PTR: Annual Report to shareholders
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- PTR Minerals Ltd
- Ticker
- PTR
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- South Australia
- Primary commodity
- Titanium
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-09-29 16:07:16 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
PTR Minerals Ltd announced a transformational year, highlighted by a maiden JORC-compliant Mineral Resource Estimate for its flagship Rosewood Titanium Project in South Australia, comprising 463Mt at 8.8% HM. This was complemented by positive metallurgical testwork confirming high recoveries of titanium minerals using conventional processing. The company also reported successful exploration results at new prospects and completed a $12 million capital raise to advance project development.
Reasoning: PTR Minerals Ltd announced a transformational year, highlighted by a maiden JORC-compliant Mineral Resource Estimate for its flagship Rosewood Titanium Project, supported by positive metallurgical testwork confirming a conventional processing route and high recoveries, alongside successful exploration expanding the mineralized footprint and a capital raise to fund ongoing development.
Positive factors
- Maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for flagship project
- High-grade resource with significant contained heavy minerals
- High Valuable Heavy Mineral (VHM) content
- Strong Indicated classification in the MRE
- Positive metallurgical testwork results with high recoveries
- Conventional processing route confirmed
- New exploration discoveries (Echo, Duke, Nardoo) extending mineralization
- Successful capital raise providing funding for development
- Low levels of deleterious elements in saprolite HM mineralization
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 90
Classification and evidence
Maiden Resourceneutral
First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.
Why it applies: The document explicitly states 'The delivery of the maiden Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for Rosewood was a major achievement.'
Evidence · text
“The delivery of the maiden Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for Rosewood was a major achievement.”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The Mineral Resource Estimate is reported 'in accordance with the JORC Code, 2012 Edition'.
Evidence · text
“The Company reports a Mineral Resource estimate in accordance with the JORC Code, 2012 Edition”
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: The MRE states '57% classified as Indicated' for the overall resource and '89% is classified as Indicated' for Rosewood East.
Evidence · text
“57% classified as Indicated”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: The MRE is reported in accordance with the JORC Code, 2012 Edition, which requires sign-off by a Competent Person.
Evidence · text
“The Company reports a Mineral Resource estimate in accordance with the JORC Code, 2012 Edition”
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: Metallurgical testwork demonstrated 'recovering more than 91% of the HM'.
Evidence · text
“recovering more than 91% of the HM”
Pilot Scale Completepositive
Pilot or demonstration plant testing completed under continuous operation.
Why it applies: A 'three-tonne bulk sample from Rosewood East was subsequently submitted to Mineral Technologies for further processing, flowsheet development, plant-design work and preliminary capital and operating-cost assessment', indicating advanced testwork beyond bench scale.
Evidence · text
“A second, representative three-tonne bulk sample from Rosewood East was subsequently submitted to Mineral Technologies for further processing, flowsheet development, plant-design work and preliminary capital and operating-cost assessment.”
Free Millingpositive
Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.
Why it applies: The document states that 'Rosewood ore responds well to conventional wet separation techniques'.
Evidence · text
“Rosewood ore responds well to conventional wet separation techniques”
Multi-Domain Testedpositive
Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.
Why it applies: A 'second, representative three-tonne bulk sample from Rosewood East' was used, implying variability testing.
Evidence · text
“A second, representative three-tonne bulk sample from Rosewood East was subsequently submitted to Mineral Technologies for further processing”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: Drilling 'identified the Echo prospect, where mineralisation was defined over approximately 4.5km and remained open along an approximately 10km prospective trend'.
Evidence · text
“Drilling north-east of Rosewood identified the Echo prospect, where mineralisation was defined over approximately 4.5km and remained open along an approximately 10km prospective trend.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: Drill intercepts are reported as downhole lengths (e.g., '42m @ 11.9% HM from 0m') without explicit mention of true width or drill orientation relative to mineralization.
Evidence · text
“42m @ 11.9% HM from 0m”
Low Deleterious Elementspositive · Story-specific tag
No canonical definition is currently available.
Why it applies: XRF assays from Duke and Nardoo prospects returned 'very low levels of deleterious elements Cr2O3 (not detected (nd)), V2O5 (<0.2%), SnO2 (nd), Th (<5 ppm) and U (nd)'.
