# Paradigm Gold Reports on Initial Results from 2026 Exploration Program on the Swift-Katie Property, BC and on Corporate Holdings Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/paradigm-gold-reports-on-initial-results-from-2026-exploration-program-on-the-sw--8cf52b93-f412-4ef3-a193-2933905a4ced Original source: https://orestocks.com/company/PDQ.V/press-releases/5596358382724985 Publisher: orestocks Original announcement: 2026-08-24T11:30:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: Unknown date Atlas analysis updated: Unknown date - Company: Paradigm Gold Corporation - Ticker: PDQ.V - Exchange: Unavailable - Region: British Columbia - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Silver, Copper, Lead, Zinc, Nickel, Tungsten, Bismuth, Arsenic - Document categories: Drill results, Other - Extracted: 2026-08-24 12:10:54 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.60 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Paradigm Gold has completed a Phase I soil sampling program at the Swift-Katie property in BC. Results confirmed and extended gold-in-soil anomalies at the Swift target and identified a new, large polymetallic anomaly at the Allouez target. Reasoning: Successful soil sampling program confirmed existing anomalies and identified a new large-scale polymetallic target, though lacks direct drill-hole validation. - Positive factor: extension of gold-in-soil anomaly at Swift target - Positive factor: delineation of new polymetallic anomaly at Allouez target - Positive factor: presence of critical elements \(Ni, W\) supportive of porphyry/skarn - Negative factor: results are soil sampling, not drill intercepts - Negative factor: historical data mentioned is unverified Facts used in scoring: 5 ## Classification and evidence **Step-Out Extension** Polarity: positive Definition: Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit. Why it applies: Soil sampling extended the gold-in-soil anomaly a further 500m to the northeast. Evidence · text > extended the gold-in-soil anomaly a further 500m to the northeast **Nearology Play** Polarity: neutral Definition: Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results. Why it applies: The company highlights the proximity to the historic Rossland Mining Camp. Evidence · text > similarity to styles of mineralization identified in the historic Rossland Mining Camp ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 5. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (5) ### Fact 1 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/paradigm-gold-reports-on-initial-results-from-2026-exploration-program-on-the-sw--8cf52b93-f412-4ef3-a193-2933905a4ced#fact-drill-facts-0) gold Historical result Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Commodity: gold - Ticker: PDQ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 3.1 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 8.6 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill - Group ID: historical:TR19 #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2017-09-07T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical drill intercept restated from 2017 release. - Positive factor: solid grade and width - Negative factor: historical data ### Fact 2 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/paradigm-gold-reports-on-initial-results-from-2026-exploration-program-on-the-sw--8cf52b93-f412-4ef3-a193-2933905a4ced#fact-drill-facts-1) copper Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Commodity: copper - Ticker: PDQ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.19 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 101.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Significant width copper intercept from company drilling at Katie target. - Positive factor: significant width ### Fact 3 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/paradigm-gold-reports-on-initial-results-from-2026-exploration-program-on-the-sw--8cf52b93-f412-4ef3-a193-2933905a4ced#fact-drill-facts-2) gold Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Commodity: gold - Ticker: PDQ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.12 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 101.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Gold grade is marginal within a large copper intercept. - Negative factor: low grade ### Fact 4 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/paradigm-gold-reports-on-initial-results-from-2026-exploration-program-on-the-sw--8cf52b93-f412-4ef3-a193-2933905a4ced#fact-drill-facts-3) copper Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Commodity: copper - Ticker: PDQ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.43 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 12.8 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Higher grade sub-interval within the VKT08-069 hole. - Positive factor: higher grade sub-interval ### Fact 5 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/paradigm-gold-reports-on-initial-results-from-2026-exploration-program-on-the-sw--8cf52b93-f412-4ef3-a193-2933905a4ced#fact-drill-facts-4) gold Needs review: drill\_no\_hole\_id #### Identity - Commodity: gold - Ticker: PDQ.V #### Geometry - Grade: 0.15 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 12.8 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: drill\_no\_hole\_id - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Gold grade is marginal within a higher grade copper sub-interval. - Negative factor: low grade ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.