Pacific Ridge Intersects 112.2 m of 1.35% Copper Equivalent or 2.02 g/t Gold Equivalent at the RDP Copper-Gold Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd.
- Ticker
- PEX
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Silver
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 05:25:55 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Pacific Ridge Exploration reported a significant drill intercept of 112.2 m at 1.35% CuEq (2.02 g/t AuEq) at the RDP project in British Columbia. This result represents the best copper-equivalent intercept recorded at the project to date and confirms the tabular geometry of the porphyry mineralization.
Reasoning: The announcement reports a new high-grade, wide copper-equivalent intercept that surpasses the previous project record, confirming the continuity of the porphyry system.
Positive factors
- best CuEq intercept ever recorded at RDP
- significant width of 112.2m
- high-grade sub-intervals reported
- confirmed porphyry geometry
Negative factors
- no metallurgical recovery testing performed to date
- metal equivalent based on estimated recoveries
Facts used in scoring: 39
Classification and evidence
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The intercept extends mineralization to the north of RDP-22-005 by a minimum of 35m.
Evidence · text
“extending mineralization to the north of RDP-22-005 by a minimum of 35m”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: Release includes detailed QA/QC protocols, including blanks, standards, and duplicates, and names ALS Global Laboratories.
Evidence · text
“Blanks and commercially certified reference materials were inserted blind into the sample stream”
Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative
Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.
Why it applies: The CuEq and AuEq calculations are based on estimated recoveries (80% Cu, 60% Au, 60% Ag) rather than actual metallurgical test work.
Evidence · text
“There has been no metallurgical recovery testing on RDP mineralization. The Company estimates copper recoveries (CuR) of 80%”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 39. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (39)
RDP-25-11RDP · copperGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 112.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-11
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 112.2 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 117 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-11:4.8-117.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong copper intercept in a porphyry system.
Positive factors
- wide intercept
- high grade for porphyry
RDP-25-11RDP · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 112.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-11
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 112.2 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 117 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-11:4.8-117.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Supporting gold grade in a polymetallic intercept.
Positive factors
- consistent with CuEq
RDP-25-11RDP · silverGrade: 3.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 112.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-11
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 112.2 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 117 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-11:4.8-117.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Trace silver component.
RDP-25-11RDP · copperGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-11
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-11:346.0-365.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong high-grade intercept within the larger hole.
Positive factors
- high grade sub-interval
RDP-25-11RDP · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-11
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-11:346.0-365.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Strong high-grade sub-interval.
Positive factors
- high grade sub-interval
RDP-25-11RDP · silverGrade: 8.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-11
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-11:346.0-365.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Elevated silver in high-grade zone.
RDP-25-10RDP · copperGrade: 0.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-10
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.9
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 2.2 m
- To
- 5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-10:2.2-5.0
- Mining Method
- open_pit
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- blanks, standards, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Near-surface intercept.
Negative factors
- narrow width
RDP-25-10RDP · goldGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-10
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 2.2 m
- To
- 5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-10:2.2-5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.71 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.71 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: RDP-25-10
RDP-25-10RDP · silverGrade: 3.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-10
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.8 m
- From
- 2.2 m
- To
- 5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-10:2.2-5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.12 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 3.12 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.12”
Context: RDP-25-10
RDP-25-11RDP · copperGrade: 0.44Grade Unit: %Intercept: 405 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-11
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.44
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 405 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 409.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-11:4.8-409.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.44 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 178.2 %·m is strong.