Evidence · text
“XRF assays from the Duke prospect returned very low levels of deleterious elements Cr2O3 (not detected (nd)), V2O5 (<0.2%), SnO2 (nd), Th (<5 ppm) and U (nd).”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The MRE states '43% in the Inferred category' for the overall resource.
Evidence · text
“43% in the Inferred category”
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: The resource estimates clearly state the cut-off grades used, such as '3% HM cut-off' and '5.5% HM cut-off'.
Evidence · text
“3% HM cut-off”
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("concentrate")
Gravity Routeneutral
Gravity separation forms a material part of the flowsheet.
Why it applies: the document describes a gravity route ("gravity")
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 90. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (43)
25RW190Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 11.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 42 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW190
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 11.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 42 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 42 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW190:0-42
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This drill intercept shows high-grade heavy mineral sands from surface over a significant width, contributing to the confidence in the Rosewood MRE.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“42m @ 11.9% HM from 0m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW190Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW190
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 5 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 11 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW190:6-11
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This very high-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept further enhances the quality of the heavy mineral sands mineralization at Rosewood.
Positive factors
- Very high grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant sub-interval within broader mineralization
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“5m @ 18.0% HM from 6m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW213Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW213
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 42 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW213:10-42
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This drill intercept shows high-grade heavy mineral sands over a significant width, contributing to the confidence in the Rosewood MRE.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“32m @ 13.0% HM from 10m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW213Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 27.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW213
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 32 m
- To
- 36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW213:32-36
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept further enhances the quality of the heavy mineral sands mineralization at Rosewood.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant sub-interval within broader mineralization
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“4m @ 27.7% HM from 32m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW214Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 15.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW214
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 33 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 43 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW214:10-43
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This drill intercept shows high-grade heavy mineral sands over a significant width, contributing to the confidence in the Rosewood MRE.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“33m @ 15.7% HM from 10m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW214Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 33.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW214
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 33.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW214:13-15
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept further enhances the quality of the heavy mineral sands mineralization at Rosewood.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant sub-interval within broader mineralization
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“2m @ 33.6% HM from 13m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW215Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 13.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW215
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 33 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW215:12-45
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This drill intercept shows high-grade heavy mineral sands over a significant width, contributing to the confidence in the Rosewood MRE.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“33m @ 13.9% HM from 12m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW215Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW215
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW215:12-21
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept further enhances the quality of the heavy mineral sands mineralization at Rosewood.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant sub-interval within broader mineralization
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“9m @ 21.0% HM from 12m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW218Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 13.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW218
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 13.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 32 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW218:0-32
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This drill intercept shows high-grade heavy mineral sands from surface over a significant width, contributing to the confidence in the Rosewood MRE.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“32m @ 13.4% HM from 0m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW218Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW218
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 22 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW218:18-22
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept further enhances the quality of the heavy mineral sands mineralization at Rosewood.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant sub-interval within broader mineralization
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“4m @ 23.0% HM from 18m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW220Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 14.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 28 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW220
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 28 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW220:7-35
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This drill intercept shows high-grade heavy mineral sands over a significant width, contributing to the confidence in the Rosewood MRE.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“28m @ 14.2% HM from 7m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW220Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 28.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW220
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 28.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 29 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW220:23-29
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept further enhances the quality of the heavy mineral sands mineralization at Rosewood.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant sub-interval within broader mineralization
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“6m @ 28.2% HM from 23m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW295Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW295
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 42 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW295:12-42
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This drill intercept shows high-grade heavy mineral sands over a significant width, contributing to the confidence in the Rosewood MRE.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“30m @ 16.0% HM from 12m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW295Rosewood East · heavy mineralGrade: 19.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW295
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 19.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 14 m
- To
- 21 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW295:14-21
