PNN: Maiden Exploration Target defined at Morro do Ferro

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Power Minerals Limited
Ticker
PNN
Exchange
ASX
Region
Minas Gerais, Brazil
Primary commodity
Rare earths
Secondary commodities
Magnet rare earth oxides, Gallium, Niobium, Thorium
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-09-22 00:29:37 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Power Minerals Limited has announced a maiden Exploration Target at its Morro do Ferro Rare Earth Project in Brazil, estimating 9.2 to 10.7 million tonnes at 7.8% to 9.2% TREO, including 1.3% to 1.6% MREO. This conceptual target is supported by extensive historical and current drilling, with plans for further work to advance towards a maiden JORC Mineral Resource estimate. The company acknowledges that unassayed drill holes and calculated density assumptions introduce some uncertainty to the estimate.

Reasoning: The company has announced a substantial maiden Exploration Target for rare earths, providing a strong conceptual basis for future resource definition, despite some inherent uncertainties typical of this stage.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Exploration Target defined with significant tonnage and grade ranges.
  • Extensive historical and current drill data supports the model.
  • Verification sampling and twin holes confirm historical assay reliability.
  • Strong geophysical correlation with mineralization.
  • Project has priority status with the Minas Gerais Government.
  • Clear pathway outlined for a potential maiden JORC Mineral Resource estimate.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and appear robust.

Negative factors

  • Exploration Target is conceptual and not a Mineral Resource, with inherent uncertainty.
  • Nine current drill holes remain unassayed, potentially affecting the estimate.
  • Bulk density for high-grade material is calculated, not directly measured.
  • Variography does not fully validate the southern projection.
  • Historical core recovery issues in saprolite not fully analyzed for grade bias.
  • No external audit of sampling techniques or data has been completed.
  • Gallium assay coverage is sparse due to analytical limitations.

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 88

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 88. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (88)

MFSR-03Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-03
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.94
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
33.9 m
From
0 m
To
33.9 m
Hole Depth
100.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-03:0-33.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341717
Northing
7575957
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1535.53 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-02-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.94”

Context: 33.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-03Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-03
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
51.5 m
To
57.5 m
Hole Depth
100.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-03:51.5-57.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341717
Northing
7575957
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1535.53 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-02-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-04Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 3.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 95 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-04
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
3.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
95 m
From
0 m
To
95 m
Hole Depth
100.2 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-04:0-95
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341751
Northing
7575993
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1541.85 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A significant historical intercept that forms part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length and grade for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“3.07”

Context: 95.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-05Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-05
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.3 m
From
19.7 m
To
29 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
19.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-05:19.7-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341788
Northing
7576032
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1543.36 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: 9.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-05Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-05
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
54.3 m
To
56.3 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
19.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-05:54.3-56.3
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341788
Northing
7576032
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1543.36 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.17”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-05Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-05
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.36
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.5 m
From
63.5 m
To
78 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
19.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-05:63.5-78
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341788
Northing
7576032
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1543.36 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.36”

Context: 14.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-05Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-05
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
84 m
To
94 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
19.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-05:84-94
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341788
Northing
7576032
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1543.36 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.49”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-05Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-05
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.3 m
From
99.7 m
To
116 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
19.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-05:99.7-116
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341788
Northing
7576032
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1543.36 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 16.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-05Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-05
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.6 m
From
123.8 m
To
137.4 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
19.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-05:123.8-137.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341788
Northing
7576032
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1543.36 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 13.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-05Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-05
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
161 m
To
163 m
Hole Depth
200 m
Intercept Depth
19.7 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-05:161-163
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341788
Northing
7576032
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1543.36 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-06Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-06
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
16.5 m
To
18.5 m
Hole Depth
100.15 m
Intercept Depth
16.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-06:16.5-18.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341809
Northing
7576062
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1533.05 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-02-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-06Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-06
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
22.6 m
To
24.6 m
Hole Depth
100.15 m
Intercept Depth
16.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-06:22.6-24.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341809
Northing
7576062
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1533.05 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-02-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-06Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-06
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.6 m
From
31.4 m
To
35.9 m
Hole Depth
100.15 m
Intercept Depth
16.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-06:31.4-35.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341809
Northing
7576062
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1533.05 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-02-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 4.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-06Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-06
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.3 m
From
84.3 m
To
88.6 m
Hole Depth
100.15 m
Intercept Depth
16.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-06:84.3-88.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341809
Northing
7576062
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1533.05 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-02-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 4.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-07Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-07
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
From
75 m
To
77.5 m
Hole Depth
200.45 m
Intercept Depth
75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-07:75-77.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341836
Northing
7576102
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1529.42 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-07Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 0.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-07
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
0.99
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8.9 m
From
113.8 m
To
122.7 m
Hole Depth
200.45 m
Intercept Depth
75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-07:113.8-122.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341836
Northing
7576102
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1529.42 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that falls below the stated cut-off after internal dilution, but is included in the dataset.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • Grade is below the stated cut-off after internal dilution.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“0.99”

