RAP: Annual Report to shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Raptor Metals Ltd
- Ticker
- RAP
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- New Brunswick, Canada
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Zinc, Lead, Silver, Gold, Cobalt
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-09-30 05:13:20 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Raptor Metals Ltd's annual report for FY2026 details a transformational year, including a strategic shift to Canadian copper and polymetallic projects. The company completed a maiden 19-hole drill program at its flagship Chester Copper Project, reporting high-grade copper and polymetallic intersections that confirmed and extended mineralization. It also acquired the Coyote and Foghorn projects, expanding its regional footprint, and commenced metallurgical test work at Chester.
Reasoning: Raptor Metals Ltd successfully transitioned its strategic focus to Canadian copper and polymetallic projects, reporting strong drill results that confirmed and extended mineralization at its flagship Chester project. The company also expanded its project portfolio through acquisitions and initiated metallurgical test work, indicating progress towards development. However, the resource estimate is a restatement of prior data, and historical results from new acquisitions are not JORC compliant.
Positive factors
- Successful strategic transition to Canadian copper and polymetallic projects
- Positive drill results confirming high-grade copper and polymetallic mineralization at Chester
- Drilling extended the interpreted mineralized strike at Chester to over 2.5km
- Acquisition of new projects (Coyote and Foghorn) expands regional footprint
- Metallurgical test work commenced at flagship project
Negative factors
- Resource estimate is a restatement of prior data with no new information
- Drill intersections are down-hole widths only, true widths are not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions for drill results are not disclosed in this document
- Historical exploration results from acquired projects are not JORC compliant and lack QP/CP sign-off
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 61
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 61. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (54)
CDH001Chester · copperGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH001
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.44
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows good copper grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length and good copper grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“CDH001 3.58m @ 2.91% Cu from 11.55m and 3.16m @ 2.80% Cu from 82.64m, within an aggregate 30.0m @ 1.44% CuEq (1.05% Cu)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH001Chester · copperGrade: 2.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.58 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH001
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.91
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.58 m
- From
- 11.55 m
- To
- 15.13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH001:11.55-15.13
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a high copper grade, which is a very positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- High copper grade for a VMS deposit
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“CDH001 3.58m @ 2.91% Cu from 11.55m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH001Chester · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.16 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH001
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.16 m
- From
- 82.64 m
- To
- 85.8 m
- Intercept Depth
- 11.55 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH001:82.64-85.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a high copper grade, which is a very positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- High copper grade for a VMS deposit
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“3.16m @ 2.80% Cu from 82.64m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH002Chester · copperGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.09 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH002
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.82
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25.09 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.05
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows good copper grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length and copper grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“CDH002 3.25m @ 2.49% Cu from 124.5m, within an aggregate 25.09m @ 1.05% CuEq (0.82% Cu)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH002Chester · copperGrade: 2.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH002
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.25 m
- From
- 124.5 m
- To
- 127.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 124.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH002:124.5-127.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a high copper grade, which is a very positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- High copper grade for a VMS deposit
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“CDH002 3.25m @ 2.49% Cu from 124.5m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH003Chester · copperGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH003
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.29 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.78
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows good copper grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Good intercept length and copper grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“CDH003 2.05m @ 1.54% Cu from 16.95m and 6.6m @ 0.74% Cu from 57.12m, within an aggregate 18.29m @ 1.78% CuEq (0.59% Cu)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH003Chester · copperGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH003
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.54
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.05 m
- From
- 16.95 m
- To
- 19 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH003:16.95-19
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good copper grade, which is a positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for a VMS deposit
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“CDH003 2.05m @ 1.54% Cu from 16.95m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH003Chester · copperGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH003
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 57.12 m
- To
- 63.72 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH003:57.12-63.72
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good copper grade over a moderate length, which is a positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade over a moderate length
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“6.6m @ 0.74% Cu from 57.12m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH004Chester · copperGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 25.05 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH004
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 25.05 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.06
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows good copper grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length and good copper grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“CDH004 11.02m @ 1.98% Cu from 53.22m and 7.0m @ 1.29% Cu from 13m, within an aggregate 25.05m @ 2.06% CuEq (1.20% Cu)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH004Chester · copperGrade: 1.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH004
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.02 m
- From
- 53.22 m
- To
- 64.24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH004:53.22-64.24
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good copper grade over a significant length, which is a positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade over a significant length
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“CDH004 11.02m @ 1.98% Cu from 53.22m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH004Chester · copperGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH004
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 20 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH004:13-20
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good copper grade over a moderate length, which is a positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade over a moderate length
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“7.0m @ 1.29% Cu from 13m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH005Chester · copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH005
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.27
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows good copper grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant intercept length and good copper grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“CDH005 10.4m @ 0.91% Cu from 40.2m, within an aggregate 30.0m @ 1.27% CuEq (0.58% Cu)”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH005Chester · copperGrade: 0.91Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH005
