RDS: Full Year Statutory Accounts
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- REDSTONE RESOURCES LIMITED
- Ticker
- RDS
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Western Australia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Nickel, Cobalt, Gold, Platinum, Palladium, Lithium, Lead, Zinc, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results, Agreement transaction, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 08:35:05 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Redstone Resources Limited released its annual financial report for the year ended 30 June 2026, reporting a net loss of $587,894 and net cash outflows from operating activities. Operationally, the company reported encouraging deep diamond drill results from hole TLD005 at its West Musgrave Project in Western Australia, intersecting high-grade copper mineralization at significant depths. The company also expanded its portfolio by acquiring new gold, lithium, copper, and base metal exploration projects in Western Australia, but the auditor highlighted a material uncertainty regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern.
Reasoning: Redstone Resources Limited reported new high-grade copper drill intercepts extending mineralization at depth at its West Musgrave Project and acquired new prospective projects, but these positive operational developments are overshadowed by a significant net loss and an auditor's going concern warning.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercepts at significant depth extending mineralization
- Evidence suggesting a magmatic sulphide source for the copper deposit
- Acquisition of new prospective exploration projects expanding the company's portfolio
- EIS co-fund grant secured for future drilling programs
Negative factors
- Net loss reported for the financial year
- Net cash outflows from operating activities
- Auditor's material uncertainty related to going concern warning
- Drill intercepts reported as apparent width only, with no true width stated
- Some drill results are historical re-releases, reducing novelty
Facts used in scoring: 51
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: The intercept of 2.7% Cu from 1048.4m in TLD005 is exceptionally high-grade for a porphyry-style copper deposit (exceptional threshold >=0.8%).
Evidence · text
“1.6m at 2.7% Cu from 1,048.4m”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drill hole TLD005 discovered copper mineralization at much greater depth (over 400m deeper vertically than previous) and ~130m further to the south, extending beyond previously known limits.
Evidence · text
“TLD005 discovered multiple lenses of Cu mineralisation - including two further significant high-grade intersections (see below) - at much greater depth (over 400m deeper vertically than previous) and more extensive being ~130m further to the south”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The document states that the information relating to drilling and exploration results was authorized by a Competent Person (Dr Greg Shirtliff) as defined by JORC 2012.
Evidence · text
“The information in this document that relates to drilling and exploration results for the West Musgrave Project from 2017 to date and the Saturn Project was authorised by Dr Greg Shirtliff, who is engaged as a Consultant to the Company through Zephyr Professional Pty Ltd. Dr Shirtliff is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Dr Shirtliff has sufficient experience which is relevant to the tasks for which he was engaged to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Dr Shirtliff consents to the inclusion in the report of matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: All reported drill intercepts are given as downhole lengths without stating true widths or drill orientation relative to mineralization.
Evidence · text
“1.8m at 2.5% Cu from 912.4m downhole”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: The document explicitly refers to these as 'historical results' and directs readers to a prior ASX announcement for their reference, indicating they are not new assays.
Evidence · text
“Refer to ASX Announcement of 14 July 2026 for reference of reported historical results”
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: Cobalt is mentioned as being associated with sulphides and having economic value, but also as a potential indicator of magmatic source, implying it's part of a polymetallic system that could have processing considerations.
Evidence · text
“Co mineralisation has been of particular interest for Redstone, not only because it is found in varying amounts with the Tollu Cu mineralisation and has economic value, but also because, given its tendency to be associated with mafic to ultramafic rocks, its presence may be evidence that the Cu is from a mafic magmatic source.”
Going Concern Warningnegative · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: The auditor's report explicitly highlights a material uncertainty regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern due to losses and cash outflows.
Evidence · text
“Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern We draw attention to Note 2 in the financial report which indicates that the Group incurred a loss after tax of $587,894 (2025: $543,366) and had net cash outflows from operating activities of $403,751 (2025: $253,649) for the year ended 30 June 2026 and as at 30 June 2026 had net current assets of $147,986 (2025: $128,083) and eexploration commitments of $636,787 for the next year.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 51. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (51)
TLD005Tollu Copper deposit · copperGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLD005
- Project
- Tollu Copper deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.8 m
- From
- 912.4 m
- To
- 914.2 m
- Hole Depth
- 1195.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 912.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLD005:912.4-914.2
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade copper intercept at significant depth extends the known mineralization and supports the potential for a larger magmatic sulphide system.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercept
- Significant depth extension of mineralization
- Potential for Voisey's Bay style deposit
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“1.8m at 2.5% Cu from 912.4m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TLD005Tollu Copper deposit · copperGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLD005
- Project
- Tollu Copper deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 1048 m
- To
- 1052 m
- Hole Depth
- 1195.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1048 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLD005:1048-1052
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This strong copper intercept at the deepest point to date further extends mineralization and supports the conceptual model for a magmatic sulphide source.
