negative factor: Low AuCN/AuFA ratio suggests refractory gold

Evidence · table

> 8.04

Context: 12.5

#### Rejected tags

**Bonanza Intercept** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 8.04 g/t gold is above the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold.

Evidence · table

> 8.04

Context: 12.5

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RMC25-032

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-23)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RMC25-032
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.09
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 83.9 m
- From: 13.6 m
- To: 97.5 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RMC25-032:13.6-97.5
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 145 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade \(1.09 g/t\) over a continuous width \(83.9m\), resulting in a strong grade-thickness product. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 88% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Positive factor: Moderate gold grade over a continuous width

- Positive factor: High grade-thickness product \(91.45 g/t·m\)

Evidence · table

> 1.09

Context: 83.9

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RMC25-032

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-24)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RMC25-032
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.99
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 34.1 m
- From: 13.6 m
- To: 47.7 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RMC25-032:13.6-97.5
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 145 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade \(1.99 g/t\) over a strong width \(34.1m\), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 88% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Positive factor: Strong gold grade over a strong width

Evidence · table

> 1.99

Context: 34.1

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RMC25-033

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-25)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RMC25-033
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.96
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 82.5 m
- From: 13 m
- To: 95.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RMC25-033:13.0-95.6
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 75 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade \(0.96 g/t\) over a continuous width \(82.5m\), resulting in a strong grade-thickness product. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 90% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Positive factor: Moderate gold grade over a continuous width

- Positive factor: High grade-thickness product \(79.2 g/t·m\)

Evidence · table

> 0.96

Context: 82.5

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

### RMC25-033

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/revival-gold-drills-2-8-g-t-gold-over-74-meters-including-8-0-g-t-over-12-meters--4bcb0b94-fdd1-4ea6-bde0-94a4a502d882#fact-drill-facts-26)

Mercur Gold Project · gold

#### Identity

- Hole ID: RMC25-033
- Project: Mercur Gold Project
- Commodity: gold
- Region: usa\_ut
- Reported Region: Utah
- Ticker: RVG

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.75
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 29.9 m
- From: 19 m
- To: 48.9 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: epithermal
- Program: mixed
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: RMC25-033:13.0-95.6
- Mining Method: mixed

#### Location

- Azimuth: 75 °
- Dip: 65 °
- Loc. Confidence: high

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS Geochemistry
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- Lab Certified: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: blanks, standards, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes

#### Compositing

- Cutoff Grade: 0.17
- Cutoff Unit: g/t
- Dilution Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade \(1.75 g/t\) over a strong width \(29.9m\), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 92% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

- Positive factor: Strong gold grade over a strong width

Evidence · table

> 1.75

Context: 29.9

#### Rejected tags

**Apparent Width Only** — Rejected; excluded from scoring

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range \(60-85%\) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

> True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.