QIMC Reports Record 23.5% Natural Hydrogen Within the First 300 Metres of Ongoing DDH-26-05 and Observations Consistent with Free Gas at Bennett Hill at 164 Metres

Original announcement by yahoo_press on

Company
Unavailable
Ticker
QIMC
Exchange
CSE
Region
Unavailable
Primary commodity
Hydrogen
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-09-22 01:14:45 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

QIMC has reported a record 23.5% natural hydrogen concentration within the first 300 metres of drill hole DDH-26-05. This intercept is approximately 540 metres shallower than the company's previous record, supporting a robust hydrogen system at Bennett Hill.

Reasoning: The discovery of record-level hydrogen concentrations at significantly shallower depths than previous records is a highly material exploration success.

Positive factors

  • Record high concentration of 23.5% H2
  • Shallow depth of encounter (within first 300m)
  • Sustained corridor of percent-level concentrations

Facts used in scoring: 2

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The new intercept is significantly shallower than the previous record, indicating vertical extension or discovery of a shallower system.

Evidence · text

“approximately 540 metres shallower than the Company's previous record”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (2)

DDH-26-05Bennett Hill · hydrogenGrade: 23.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 54 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-26-05
Project
Bennett Hill
Commodity
hydrogen
Ticker
QIMC

Geometry

Grade
23.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
54 m
From
143 m
To
197 m
Intercept Depth
143 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
DDH-26-05:143-197

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 23.5% H2 is a record concentration for the company and occurs in a sustained 54m corridor.

Positive factors

  • Record concentration
  • Sustained interval

Evidence · text

“~54-metre corridor of sustained percent-level hydrogen concentrations (143-197 m)”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

DDH-26-04Bennett Hill · hydrogenGrade: 24.3Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
DDH-26-04
Project
Bennett Hill
Commodity
hydrogen
Ticker
QIMC

Geometry

Grade
24.3
Grade Unit
%
From
707 m
Intercept Depth
707 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical record used for comparison.

Evidence · text

“previous record of 24.3% H₂ at 707 metres in DDH-26-04”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.