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.91
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.4 m
- From
- 40.2 m
- To
- 50.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 40.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH005:40.2-50.6
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good copper grade over a significant length, which is a positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade over a significant length
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“CDH005 10.4m @ 0.91% Cu from 40.2m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH004Chester · copperGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH004
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH004:13-27
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good copper grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good copper grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“14.0m @ 2.39% CuEq, comprising 0.74% Cu, 4.44% Zn, 1.60% Pb and 22.02g/t Ag from 13m in CDH004”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH004Chester · zincGrade: 4.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH004
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH004:13-27
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good zinc grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good zinc grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“14.0m @ 2.39% CuEq, comprising 0.74% Cu, 4.44% Zn, 1.60% Pb and 22.02g/t Ag from 13m in CDH004”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH004Chester · leadGrade: 1.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH004
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH004:13-27
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good lead grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good lead grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“14.0m @ 2.39% CuEq, comprising 0.74% Cu, 4.44% Zn, 1.60% Pb and 22.02g/t Ag from 13m in CDH004”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH004Chester · silverGrade: 22.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH004
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 22.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 14 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 13 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH004:13-27
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.39
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good silver grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good silver grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“14.0m @ 2.39% CuEq, comprising 0.74% Cu, 4.44% Zn, 1.60% Pb and 22.02g/t Ag from 13m in CDH004”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH003Chester · copperGrade: 0.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.69 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH003
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.69 m
- From
- 16.95 m
- To
- 27.64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH003:16.95-27.64
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good copper grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good copper grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“10.69m @ 2.46% CuEq, comprising 0.49% Cu, 5.73% Zn, 2.09% Pb and 18.35g/t Ag from 16.95m in CDH003”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH003Chester · zincGrade: 5.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.69 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH003
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.73
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.69 m
- From
- 16.95 m
- To
- 27.64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH003:16.95-27.64
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good zinc grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good zinc grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“10.69m @ 2.46% CuEq, comprising 0.49% Cu, 5.73% Zn, 2.09% Pb and 18.35g/t Ag from 16.95m in CDH003”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH003Chester · leadGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10.69 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH003
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.09
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 10.69 m
- From
- 16.95 m
- To
- 27.64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH003:16.95-27.64
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good lead grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good lead grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“10.69m @ 2.46% CuEq, comprising 0.49% Cu, 5.73% Zn, 2.09% Pb and 18.35g/t Ag from 16.95m in CDH003”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH003Chester · silverGrade: 18.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.69 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH003
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 18.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10.69 m
- From
- 16.95 m
- To
- 27.64 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16.95 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH003:16.95-27.64
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 2.46
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good silver grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good silver grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“10.69m @ 2.46% CuEq, comprising 0.49% Cu, 5.73% Zn, 2.09% Pb and 18.35g/t Ag from 16.95m in CDH003”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH010Chester · copperGrade: 1.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH010
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.71
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11.75 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 21.75 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH010:10-21.75
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows good copper grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade over a significant length
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“CDH010: 11.75m @ 1.71% Cu from 10m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH010Chester · copperGrade: 3.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH010
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.38
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 13.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH010:10-13.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a very high copper grade, which is an excellent result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Very high copper grade for a VMS deposit
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“including 3.1m @ 5.19% CuEq comprising 3.38% Cu, 1.80% Pb, 4.70% Zn, 0.017% Co and 21.8g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH010Chester · leadGrade: 1.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH010
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 13.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH010:10-13.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a high lead grade, which is a very positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- High lead grade for a VMS deposit
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“including 3.1m @ 5.19% CuEq comprising 3.38% Cu, 1.80% Pb, 4.70% Zn, 0.017% Co and 21.8g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH010Chester · zincGrade: 4.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH010
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 13.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH010:10-13.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a high zinc grade, which is a very positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- High zinc grade for a VMS deposit
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“including 3.1m @ 5.19% CuEq comprising 3.38% Cu, 1.80% Pb, 4.70% Zn, 0.017% Co and 21.8g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH010Chester · cobaltGrade: 0.017Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH010
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- cobalt
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.017
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 13.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH010:10-13.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The presence of cobalt adds to the polymetallic nature of the intercept, which is positive. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Cobalt presence adds to polymetallic nature
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“including 3.1m @ 5.19% CuEq comprising 3.38% Cu, 1.80% Pb, 4.70% Zn, 0.017% Co and 21.8g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH010Chester · silverGrade: 21.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH010
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 3.1 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 13.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH010:10-13.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.19
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The presence of good silver grades adds to the polymetallic nature of the intercept, which is positive. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces overall confidence.
