# QIMC Reports Multiple Elevated Hydrogen Mud-Gas Readings Over 100m-250m Interval of DDH-26-04, Including a Peak Hydrogen Reading of 16.0%, Two Hydrogen Readings of 13.5%, and Nine Readings at or Above 5% Hydrogen Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/qimc-reports-multiple-elevated-hydrogen-mud-gas-readings-over-100m-250m-interval--421bae5a-5401-450e-b6f5-d7e2c63e0cb2 Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/articles/qimc-reports-multiple-elevated-hydrogen-123000204.html Publisher: yahoo\_press Original announcement: 2026-06-29T12:30:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-22T01:45:20.388Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-22T01:45:20.388Z - Company: Québec Innovative Materials Corp. - Ticker: QIMC - Exchange: CSE - Region: Québec - Primary commodity: Hydrogen - Secondary commodities: Methane, Carbon dioxide - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-22 01:45:21 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Québec Innovative Materials Corp. reported preliminary mud-gas geochemical results from diamond drill hole DDH-26-04. The 100m-250m interval showed multiple elevated hydrogen readings, including a peak of 16.0%, while methane and carbon dioxide levels remained very low. Reasoning: The company reported significant hydrogen concentrations \(up to 16%\) in mud-gas samples, which is a strong geochemical signal for a hydrogen exploration project. - Positive factor: High-range hydrogen readings - Positive factor: Repeated percent-level concentrations - Positive factor: Low methane and CO2 interference Facts used in scoring: 3 ## Classification and evidence **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: The release mentions the use of a Higher-range EAGLE II analyzer and 60 IsoJar samples. Evidence · text > Higher-range EAGLE II analyzer records repeated percent-level hydrogen readings ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (3) ### DDH-26-04 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/qimc-reports-multiple-elevated-hydrogen-mud-gas-readings-over-100m-250m-interval--421bae5a-5401-450e-b6f5-d7e2c63e0cb2#fact-drill-facts-0) hydrogen Needs review: ungrounded #### Identity - Hole ID: DDH-26-04 - Commodity: hydrogen - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: canada\_qc - Ticker: QIMC #### Geometry - Grade: 16 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 150 m - From: 100 m - To: 250 m - Intercept Depth: 100 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: DDH-26-04:100-250 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: ungrounded - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: 16.0% hydrogen is an exceptionally high geochemical reading for mud-gas sampling. - Positive factor: Peak reading of 16.0% Evidence · text > peak Hydrogen Reading of 16.0% #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### DDH-26-04 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/qimc-reports-multiple-elevated-hydrogen-mud-gas-readings-over-100m-250m-interval--421bae5a-5401-450e-b6f5-d7e2c63e0cb2#fact-drill-facts-1) methane #### Identity - Hole ID: DDH-26-04 - Commodity: methane - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: canada\_qc - Ticker: QIMC #### Geometry - Grade: 0 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 150 m - From: 100 m - To: 250 m - Intercept Depth: 100 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: DDH-26-04:100-250 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Methane near 0% is a positive indicator for hydrogen purity. - Positive factor: Low methane levels suggest high purity hydrogen potential Evidence · text > methane remained near 0% #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ### DDH-26-04 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/qimc-reports-multiple-elevated-hydrogen-mud-gas-readings-over-100m-250m-interval--421bae5a-5401-450e-b6f5-d7e2c63e0cb2#fact-drill-facts-2) carbon dioxide #### Identity - Hole ID: DDH-26-04 - Commodity: carbon dioxide - Region: canada\_qc - Reported Region: canada\_qc - Ticker: QIMC #### Geometry - Grade: 0.2 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 150 m - From: 100 m - To: 250 m - Intercept Depth: 100 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: DDH-26-04:100-250 #### Review - Needs Review: No - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-06-29T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: CO2 at or below 0.2% is a low impurity level. - Positive factor: Low CO2 levels Evidence · text > carbon dioxide at or below 0.2% #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.