Context: 8.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-07Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-07
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
192 m
To
198 m
Hole Depth
200.45 m
Intercept Depth
75 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-07:192-198
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341836
Northing
7576102
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1529.42 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-06T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.00”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-09Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-09
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.9 m
From
0 m
To
2.9 m
Hole Depth
100.25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-09:0-2.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341928
Northing
7575999
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1504.6 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-04-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.34”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-09Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-09
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.3 m
From
17.5 m
To
19.8 m
Hole Depth
100.25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-09:17.5-19.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341928
Northing
7575999
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1504.6 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-04-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.11”

Context: 2.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-09Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 34.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-09
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
0.93
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
34.2 m
From
39.3 m
To
73.5 m
Hole Depth
100.25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-09:39.3-73.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341928
Northing
7575999
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1504.6 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-04-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that falls below the stated cut-off after internal dilution, but is included in the dataset.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • Grade is below the stated cut-off after internal dilution.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“0.93”

Context: 34.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-09Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-09
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
From
79.5 m
To
82 m
Hole Depth
100.25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-09:79.5-82
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341928
Northing
7575999
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1504.6 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-04-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.13”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-10Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 5.72Grade Unit: %Intercept: 86 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-10
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
5.72
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
86 m
From
0 m
To
86 m
Hole Depth
100.44 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-10:0-86
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341856
Northing
7575929
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1530.55 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong historical intercept that forms a key part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • High grade and significant intercept length for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“5.72”

Context: 86.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-11Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-11
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.1 m
From
0 m
To
2.1 m
Hole Depth
100.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-11:0-2.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341783
Northing
7575861
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1523.76 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 2.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-11Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-11
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.3 m
From
16.9 m
To
23.2 m
Hole Depth
100.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-11:16.9-23.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341783
Northing
7575861
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1523.76 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 6.3

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-12Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 3.47Grade Unit: %Intercept: 40.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-12
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
3.47
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
40.5 m
From
17.5 m
To
58 m
Hole Depth
100 m
Intercept Depth
17.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-12:17.5-58
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342107
Northing
7575836
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1437.48 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A significant historical intercept that forms part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length and grade for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“3.47”

Context: 40.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-13Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 2.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 24.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-13
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
2.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
24.4 m
From
25.1 m
To
49.6 m
Hole Depth
100.95 m
Intercept Depth
25.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-13:25.1-49.6
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342032
Northing
7575765
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1450.15 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“2.32”

Context: 24.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-13Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-13
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
63 m
To
65 m
Hole Depth
100.95 m
Intercept Depth
25.1 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-13:63-65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342032
Northing
7575765
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1450.15 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-14Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 2.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-14
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
2.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3.4 m
From
0 m
To
3.4 m
Hole Depth
100.5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-14:0-3.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341963
Northing
7575700
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1441.21 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-23T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“2.74”

Context: 3.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-14Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-14
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.1 m
From
87.9 m
To
90 m
Hole Depth
100.5 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-14:87.9-90
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341963
Northing
7575700
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1441.21 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-23T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.15”

Context: 2.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-15Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 2.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-15
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
2.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
90 m
To
92 m
Hole Depth
100.6 m
Intercept Depth
90 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-15:90-92
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341758
Northing
7576173
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1477.37 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-23T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“2.75”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-16Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-16
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.56
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
10 m
From
4 m
To
14 m
Hole Depth
100.95 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-16:4-14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341688
Northing
7576108
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1494.92 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.56”