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade sub-interval within a broader intercept further enhances the quality of the heavy mineral sands mineralization at Rosewood.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant sub-interval within broader mineralization
- Underpins maiden MRE
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“7m @ 19.8% HM from 14m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
25RW164Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW164
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 17 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW164:6-17
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept at the new Echo Prospect indicates a new mineralized zone, demonstrating exploration success and potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Good intercept length
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“11m @ 3.2% HM from 6m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW164Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW164
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 11 m
- To
- 13 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW164:11-13
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within the new Echo Prospect further supports the discovery of a new mineralized zone with potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Higher grade sub-interval
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“2m @ 6.1% HM from 11m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW152Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW152
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 10 m
- To
- 16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW152:10-16
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept at the new Echo Prospect indicates a new mineralized zone, demonstrating exploration success and potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Good grade for heavy mineral sands
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“6m @ 5.1% HM from 10m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW152Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 7.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW152
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 16 m
- Intercept Depth
- 10 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW152:13-16
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within the new Echo Prospect further supports the discovery of a new mineralized zone with potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Higher grade sub-interval
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“3m @ 7.1% HM from 13m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW165Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW165
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 16 m
- To
- 25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW165:16-25
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept at the new Echo Prospect indicates a new mineralized zone, demonstrating exploration success and potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Good intercept length
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“9m @ 3.0% HM from 16m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW165Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 5.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW165
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2 m
- From
- 23 m
- To
- 25 m
- Intercept Depth
- 16 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW165:23-25
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within the new Echo Prospect further supports the discovery of a new mineralized zone with potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Higher grade sub-interval
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“2m @ 5.3% HM from 23m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW155Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 3.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW155
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7 m
- From
- 12 m
- To
- 19 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW155:12-19
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept at the new Echo Prospect indicates a new mineralized zone, demonstrating exploration success and potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Good intercept length
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“7m @ 3.2% HM from 12m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW155Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW155
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 13 m
- To
- 14 m
- Intercept Depth
- 12 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW155:13-14
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This higher-grade sub-interval within the new Echo Prospect further supports the discovery of a new mineralized zone with potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Higher grade sub-interval
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“1m @ 6.1% HM from 13m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW162Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW162
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 3 m
- From
- 7 m
- To
- 10 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW162:7-10
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept at the new Echo Prospect indicates a new mineralized zone, demonstrating exploration success and potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Good grade for heavy mineral sands
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“3m @ 4.5% HM from 7m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW162Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 10.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW162
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 10.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1 m
- From
- 9 m
- To
- 10 m
- Intercept Depth
- 7 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW162:9-10
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval within the new Echo Prospect further supports the discovery of a new mineralized zone with potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- High grade sub-interval
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“1m @ 10.2% HM from 9m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25RW163Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 3.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25RW163
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 12 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25RW163:6-12
Location
- Location
- Echo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept at the new Echo Prospect indicates a new mineralized zone, demonstrating exploration success and potential for expansion.
Positive factors
- New mineralized zone identified
- Good intercept length
- Open along strike
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“6m @ 3.5% HM from 6m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25DK005Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 39.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25DK005
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 39.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 60 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25DK005:0-60
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Duke Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a very significant width, indicating strong exploration success.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Very significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“60m @ 39.3% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25DK005Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 61.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25DK005
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 61.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 6 m
- From
- 25 m
- To
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25DK005:25-31
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade sub-interval further highlights the quality of the new style of heavy mineral sands mineralization at the Duke Prospect.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Very high-grade sub-interval
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“6m @ 61.6% HM from 25m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
24DK001Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 26.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24DK001
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 26.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 24 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 24 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24DK001:0-24
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Duke Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a significant width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“24m @ 26.1% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25DK004Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 21.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 31 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25DK004