Positive factors
- Strong copper intercept
- Significant depth extension of mineralization
- Potential for Voisey's Bay style deposit
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“4m at 1.3% Cu from 1,048m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TLD005Tollu Copper deposit · copperGrade: 2.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLD005
- Project
- Tollu Copper deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.6 m
- From
- 1048.4 m
- To
- 1050 m
- Hole Depth
- 1195.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1048.4 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLD005:1048.4-1050
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade copper sub-interval within a deeper intercept further confirms strong mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercept
- Significant depth extension of mineralization
- Potential for Voisey's Bay style deposit
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“1.6m at 2.7% Cu from 1,048.4m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TLD005Tollu Copper deposit · copperGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLD005
- Project
- Tollu Copper deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 193 m
- To
- 203 m
- Hole Depth
- 1195.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 193 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLD005:193-203
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A significant shallow copper intercept confirms mineralization closer to surface within the same drill hole.
Positive factors
- Strong copper intercept
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“10m at 1.37% Cu from 193m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TLD005Tollu Copper deposit · copperGrade: 2.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLD005
- Project
- Tollu Copper deposit
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.37
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 195 m
- To
- 199 m
- Hole Depth
- 1195.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 195 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLD005:195-199
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade copper sub-interval within a shallow intercept further confirms strong mineralization closer to surface.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper intercept
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“4m at 2.37% Cu from 195m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TLD005Tollu Copper deposit · cobaltGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLD005
- Project
- Tollu Copper deposit
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 728.3 m
- To
- 729.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 1195.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 728.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLD005:728.3-729.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt mineralization at depth, not always associated with copper, provides subtle evidence for a gabbroic source and magmatic sulphides.
Positive factors
- Cobalt mineralization at depth
- Suggests magmatic sulphide source
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“1.1m at 0.11% Co from 728.3m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TLD005Tollu Copper deposit · cobaltGrade: 0.076Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLD005
- Project
- Tollu Copper deposit
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.076
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.6 m
- From
- 1048 m
- To
- 1048.6 m
- Hole Depth
- 1195.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1048 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLD005:1048-1048.6
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt mineralization at depth, not always associated with copper, provides subtle evidence for a gabbroic source and magmatic sulphides.
Positive factors
- Cobalt mineralization at depth
- Suggests magmatic sulphide source
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“0.6m at 0.076% Co from 1,048m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
TLD005Tollu Copper deposit · cobaltGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLD005
- Project
- Tollu Copper deposit
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.2 m
- From
- 201.2 m
- To
- 202.4 m
- Hole Depth
- 1195.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 201.2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLD005:201.2-202.4
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Cobalt mineralization in the upper zone of the drill hole provides further evidence for a potential magmatic sulphide source.
Positive factors
- Cobalt mineralization in upper zone
- Suggests magmatic sulphide source
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“1.2m at 0.12% Co from 201.2m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
BSB0524Saturn · copperGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0524
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 44 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 44 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0524:0-44
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization from surface, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Thick intercept from surface
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for copper
Evidence · text
“44m @ 0.23% Cu, 0.07% Ni and 0.29g/t Pt+Pd+Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0524Saturn · nickelGrade: 0.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0524
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 44 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 44 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0524:0-44
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization from surface, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Thick intercept from surface
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for nickel
Evidence · text
“44m @ 0.23% Cu, 0.07% Ni and 0.29g/t Pt+Pd+Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0524Saturn · goldGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 44 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0524
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 44 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 44 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0524:0-44
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization from surface, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Thick intercept from surface
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for gold
Evidence · text
“44m @ 0.23% Cu, 0.07% Ni and 0.29g/t Pt+Pd+Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0524Saturn · copperGrade: 0.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0524
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 14 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0524:5-14
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“9m @ 0.65% Cu, 0.15% Ni and 0.21g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 5m downhole (BSB0524)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0524Saturn · nickelGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0524
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 14 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0524:5-14
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“9m @ 0.65% Cu, 0.15% Ni and 0.21g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 5m downhole (BSB0524)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0524Saturn · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0524
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 14 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0524:5-14
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“9m @ 0.65% Cu, 0.15% Ni and 0.21g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 5m downhole (BSB0524)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC003Saturn · copperGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: %Intercept: 58 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC003
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 58 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC003:20-78
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Thick intercept
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for copper
Evidence · text
“58m @ 0.35% Cu, 0.08% Ni and 0.21g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 20m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC003Saturn · nickelGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 58 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC003
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 58 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC003:20-78
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Thick intercept
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for nickel
Evidence · text
“58m @ 0.35% Cu, 0.08% Ni and 0.21g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 20m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC003Saturn · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 58 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC003
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 58 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC003:20-78
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Thick intercept
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for gold
Evidence · text
“58m @ 0.35% Cu, 0.08% Ni and 0.21g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 20m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC003Saturn · copperGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC003
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC003:20-35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“15m @ 0.63% Cu, 0.15% Ni and 0.33g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 20m downhole (BSC003)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC003Saturn · nickelGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC003
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC003:20-35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“15m @ 0.63% Cu, 0.15% Ni and 0.33g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 20m downhole (BSC003)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC003Saturn · goldGrade: 0.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC003
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.33
