# Power Metallic intercepts 12.54 meters of 10.99% CuEq at the Lion Zone and 11.25m of 1.22% CuEq at Nisk East - First Lion Like Mineralization Intercepted near the Nisk Zone

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/power-metallic-intercepts-12-54-meters-of-10-99-cueq-at-the-lion-zone-and-11-25m--e8a6a12f-d239-4777-b0c3-fd577a5a783f

Original source: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/power-metallic-intercepts-12-54-135000707.html

Publisher: yahoo\_press

Original announcement: 2025-06-04T08:20:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: Power Metallic Mines Inc.

- Ticker: PNPN

- Exchange: TSXV

- Region: Unavailable

- Primary commodity: Copper

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Drill results

- Extracted: 2026-07-30 15:34:38 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.80 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Power Metallic Mines Inc. has reported significant drill results from its winter 2025 campaign, headlined by a 12.54m intercept of 10.99% CuEq at the Lion Zone. The results also include a 11.25m intercept of 1.22% CuEq at Nisk East, marking the first 'Lion-like' mineralization intercepted near the Nisk Zone.

Reasoning: The announcement reports a very high-grade CuEq intercept \(10.99%\) at the Lion Zone, which appears to be a significant discovery/extension of mineralization.

- Positive factor: High-grade CuEq intercept

- Positive factor: Step-out/extension potential

- Positive factor: First Lion-like mineralization intercepted

Facts used in scoring: 2

## Classification and evidence

**Step-Out Extension**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The release mentions testing the down plunge extent and off-hole EM anomalies.

Evidence · text

> testing the down plunge extent, shallow sub-crop projections, in-fill drilling of the Lion Zone, and testing of off-hole EM \(BHEM\) anomalies

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (2)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/power-metallic-intercepts-12-54-meters-of-10-99-cueq-at-the-lion-zone-and-11-25m--e8a6a12f-d239-4777-b0c3-fd577a5a783f#fact-drill-facts-0)

Lion Zone · copper

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Lion Zone
- Commodity: copper
- Ticker: PNPN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 10.99
- Grade Unit: % CuEq
- Intercept: 12.54 m

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 10.99
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: 10.99% CuEq over 12.54m is an exceptionally high-grade intercept.

- Positive factor: Exceptional grade

Evidence · text

> 12.54 meters of 10.99% CuEq at the Lion Zone

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/power-metallic-intercepts-12-54-meters-of-10-99-cueq-at-the-lion-zone-and-11-25m--e8a6a12f-d239-4777-b0c3-fd577a5a783f#fact-drill-facts-1)

Nisk East · copper

Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id

#### Identity

- Project: Nisk East
- Commodity: copper
- Ticker: PNPN

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.22
- Grade Unit: % CuEq
- Intercept: 11.25 m

#### Classification

- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Mining Method: unknown

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1.22
- Metal Eq. Unit: % CuEq

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2025-06-04T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate grade intercept at Nisk East.

- Positive factor: Mineralization intercepted

Evidence · text

> 11.25m of 1.22% CuEq at Nisk East

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.