Context: 10.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-16Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 0.95Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-16
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
0.95
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.4 m
From
19.7 m
To
29 m
Hole Depth
100.95 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-16:19.7-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341688
Northing
7576108
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1494.92 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that falls below the stated cut-off after internal dilution, but is included in the dataset.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • Grade is below the stated cut-off after internal dilution.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“0.95”

Context: 9.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-16Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-16
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19 m
From
35 m
To
54 m
Hole Depth
100.95 m
Intercept Depth
4 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-16:35-54
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341688
Northing
7576108
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1494.92 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that falls below the stated cut-off after internal dilution, but is included in the dataset.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • Grade is below the stated cut-off after internal dilution.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 19.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-17Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-17
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.4 m
From
0 m
To
18.4 m
Hole Depth
100.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-17:0-18.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341618
Northing
7576042
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1486.28 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-03-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: 18.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-18Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 3.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 29 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-18
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
3.34
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
29 m
From
0 m
To
29 m
Hole Depth
100.25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-18:0-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341940
Northing
7575813
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1480.31 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-04-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A significant historical intercept that forms part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length and grade for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“3.34”

Context: 29.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-18Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-18
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
36 m
To
38 m
Hole Depth
100.25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-18:36-38
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341940
Northing
7575813
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1480.31 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-04-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-18Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-18
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
50.5 m
To
54.5 m
Hole Depth
100.25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-18:50.5-54.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341940
Northing
7575813
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1480.31 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-04-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-18Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-18
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m
From
60.5 m
To
72.5 m
Hole Depth
100.25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-18:60.5-72.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341940
Northing
7575813
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1480.31 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2012-04-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-19Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 5.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-19
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
5.5 m
From
2 m
To
7.5 m
Hole Depth
40.85 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-19:2-7.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342000
Northing
7575730
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1448.36 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: 5.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-19Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-19
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
26 m
To
28 m
Hole Depth
40.85 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-19:26-28
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342000
Northing
7575730
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1448.36 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-10T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-20Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 7.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 58.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-20
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
7.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
58.5 m
From
0 m
To
58.5 m
Hole Depth
60.6 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-20:0-58.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342072
Northing
7575803
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1438.09 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong historical intercept that forms a key part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • High grade and significant intercept length for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“7.26”

Context: 58.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-21Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-21
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
16 m
To
18 m
Hole Depth
65.95 m
Intercept Depth
16 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-21:16-18
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342141
Northing
7575871
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1429.1 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-22Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-22
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.5 m
From
9.5 m
To
14 m
Hole Depth
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
9.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-22:9.5-14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342038
Northing
7575848
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1455.81 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.05”

Context: 4.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-22Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-22
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.68
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9 m
From
22 m
To
31 m
Hole Depth
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
9.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-22:22-31
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342038
Northing
7575848
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1455.81 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.68”

Context: 9.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-22Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 33.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-22
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
33.1 m
From
37 m
To
70.1 m
Hole Depth
70.1 m
Intercept Depth
9.5 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-22:37-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342038
Northing
7575848
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1455.81 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.75”

Context: 33.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-23Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.22Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-23
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.22
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
0 m
To
11 m
Hole Depth
60 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-23:0-11
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342001
Northing
7575813
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1465.71 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.22”

Context: 11.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-23Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-23
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.86
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6.4 m
From
16.6 m
To
23 m
Hole Depth
60 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-23:16.6-23
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342001
Northing
7575813
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1465.71 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.86”

Context: 6.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-23Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-23
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.42
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.6 m
From
33 m
To
35.7 m
Hole Depth
60 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-23:33-35.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342001
Northing
7575813
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1465.71 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.42”

Context: 2.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-23Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-23
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.37
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
40 m
To
44 m
Hole Depth
60 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-23:40-44
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342001
Northing
7575813
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1465.71 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.37”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-23Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-23
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.5 m
From
48.2 m
To
50.7 m
Hole Depth
60 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-23:48.2-50.7
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
342001
Northing
7575813
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1465.71 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 2.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-24Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.88Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-24
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.88
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16 m
From
0 m
To
16 m
Hole Depth
50.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-24:0-16
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341966
Northing
7575776
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1469.18 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.88”

Context: 16.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-24Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-24
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
26 m
To
30 m
Hole Depth
50.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-24:26-30
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341966
Northing
7575776
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1469.18 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.16”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-24Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-24
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.9 m
From
41 m
To
50.9 m
Hole Depth
50.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-24:41-50.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341966
Northing
7575776
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1469.18 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-10-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.29”

