Quarterly Activities/Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report 16 pages 1.6MB
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Exultant Mining Limited
- Ticker
- 10X
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- New South Wales
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Lead, Zinc, Copper
- Document categories
- Drill results, Capital raise, Other
- Extracted
- 2026-10-01 04:27:39 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Exultant Mining Limited reported a successful December 2025 quarter, highlighted by its ASX listing and an oversubscribed A$5.0 million IPO, resulting in a strong A$4.3 million cash position. Initial reconnaissance fieldwork at the Peak View and Black Hammer projects yielded encouraging high-grade rock chip results, including up to 5.42 g/t gold and 256 g/t silver with 4.82% lead, confirming prospectivity. The company also secured land access agreements and expanded its Black Hammer project footprint, setting the stage for planned drilling in Q2 2026.
Reasoning: Exultant Mining Limited successfully listed on the ASX and completed an oversubscribed IPO, securing a strong cash position. Initial reconnaissance fieldwork yielded high-grade rock chip results for gold, silver, and lead at its Peak View and Black Hammer projects, confirming prospectivity and de-risking future exploration, with drilling planned for Q2 2026.
Positive factors
- Successful ASX listing and oversubscribed IPO providing strong cash position
- High-grade gold and silver-lead rock chip results confirming prospectivity
- Confirmation of historical mineralization and expansion of project footprint
- De-risking of projects through land access and data compilation
- Planned drilling in Q2 2026 indicates clear path forward
Negative factors
- Rock chip samples are early-stage and not representative of in-situ mineralization
- Historical drill results are presented without new assays or reinterpretation
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 29
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release states that rock chip samples were submitted for 'multi-element ICP-MS (ME-MS61) and fire assay gold (Au-AA23) laboratory analysis' and includes a Competent Person Statement by Sebastian Hind, a Member of the AusIMM.
Evidence · text
“multi-element ICP-MS (ME-MS61) and fire assay gold (Au-AA23) laboratory analysis”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: A rock chip sample returned 5.42 g/t Au, which is above the exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au) for gold.
Evidence · text
“5.42 g/t Au”
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: A rock chip sample returned 256 g/t Ag, which the company describes as 'Exceptional silver-lead results' and is above the strong threshold (200 g/t Ag) for silver.
Evidence · text
“256 g/t Ag”
Nearology Playneutral
Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.
Why it applies: The company highlights results from 'historic Big Badja Silver Mine' and mentions 'historic Tuglow Copper Mines' and validating historical high-grade occurrences, leveraging proximity to known mineralization.
Evidence · text
“Exceptional silver-lead results of up to 256 g/t Ag and 4.82% Pb returned from rock chip samples collected at the historic Big Badja Silver Mine”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 29. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (29)
Fact 1Peak View · goldGrade: 5.42Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Undoo Creek
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A rock chip sample returned 5.42 g/t Au, which is an exceptional grade for gold, confirming the prospectivity of the Undoo Creek prospect.
Positive factors
- High-grade gold result from rock chip sampling
- Confirms prospectivity of Undoo Creek prospect
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“5.42 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Peak View · silverGrade: 256Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 256
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A rock chip sample returned 256 g/t Ag, which is a strong grade for silver and matches the best prior silver grade for the Peak View project, confirming high-grade prospectivity.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver result from rock chip sampling
- Confirms prospectivity of historic Big Badja Silver Mine
- Matches best prior silver grade for the project
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“256 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 3Peak View · leadGrade: 4.82Grade Unit: %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.82
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Big Badja Silver Mine
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A rock chip sample returned 4.82% Pb, which is a high-grade lead result, confirming the prospectivity of the historic Big Badja Silver Mine.
Positive factors
- High-grade lead result from rock chip sampling
- Confirms prospectivity of historic Big Badja Silver Mine
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“4.82% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 4Peak View · leadGrade: 3950Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3950
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 3,950 ppm Pb contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.
Positive factors
- Anomalous lead result from rock chip sampling
- Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“3,950 ppm Pb”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 5Peak View · zincGrade: 1165Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1165
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 1,165 ppm Zn contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.
Positive factors
- Anomalous zinc result from rock chip sampling
- Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“1,165 ppm Zn”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 6Peak View · copperGrade: 1610Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1610
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 1,610 ppm Cu contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.
Positive factors
- Anomalous copper result from rock chip sampling
- Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“1,610 ppm Cu”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 7Peak View · goldGrade: 0.173Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.173
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 0.173 g/t Au contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.
Positive factors
- Anomalous gold result from rock chip sampling
- Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“0.173 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 8Peak View · silverGrade: 2.57Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.57
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Peak View prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An anomalous rock chip result of 2.57 g/t Ag contributes to confirming the polymetallic prospectivity of the Peak View prospect.
Positive factors
- Anomalous silver result from rock chip sampling
- Contributes to confirming polymetallic prospectivity of Peak View prospect
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“2.57 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 9Black Hammer · goldGrade: 0.103Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Black Hammer
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.103
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- AC Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An encouraging rock chip result of 0.103 g/t Au confirms the prospectivity of the AC Prospect within the Black Hammer Project.
Positive factors
- Encouraging gold result from rock chip sampling
- Confirms prospectivity of AC Prospect
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“0.103 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 10Black Hammer · goldGrade: 0.322Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Black Hammer
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.322
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Hughes Copper prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An encouraging rock chip result of 0.322 g/t Au confirms gold mineralization at the Hughes Copper prospect, associated with historic workings.