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC003:20-35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“15m @ 0.63% Cu, 0.15% Ni and 0.33g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 20m downhole (BSC003)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC003Saturn · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC003
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 27 m
- To
- 28 m
- Intercept Depth
- 27 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC003:27-28
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical peak copper concentration indicates high-grade potential, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Peak copper concentration
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“1.1% Cu - 1m from 27m downhole (BSC003)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC003Saturn · goldGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC003
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC003:12-13
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical peak gold concentration indicates high-grade potential, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Peak gold concentration
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“1.2g/t Au - 1m from 12m downhole (BSC003)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0536Saturn · copperGrade: 0.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0536
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0536:0-35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization from surface, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Thick intercept from surface
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for copper
Evidence · text
“35m @ 0.29% Cu, 0.12% Ni and 0.16g/t Pt+Pd+Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0536Saturn · nickelGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0536
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0536:0-35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization from surface, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Thick intercept from surface
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for nickel
Evidence · text
“35m @ 0.29% Cu, 0.12% Ni and 0.16g/t Pt+Pd+Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0536Saturn · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0536
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0536:0-35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization from surface, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Thick intercept from surface
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for gold
Evidence · text
“35m @ 0.29% Cu, 0.12% Ni and 0.16g/t Pt+Pd+Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0536Saturn · copperGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0536
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0536:5-15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“10m @ 0.56% Cu, 0.25% Ni and 0.17g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 5m downhole (BSB0536)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0536Saturn · nickelGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0536
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0536:5-15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“10m @ 0.56% Cu, 0.25% Ni and 0.17g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 5m downhole (BSB0536)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0536Saturn · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0536
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0536:5-15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“10m @ 0.56% Cu, 0.25% Ni and 0.17g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 5m downhole (BSB0536)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC005Saturn · copperGrade: 0.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC005
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.56
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC005:6-15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“9m @ 0.56% Cu, 0.11% Ni and 0.35ppm Pt+Pd+Au from 6m downhole (BSC005)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC005Saturn · nickelGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC005
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- nickel
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC005:6-15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for nickel
Evidence · text
“9m @ 0.56% Cu, 0.11% Ni and 0.35ppm Pt+Pd+Au from 6m downhole (BSC005)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSC005Saturn · goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSC005
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSC005:6-15
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate polymetallic mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Polymetallic mineralization
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for gold
Evidence · text
“9m @ 0.56% Cu, 0.11% Ni and 0.35ppm Pt+Pd+Au from 6m downhole (BSC005)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0058Saturn · goldGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0058
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 63 m
- To
- 64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 63 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0058:63-64
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical peak PGE concentration indicates high-grade potential, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Peak PGE concentration
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Narrow intercept
Evidence · text
“1.1g/t Pt+Pd+Au - 1m from 63m downhole (BSB0058)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0478Saturn · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0478
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 25 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0478:5-30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate PGE mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- PGE mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for gold
Evidence · text
“25m @ 0.18 g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 5m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0478Saturn · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0478
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 25 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 25 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0478:25-30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader PGE mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“5m @ 0.23 g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 25m downhole (BSB0478)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0486Saturn · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 33 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0486
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 33 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0486:7-40
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate PGE mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- PGE mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for gold
Evidence · text
“33m @ 0.15 g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 7m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0486Saturn · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0486
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 12 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0486:7-12
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader PGE mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“5m @ 0.23 g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 7m downhole (BSB0486)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0492Saturn · goldGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0492
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0492:0-32
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate PGE mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- PGE mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for gold
Evidence · text
“32m @ 0.16 g/t Pt+Pd+Au from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0492Saturn · goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0492
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 2 m
- To
- 7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0492:2-7
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results show a higher-grade sub-interval within the broader PGE mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Higher-grade sub-interval
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“5m @ 0.22 g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 2m downhole (BSB0492)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0645Saturn · goldGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0645
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 20 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 20 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0645:20-35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate PGE mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- PGE mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for gold
Evidence · text
“15m @ 0.18g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 20m downhole (BSB0645)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
BSB0641Saturn · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- BSB0641
- Project
- Saturn
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 8 m
- From
- 5 m
- To
- 13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 5 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- BSB0641:5-13
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate PGE mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- PGE mineralization identified
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
- Low grade for gold
Evidence · text
“8m @ 0.17g/t Pt+Pd+Au from 5m downhole (BSB0641”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 41Twin Hills · goldGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Twin Hills
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- australia_wa
- Ticker
- RDS
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 17 m
- From
- 28 m
- To
- 45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 28 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- Twin_Hills:28-45
- Mining Method
- unknown
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill results indicate gold mineralization, but this is a re-release of old data with apparent width only.
