Revival Gold Drills 2.8 g/t gold over 74 meters Including 8.0 g/t over 12 meters at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Revival Gold Inc.
Ticker
RVG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Utah
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-21 00:26:46 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Revival Gold announced final results from its 2025 drilling program at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah, highlighted by a significant intercept of 2.75 g/t gold over 74.3 meters, including 8.04 g/t gold over 12.5 meters in hole RMC25-031. These high-grade results confirm the presence of Carlin-style ore shoots below the current pit designs, underscoring the project's exploration potential. The company plans to resume drilling at Mercur later this month to support a Pre-Feasibility Study targeted for Q1 2027.

Reasoning: Revival Gold reported exceptional and strong gold intercepts from its 2025 drilling program at the Mercur Gold Project, including 8.04 g/t gold over 12.5 meters and 2.75 g/t gold over 74.3 meters. These results confirm the presence of high-grade Carlin-style ore shoots below the current PEA design pits, highlighting significant exploration potential. While the grades and widths are highly positive, the low AuCN/AuFA ratios for these intercepts indicate a refractory component to the gold, which could impact processing economics. The company provided robust QA/QC disclosure.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade (8.04 g/t) in a significant intercept (12.5m)
  • Strong gold grade (2.75 g/t) over a continuous width (74.3m)
  • High-grade intercepts confirm exploration potential for Carlin-style ore shoots below current pit designs
  • Comprehensive QA/QC disclosure with accredited lab and QP sign-off

Negative factors

  • Low AuCN/AuFA ratios for key intercepts suggest refractory gold, potentially increasing processing complexity
  • True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value

Facts used in scoring: 27

Atlas analysis — Revival Gold Inc.: Revival Gold Drills 2.8 g/t gold over 74 meters Including 8.0 g/t over 12 meters at the Mercur Gold Project in Utah. 2.75 g/t over 74.3 m; 1.09 g/t over 83.9 m; 0.96 g/t over 82.5 m

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release mentions ALS Geochemistry as an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab and that the technical information was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, both QPs.

Evidence · text

“ALS Minerals is an ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited lab. Technical information included in this news release was reviewed and approved by Mr. John Meyer, P.Eng., a QP and Vice President, Engineering and Development for the Company, and Mr. Dan Pace, RM SME, a QP and Chief Geologist for the Company.”

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: The release states that mineralized intercepts are calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.

Evidence · text

“Mineralized intercepts calculated based on a 0.17 g/t cutoff grade allowing up to 2 intervals of internal dilution.”

Refractory Orenegative

Ore requires oxidation/pressure treatment before recovery — a processing and recovery risk.

Why it applies: Several intercepts show low AuCN/AuFA ratios (e.g., 37%, 52%, 11%, 41%), indicating a significant portion of the gold is not cyanide soluble and suggesting refractory ore.

Evidence · table

“37”

Context: 2.75

PEA-Supportingneutral · Story-specific tag

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The drilling results are discussed in the context of supporting a planned Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) and are compared to PEA design pits.

Evidence · text

“Data collected from drilling in 2025 and 2026 will support the Company's planned Pre-Feasibility Study targeted for release in Q1 2027”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 27. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (27)

RM25-132Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-132
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
19.8 m
To
24.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.88 g/t) over a narrow width (4.6m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 96% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-132Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 21.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-132
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
21.3 m
From
45.7 m
To
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.40 g/t) over a moderate width (21.3m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 72% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 21.3

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-132Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-132
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
74.7 m
To
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.37 g/t) over a moderate width (22.9m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 89% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.37”

Context: 22.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-132Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-132
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
102.1 m
To
106.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade (0.25 g/t) over a narrow width (4.6m), which is below the weak threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 88% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Very low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-132Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-132
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.1 m
From
115.8 m
To
121.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade (0.33 g/t) over a narrow width (6.1m), which is below the weak threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 84% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Very low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.33”

Context: 6.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-146Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-146
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
7.6 m
To
10.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
100 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.49 g/t) over a narrow width (3.0m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 78% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 3.0

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-146Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-146
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
13.7 m
To
18.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
100 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a very low gold grade (0.22 g/t) over a narrow width (4.6m), which is below the weak threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 41% indicates poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • Very low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.22”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-146Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-146
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38.1 m
From
22.9 m
To
61 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
100 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.54 g/t) over a strong width (38.1m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 82% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.54”

Context: 38.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-153Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-153
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
33.5 m
From
4.6 m
To
38.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
145 °
Dip
60 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.45 g/t) over a strong width (33.5m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 95% indicates excellent cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 33.5

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-161Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-161
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.8 m
From
62.5 m
To
79.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
175 °
Dip
55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.43 g/t) over a moderate width (16.8m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 72% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 16.8

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-171Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-171
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
38.1 m
From
0 m
To
38.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
200 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.49 g/t) over a strong width (38.1m) from surface, but it is explicitly noted as mineralized waste rock from historical in-pit backfill, not part of current resources. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 46% indicates poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold
  • Intercept is from mineralized waste rock from historical in-pit backfill, not current resources

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 38.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-171Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-171
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
59.4 m
To
67.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
200 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.49 g/t) over a moderate width (7.6m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 78% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.49”

Context: 7.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-171Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-171
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
91.4 m
To
94.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
200 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.63 g/t) over a narrow width (3.0m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 7% indicates very poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting highly refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 3.0