Context: 9.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-25Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-25
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
60 m
From
0 m
To
60 m
Hole Depth
60 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-25:0-60
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341965
Northing
7575847
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1479.68 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.66”

Context: 60.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-26Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 4.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-26
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
4.79
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.2 m
From
0 m
To
14.2 m
Hole Depth
50.05 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-26:0-14.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341895
Northing
7575775
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1476.19 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong historical intercept that forms a key part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • High grade for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“4.79”

Context: 14.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-27Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 70.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-27
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.82
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
70.1 m
From
0 m
To
70.1 m
Hole Depth
70.05 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-27:0-70.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341935
Northing
7575880
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1493.68 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-21T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.82”

Context: 70.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-28Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-28
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14.5 m
From
0 m
To
14.5 m
Hole Depth
60.75 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-28:0-14.5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341901
Northing
7575842
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1497.35 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.85”

Context: 14.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-28Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-28
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.82
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8 m
From
24 m
To
32 m
Hole Depth
60.75 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-28:24-32
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341901
Northing
7575842
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1497.35 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.82”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-28Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-28
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.64
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.8 m
From
42 m
To
60.8 m
Hole Depth
60.75 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-28:42-60.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341901
Northing
7575842
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1497.35 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.64”

Context: 18.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-29Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 4.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 16.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-29
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
4.85
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
16.9 m
From
0 m
To
16.9 m
Hole Depth
41 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-29:0-16.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341865
Northing
7575811
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1495.25 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-25T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong historical intercept that forms a key part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • High grade for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“4.85”

Context: 16.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-30Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-30
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.83
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
32 m
From
0 m
To
32 m
Hole Depth
80.75 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-30:0-32
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341939
Northing
7575946
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1496.35 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.83”

Context: 32.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-30Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-30
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
46 m
To
52 m
Hole Depth
80.75 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-30:46-52
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341939
Northing
7575946
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1496.35 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-30Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-30
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8 m
From
64 m
To
72 m
Hole Depth
80.75 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-30:64-72
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341939
Northing
7575946
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1496.35 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-19T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-31Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 3.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 89 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-31
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
3.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
89 m
From
0 m
To
89 m
Hole Depth
90.9 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-31:0-89
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341902
Northing
7575909
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1501.8 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-27T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A significant historical intercept that forms part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • Significant intercept length and grade for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“3.04”

Context: 89.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-32Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 4.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-32
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
4.66
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
68 m
From
0 m
To
68 m
Hole Depth
70.7 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-32:0-68
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341866
Northing
7575874
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1516.98 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-28T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong historical intercept that forms a key part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • High grade and significant intercept length for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“4.66”

Context: 68.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-33Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 2.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 26 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-33
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
2.82
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
26 m
From
0 m
To
26 m
Hole Depth
30.25 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-33:0-26
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341832
Northing
7575841
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1500.41 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-25T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“2.82”

Context: 26.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-34Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-34
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.64
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4.9 m
From
0 m
To
4.9 m
Hole Depth
110.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-34:0-4.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341889
Northing
7575964
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1521.46 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.64”

Context: 4.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-34Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-34
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
6 m
From
9 m
To
15 m
Hole Depth
110.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-34:9-15
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341889
Northing
7575964
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1521.46 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.23”

Context: 6.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-34Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 88.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-34
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
88.1 m
From
22 m
To
110.1 m
Hole Depth
110.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-34:22-110.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341889
Northing
7575964
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1521.46 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 88.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-35Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 8.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 60.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-35
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
8.92
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
60.9 m
From
0 m
To
60.9 m
Hole Depth
60.85 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-35:0-60.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341821
Northing
7575893
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1529.35 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-25T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A very strong historical intercept that forms a key part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • Very high grade and significant intercept length for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“8.92”

Context: 60.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-36Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 3.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 100 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-36
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
3.98
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
100 m
From
0 m
To
100.1 m
Hole Depth
100.05 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-36:0-100.1
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341815
Northing
7575970
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1546.06 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong historical intercept that forms a key part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • High grade and significant intercept length for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“3.98”

