Renforth Intersects Broad Nickel-Cobalt and Zinc-Copper-Silver Mineralization in Victoria Undercut Drilling, Including 118.0 M of 0.081% Ni and 10.9 M of 0.544% Zn
Original announcement by orestocks on
- Company
- Renforth Resources Inc.
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
- Exchange
- Unavailable
- Region
- Québec
- Primary commodity
- Nickel
- Secondary commodities
- Cobalt, Zinc, Copper, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-10-05 11:15:16 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Renforth Resources announced new drill results from its Victoria polymetallic nickel deposit in Québec, confirming broad nickel-cobalt and zinc-copper-silver mineralization and extending it at depth. Hole SUR-26-58 intersected 118.0 m of 0.081% Ni and 62 ppm Co, and ended in mineralization, indicating the deposit remains open. The results will inform ongoing metallurgical testwork aimed at defining a processing route for the bulk-tonnage deposit.
Reasoning: New drill results confirm broad polymetallic mineralization and down-dip continuity at the Victoria deposit, with one hole ending in mineralization. However, individual metal grades are low, true widths are unknown, and the metal equivalent assumptions for interval selection are aggressive.
Positive factors
- broad_intercepts
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
- qaqc_disclosed
- qp_signed
Negative factors
- low_grades_individual_metals
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
- partial_digestion_assay
Facts used in scoring: 99
Classification and evidence
Heap Leach Routeneutral
Processing via heap leach — lower CAPEX and OPEX, lower recovery expected.
Why it applies: the document describes a heap_leach route ("heap leaching")
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("flotation")
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 99. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (99)
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.081Grade Unit: %Intercept: 118 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.081
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 118 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 279 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-279
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.081”
Context: 118.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.015Grade Unit: %Intercept: 118 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.015
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 118 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 279 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-279
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.015”
Context: 118.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 62Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 118 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 62
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 118 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 279 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-279
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“62”
Context: 118.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 118 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 118 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 279 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-279
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.070”
Context: 118.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 118 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 118 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 279 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-279
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 118.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 171.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-171.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.090”
Context: 10.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 171.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-171.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: 10.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 71Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 10.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 71
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 171.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-171.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“71”
Context: 10.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.074Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.074
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 171.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-171.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.074”
Context: 10.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.5 m
- From
- 161 m
- To
- 171.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 161 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:161-171.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: 10.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.151Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.151
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 166.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:164-166.1
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.15
- Cutoff Unit
- % Ni
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.151”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.023Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.023
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 166.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:164-166.1
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.15
- Cutoff Unit
- % Ni
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low, narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.023”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 105Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 105
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 166.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:164-166.1
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.15
- Cutoff Unit
- % Ni
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“105”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 166.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:164-166.1
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.15
- Cutoff Unit
- % Ni
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low, narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 164 m
- To
- 166.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:164-166.1
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.15
- Cutoff Unit
- % Ni
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low, narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 2.10
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.078Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.078
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.55 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.078”
Context: 17.55
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.032Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.032
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.55 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.032”
Context: 17.55
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 73Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 17.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 73
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 17.55 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“73”
Context: 17.55
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.255Grade Unit: %Intercept: 17.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.255
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 17.55 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.255”
Context: 17.55
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17.55 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.33”
Context: 17.55
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.151Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.151
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.65 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 191.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-191.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.151”
Context: 7.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.65 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 191.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-191.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.017”
Context: 7.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 101Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 101
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.65 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 191.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-191.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“101”
Context: 7.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.65 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 191.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-191.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.010”
Context: 7.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.65 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 191.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-191.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 7.65
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.186Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.186
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 185.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-185.65
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.186”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 185.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-185.65
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low, narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.020”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 115Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 115
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 185.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-185.65
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“115”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 185.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-185.65
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low, narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 183.4 m
- To
- 185.65 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 183.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:183.4-185.65
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low, narrow width and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- low_width
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: 2.25
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.033Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.033
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.9 m
- From
- 190.35 m
- To
- 198.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.35 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:190.35-198.25
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.033”
Context: 7.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.054Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.054
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.9 m
- From
- 190.35 m
- To
- 198.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.35 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:190.35-198.25
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.054”
Context: 7.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 66Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 66
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.9 m
- From
- 190.35 m
- To
- 198.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.35 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:190.35-198.25
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“66”
Context: 7.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.506Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.506
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.9 m
- From
- 190.35 m
- To
- 198.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.35 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:190.35-198.25
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, with moderate grade but true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.506”
Context: 7.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.9 m
- From
- 190.35 m
- To
- 198.25 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 190.35 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:190.35-198.25