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 21.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 31 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 31 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25DK004:0-31
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Duke Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a significant width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“31m @ 21.5% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25DK007Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25DK007
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 37 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 37 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25DK007:0-37
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Duke Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a significant width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“37m @ 21.0% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
24DK002Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 16.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24DK002
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 27 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24DK002:0-27
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at the Duke Prospect demonstrates a new style of heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a significant width.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“27m @ 16.4% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
24DK003Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 14.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 42 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24DK003
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 14.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 42 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 42 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24DK003:0-42
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at the Duke Prospect demonstrates a new style of heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a very significant width.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Very significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“42m @ 14.6% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
24DK003Muckanippie · titanium dioxideGrade: 34.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 41 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24DK003
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- titanium dioxide
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 34.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 41 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional TiO2 intercept at the Duke Prospect confirms high-quality titanium mineralization over a significant width, with very low deleterious elements.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for titanium dioxide
- Very significant intercept length
- New style of high-grade mineralization
- Low deleterious elements
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
- From/to depths not explicitly stated for TiO2 interval
Evidence · text
“41m @ 34.4% TiO2”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
24DK003Muckanippie · titanium dioxideGrade: 59.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24DK003
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- titanium dioxide
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 59.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 9 m
- To
- 18 m
- Intercept Depth
- 9 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24DK003:9-18
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade TiO2 sub-interval further highlights the quality of the new style of titanium mineralization at the Duke Prospect, with very low deleterious elements.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for titanium dioxide
- Very high-grade sub-interval
- New style of high-grade mineralization
- Low deleterious elements
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“9m @ 59.6% TiO2 from 9m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25DK009Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 30.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25DK009
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9 m
- From
- 6 m
- To
- 15 m
- Intercept Depth
- 6 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25DK009:6-15
Location
- Location
- Duke Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Duke Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization over a good width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Good intercept length
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“9m @ 30.9% HM from 6m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25ND011Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 31.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 35 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25ND011
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 31.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 35 m
- From
- 18 m
- To
- 53 m
- Intercept Depth
- 18 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25ND011:18-53
Location
- Location
- Nardoo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Nardoo Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization over a significant width, indicating strong exploration success.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“35m @ 31.5% HM from 18m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
24ND002Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 23.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24ND002
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 23.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 44 m
- From
- 1 m
- To
- 45 m
- Intercept Depth
- 1 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24ND002:1-45
Location
- Location
- Nardoo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Nardoo Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization over a very significant width from shallow depths.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Very significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“44m @ 23.9% HM from 1m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25ND022Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25ND022
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 16.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 60 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 60 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25ND022:0-60
Location
- Location
- Nardoo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at the Nardoo Prospect demonstrates a new style of heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a very significant width.
Positive factors
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Very significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“60m @ 16.3% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25ND018Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 25.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 36 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25ND018
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 25.7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 36 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 36 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25ND018:0-36
Location
- Location
- Nardoo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Nardoo Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a significant width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“36m @ 25.7% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
25ND019Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 30.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25ND019
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 30.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 30 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 30 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 25ND019:0-30
Location
- Location
- Nardoo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Nardoo Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a significant width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“30m @ 30.4% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
24ND003Muckanippie · heavy mineralGrade: 29.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24ND003
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 29.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 44 m
- From
- 0 m
- To
- 44 m
- Intercept Depth
- 0 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24ND003:0-44
Location
- Location
- Nardoo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional intercept at the Nardoo Prospect demonstrates a new style of high-grade heavy mineral sands mineralization from surface over a very significant width.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for heavy mineral sands
