# Positive Beneficiation Test Results from the Channel Sands in U3O8 Corp.'s Laguna Salada Uranium-Vanadium Deposit

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/positive-beneficiation-test-results-from-the-channel-sands-in-u3o8-corp-s-laguna--411b0fd0-718b-44e7-b7a9-fdab37e4abf0

Original source: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/GCOM/news/7794889904957686/positive-beneficiation-test-results-from-the-channel-sands-in-u3o8-corp-s-laguna

Publisher: tmx

Original announcement: 2018-06-27T11:55:21.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: Unknown date

Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date

- Company: U3O8 Corp.

- Ticker: UWE

- Exchange: TSX

- Region: Chubut Province, Argentina

- Primary commodity: Uranium

- Secondary commodities: Vanadium

- Document categories: Metallurgy

- Extracted: 2026-08-21 13:06:25 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

U3O8 Corp. reported successful beneficiation test results for the Laguna Salada uranium-vanadium deposit. The tests demonstrated that screening the channel sands at 0.5mm effectively pre-concentrates uranium and vanadium while rejecting the majority of reagent-consuming gypsum.

Reasoning: Beneficiation tests confirmed that screening at 0.5mm can capture 88% of uranium and 76% of vanadium while rejecting 94% of gypsum, significantly improving potential economics compared to the previous PEA model.

- Positive factor: successful pre-concentration via scrubbing/screening

- Positive factor: effective rejection of reagent-consuming gypsum

- Positive factor: higher metal capture in fine fractions compared to previous gravel model

- Negative factor: high proportion of metals rejected in the finest fraction \(0.01mm\) would reduce revenue

Facts used in scoring: 4

## Classification and evidence

**Free Milling**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: The document describes the sand as 'soft, channel-fill sands' that can be processed via simple scrubbing and screening.

Evidence · text

> beneficiation test work on soft, channel-fill sands

**Mill Route**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Processing via mill or concentrator \(CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation\).

Why it applies: The process involves scrubbing in a rotating drum and vibrating stacked screens.

Evidence · text

> the sand was scrubbed in a rotating drum for two minutes and was run through a set of vibrating stacked screens

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Metallurgical Results (4)

### Fact 1

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/positive-beneficiation-test-results-from-the-channel-sands-in-u3o8-corp-s-laguna--411b0fd0-718b-44e7-b7a9-fdab37e4abf0#fact-metallurgical-facts-0)

uranium

#### Identity

- Commodity: uranium
- Ticker: UWE

#### Test Work

- Sample: raw sand from channel-fill sands

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 88 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test
- Head Grade: 1085
- Head Grade Unit: ppm

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2018-06-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade raw sand \(1085 ppm\) with high recovery potential through beneficiation.

- Positive factor: 88% capture at 0.5mm screening

Evidence · text

> The grade of the raw sand was 1,085 parts per million \("ppm"\) uranium

### Fact 2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/positive-beneficiation-test-results-from-the-channel-sands-in-u3o8-corp-s-laguna--411b0fd0-718b-44e7-b7a9-fdab37e4abf0#fact-metallurgical-facts-1)

vanadium

#### Identity

- Commodity: vanadium
- Ticker: UWE

#### Test Work

- Sample: raw sand from channel-fill sands

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 76 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test
- Head Grade: 610
- Head Grade Unit: ppm

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2018-06-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant vanadium grade in raw sand with high recovery potential through beneficiation.

- Positive factor: 76% capture at 0.5mm screening

Evidence · text

> and 610 ppm vanadium

### Fact 3

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/positive-beneficiation-test-results-from-the-channel-sands-in-u3o8-corp-s-laguna--411b0fd0-718b-44e7-b7a9-fdab37e4abf0#fact-metallurgical-facts-2)

uranium

#### Identity

- Commodity: uranium
- Ticker: UWE

#### Test Work

- Sample: finest component of sand \(&lt;0.01mm\)

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 50 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2018-06-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: While 50% is captured, the high rejection rate in this specific fraction would reduce revenue.

- Negative factor: high proportion of metals rejected

Evidence · text

> 50% of the uranium... is concentrated into the finest component of the sand \(less than 0.01mm diameter grains\)

### Fact 4

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/positive-beneficiation-test-results-from-the-channel-sands-in-u3o8-corp-s-laguna--411b0fd0-718b-44e7-b7a9-fdab37e4abf0#fact-metallurgical-facts-3)

vanadium

#### Identity

- Commodity: vanadium
- Ticker: UWE

#### Test Work

- Sample: finest component of sand \(&lt;0.01mm\)

#### Recovery

- Recovery: 38 %
- Recovery Basis: actual\_test

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2018-06-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Only 38% vanadium capture in the finest fraction is insufficient for revenue maximization.

- Negative factor: high proportion of metals rejected

Evidence · text

> and 38% of its vanadium is concentrated into the finest component of the sand

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