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.50”
Context: 7.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.021Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.021
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 191.05 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.05 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:191.05-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.021”
Context: 9.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.043Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.043
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 191.05 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.05 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:191.05-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.043”
Context: 9.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 52Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 52
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 191.05 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.05 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:191.05-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“52”
Context: 9.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.444Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.444
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 191.05 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.05 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:191.05-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, with moderate grade but true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.444”
Context: 9.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.9 m
- From
- 191.05 m
- To
- 200.95 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 191.05 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:191.05-200.95
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 9.90
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.118Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.118
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
- From
- 204.6 m
- To
- 213.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 204.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:204.6-213.3
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.118”
Context: 8.70
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.006Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.006
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
- From
- 204.6 m
- To
- 213.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 204.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:204.6-213.3
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.006”
Context: 8.70
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 79Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 79
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
- From
- 204.6 m
- To
- 213.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 204.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:204.6-213.3
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“79”
Context: 8.70
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.009Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.009
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
- From
- 204.6 m
- To
- 213.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 204.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:204.6-213.3
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.009”
Context: 8.70
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.7 m
- From
- 204.6 m
- To
- 213.3 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 204.6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:204.6-213.3
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.07”
Context: 8.70
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.083Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.083
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
- From
- 228 m
- To
- 255.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 228 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:228-255.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.083”
Context: 27.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
- From
- 228 m
- To
- 255.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 228 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:228-255.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: 27.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 69Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 27.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 69
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
- From
- 228 m
- To
- 255.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 228 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:228-255.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“69”
Context: 27.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.101Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.101
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
- From
- 228 m
- To
- 255.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 228 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:228-255.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.101”
Context: 27.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.47
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.5 m
- From
- 228 m
- To
- 255.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 228 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:228-255.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.47”
Context: 27.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.051Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.051
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 253.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-253.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.051”
Context: 5.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 253.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-253.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.090”
Context: 5.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 87Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 87
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 253.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-253.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“87”
Context: 5.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 253.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-253.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, with moderate grade but true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.450”
Context: 5.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.57Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.85 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 253.05 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-253.05
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.57”
Context: 5.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.037Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.037
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.15 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 252.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-252.35
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.037”
Context: 5.15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.095Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.095
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.15 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 252.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-252.35
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.095”
Context: 5.15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 81Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 5.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 81
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 5.15 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 252.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-252.35
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“81”
Context: 5.15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5.15 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 252.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-252.35
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, with moderate grade but true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.510”
Context: 5.15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5.15 m
- From
- 247.2 m
- To
- 252.35 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 247.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:247.2-252.35
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 5.15
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.039Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.039
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 248.7 m
- To
- 250.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:248.7-250.9
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.2
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.039”
Context: 2.20
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.158Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.158
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 248.7 m
- To
- 250.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:248.7-250.9
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.158”
Context: 2.20
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 102Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 102
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 248.7 m
- To
- 250.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:248.7-250.9
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.1
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“102”
Context: 2.20
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.662Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.662
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 248.7 m
- To
- 250.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:248.7-250.9
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, with moderate grade but true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.662”
Context: 2.20
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.2 m
- From
- 248.7 m
- To
- 250.9 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 248.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:248.7-250.9
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: 2.20
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.092Grade Unit: %Intercept: 74.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.092
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 74.3 m
- From
- 284.7 m
- To
- 359 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:284.7-359
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.092”
Context: 74.30
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.013Grade Unit: %Intercept: 74.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.013
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 74.3 m
- From
- 284.7 m
- To
- 359 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:284.7-359
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.013”
Context: 74.30
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 70Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 74.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 70
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 74.3 m
- From
- 284.7 m
- To
- 359 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:284.7-359
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“70”
Context: 74.30
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.041Grade Unit: %Intercept: 74.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.041
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 74.3 m
- From
- 284.7 m
- To
- 359 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:284.7-359
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.041”
Context: 74.30
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 74.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 74.3 m
- From
- 284.7 m
- To
- 359 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 284.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:284.7-359
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.11”
Context: 74.30
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.116Grade Unit: %Intercept: 31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.116
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 31 m
- From
- 301 m
- To
- 332 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 301 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:301-332
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.116”