Positive factors
- Encouraging gold result from rock chip sampling
- Confirms gold mineralization associated with historic workings
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“0.322 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 11Black Hammer · silverGrade: 7.36Grade Unit: g/tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Black Hammer
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.36
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Hughes Copper prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An encouraging rock chip result of 7.36 g/t Ag confirms polymetallic mineralization at the Hughes Copper prospect, associated with historic workings.
Positive factors
- Encouraging silver result from rock chip sampling
- Confirms polymetallic mineralization associated with historic workings
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“7.36 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 12Black Hammer · leadGrade: 4570Grade Unit: ppmView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Black Hammer
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 4570
- Grade Unit
- ppm
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- surface
Location
- Location
- Hughes Copper prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: An encouraging rock chip result of 4,570 ppm Pb confirms polymetallic mineralization at the Hughes Copper prospect, associated with historic workings.
Positive factors
- Encouraging lead result from rock chip sampling
- Confirms polymetallic mineralization associated with historic workings
Negative factors
- Rock chip sample is not representative of in-situ mineralization
Evidence · text
“4,570 ppm Pb”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 32.2 m
- To
- 34.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.2-34.3
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.1 m at 1.79% Cu from PVD003 confirms high-grade copper mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical copper intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“2.1 m @ 1.79% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 5.89Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.89
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 32.2 m
- To
- 34.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.2-34.3
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.1 m at 5.89% Pb from PVD003 confirms high-grade lead mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical lead intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“5.89% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 11.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.83
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 32.2 m
- To
- 34.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.2-34.3
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.1 m at 11.83% Zn from PVD003 confirms high-grade zinc mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical zinc intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“11.83% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 105Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD003
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 105
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.1 m
- From
- 32.2 m
- To
- 34.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 32.2 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD003:32.2-34.3
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.1 m at 105 g/t Ag from PVD003 confirms high-grade silver mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical silver intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“105 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVD007Peak View · copperGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD007
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 93.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD007:91-93.7
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.7 m at 3.0% Cu from PVD007 confirms high-grade copper mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical copper intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“2.7 m @ 3.0% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVD007Peak View · leadGrade: 1.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD007
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 93.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD007:91-93.7
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.7 m at 1.41% Pb from PVD007 confirms lead mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- Historical lead intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“1.41% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVD007Peak View · zincGrade: 3.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD007
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.88
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 93.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD007:91-93.7
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.7 m at 3.88% Zn from PVD007 confirms zinc mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- Historical zinc intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“3.88% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVD007Peak View · silverGrade: 52Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVD007
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 52
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.7 m
- From
- 91 m
- To
- 93.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 91 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVD007:91-93.7
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 2.7 m at 52 g/t Ag from PVD007 confirms silver mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- Historical silver intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“52 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PV02Peak View · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV02
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 164.1 m
- To
- 165.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV02:164.1-165.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 1.5 m at 0.40% Cu from PV02 confirms copper mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- Historical copper intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“1.5 m @ 0.40% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PV02Peak View · leadGrade: 3.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV02
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.25
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 164.1 m
- To
- 165.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV02:164.1-165.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 1.5 m at 3.25% Pb from PV02 confirms lead mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- Historical lead intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“3.25% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PV02Peak View · zincGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV02
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 164.1 m
- To
- 165.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV02:164.1-165.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 1.5 m at 5.10% Zn from PV02 confirms high-grade zinc mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical zinc intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“5.10% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PV02Peak View · silverGrade: 188Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PV02
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 188
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.5 m
- From
- 164.1 m
- To
- 165.6 m
- Intercept Depth
- 164.1 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PV02:164.1-165.6
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 1.5 m at 188 g/t Ag from PV02 confirms high-grade silver mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical silver intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“188 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVI008Peak View · copperGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVI008
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 152.6 m
- To
- 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVI008:152.6-153.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 1.21% Cu from PVI008 confirms copper mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- Historical copper intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“0.8 m @ 1.21% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVI008Peak View · leadGrade: 11.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVI008
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 152.6 m
- To
- 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVI008:152.6-153.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 11.60% Pb from PVI008 confirms high-grade lead mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical lead intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“11.60% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVI008Peak View · zincGrade: 22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVI008
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 22
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 152.6 m
- To
- 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVI008:152.6-153.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 22.0% Zn from PVI008 confirms exceptional-grade zinc mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- Exceptional-grade historical zinc intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“22.0% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVI008Peak View · goldGrade: 0.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVI008
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 152.6 m
- To
- 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVI008:152.6-153.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 0.50 g/t Au from PVI008 confirms gold mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- Historical gold intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“0.50 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
PVI008Peak View · silverGrade: 119Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- PVI008
- Project
- Peak View
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- 10X
Geometry
- Grade
- 119
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.8 m
- From
- 152.6 m
- To
- 153.4 m
- Intercept Depth
- 152.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- PVI008:152.6-153.4
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-01-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical drill intercept of 0.8 m at 119 g/t Ag from PVI008 confirms high-grade silver mineralization, though it is not a new result.
Positive factors
- High-grade historical silver intercept
Negative factors
- Result is historical and not new drilling
- Narrow intercept length
Evidence · text
“119 g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.