- Very significant intercept length
- Shallow mineralization from surface
- New style of high-grade mineralization
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“44m @ 29.4% HM from surface”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
24ND003Muckanippie · titanium dioxideGrade: 27.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 42 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24ND003
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- titanium dioxide
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 27.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 42 m
- From
- 2 m
- To
- 44 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24ND003:2-44
Location
- Location
- Nardoo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptional TiO2 intercept at the Nardoo Prospect confirms high-quality titanium mineralization over a significant width, with very low deleterious elements.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for titanium dioxide
- Very significant intercept length
- New style of high-grade mineralization
- Low deleterious elements
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“42m @ 27.6% TiO2 from 2m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
24ND003Muckanippie · titanium dioxideGrade: 37.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 24ND003
- Project
- Muckanippie
- Commodity
- titanium dioxide
- Region
- australia_sa
- Reported Region
- australia_sa
- Ticker
- PTR
Geometry
- Grade
- 37.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 29 m
- To
- 44 m
- Intercept Depth
- 2 m
Classification
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- 24ND003:29-44
Location
- Location
- Nardoo Prospect
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- QP Signed
- Yes
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- No
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This exceptionally high-grade TiO2 sub-interval further highlights the quality of the new style of titanium mineralization at the Nardoo Prospect, with very low deleterious elements.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade for titanium dioxide
- Very high-grade sub-interval
- New style of high-grade mineralization
- Low deleterious elements
Negative factors
- Apparent width only
Evidence · text
“15m @ 37.6% TiO2 from 29m”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Resource Estimates (42)
indicatedRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 263000000Grade: 10.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 26.6Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:50dcc248220b1aaf2eed
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 263000000
- Grade
- 10.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 26.6
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a significant portion of the maiden resource, classified as Indicated, with a high grade for heavy mineral sands, contributing strongly to the project's overall potential.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- JORC compliant
Evidence · table
“10.1”
Context: 263
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
indicatedRosewood · rutileTonnes: 263000000Grade: 3.9Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:50dcc248220b1aaf2eed
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 263000000
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The rutile content within the Indicated Rosewood East resource adds to the overall value proposition of the heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Rutile is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“3.9”
Context: 263
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 263000000Grade: 82Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:50dcc248220b1aaf2eed
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 263000000
- Grade
- 82
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The leucoxene content within the Indicated Rosewood East resource further enhances the economic potential of the heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Leucoxene is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“82”
Context: 263
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 263000000Grade: 9Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:50dcc248220b1aaf2eed
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 263000000
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The ilmenite content within the Indicated Rosewood East resource contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands product suite.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Ilmenite is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: 263
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 31000000Grade: 6.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1.9Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:5ece14a9987d7195cea8
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 31000000
- Grade
- 6.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 1.9
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This Inferred portion of the Rosewood East resource adds to the overall tonnage, but with lower confidence than the Indicated category.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Good grade for heavy mineral sands
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“6.1”
Context: 31
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
inferredRosewood · rutileTonnes: 31000000Grade: 2.9Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:5ece14a9987d7195cea8
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 31000000
- Grade
- 2.9
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The rutile content in the Inferred Rosewood East resource contributes to the overall potential, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Rutile is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“2.9”
Context: 31
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 31000000Grade: 68Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:5ece14a9987d7195cea8
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 31000000
- Grade
- 68
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The leucoxene content in the Inferred Rosewood East resource adds to the project's potential, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Leucoxene is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“68”
Context: 31
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 31000000Grade: 21Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:5ece14a9987d7195cea8
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 31000000
- Grade
- 21
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The ilmenite content in the Inferred Rosewood East resource contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands product suite, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Ilmenite is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“21”
Context: 31
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 1000000Grade: 4Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 0.05Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:2ba1a3bdb2d204ba86b3
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood West
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1000000
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 0.05
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This small Indicated portion of the Rosewood West resource adds to the overall resource, but with a lower grade than the main Rosewood East deposit.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Lower grade compared to Rosewood East
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
indicatedRosewood · rutileTonnes: 1000000Grade: 2.6Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:2ba1a3bdb2d204ba86b3
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood West
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1000000
- Grade
- 2.6
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The rutile content in the Indicated Rosewood West resource is lower than the main Rosewood East deposit, but still contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
Negative factors
- Lower rutile content compared to Rosewood East
Evidence · table
“2.6”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 1000000Grade: 59Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:2ba1a3bdb2d204ba86b3
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood West
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1000000
- Grade
- 59
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The leucoxene content in the Indicated Rosewood West resource is lower than the main Rosewood East deposit, but still contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
Negative factors
- Lower leucoxene content compared to Rosewood East
Evidence · table
“59”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 1000000Grade: 32Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:2ba1a3bdb2d204ba86b3
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood West