Context: 31.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.026Grade Unit: %Intercept: 31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.026
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 31 m
- From
- 301 m
- To
- 332 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 301 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:301-332
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.026”
Context: 31.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 90Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 90
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 31 m
- From
- 301 m
- To
- 332 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 301 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:301-332
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“90”
Context: 31.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.094Grade Unit: %Intercept: 31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.094
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 31 m
- From
- 301 m
- To
- 332 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 301 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:301-332
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.094”
Context: 31.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 31 m
- From
- 301 m
- To
- 332 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 301 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:301-332
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.24”
Context: 31.00
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.133Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.133
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.8 m
- From
- 308.7 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 308.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:308.7-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.133”
Context: 8.80
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.065Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.065
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.8 m
- From
- 308.7 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 308.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:308.7-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.065”
Context: 8.80
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 135Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 8.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 135
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 8.8 m
- From
- 308.7 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 308.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:308.7-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“135”
Context: 8.80
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.325Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.325
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 8.8 m
- From
- 308.7 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 308.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:308.7-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, with moderate grade but true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.325”
Context: 8.80
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8.8 m
- From
- 308.7 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 308.7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:308.7-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.49”
Context: 8.80
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.167Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.167
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- From
- 313.65 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 313.65 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:313.65-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.15
- Cutoff Unit
- % Ni
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.167”
Context: 3.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.069Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.069
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- From
- 313.65 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 313.65 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:313.65-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.15
- Cutoff Unit
- % Ni
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.069”
Context: 3.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 172Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 172
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- From
- 313.65 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 313.65 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:313.65-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.15
- Cutoff Unit
- % Ni
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“172”
Context: 3.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- From
- 313.65 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 313.65 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:313.65-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, with moderate grade but true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.550”
Context: 3.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.55
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- From
- 313.65 m
- To
- 317.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 313.65 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:313.65-317.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Zn
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.55”
Context: 3.85
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.088Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.088
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26.5 m
- From
- 363.5 m
- To
- 390 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 363.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:363.5-390
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is very low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.088”
Context: 26.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.004Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.004
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26.5 m
- From
- 363.5 m
- To
- 390 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 363.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:363.5-390
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.004”
Context: 26.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 61Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 26.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 61
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 26.5 m
- From
- 363.5 m
- To
- 390 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 363.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:363.5-390
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“61”
Context: 26.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 26.5 m
- From
- 363.5 m
- To
- 390 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 363.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:363.5-390
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: 26.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 26.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 26.5 m
- From
- 363.5 m
- To
- 390 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 363.5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:363.5-390
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Broad silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- broad_intercept
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 26.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.101Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.101
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 374 m
- To
- 378.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 374 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:374-378.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.101”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · copperGrade: 0.003Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.003
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 374 m
- To
- 378.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 374 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:374-378.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.003”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · cobaltGrade: 64Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 64
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 374 m
- To
- 378.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 374 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:374-378.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“64”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · zincGrade: 0.002Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.002
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 374 m
- To
- 378.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 374 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:374-378.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.002”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-58Victoria · silverGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-58
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 374 m
- To
- 378.5 m
- Hole Depth
- 390 m
- Intercept Depth
- 374 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-58:374-378.5
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.12
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 2 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Silver intercept confirming down-dip continuity and ending in mineralization, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
- open_at_depth
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 4.50
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-59Victoria · nickelGrade: 0.016Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-59
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.016
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 163 m
- To
- 170.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-59:163-170.45
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Nickel intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low for nickel and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.016”
Context: 7.45
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-59Victoria · copperGrade: 0.035Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-59
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.035
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 163 m
- To
- 170.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-59:163-170.45
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Copper intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is very low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- very_low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.035”
Context: 7.45
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-59Victoria · cobaltGrade: 43Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-59
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 43
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 163 m
- To
- 170.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-59:163-170.45
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“43”
Context: 7.45
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
SUR-26-59Victoria · zincGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.45 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SUR-26-59
- Project
- Victoria
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- canada_qc
- Ticker
- RFR.CN
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.45 m
- From
- 163 m
- To
- 170.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 163 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SUR-26-59:163-170.45
- Mining Method
- mixed
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Canada Ltd.
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Compositing
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.08
- Cutoff Unit
- % NiEq
- Dilution Disclosed
- Yes
- Max Dilution
- 3 m
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Zinc intercept confirming down-dip continuity, but grade is low and true width is unknown. NiEq assumptions for interval selection are aggressive and multiple cutoffs were used.
Positive factors
- continuity_extension
Negative factors
- low_grade
- apparent_width_only
- metal_equivalent_opaque
- partial_digestion_assay
- multiple_cutoffs_used_for_intervals
Evidence · table
“0.160”
Context: 7.45
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Compositing Transparentpositive
Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.