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-172Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-172
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.8 m
From
0 m
To
16.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.39 g/t) over a moderate width (16.8m) from surface, but it is explicitly noted as mineralized waste rock from historical in-pit backfill, not part of current resources. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 55% indicates poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold
  • Intercept is from mineralized waste rock from historical in-pit backfill, not current resources

Evidence · table

“0.39”

Context: 16.8

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-172Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-172
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
22.9 m
From
102.1 m
To
125 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-172:102.1-125.0
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade (1.80 g/t) over a strong width (22.9m), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 91% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a strong width

Evidence · table

“1.80”

Context: 22.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-172Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 6.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-172
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
6.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.6 m
From
117.3 m
To
121.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-172:102.1-125.0
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
140 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows an exceptional gold grade (6.05 g/t) over a narrow width (4.6m), which is a very positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 92% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade

Evidence · table

“6.05”

Context: 4.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 6.05 g/t gold is above the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold.

Evidence · table

“6.05”

Context: 4.6

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-178Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-178
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.56
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.7 m
From
9.1 m
To
19.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
55 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.56 g/t) over a moderate width (10.7m), which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 66% indicates poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.56”

Context: 10.7

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-179Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.77Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-179
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.77
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32 m
From
0 m
To
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
85 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a low gold grade (0.77 g/t) over a strong width (32.0m) from surface, which is below the moderate threshold for gold. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 11% indicates very poor cyanide recoverability, suggesting highly refractory gold.

Negative factors

  • Low grade for gold

Evidence · table

“0.77”

Context: 32.0

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-179Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-179
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
35.1 m
From
56.4 m
To
91.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-179:56.4-91.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
85 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade (1.13 g/t) over a strong width (35.1m), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 78% indicates moderate cyanide recoverability.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a strong width

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: 35.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-179Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-179
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
3.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
80.8 m
To
83.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RM25-179:56.4-91.4
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
85 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade (3.24 g/t) over a narrow width (3.0m), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 98% indicates excellent cyanide recoverability.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade

Evidence · table

“3.24”

Context: 3.0

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RM25-179Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RM25-179
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m
From
109.7 m
To
117.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
290 °
Dip
85 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade (1.36 g/t) over a moderate width (7.6m), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 95% indicates excellent cyanide recoverability.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: 7.6

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RMC25-031Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 2.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-031
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
2.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
74.3 m
From
90.9 m
To
165.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-031:90.9-165.2
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
135 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a strong gold grade (2.75 g/t) over a continuous width (74.3m), resulting in an exceptional grade-thickness product. This is a highly positive result, although the low AuCN/AuFA ratio of 37% indicates significant refractory gold.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a continuous width
  • High grade-thickness product (204.3 g/t·m)

Negative factors

  • Low AuCN/AuFA ratio suggests refractory gold

Evidence · table

“2.75”

Context: 74.3

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RMC25-031Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 8.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-031
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
8.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.5 m
From
130 m
To
142.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-031:90.9-165.2
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
135 °
Dip
80 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows an exceptional gold grade (8.04 g/t) over a moderate width (12.5m), resulting in a strong grade-thickness product. This is a highly positive result, although the low AuCN/AuFA ratio of 52% indicates significant refractory gold.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional gold grade
  • High grade-thickness product (100.5 g/t·m)

Negative factors

  • Low AuCN/AuFA ratio suggests refractory gold

Evidence · table

“8.04”

Context: 12.5

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The grade of 8.04 g/t gold is above the 5 g/t exceptional threshold for gold.

Evidence · table

“8.04”

Context: 12.5

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RMC25-032Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 83.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-032
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
83.9 m
From
13.6 m
To
97.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-032:13.6-97.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
145 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade (1.09 g/t) over a continuous width (83.9m), resulting in a strong grade-thickness product. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 88% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a continuous width
  • High grade-thickness product (91.45 g/t·m)

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 83.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RMC25-032Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.99Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 34.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-032
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.99
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
34.1 m
From
13.6 m
To
47.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-032:13.6-97.5
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
145 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade (1.99 g/t) over a strong width (34.1m), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 88% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a strong width

Evidence · table

“1.99”

Context: 34.1

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RMC25-033Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 0.96Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 82.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-033
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
0.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
82.5 m
From
13 m
To
95.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-033:13.0-95.6
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
75 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows a moderate gold grade (0.96 g/t) over a continuous width (82.5m), resulting in a strong grade-thickness product. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 90% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Positive factors

  • Moderate gold grade over a continuous width
  • High grade-thickness product (79.2 g/t·m)

Evidence · table

“0.96”

Context: 82.5

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”
RMC25-033Mercur Gold Project · goldGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 29.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
RMC25-033
Project
Mercur Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_ut
Reported Region
Utah
Ticker
RVG

Geometry

Grade
1.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
29.9 m
From
19 m
To
48.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
RMC25-033:13.0-95.6
Mining Method
mixed

Location

Azimuth
75 °
Dip
65 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Geochemistry
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
0.17
Cutoff Unit
g/t
Dilution Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a strong gold grade (1.75 g/t) over a strong width (29.9m), which is a positive result. The AuCN/AuFA ratio of 92% indicates good cyanide recoverability.

Positive factors

  • Strong gold grade over a strong width

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: 29.9

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: True width is estimated as a range (60-85%) rather than a precise value, indicating the reported width is downhole.

Evidence · text

“True width for all holes is estimated to be 60-85% of drilled width.”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.