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 1000000
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The ilmenite content in the Indicated Rosewood West resource is higher than Rosewood East, offering a different product mix within the heavy mineral sands.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Higher ilmenite content compared to Rosewood East
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: 1
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 168000000Grade: 7.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 12Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:d4a6ab17f47563285fe8
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood West
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 168000000
- Grade
- 7.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 12
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This large Inferred portion of the Rosewood West resource significantly adds to the overall tonnage, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Good grade for heavy mineral sands
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“7.1”
Context: 168
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
inferredRosewood · rutileTonnes: 168000000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:d4a6ab17f47563285fe8
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood West
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 168000000
- Grade
- 1.8
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The rutile content in the Inferred Rosewood West resource contributes to the overall potential, but is lower than Rosewood East and requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Rutile is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Lower rutile content compared to Rosewood East
Evidence · table
“1.8”
Context: 168
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 168000000Grade: 63Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:d4a6ab17f47563285fe8
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood West
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 168000000
- Grade
- 63
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The leucoxene content in the Inferred Rosewood West resource adds to the project's potential, but is lower than Rosewood East and requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Leucoxene is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Lower leucoxene content compared to Rosewood East
Evidence · table
“63”
Context: 168
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 168000000Grade: 23Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:d4a6ab17f47563285fe8
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood West
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 168000000
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The ilmenite content in the Inferred Rosewood West resource is higher than Rosewood East, offering a different product mix, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Ilmenite is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
- Higher ilmenite content compared to Rosewood East
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“23”
Context: 168
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 264000000Grade: 10.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 26.7Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:76a65b7e75a886283958
- Deposit or zone
- COMBINED
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 264000000
- Grade
- 10.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 26.7
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This combined Indicated resource represents a substantial and high-confidence portion of the maiden MRE for the Rosewood project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- High grade for heavy mineral sands
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- JORC compliant
Evidence · table
“10.1”
Context: 264
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
indicatedRosewood · rutileTonnes: 264000000Grade: 3.9Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:76a65b7e75a886283958
- Deposit or zone
- COMBINED
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 264000000
- Grade
- 3.9
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The combined Indicated rutile content contributes significantly to the overall value of the Rosewood heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Rutile is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“3.9”
Context: 264
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 264000000Grade: 82Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:76a65b7e75a886283958
- Deposit or zone
- COMBINED
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 264000000
- Grade
- 82
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The combined Indicated leucoxene content further enhances the economic potential of the Rosewood heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Leucoxene is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“82”
Context: 264
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 264000000Grade: 9Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:76a65b7e75a886283958
- Deposit or zone
- COMBINED
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 264000000
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The combined Indicated ilmenite content contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands product suite from the Rosewood project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Ilmenite is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: 264
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 199000000Grade: 7Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 13.9Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:417684d55d2035ea7450
- Deposit or zone
- COMBINED
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 199000000
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 13.9
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This large combined Inferred resource adds significant tonnage to the maiden MRE, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Good grade for heavy mineral sands
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“7.0”
Context: 199
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
inferredRosewood · rutileTonnes: 199000000Grade: 2Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:417684d55d2035ea7450
- Deposit or zone
- COMBINED
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 199000000
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The combined Inferred rutile content contributes to the overall potential, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Rutile is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“2.0”
Context: 199
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 199000000Grade: 64Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:417684d55d2035ea7450
- Deposit or zone
- COMBINED
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 199000000
- Grade
- 64
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The combined Inferred leucoxene content adds to the project's potential, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Leucoxene is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“64”
Context: 199
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 199000000Grade: 23Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:417684d55d2035ea7450
- Deposit or zone
- COMBINED
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 199000000
- Grade
- 23
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The combined Inferred ilmenite content contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands product suite, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Ilmenite is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“23”
Context: 199
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
TOTALRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 463000000Grade: 8.8Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 40.6Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a15944d55c38d2f1f2d3
- Deposit or zone
- TOTAL
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 463000000
- Grade
- 8.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 40.6
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The total maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for Rosewood is a significant achievement, demonstrating a large, high-grade heavy mineral sands deposit with substantial contained metal.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Large tonnage and high grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant contained metal
- JORC compliant
Evidence · table
“8.8”
Context: 463
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
TOTALRosewood · rutileTonnes: 463000000Grade: 3.2Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a15944d55c38d2f1f2d3
- Deposit or zone
- TOTAL
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 463000000
