Positive Beneficiation Test Results from the Channel Sands in U3O8 Corp.'s Laguna Salada Uranium-Vanadium Deposit

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
U3O8 Corp.
Ticker
UWE
Exchange
TSX
Region
Chubut Province, Argentina
Primary commodity
Uranium
Secondary commodities
Vanadium
Document categories
Metallurgy
Extracted
2026-08-21 13:06:25 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

U3O8 Corp. reported successful beneficiation test results for the Laguna Salada uranium-vanadium deposit. The tests demonstrated that screening the channel sands at 0.5mm effectively pre-concentrates uranium and vanadium while rejecting the majority of reagent-consuming gypsum.

Reasoning: Beneficiation tests confirmed that screening at 0.5mm can capture 88% of uranium and 76% of vanadium while rejecting 94% of gypsum, significantly improving potential economics compared to the previous PEA model.

Positive factors

  • successful pre-concentration via scrubbing/screening
  • effective rejection of reagent-consuming gypsum
  • higher metal capture in fine fractions compared to previous gravel model

Negative factors

  • high proportion of metals rejected in the finest fraction (0.01mm) would reduce revenue

Facts used in scoring: 4

Atlas analysis — U3O8 Corp.: Positive Beneficiation Test Results from the Channel Sands in U3O8 Corp.'s Laguna Salada Uranium-Vanadium Deposit. 88% recovery; 76% recovery; 50% recovery

Classification and evidence

Free Millingpositive

Simple, clean ore amenable to standard processing without oxidation.

Why it applies: The document describes the sand as 'soft, channel-fill sands' that can be processed via simple scrubbing and screening.

Evidence · text

“beneficiation test work on soft, channel-fill sands”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: The process involves scrubbing in a rotating drum and vibrating stacked screens.

Evidence · text

“the sand was scrubbed in a rotating drum for two minutes and was run through a set of vibrating stacked screens”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Metallurgical Results (4)

Fact 1uraniumRecovery: 88 %Head Grade: 1085Head Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
uranium
Ticker
UWE

Test Work

Sample
raw sand from channel-fill sands

Recovery

Recovery
88 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
1085
Head Grade Unit
ppm

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2018-06-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High grade raw sand (1085 ppm) with high recovery potential through beneficiation.

Positive factors

  • 88% capture at 0.5mm screening

Evidence · text

“The grade of the raw sand was 1,085 parts per million ("ppm") uranium”
Fact 2vanadiumRecovery: 76 %Head Grade: 610Head Grade Unit: ppmView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
vanadium
Ticker
UWE

Test Work

Sample
raw sand from channel-fill sands

Recovery

Recovery
76 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test
Head Grade
610
Head Grade Unit
ppm

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2018-06-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant vanadium grade in raw sand with high recovery potential through beneficiation.

Positive factors

  • 76% capture at 0.5mm screening

Evidence · text

“and 610 ppm vanadium”
Fact 3uraniumRecovery: 50 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
uranium
Ticker
UWE

Test Work

Sample
finest component of sand (<0.01mm)

Recovery

Recovery
50 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2018-06-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: While 50% is captured, the high rejection rate in this specific fraction would reduce revenue.

Negative factors

  • high proportion of metals rejected

Evidence · text

“50% of the uranium... is concentrated into the finest component of the sand (less than 0.01mm diameter grains)”
Fact 4vanadiumRecovery: 38 %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
vanadium
Ticker
UWE

Test Work

Sample
finest component of sand (<0.01mm)

Recovery

Recovery
38 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2018-06-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Only 38% vanadium capture in the finest fraction is insufficient for revenue maximization.

Negative factors

  • high proportion of metals rejected

Evidence · text

“and 38% of its vanadium is concentrated into the finest component of the sand”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.