Power Metallic Intercepts 16.55 Meters of 15.11% CuEqRec¹ in Hole 25-049, and 7.60 Meters of 7.20% CuEqRec¹ in Hole 25-043 at Lion
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Power Metallic Mines Inc.
- Ticker
- PNPN
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- Unavailable
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-18 22:07:40 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Power Metallic Mines Inc. has reported high-grade copper equivalent intercepts from its Lion project. Notable results include 15.11% CuEq over 16.55m in hole 25-049 and 7.20% CuEq over 7.60m in hole 25-043.
Reasoning: The announcement reports very high-grade copper equivalent intercepts (15.11% and 7.20% CuEq) which are highly material for an exploration-stage project.
Positive factors
- High-grade copper equivalent intercepts
- Significant width on high-grade intercepts
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: 15.11% CuEq is exceptionally high grade for copper systems.
Evidence · text
“15.11% CuEqRec¹”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
25-049Lion · copperGrade: 15.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.55 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25-049
- Project
- Lion
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- PNPN
Geometry
- Grade
- 15.11
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 16.55 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 15.11
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEqRec¹
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 15.11% CuEq over 16.55m is an exceptional intercept for copper-based systems.
Positive factors
- Exceptional grade and width
Evidence · text
“16.55 Meters of 15.11% CuEqRec¹ in Hole 25-049”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
25-043Lion · copperGrade: 7.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- 25-043
- Project
- Lion
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- PNPN
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.2
- Metal Eq. Unit
- % CuEqRec¹
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-10T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 7.20% CuEq is a strong high-grade intercept.
Positive factors
- Strong high-grade intercept
Evidence · text
“7.60 Meters of 7.20% CuEqRec¹ in Hole 25-043”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: an equivalent grade is reported without its assumptions
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.