QMC Drills 2.95% Li2O at Irgon Dike
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Quantum Minerals Corp.
- Ticker
- QMC
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Manitoba
- Primary commodity
- Lithium
- Secondary commodities
- Tantalum, Cesium, Niobium
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-24 08:24:54 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Quantum Minerals Corp. reported initial assay results from its 2019 drill program at the Irgon Lithium Mine Project in Manitoba. The results include a high-grade 0.75m intercept of 2.95% Li2O and confirm the presence of spodumene mineralization in all holes drilled.
Reasoning: Strong lithium grades (up to 2.95% Li2O) reported from initial drill program, confirming mineralization at depth.
Positive factors
- high-grade lithium intercepts
- spodumene mineralization confirmed in all holes
- QA/QC disclosed
Facts used in scoring: 6
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release mentions review and approval by a Qualified Person (Bruce E. Goad, P. Geo.)
Evidence · text
“reviewed and approved by Bruce E. Goad, P. Geo., who is a qualified person”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (6)
IR-19-06Irgon Lithium Mine Project · lithiumGrade: 2.95Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 0.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- IR-19-06
- Project
- Irgon Lithium Mine Project
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- Manitoba
- Ticker
- QMC
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.95
- Grade Unit
- % Li2O
- Intercept
- 0.75 m
- From
- 77 m
- To
- 77.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2019-09-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 2.95% Li2O exceeds the exceptional threshold for lithium.
Positive factors
- exceptional grade
Evidence · table
“2.95”
Context: 0.75
IR-19-09Irgon Lithium Mine Project · lithiumGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 3.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- IR-19-09
- Project
- Irgon Lithium Mine Project
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- Manitoba
- Ticker
- QMC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.85
- Grade Unit
- % Li2O
- Intercept
- 3.65 m
- From
- 46.1 m
- To
- 49.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2019-09-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 1.85% Li2O is a strong grade for lithium.
Positive factors
- strong grade
Evidence · table
“1.85”
Context: 3.65
IR-19-09Irgon Lithium Mine Project · lithiumGrade: 2.46Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 2.51 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- IR-19-09
- Project
- Irgon Lithium Mine Project
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- Manitoba
- Ticker
- QMC
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.46
- Grade Unit
- % Li2O
- Intercept
- 2.51 m
- From
- 47.24 m
- To
- 49.75 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- IR-19-09:47.24-49.75
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2019-09-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval within IR-19-09.
Positive factors
- high-grade sub-interval
Evidence · table
“2.46”
Context: 2.51
IR-19-03Irgon Lithium Mine Project · lithiumGrade: 1Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 20.35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- IR-19-03
- Project
- Irgon Lithium Mine Project
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- Manitoba
- Ticker
- QMC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- % Li2O
- Intercept
- 20.35 m
- From
- 39.95 m
- To
- 60.3 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2019-09-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Wide 20.35m intercept at 1.0% Li2O.
Positive factors
- significant width
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: 20.35
IR-19-01Irgon Lithium Mine Project · lithiumGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 9.75 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- IR-19-01
- Project
- Irgon Lithium Mine Project
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- Manitoba
- Ticker
- QMC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.29
- Grade Unit
- % Li2O
- Intercept
- 9.75 m
- From
- 121.8 m
- To
- 132.55 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2019-09-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 1.29% Li2O is a strong grade.
Positive factors
- strong grade
Evidence · table
“1.29”
Context: 9.75
IR-19-01Irgon Lithium Mine Project · lithiumGrade: 1.3Grade Unit: % Li2OIntercept: 7.85 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- IR-19-01
- Project
- Irgon Lithium Mine Project
- Commodity
- lithium
- Region
- canada_mb
- Reported Region
- Manitoba
- Ticker
- QMC
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.3
- Grade Unit
- % Li2O
- Intercept
- 7.85 m
- From
- 123.7 m
- To
- 130.9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- IR-19-01:123.7-130.9
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2019-09-11T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval within IR-19-01.
Positive factors
- strong grade
Evidence · table
“1.30”
Context: 7.85
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.