RETRANSMISSION: Gold Runner Exploration Samples Up To 25,306 Grams per Ton Silver With 11.22 Grams per Ton Gold For a Gold Equivalent of 12.7 Ounces per Ton in New 350 Meter Gold Stack Trend on the 100% Controlled Golden Girl Property, Golden Triangle, B.C.

Positive factors

• Exceptional gold grade (11.22 g/t) significantly above the 75th percentile for gold deposits (0.51 g/t).
• Part of a newly discovered 350-meter trend, indicating significant exploration potential.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• Bonanza silver grade (25,306 g/t) indicating very high-grade mineralization.
• Part of a newly discovered 350-meter trend, suggesting significant exploration potential.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• High copper grade (2.97%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.
• Part of a newly discovered 350-meter trend, suggesting significant exploration potential.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• High lead grade (8.19%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.
• Part of a newly discovered 350-meter trend, suggesting significant exploration potential.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• High zinc grade (5.89%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.
• Part of a newly discovered 350-meter trend, suggesting significant exploration potential.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• Exceptional gold equivalent grade (396.66 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating very high overall metal value.
• Part of a newly discovered 350-meter trend, suggesting significant exploration potential.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.

Positive factors

• Strong gold grade (2.22 g/t) for a surface sample, well above the 75th percentile for gold deposits (0.51 g/t).

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• Very high silver grade (2,197 g/t) for a surface sample, indicating strong mineralization.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• Moderate copper grade (0.58%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• Moderate lead grade (3.05%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• Moderate zinc grade (2.51%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• Very high gold equivalent grade (36.86 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating strong overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• Very high silver grade (1,633 g/t) for a surface sample, indicating strong mineralization.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• High lead grade (6.82%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• High zinc grade (9.18%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• Very high gold equivalent grade (28.35 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating strong overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• Very high silver grade (1,267 g/t) for a surface sample, indicating strong mineralization.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• Very high lead grade (14.83%) for a surface sample, contributing significantly to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• Very high zinc grade (11.16%) for a surface sample, contributing significantly to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• Very high gold equivalent grade (24.54 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating strong overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.

Positive factors

• Strong gold grade (3.56 g/t) for a surface sample, well above the 75th percentile for gold deposits (0.51 g/t).

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• High silver grade (885 g/t) for a surface sample, indicating strong mineralization.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Very low copper grade.

Positive factors

• Very high lead grade (9.77%) for a surface sample, contributing significantly to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• Very high gold equivalent grade (18.44 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating strong overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• High silver grade (969 g/t) for a surface sample, indicating strong mineralization.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• High lead grade (5.94%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• High zinc grade (5.09%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• Very high gold equivalent grade (17.12 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating strong overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• High silver grade (641 g/t) for a surface sample, indicating strong mineralization.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• Moderate lead grade (4.72%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• High gold equivalent grade (11.04 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating strong overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.

Positive factors

• Strong gold grade (2.72 g/t) for a surface sample, well above the 75th percentile for gold deposits (0.51 g/t).

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective talus sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• High silver grade (382 g/t) for a surface sample, indicating strong mineralization.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective talus sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective talus sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective talus sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective talus sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• High gold equivalent grade (9.14 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating strong overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective talus sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Positive factors

• High silver grade (342 g/t) for a surface sample, indicating strong mineralization.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• High gold equivalent grade (6.22 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating strong overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Very low copper grade.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Lead can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• Moderate zinc grade (3.81%) for a surface sample, contributing to overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Zinc can be a penalty element in concentrates.

Positive factors

• High gold equivalent grade (1.56 g/t AuEq) for a surface sample, indicating strong overall metal value.

Negative factors

• Result is from a selective grab sample, which may not be representative.
• Metal equivalent calculation relies on assumed metallurgical recoveries from analogue deposits, not project-specific testwork, which introduces uncertainty.