Pacific Ridge Intersects 154.7 m of 0.63% Copper Equivalent or 0.94 g/t Gold Equivalent; Expands Mineralization 270 m to the Northwest

Reasoning: This is a high-grade but very narrow historical intercept, providing limited new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: This long, strong historical intercept confirms previous findings but offers no new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: This exceptional grade historical sub-interval highlights a high-quality zone but is not new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: This exceptional grade historical sub-interval highlights a high-quality zone but is not new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: This strong grade historical sub-interval confirms a mineralized zone but is not new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: This moderate grade historical sub-interval confirms a mineralized zone but is not new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: This exceptional grade historical sub-interval highlights a high-quality zone but is not new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: This exceptional grade historical sub-interval highlights a high-quality zone but is not new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: The intercept of 154.7 m at 0.63% CuEq is a long, strong grade for a porphyry deposit, contributing significantly to the project's potential and expanding known mineralization. However, the lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: The sub-interval of 86.0 m at 0.97% CuEq represents a high-grade zone within the broader intercept, enhancing the overall economic potential. However, the lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: The sub-interval of 44.0 m at 1.26% CuEq is an exceptional grade for a porphyry deposit, indicating a very high-quality zone. However, the lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: The intercept of 148.0 m at 0.37% CuEq is a long, moderate grade for a porphyry deposit, confirming mineralization continuity. However, the lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: The sub-interval of 66.5 m at 0.57% CuEq shows a stronger grade zone within the broader intercept. However, the lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: The sub-interval of 44.0 m at 0.69% CuEq is a strong grade for a porphyry deposit. However, the lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: The intercept of 130.8 m at 0.47% CuEq is a moderate grade over a significant length, notably expanding mineralization 270 m to the northwest. However, the lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: The sub-interval of 82.0 m at 0.59% CuEq shows a strong grade zone within the broader intercept, further supporting the expansion of mineralization. However, the lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: The sub-interval of 19.4 m at 0.69% CuEq is a strong grade for a porphyry deposit, contributing to the expanded mineralization footprint. However, the lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: This long, exceptional grade historical intercept confirms previous findings but offers no new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: This strong grade historical intercept confirms previous findings but offers no new information. The lack of metallurgical testwork and undisclosed cut-off grade add uncertainty.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.9 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 2.5 %·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.71 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 178.2 %·m is strong.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 153.9 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.87 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 757.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.76 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 85.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 96.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.16 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 354.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.66 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 89.0 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.74 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 99.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.78 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 375.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 15.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.37 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.1 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 38.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 138.5 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.05 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 38.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.97 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 35.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 199.1 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.69 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 44.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 37.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.39 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 216.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.42 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 65.0 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.29 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 44.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.95 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 301.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.61 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 52.5 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.49 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 42.1 g/t·m is moderate.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.93 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 252.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.81 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 35.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.62 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 27.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.24 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 186.6 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.31 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 45.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.09 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 13.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.28 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 189.4 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 29.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.16 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 10.6 g/t·m is weak.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.91 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 127.0 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.56 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 24.6 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.18 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 7.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.09 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 92.0 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 39.2 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.24 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 31.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.34 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 175.3 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.35 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 28.7 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.34 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 27.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.6 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 131.2 g/t·m is below.

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.45 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 8.7 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.33 g/t gold is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 6.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).