Positive factors
- Good silver grade adds to polymetallic nature
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“including 3.1m @ 5.19% CuEq comprising 3.38% Cu, 1.80% Pb, 4.70% Zn, 0.017% Co and 21.8g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH006Chester · copperGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH006
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.1 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 22.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH006:6-22.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good copper equivalent grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good copper equivalent grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“CDH006: 16.1m @ 1.96% CuEq comprising 0.32% Cu, 2.24% Pb, 4.30% Zn and 17.06g/t Ag from 6m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH006Chester · leadGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH006
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.1 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 22.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH006:6-22.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good lead grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good lead grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“CDH006: 16.1m @ 1.96% CuEq comprising 0.32% Cu, 2.24% Pb, 4.30% Zn and 17.06g/t Ag from 6m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH006Chester · zincGrade: 4.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH006
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.1 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 22.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH006:6-22.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good zinc grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good zinc grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“CDH006: 16.1m @ 1.96% CuEq comprising 0.32% Cu, 2.24% Pb, 4.30% Zn and 17.06g/t Ag from 6m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH006Chester · silverGrade: 17.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH006
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 17.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 16.1 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 22.1 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH006:6-22.1
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.96
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This polymetallic intercept shows good silver grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width and metal equivalent assumptions reduces confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant polymetallic intercept with good silver grade
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
- Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed in this document
Evidence · text
“CDH006: 16.1m @ 1.96% CuEq comprising 0.32% Cu, 2.24% Pb, 4.30% Zn and 17.06g/t Ag from 6m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH007Chester · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH007
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.5 m
- From
- 30.5 m
- To
- 40 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH007:30.5-40
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows good copper grades over a significant length, contributing positively to the project's potential. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade over a significant length
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“CDH007: three separate copper-rich zones comprising 9.5m @ 1.18% Cu from 30.5m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH007Chester · copperGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH007
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.85 m
- From
- 56.45 m
- To
- 60.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH007:56.45-60.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good copper grade over a moderate length, which is a positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade over a moderate length
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“3.85m @ 1.53% Cu from 56.45m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH007Chester · copperGrade: 1.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.48 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH007
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.48 m
- From
- 62.72 m
- To
- 67.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 30.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH007:62.72-67.2
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows a good copper grade over a moderate length, which is a positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade over a moderate length
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“4.48m @ 1.08% Cu from 62.72m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
CDH008Chester · copperGrade: 2.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.55 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- CDH008
- Project
- Chester
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3.55 m
- From
- 26.1 m
- To
- 29.65 m
- Intercept Depth
- 26.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- CDH008:26.1-29.65
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- East Zone
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows a high copper grade, which is a very positive result for the project. The reporting is JORC compliant and QP signed, but the lack of true width is a minor negative factor.
