# Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report                                                                                                                  16 										                                             pages                                                                                       									                                                                                                                          1.6MB

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03053703

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-01T04:27:38.755Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-01T04:27:38.755Z

- Company: Exultant Mining Limited

- Ticker: 10X

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: New South Wales

- Primary commodity: Silver

- Secondary commodities: Gold, Lead, Zinc, Copper

- Document categories: Drill results, Capital raise, Other

- Extracted: 2026-10-01 04:27:39 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Exultant Mining Limited reported a successful December 2025 quarter, highlighted by its ASX listing and an oversubscribed A$5.0 million IPO, resulting in a strong A$4.3 million cash position. Initial reconnaissance fieldwork at the Peak View and Black Hammer projects yielded encouraging high-grade rock chip results, including up to 5.42 g/t gold and 256 g/t silver with 4.82% lead, confirming prospectivity. The company also secured land access agreements and expanded its Black Hammer project footprint, setting the stage for planned drilling in Q2 2026.

Reasoning: Exultant Mining Limited successfully listed on the ASX and completed an oversubscribed IPO, securing a strong cash position. Initial reconnaissance fieldwork yielded high-grade rock chip results for gold, silver, and lead at its Peak View and Black Hammer projects, confirming prospectivity and de-risking future exploration, with drilling planned for Q2 2026.

- Positive factor: Successful ASX listing and oversubscribed IPO providing strong cash position

- Positive factor: High-grade gold and silver-lead rock chip results confirming prospectivity

- Positive factor: Confirmation of historical mineralization and expansion of project footprint

- Positive factor: De-risking of projects through land access and data compilation

- Positive factor: Planned drilling in Q2 2026 indicates clear path forward

- Negative factor: Rock chip samples are early-stage and not representative of in-situ mineralization

- Negative factor: Historical drill results are presented without new assays or reinterpretation

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 29

## Classification and evidence

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: The release states that rock chip samples were submitted for 'multi-element ICP-MS \(ME-MS61\) and fire assay gold \(Au-AA23\) laboratory analysis' and includes a Competent Person Statement by Sebastian Hind, a Member of the AusIMM.

Evidence · text

> multi-element ICP-MS \(ME-MS61\) and fire assay gold \(Au-AA23\) laboratory analysis

**Bonanza Intercept**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: A rock chip sample returned 5.42 g/t Au, which is above the exceptional threshold \(5 g/t Au\) for gold.

Evidence · text

> 5.42 g/t Au

**Bonanza Intercept**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: A rock chip sample returned 256 g/t Ag, which the company describes as 'Exceptional silver-lead results' and is above the strong threshold \(200 g/t Ag\) for silver.

Evidence · text

> 256 g/t Ag

**Nearology Play**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: The company highlights results from 'historic Big Badja Silver Mine' and mentions 'historic Tuglow Copper Mines' and validating historical high-grade occurrences, leveraging proximity to known mineralization.

Evidence · text

> Exceptional silver-lead results of up to 256 g/t Ag and 4.82% Pb returned from rock chip samples collected at the historic Big Badja Silver Mine

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 29. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (29)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-0)

Peak View · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 5.42
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Undoo Creek
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A rock chip sample returned 5.42 g/t Au, which is an exceptional grade for gold, confirming the prospectivity of the Undoo Creek prospect.

- Positive factor: High-grade gold result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Confirms prospectivity of Undoo Creek prospect

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 5.42 g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-1)

Peak View · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 256
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Big Badja Silver Mine
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A rock chip sample returned 256 g/t Ag, which is a strong grade for silver and matches the best prior silver grade for the Peak View project, confirming high-grade prospectivity.

- Positive factor: High-grade silver result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Confirms prospectivity of historic Big Badja Silver Mine

- Positive factor: Matches best prior silver grade for the project

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 256 g/t Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 3

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-2)

Peak View · lead

#### Identity

- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.82
- Grade Unit: %

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Big Badja Silver Mine
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A rock chip sample returned 4.82% Pb, which is a high-grade lead result, confirming the prospectivity of the historic Big Badja Silver Mine.

- Positive factor: High-grade lead result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Confirms prospectivity of historic Big Badja Silver Mine

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 4.82% Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 4

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-3)

Peak View · lead

#### Identity

- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3950
- Grade Unit: ppm

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 3,950 ppm Pb contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.

- Positive factor: Anomalous lead result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 3,950 ppm Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 5

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-4)

Peak View · zinc

#### Identity

- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1165
- Grade Unit: ppm

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 1,165 ppm Zn contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.

- Positive factor: Anomalous zinc result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 1,165 ppm Zn

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 6

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-5)

Peak View · copper

#### Identity

- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1610
- Grade Unit: ppm

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 1,610 ppm Cu contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.

- Positive factor: Anomalous copper result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 1,610 ppm Cu

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 7

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-6)

Peak View · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.173
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 0.173 g/t Au contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.

- Positive factor: Anomalous gold result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 0.173 g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 8

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-7)

Peak View · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.57
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 2.57 g/t Ag contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.

- Positive factor: Anomalous silver result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 2.57 g/t Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 9

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-8)

Black Hammer · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Black Hammer
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.103
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: AC Prospect
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An encouraging rock chip result of 0.103 g/t Au confirms the prospectivity of the AC Prospect within the Black Hammer Project.

- Positive factor: Encouraging gold result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Confirms prospectivity of AC Prospect

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 0.103 g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 10

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-9)

Black Hammer · gold

#### Identity

- Project: Black Hammer
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.322
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Hughes Copper prospect
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An encouraging rock chip result of 0.322 g/t Au confirms gold mineralization at the Hughes Copper prospect, associated with historic workings.