Context: 100.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-37Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-37
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
0 m
To
2 m
Hole Depth
120.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-37:0-2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341850
Northing
7576005
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1539.18 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-37Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-37
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
17 m
To
19 m
Hole Depth
120.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-37:17-19
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341850
Northing
7576005
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1539.18 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-37Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 48.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-37
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
48.8 m
From
34.2 m
To
83 m
Hole Depth
120.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-37:34.2-83
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341850
Northing
7576005
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1539.18 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 48.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-37Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-37
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m
From
91 m
To
103 m
Hole Depth
120.1 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-37:91-103
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341850
Northing
7576005
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1539.18 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-18T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.53”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-38Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 5.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 68 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-38
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
5.01
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
68 m
From
0 m
To
68 m
Hole Depth
80.3 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-38:0-68
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341781
Northing
7575933
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1542.94 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-13T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A strong historical intercept that forms a key part of the data supporting the exploration target.

Positive factors

  • High grade and significant intercept length for a historical result.
  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“5.01”

Context: 68.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-39Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-39
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.9 m
From
0 m
To
2.9 m
Hole Depth
90.65 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-39:0-2.9
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341771
Northing
7576014
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1532.68 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: 2.9

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-39Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-39
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13 m
From
14 m
To
27 m
Hole Depth
90.65 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-39:14-27
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341771
Northing
7576014
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1532.68 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: 13.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-39Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.32Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-39
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.32
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8 m
From
33 m
To
41 m
Hole Depth
90.65 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-39:33-41
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341771
Northing
7576014
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1532.68 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.32”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-39Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-39
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12 m
From
47 m
To
59 m
Hole Depth
90.65 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-39:47-59
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341771
Northing
7576014
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1532.68 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.18”

Context: 12.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-39Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 14 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-39
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
14 m
From
71 m
To
85 m
Hole Depth
90.65 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-39:71-85
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341771
Northing
7576014
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1532.68 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.44”

Context: 14.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-40Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 2.99Grade Unit: %Intercept: 65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-40
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
2.99
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
65 m
From
0 m
To
65 m
Hole Depth
70.75 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-40:0-65
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341733
Northing
7575977
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1527.93 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“2.99”

Context: 65.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-41Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 12.4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-41
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
12.4 m
From
0 m
To
12.4 m
Hole Depth
60.15 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-41:0-12.4
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341707
Northing
7576036
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1525.89 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.90”

Context: 12.4

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-41Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-41
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
31 m
To
35 m
Hole Depth
60.15 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-41:31-35
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341707
Northing
7576036
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1525.89 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.20”

Context: 4.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-41Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 20.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-41
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
20.2 m
From
40 m
To
60.2 m
Hole Depth
60.15 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-41:40-60.2
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341707
Northing
7576036
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1525.89 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-05T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.67”

Context: 20.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-42Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-42
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m
From
27 m
To
29 m
Hole Depth
80.55 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-42:27-29
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341742
Northing
7576071
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1525.43 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.19”

Context: 2.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-42Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-42
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.8 m
From
40 m
To
42.8 m
Hole Depth
80.55 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-42:40-42.8
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341742
Northing
7576071
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1525.43 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.26”

Context: 2.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

MFSR-42Morro do Ferro · rare_earthsGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
MFSR-42
Project
Morro do Ferro
Commodity
rare_earths
Region
brazil
Reported Region
brazil
Ticker
PNN

Geometry

Grade
1.49
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
8 m
From
47 m
To
55 m
Hole Depth
80.55 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill
Group ID
MFSR-42:47-55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Easting
341742
Northing
7576071
CRS
WGS84 UTM Zone 23S
EPSG
32723
Elevation
1525.43 m
Azimuth
226 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
SGS Geosol
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
1
Cutoff Unit
%
Dilution Disclosed
Yes
Max Dilution
4 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2014-11-07T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A historical intercept that contributes to the overall dataset for the exploration target, but is not new information.

Positive factors

  • Intercept contributes to the overall understanding of the deposit.
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Result is historical and not new information.
  • True width is not known.

Evidence · table

“1.49”

Context: 8.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Compositing Transparentpositive

Cut-off grade and internal dilution rules are clearly stated for reported intervals.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade and internal dilution are both stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "Independent descriptions of the deposit geometry are consistent with the Company’s drilling: Wedow (1967) mapped a lenti"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.