Positive factors
- Gold mineralization identified
- Good intercept length
Negative factors
- Stale data re-release
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“17m @ 1.23 g/t Au from 28m downhole”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Fact 42Mt Cauden Gold and Lithium Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Cauden Gold and Lithium Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Mt Cauden project expands the company's portfolio into a highly prospective gold and lithium region.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new prospective project
- Exposure to multiple commodities
- Strategic location in a proven gold district
Evidence · text
“In June 2026, the Entity entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in a suite of highly prospective gold, lithium, copper and base metals exploration projects located in Western Australia”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 43Mt Cauden Gold and Lithium Project · lithiumView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Mt Cauden Gold and Lithium Project
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Mt Cauden project expands the company's portfolio into a highly prospective gold and lithium region.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new prospective project
- Exposure to multiple commodities
- Strategic location near a major lithium mine
Evidence · text
“In June 2026, the Entity entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in a suite of highly prospective gold, lithium, copper and base metals exploration projects located in Western Australia”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 44Twin Hills Gold Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Twin Hills Gold Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Twin Hills project expands the company's portfolio into a highly prospective gold region.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new prospective project
- Strategic location in a gold-endowed mining centre
Evidence · text
“In June 2026, the Entity entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in a suite of highly prospective gold, lithium, copper and base metals exploration projects located in Western Australia”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 45Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project · copperView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Rudall East project expands the company's portfolio into a highly prospective base metals region with Mt Isa style potential.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new prospective project
- Exposure to multiple base metals
- Potential for Mt Isa-Rammelsberg style deposits
Evidence · text
“In June 2026, the Entity entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in a suite of highly prospective gold, lithium, copper and base metals exploration projects located in Western Australia”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 46Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project · goldView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Rudall East project expands the company's portfolio into a highly prospective base metals region with Mt Isa style potential.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new prospective project
- Exposure to multiple base metals
- Potential for Mt Isa-Rammelsberg style deposits
Evidence · text
“In June 2026, the Entity entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in a suite of highly prospective gold, lithium, copper and base metals exploration projects located in Western Australia”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 47Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project · leadView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Rudall East project expands the company's portfolio into a highly prospective base metals region with Mt Isa style potential.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new prospective project
- Exposure to multiple base metals
- Potential for Mt Isa-Rammelsberg style deposits
Evidence · text
“In June 2026, the Entity entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in a suite of highly prospective gold, lithium, copper and base metals exploration projects located in Western Australia”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 48Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project · zincView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Rudall East project expands the company's portfolio into a highly prospective base metals region with Mt Isa style potential.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new prospective project
- Exposure to multiple base metals
- Potential for Mt Isa-Rammelsberg style deposits
Evidence · text
“In June 2026, the Entity entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in a suite of highly prospective gold, lithium, copper and base metals exploration projects located in Western Australia”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 49Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project · silverView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rudall East Mt Isa style Cu-Au and Base Metals Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Rudall East project expands the company's portfolio into a highly prospective base metals region with Mt Isa style potential.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new prospective project
- Exposure to multiple base metals
- Potential for Mt Isa-Rammelsberg style deposits
Evidence · text
“In June 2026, the Entity entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in a suite of highly prospective gold, lithium, copper and base metals exploration projects located in Western Australia”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 50Cockatoo Rocks LCT Pegmatite Project · lithiumView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Cockatoo Rocks LCT Pegmatite Project
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- australia_wa
- Reported Region
- Western Australia
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The acquisition of the Cockatoo Rocks project expands the company's portfolio into a highly prospective lithium region.
Positive factors
- Acquisition of new prospective project
- Potential for LCT pegmatites
Evidence · text
“In June 2026, the Entity entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire a 100% interest in a suite of highly prospective gold, lithium, copper and base metals exploration projects located in Western Australia”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 51James Bay Lithium Projects · lithiumView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- James Bay Lithium Projects
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_qc
- Reported Region
- Québec, Canada
- Ticker
- RDS
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The James Bay Lithium Projects JV is strategically located but saw no exploration activity in the reported financial year, limiting its immediate impact.
Positive factors
- Strategic location in a world-class lithium province
Negative factors
- No exploration work completed in FY2026
Evidence · text
“Redstone acquired a 100% interest in the Camaro, Taiga and Hellcat Projects (the James Bay Lithium Projects) as part of a 50/50 unincorporated joint venture (JV) with ASX-listed Galan Lithium Ltd (ASX: GLN) (Galan) (see ASX announcement dated 4 October 2023).”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.