- Positive factor: Encouraging gold result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Confirms gold mineralization associated with historic workings

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 0.322 g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 11

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-10)

Black Hammer · silver

#### Identity

- Project: Black Hammer
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.36
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Hughes Copper prospect
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An encouraging rock chip result of 7.36 g/t Ag confirms polymetallic mineralization at the Hughes Copper prospect, associated with historic workings.

- Positive factor: Encouraging silver result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Confirms polymetallic mineralization associated with historic workings

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 7.36 g/t Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### Fact 12

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-11)

Black Hammer · lead

#### Identity

- Project: Black Hammer
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4570
- Grade Unit: ppm

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: surface

#### Location

- Location: Hughes Copper prospect
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: An encouraging rock chip result of 4,570 ppm Pb confirms polymetallic mineralization at the Hughes Copper prospect, associated with historic workings.

- Positive factor: Encouraging lead result from rock chip sampling

- Positive factor: Confirms polymetallic mineralization associated with historic workings

- Negative factor: Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

> 4,570 ppm Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-12)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.79
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 2.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 34.3 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-34.3

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.1 m at 1.79% Cu from PVD003 confirms high-grade copper mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical copper intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 2.1 m @ 1.79% Cu

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-13)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 5.89
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 2.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 34.3 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-34.3

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.1 m at 5.89% Pb from PVD003 confirms high-grade lead mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical lead intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 5.89% Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-14)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 11.83
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 2.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 34.3 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-34.3

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.1 m at 11.83% Zn from PVD003 confirms high-grade zinc mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical zinc intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 11.83% Zn

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVD003

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-15)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD003
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 105
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 2.1 m
- From: 32.2 m
- To: 34.3 m
- Intercept Depth: 32.2 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD003:32.2-34.3

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.1 m at 105 g/t Ag from PVD003 confirms high-grade silver mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical silver intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 105 g/t Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVD007

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-16)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD007
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 2.7 m
- From: 91 m
- To: 93.7 m
- Intercept Depth: 91 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD007:91-93.7

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.7 m at 3.0% Cu from PVD007 confirms high-grade copper mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical copper intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 2.7 m @ 3.0% Cu

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVD007

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-17)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD007
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.41
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 2.7 m
- From: 91 m
- To: 93.7 m
- Intercept Depth: 91 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD007:91-93.7

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.7 m at 1.41% Pb from PVD007 confirms lead mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: Historical lead intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 1.41% Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVD007

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-18)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD007
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.88
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 2.7 m
- From: 91 m
- To: 93.7 m
- Intercept Depth: 91 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD007:91-93.7

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.7 m at 3.88% Zn from PVD007 confirms zinc mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: Historical zinc intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 3.88% Zn

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVD007

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-19)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVD007
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 52
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 2.7 m
- From: 91 m
- To: 93.7 m
- Intercept Depth: 91 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVD007:91-93.7

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.7 m at 52 g/t Ag from PVD007 confirms silver mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: Historical silver intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 52 g/t Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PV02

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-20)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV02
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.4
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 1.5 m
- From: 164.1 m
- To: 165.6 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.1 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV02:164.1-165.6

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 1.5 m at 0.40% Cu from PV02 confirms copper mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: Historical copper intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 1.5 m @ 0.40% Cu

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PV02

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-21)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV02
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.25
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 1.5 m
- From: 164.1 m
- To: 165.6 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.1 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV02:164.1-165.6

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 1.5 m at 3.25% Pb from PV02 confirms lead mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: Historical lead intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 3.25% Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PV02

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-22)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV02
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 5.1
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 1.5 m
- From: 164.1 m
- To: 165.6 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.1 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV02:164.1-165.6

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 1.5 m at 5.10% Zn from PV02 confirms high-grade zinc mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical zinc intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 5.10% Zn

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PV02

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-23)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PV02
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 188
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 1.5 m
- From: 164.1 m
- To: 165.6 m
- Intercept Depth: 164.1 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PV02:164.1-165.6

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 1.5 m at 188 g/t Ag from PV02 confirms high-grade silver mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical silver intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 188 g/t Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVI008

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-24)

Peak View · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVI008
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.21
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 152.6 m
- To: 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 152.6 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVI008:152.6-153.4

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 1.21% Cu from PVI008 confirms copper mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: Historical copper intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 0.8 m @ 1.21% Cu

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVI008

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-25)

Peak View · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVI008
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 11.6
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 152.6 m
- To: 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 152.6 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVI008:152.6-153.4

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 11.60% Pb from PVI008 confirms high-grade lead mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical lead intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 11.60% Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVI008

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-26)

Peak View · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVI008
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 22
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 152.6 m
- To: 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 152.6 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVI008:152.6-153.4

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 22.0% Zn from PVI008 confirms exceptional-grade zinc mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: Exceptional-grade historical zinc intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 22.0% Zn

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVI008

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-27)

Peak View · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVI008
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.5
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 152.6 m
- To: 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 152.6 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVI008:152.6-153.4

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 0.50 g/t Au from PVI008 confirms gold mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: Historical gold intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 0.50 g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### PVI008

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/quarterly-activities-appendix-5b-cash-flow-report-16-pages-1-6mb--1fec9e9b-cc24-48b4-b5d6-ebfe01277ac3#fact-drill-facts-28)

Peak View · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: PVI008
- Project: Peak View
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: 10X

#### Geometry

- Grade: 119
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 0.8 m
- From: 152.6 m
- To: 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth: 152.6 m

#### Classification

- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: PVI008:152.6-153.4

#### QA/QC

- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 119 g/t Ag from PVI008 confirms high-grade silver mineralization, though it is not a new result.

- Positive factor: High-grade historical silver intercept

- Negative factor: Result is historical and not new drilling

- Negative factor: Narrow intercept length

Evidence · text

> 119 g/t Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**No QA/QC Disclosure**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.