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The total rutile content within the maiden MRE adds significant value to the Rosewood heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Rutile is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 463
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
TOTALRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 463000000Grade: 75Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a15944d55c38d2f1f2d3
- Deposit or zone
- TOTAL
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 463000000
- Grade
- 75
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The total leucoxene content within the maiden MRE further enhances the economic potential of the Rosewood heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Leucoxene is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“75”
Context: 463
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
TOTALRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 463000000Grade: 14Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:a15944d55c38d2f1f2d3
- Deposit or zone
- TOTAL
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 463000000
- Grade
- 14
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The total ilmenite content within the maiden MRE contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands product suite from the Rosewood project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Ilmenite is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“14”
Context: 463
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 196000000Grade: 12.2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 23.9Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:79f511f3e166f4d4f0f1
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 196000000
- Grade
- 12.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 23.9
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This high-grade Indicated resource for Rosewood East, at a higher cut-off, highlights the quality and confidence in the core of the deposit.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Very high grade for heavy mineral sands
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- JORC compliant
Evidence · table
“12.2”
Context: 196
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
indicatedRosewood · rutileTonnes: 196000000Grade: 4.1Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:79f511f3e166f4d4f0f1
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 196000000
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The rutile content within the high-grade Indicated Rosewood East resource adds to the overall value proposition of the heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Rutile is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“4.1”
Context: 196
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 196000000Grade: 84Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:79f511f3e166f4d4f0f1
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 196000000
- Grade
- 84
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The leucoxene content within the high-grade Indicated Rosewood East resource further enhances the economic potential of the heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Leucoxene is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“84”
Context: 196
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 196000000Grade: 7Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:79f511f3e166f4d4f0f1
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 196000000
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The ilmenite content within the high-grade Indicated Rosewood East resource contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands product suite.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Indicated category provides good confidence
- Ilmenite is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 196
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 12000000Grade: 9.3Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1.1Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:867f019cd2287bd86662
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12000000
- Grade
- 9.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 1.1
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This Inferred portion of the Rosewood East resource, at a higher cut-off, adds to the overall tonnage, but with lower confidence than the Indicated category.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Good grade for heavy mineral sands
- JORC compliant
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“9.3”
Context: 12
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
inferredRosewood · rutileTonnes: 12000000Grade: 3.2Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:867f019cd2287bd86662
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12000000
- Grade
- 3.2
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The rutile content in the Inferred Rosewood East resource, at a higher cut-off, contributes to the overall potential, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Rutile is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“3.2”
Context: 12
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 12000000Grade: 70Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:867f019cd2287bd86662
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12000000
- Grade
- 70
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The leucoxene content in the Inferred Rosewood East resource, at a higher cut-off, adds to the project's potential, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Leucoxene is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“70”
Context: 12
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 12000000Grade: 19Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:867f019cd2287bd86662
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12000000
- Grade
- 19
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The ilmenite content in the Inferred Rosewood East resource, at a higher cut-off, contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands product suite, but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Ilmenite is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
Evidence · table
“19”
Context: 12
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Rosewood EastRosewood · heavy mineralTonnes: 208000000Grade: 12.1Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 25Contained Unit: mtView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:612ab5ae41903c3a3429
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 208000000
- Grade
- 12.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 25
- Contained Unit
- mt
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The total high-grade Rosewood East resource, at a higher cut-off, demonstrates the substantial and high-quality core of the deposit within the maiden MRE.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Very high grade for heavy mineral sands
- Significant contained metal
- JORC compliant
Evidence · table
“12.1”
Context: 208
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
Rosewood EastRosewood · rutileTonnes: 208000000Grade: 4Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- rutile
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:612ab5ae41903c3a3429
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 208000000
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The total rutile content within the high-grade Rosewood East resource adds significant value to the heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Rutile is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“4.0”
Context: 208
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Rosewood EastRosewood · leucoxeneTonnes: 208000000Grade: 84Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- leucoxene
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:612ab5ae41903c3a3429
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 208000000
- Grade
- 84
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The total leucoxene content within the high-grade Rosewood East resource further enhances the economic potential of the heavy mineral sands project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Leucoxene is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“84”
Context: 208
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Rosewood EastRosewood · ilmeniteTonnes: 208000000Grade: 8Grade Unit: % in HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- ilmenite
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Resource group id
- resource:612ab5ae41903c3a3429
- Deposit or zone
- Rosewood East
Resource Data
- Tonnes
- 208000000
- Grade
- 8
- Grade Unit
- % in HM
- Cutoff Grade
- 5.5
- Cutoff Unit
- % HM
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2026-06-30
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The total ilmenite content within the high-grade Rosewood East resource contributes to the overall heavy mineral sands product suite from the project.
