# Pulsar & Lunar Helium-3 Mining Sign Evaluation Agr Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/pulsar-lunar-helium-3-mining-sign-evaluation-agr--6a73d118-7461-4f71-8fc8-0d2e8c3ce082 Original source: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/PLSR/pulsar-lunar-helium-3-mining-sign-evaluation-agr/17834197 Publisher: lse Original announcement: 2026-10-14T05:00:09.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-14T09:04:54.107Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-14T09:04:54.107Z - Company: Pulsar Helium Inc. - Ticker: PLSR - Exchange: LSE - Region: Minnesota, USA - Primary commodity: Helium-3 - Secondary commodities: Helium - Document categories: Agreement transaction, Other, Drill results - Extracted: 2026-10-14 09:04:54 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Pulsar Helium Inc. has entered into an evaluation agreement with Lunar Helium-3 Mining, LLC to assess the technical feasibility of recovering and concentrating helium-3 from its Topaz Project in Minnesota. The staged program aims to evaluate LH3M's proprietary technology using Topaz gas samples to determine recovery performance, purity, and preliminary economics. Reasoning: The agreement to evaluate proprietary recovery technology for a high-value, strategically critical isotope at a flagship project is a significant development for the company's value proposition. - Positive factor: Strategic partnership with technology provider LH3M - Positive factor: High-value commodity \(US$18m/kg\) - Positive factor: Third-party validation of helium-3 presence by USGS and LLNL - Positive factor: Potential to create a new US commercial supply source - Negative factor: Early-stage evaluation with no assurance of commercial viability - Negative factor: Technology is experimental and unproven at scale - Negative factor: No definitive agreement or pilot program yet secured Facts used in scoring: 1 ## Classification and evidence **QA/QC Disclosed** Polarity: positive Story-specific tag Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\). Why it applies: The release mentions independent analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey Noble Gas Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Evidence · text > raw gas samples from the Jetstream \#1 well at Topaz were independently analyzed by the U.S. Geological Survey Noble Gas Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 1. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (1) ### Jetstream \#1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/pulsar-lunar-helium-3-mining-sign-evaluation-agr--6a73d118-7461-4f71-8fc8-0d2e8c3ce082#fact-drill-facts-0) Topaz · helium-3 Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: Jetstream \#1 - Project: Topaz - Commodity: helium-3 - Region: minnesota, usa - Reported Region: minnesota, usa - Ticker: PLSR #### Geometry - Grade: 11.55 - Grade Unit: ppb #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-19T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical grade reported from Jetstream \#1 well, validated by federal laboratories. - Positive factor: Third-party validation by USGS and LLNL Evidence · text > Both U.S. Federal laboratories confirmed helium-3 concentrations of approximately 11.2-11.9 parts per billion #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.