# Renegade Gold Files NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Rebel Gold Deposit, Red Lake District, Ontario

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/renegade-gold-files-ni-43-101-technical-report-for-the-rebel-gold-deposit-red-la--8a6d8c98-bed8-466e-ac0d-bf3f30852ec6

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/commodities/articles/renegade-gold-files-ni-43-112000114.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2026-04-01T11:20:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Renegade Gold Inc.

- Ticker: RAGE

- Exchange: TSXV

- Region: Ontario

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Resource update, Other

- Extracted: 2026-08-21 00:36:28 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Renegade Gold Inc. has filed an independent NI 43-101 technical report on SEDAR+ for the Rebel Gold Deposit in Ontario. The report includes a Mineral Resource Estimate with an effective date of February 5, 2026.

Reasoning: The company has filed a formal NI 43-101 technical report containing a Mineral Resource Estimate, which is a key regulatory milestone for project advancement.

- Positive factor: NI 43-101 compliance

- Positive factor: Independent report filing

Facts used in scoring: 0

## Classification and evidence

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The announcement explicitly states the report was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

> prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 0. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

No stored fact records are available for this extraction.

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.