Positive factors
- Maiden resource estimate
- Ilmenite is a valuable component of heavy mineral sands
Evidence · table
“8”
Context: 208
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 41View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Ticker
- PTR
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A successful $12 million placement provides crucial funding to advance the Rosewood project and broader Muckanippie exploration, demonstrating investor confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant capital raised
- Provides funding for project advancement
- Placement at a reasonable price
Evidence · text
“$12 million placement at $0.25 per share”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Fact 42Muckanippie ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Muckanippie Project
- Ticker
- PTR
Resource scope
- Resource group id
- resource:67fe8852ed96ae27b457
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Earning a 70% interest in EL 6715 secures PTR's position in a key tenement hosting multiple prospects, including a portion of Rosewood, through a joint venture with Narryer Metals.
Positive factors
- Increased ownership in key tenement
- Secures interest in multiple prospects
- Joint venture with experienced partner
Evidence · text
“earning a 70% interest in EL 6715, which hosts the western portion of Rosewood together with the Echo, Duke, Nardoo and Claypan prospects. PTR manages the resulting joint venture with Narryer Metals Limited, which retains a 30% interest.”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
Metallurgical Results (5)
wet separationRosewood · heavy mineralRecovery: 91 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- wet separation
- Processing Route
- conventional wet separation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 91 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 90.8
- Conc. Grade Unit
- % HM
Lab
- Laboratory
- IHC Mining
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Metallurgical testwork confirmed high recovery of heavy minerals using conventional wet separation, producing a high-quality concentrate, which is a significant de-risking step for the project.
Positive factors
- High recovery for heavy minerals
- Conventional processing route confirmed
- High-quality concentrate produced
- Detailed testwork provides confidence
Evidence · text
“recovering more than 91% of the HM into a high-quality concentrate containing 90.8% HM”
Fact 2Rosewood · titanium dioxideView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- titanium dioxide
- Ticker
- PTR
Test Work
- Sample
- five titanium-rich product streams
Recovery
- Conc. Grade
- 55.4
- Conc. Grade Unit
- % TiO2
Lab
- Laboratory
- IHC Mining
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Preliminary mineral separation testwork successfully produced multiple titanium-rich product streams with good grades, indicating potential for diverse end-products.
Positive factors
- Production of multiple titanium-rich product streams
- Good concentrate grade for titanium dioxide
Evidence · text
“five titanium-rich product streams grading between 55.4% and 84.2% TiO₂”
Fact 3Rosewood · titanium dioxideView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- titanium dioxide
- Ticker
- PTR
Test Work
- Sample
- five titanium-rich product streams
Recovery
- Conc. Grade
- 84.2
- Conc. Grade Unit
- % TiO2
Lab
- Laboratory
- IHC Mining
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Preliminary mineral separation testwork successfully produced multiple titanium-rich product streams, with the highest grade reaching 84.2% TiO2, indicating high-quality potential.
Positive factors
- Production of multiple titanium-rich product streams
- Very high concentrate grade for titanium dioxide
Evidence · text
“five titanium-rich product streams grading between 55.4% and 84.2% TiO₂”
Fact 4Rosewood · titanium dioxideView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood
- Commodity
- titanium dioxide
- Ticker
- PTR
Test Work
- Sample
- five titanium-rich product streams
Recovery
- Conc. Grade
- 67
- Conc. Grade Unit
- % TiO2
Lab
- Laboratory
- IHC Mining
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Preliminary mineral separation testwork successfully produced multiple titanium-rich product streams with a strong average yield of 67% TiO2, indicating good product quality.
Positive factors
- Production of multiple titanium-rich product streams
- Good average concentrate grade for titanium dioxide
Evidence · text
“average product yield of 67% TiO2”
Fact 5Rosewood East · heavy mineralHead Grade: 13Head Grade Unit: % HMView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Rosewood East
- Commodity
- heavy mineral
- Ticker
- PTR
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Sample
- second bulk sample (RM04) from the Rosewood East area
Recovery
- Head Grade
- 13
- Head Grade Unit
- % HM
Lab
- Laboratory
- Mineral Technologies
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-29T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A second bulk sample from Rosewood East confirmed a very high head grade, supporting ongoing detailed metallurgical and plant design studies.
Positive factors
- High head grade confirmed for bulk sample
- Sample is representative of the mineralization
- Advanced testwork initiated
Evidence · text
“overall grade of this second bulk sample has been determined to be 13% HM”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.