Positive factors
- High copper grade for a VMS deposit
- QP/CP signed and JORC compliant reporting
Negative factors
- True width not known
Evidence · text
“CDH008: 3.55m @ 2.65% Cu from 26.1m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"
SJ09-01Coyote · silverGrade: 592Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09-01
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 592
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 59.6 m
- To
- 60.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09-01:59.6-60.4
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a high silver grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- High silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“592.00”
Context: 0.80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09-01Coyote · copperGrade: 1.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09-01
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.95
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 59.6 m
- To
- 60.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09-01:59.6-60.4
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a good copper grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“1.95”
Context: 0.80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09-01Coyote · zincGrade: 7.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09-01
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.39
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 59.6 m
- To
- 60.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 59.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09-01:59.6-60.4
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a good zinc grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Good zinc grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“7.39”
Context: 0.80
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09-01Coyote · silverGrade: 128Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09-01
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 128
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 60.4 m
- To
- 61.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09-01:60.4-61.5
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“128.00”
Context: 1.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09-01Coyote · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09-01
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 60.4 m
- To
- 61.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09-01:60.4-61.5
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“1.10”
Context: 1.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09-01Coyote · zincGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09-01
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.1 m
- From
- 60.4 m
- To
- 61.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 60.4 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09-01:60.4-61.5
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“5.10”
Context: 1.10
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09-04Coyote · silverGrade: 423Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09-04
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 423
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 50 m
- To
- 50.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 50 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09-04:50-50.7
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a high silver grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- High silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“423.00”
Context: 0.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09-04Coyote · copperGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09-04
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 50 m
- To
- 50.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 50 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09-04:50-50.7
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a good copper grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“2.24”
Context: 0.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09-04Coyote · zincGrade: 5.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09-04
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 50 m
- To
- 50.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 50 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09-04:50-50.7
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a good zinc grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Good zinc grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“5.14”
Context: 0.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09‐12Coyote · silverGrade: 151Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09‐12
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 151
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 47 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09‐12:46-47
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate silver grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“151.00”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09‐12Coyote · copperGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09‐12
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.84
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 47 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09‐12:46-47
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“0.84”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09‐12Coyote · zincGrade: 3.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09‐12
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.64
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 46 m
- To
- 47 m
- Intercept Depth
- 46 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09‐12:46-47
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate zinc grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“3.64”
Context: 1.00
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09‐12Coyote · silverGrade: 585Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09‐12
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 585
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 47 m
- To
- 47.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09‐12:47-47.7
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a high silver grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- High silver grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“585.00”
Context: 0.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09‐12Coyote · copperGrade: 2.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09‐12
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.47
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 47 m
- To
- 47.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09‐12:47-47.7
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a good copper grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“2.47”
Context: 0.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09‐12Coyote · zincGrade: 14.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09‐12
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.7 m
- From
- 47 m
- To
- 47.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 47 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09‐12:47-47.7
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a high zinc grade, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off. The narrow width also limits its materiality.
Positive factors
- High zinc grade
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · table
“14.60”
Context: 0.70
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09‐14Coyote · silverGrade: 268.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09‐14
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 268.2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 44.7 m
- To
- 51.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09‐14:44.7-51.3
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a high silver grade over a moderate length, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off.
Positive factors
- High silver grade over a moderate length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
Evidence · table
“268.20”
Context: 6.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09‐14Coyote · copperGrade: 1.27Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09‐14
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.27
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 44.7 m
- To
- 51.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09‐14:44.7-51.3
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a moderate copper grade over a moderate length, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade over a moderate length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
Evidence · table
“1.27”
Context: 6.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ09‐14Coyote · zincGrade: 5.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ09‐14
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6.6 m
- From
- 44.7 m
- To
- 51.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 44.7 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ09‐14:44.7-51.3
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows a good zinc grade over a moderate length, but its novelty and confidence are low due to it being historical, not JORC compliant, and lacking QP/CP sign-off.
Positive factors
- Good zinc grade over a moderate length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
- No QP/CP sign-off
Evidence · table
“5.65”
Context: 6.60
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
SJ10-21Coyote · silverGrade: 107.66Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- SJ10-21
- Project
- Coyote
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- canada_nb
- Ticker
- RAP
Geometry
- Grade
- 107.66
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.5 m
- From
- 40.95 m
- To
- 45.45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 40.95 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- SJ10-21:40.95-45.45
Location
- Location
- Silverjack Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Positive factors
- Moderate silver grade over a moderate length
Negative factors
- Historical data, not JORC compliant
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Resource Estimates (7)
indicatedchester project · copperTonnes: 4870000Grade: 1.13Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 120.28Contained Unit: mlbsHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- chester project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick, Canada
- Ticker
- RAP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Brett Wallace
- Resource group id
- resource:da7ab659d1f2088c4b29
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4870000
- Grade
- 1.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 120.28
- Contained Unit
- mlbs
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated copper resource at Chester is JORC compliant and QP signed, providing a reasonable level of confidence. However, it is a restatement of a prior estimate with no new material information, limiting its novelty.
Positive factors
- Resource is JORC compliant and QP signed
- Indicated category provides reasonable geological confidence
Negative factors
- Estimate is a restatement of prior data, not a new update
- No new information or data materially affects the estimate
Evidence · text
“The Chester Mineral Resource is reported at a 0.5% Cu cut-off grade”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
inferredchester project · copperTonnes: 1820000Grade: 1.01Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 38.35Contained Unit: mlbsHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- chester project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick, Canada
- Ticker
- RAP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Brett Wallace
- Resource group id
- resource:a6722231954362e8ffc0
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1820000
- Grade
- 1.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 38.35
- Contained Unit
- mlbs
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred copper resource at Chester is JORC compliant and QP signed, but its novelty is low as it's a restatement of prior data. The inferred category also implies lower geological confidence.