Positive factors
- 0.44 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.44”
Context: RDP-25-11
RDP-25-11RDP · goldGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 405 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-11
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 405 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 409.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-11:4.8-409.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.38 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 153.9 g/t·m is strong (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.38 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.38”
Context: RDP-25-11
RDP-25-11RDP · silverGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 405 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- RDP-25-11
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.87
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 405 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 409.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- RDP-25-11:4.8-409.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.87 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 757.4 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.87”
Context: RDP-25-11
includesRDP · copperGrade: 1.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 22.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 22.2 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:4.8-27
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.49 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 33.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.49 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.49”
Context: includes
includesRDP · goldGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.2 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:4.8-27
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 22.2 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.00”
Context: includes
includesRDP · silverGrade: 5.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 22.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 22.2 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 27 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:4.8-27
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.86 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 130.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.86 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.86”
Context: includes
andRDP · copperGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 112.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.76
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 112.2 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 117 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:4.8-117
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.76 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 85.3 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.76 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.76”
Context: and
andRDP · goldGrade: 0.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 112.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.86
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 112.2 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 117 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:4.8-117
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.86 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 96.5 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.86 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.86”
Context: and
andRDP · silverGrade: 3.16Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 112.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.16
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 112.2 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 117 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:4.8-117
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.16 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 354.6 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.16”
Context: and
andRDP · copperGrade: 0.66Grade Unit: %Intercept: 134.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.66
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 134.9 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 139.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:4.8-139.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-10-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.66 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 89.0 %·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.66 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.66”
Context: and
andRDP · goldGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 134.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.74
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 134.9 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 139.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:4.8-139.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.74 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 99.8 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.74 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.74”
Context: and
andRDP · silverGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 134.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.78
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 134.9 m
- From
- 4.8 m
- To
- 139.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:4.8-139.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.78 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 375.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“2.78”
Context: and
andRDP · copperGrade: 0.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 117 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:85-117
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.87 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 27.8 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.87 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: and
andRDP · goldGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.73
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 117 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:85-117
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.73 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 55.4 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.73 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.73”
Context: and
andRDP · silverGrade: 4.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 85 m
- To
- 117 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:85-117
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.05 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 129.6 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 4.05 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“4.05”
Context: and
includesRDP · copperGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 38 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 194 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:156-194
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2022-10-25T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.4 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 15.2 %·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.4 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: includes
includesRDP · goldGrade: 0.23Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.23
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 194 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:156-194
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.23 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 8.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.23”
Context: includes
includesRDP · silverGrade: 1.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 38 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 38 m
- From
- 156 m
- To
- 194 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:156-194
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.37 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 52.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.37 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.37”
Context: includes
andRDP · copperGrade: 0.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 127.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.3
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 127.1 m
- From
- 150.9 m
- To
- 278 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:150.9-278
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.3 % copper is moderate against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 38.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.30”
Context: and
andRDP · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 127.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 127.1 m
- From
- 150.9 m
- To
- 278 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:150.9-278
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.12 g/t gold is weak against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 15.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: and
andRDP · silverGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 127.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 127.1 m
- From
- 150.9 m
- To
- 278 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:150.9-278
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 138.5 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 1.09 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: and
includesRDP · copperGrade: 1.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 37 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 37 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 383 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:346-383
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.05 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 38.9 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.05 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.05”
Context: includes
includesRDP · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 37 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 383 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:346-383
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.97 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 35.9 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.97 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.97”
Context: includes
includesRDP · silverGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 37 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- includes
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.38
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 37 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 383 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- includes:346-383
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.38 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 199.1 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 5.38 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“5.38”
Context: includes
andRDP · copperGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:346-365
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.53 % copper is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 29.1 %·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.53 % copper is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.53”
Context: and
andRDP · goldGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:346-365
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.63 g/t gold is exceptional against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 31.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 1.63 g/t gold is exceptional on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“1.63”
Context: and
andRDP · silverGrade: 8.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 8.17
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 365 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:346-365
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 8.17 g/t silver is below against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 155.2 g/t·m is below.
Negative factors
- 8.17 g/t silver is below the weak threshold (30 g/t) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“8.17”
Context: and
andRDP · copperGrade: 0.69Grade Unit: %Intercept: 63.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.69
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 63.8 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 409.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:346-409.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.69 % copper is strong against the porphyry deposit band [0.8, 0.4, 0.25, 0.15] %. Grade×width 44.0 %·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.69 % copper is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.69”
Context: and
andRDP · goldGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 63.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 63.8 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 409.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:346-409.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.58 g/t gold is strong against the porphyry deposit band [1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.15] g/t. Grade×width 37.0 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).
Positive factors
- 0.58 g/t gold is strong on the porphyry deposit band.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: and
andRDP · silverGrade: 3.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 63.8 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- and
- Project
- RDP
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- British Columbia
- Ticker
- PEX
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.39
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 63.8 m
- From
- 346 m
- To
- 409.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- porphyry
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- and:346-409.8
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-10-16T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.39 g/t silver is weak against the default band [500, 200, 100, 30] g/t. Grade×width 216.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is below; the better of the two is used).
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“3.39”
Context: and
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.