Positive factors
- Resource is JORC compliant and QP signed
Negative factors
- Estimate is a restatement of prior data, not a new update
- No new information or data materially affects the estimate
- Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence
Evidence · text
“The Chester Mineral Resource is reported at a 0.5% Cu cut-off grade”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
indicatedchester project · leadTonnes: 4870000Contained Metal: 13.66Contained Unit: mlbsHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- chester project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick, Canada
- Ticker
- RAP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Brett Wallace
- Resource group id
- resource:da7ab659d1f2088c4b29
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4870000
- Contained Metal
- 13.66
- Contained Unit
- mlbs
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated lead resource at Chester is JORC compliant and QP signed, but its novelty is low as it's a restatement of prior data. The absence of a grade in the document reduces confidence in its specific value.
Positive factors
- Resource is JORC compliant and QP signed
- Indicated category provides reasonable geological confidence
Negative factors
- Estimate is a restatement of prior data, not a new update
- No new information or data materially affects the estimate
- Grade not provided in the document
Evidence · text
“The Chester Mineral Resource is reported at a 0.5% Cu cut-off grade”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
inferredchester project · leadTonnes: 1820000Contained Metal: 3.17Contained Unit: mlbsHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- chester project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick, Canada
- Ticker
- RAP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Brett Wallace
- Resource group id
- resource:a6722231954362e8ffc0
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1820000
- Contained Metal
- 3.17
- Contained Unit
- mlbs
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred lead resource at Chester is JORC compliant and QP signed, but its novelty is low as it's a restatement of prior data. The inferred category and absence of a grade reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Resource is JORC compliant and QP signed
Negative factors
- Estimate is a restatement of prior data, not a new update
- No new information or data materially affects the estimate
- Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence
- Grade not provided in the document
Evidence · text
“The Chester Mineral Resource is reported at a 0.5% Cu cut-off grade”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
indicatedchester project · silverTonnes: 4870000Contained Metal: 69000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- chester project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick, Canada
- Ticker
- RAP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Brett Wallace
- Resource group id
- resource:da7ab659d1f2088c4b29
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4870000
- Contained Metal
- 69000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated silver resource at Chester is JORC compliant and QP signed, but its novelty is low as it's a restatement of prior data. The absence of a grade in the document reduces confidence in its specific value.
Positive factors
- Resource is JORC compliant and QP signed
- Indicated category provides reasonable geological confidence
Negative factors
- Estimate is a restatement of prior data, not a new update
- No new information or data materially affects the estimate
- Grade not provided in the document
Evidence · text
“The Chester Mineral Resource is reported at a 0.5% Cu cut-off grade”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
indicatedchester project · zincTonnes: 4870000Contained Metal: 10.52Contained Unit: mlbsHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- chester project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick, Canada
- Ticker
- RAP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Brett Wallace
- Resource group id
- resource:da7ab659d1f2088c4b29
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 4870000
- Contained Metal
- 10.52
- Contained Unit
- mlbs
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The indicated zinc resource at Chester is JORC compliant and QP signed, but its novelty is low as it's a restatement of prior data. The absence of a grade in the document reduces confidence in its specific value.
Positive factors
- Resource is JORC compliant and QP signed
- Indicated category provides reasonable geological confidence
Negative factors
- Estimate is a restatement of prior data, not a new update
- No new information or data materially affects the estimate
- Grade not provided in the document
Evidence · text
“The Chester Mineral Resource is reported at a 0.5% Cu cut-off grade”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
inferredchester project · zincTonnes: 1820000Contained Metal: 1.57Contained Unit: mlbsHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- chester project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick, Canada
- Ticker
- RAP
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Brett Wallace
- Resource group id
- resource:a6722231954362e8ffc0
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1820000
- Contained Metal
- 1.57
- Contained Unit
- mlbs
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % Cu
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-09-07T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The inferred zinc resource at Chester is JORC compliant and QP signed, but its novelty is low as it's a restatement of prior data. The inferred category and absence of a grade reduce confidence.
Positive factors
- Resource is JORC compliant and QP signed
Negative factors
- Estimate is a restatement of prior data, not a new update
- No new information or data materially affects the estimate
- Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence
- Grade not provided in the document
Evidence · text
“The Chester Mineral Resource is reported at a 0.5% Cu cut-off grade”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.