P2 Gold Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell

Original announcement by cnw on

Company
P2 Gold Inc.
Ticker
PGLD
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Nevada
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-14 09:24:09 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

P2 Gold announced drill results from six RC holes at its Gabbs Project in Nevada, extending gold-copper mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The drilling also identified a new hanging wall gold-copper unit within the Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) pit shell, which could reduce the strip ratio and enhance project economics. These results will be incorporated into an updated Mineral Resource estimate, targeted for completion later this quarter, to support a feasibility study expected in Q1 2027.

Reasoning: P2 Gold's latest drill results from the Gabbs Project extend gold-copper mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone and identify a new mineralized unit within the existing PEA pit shell. This new unit has the potential to reduce the strip ratio and improve project economics, adding significant novelty and materiality to the ongoing feasibility study. While individual gold and copper grades are moderate to weak compared to project averages and porphyry benchmarks, the strategic implications of the extension and new discovery are positive. QA/QC procedures are well-disclosed and a Qualified Person has signed off on the results.

Positive factors

  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio and improve project economics
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • True width not determined for intercepts

Facts used in scoring: 28

Classification and evidence

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drill holes GBR-131 to GBR-133 and GBR-138 to GBR-140 were drilled to test the gold-copper mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone, extending beyond previously known limits.

Evidence · text

“drilled on the downdip extension of the Sullivan Zone”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details that samples were prepared and analyzed by ALS Global, with specific methods (multi-digestion, ICP, fire assay) and QA/QC protocols including blanks, standards, and field duplicates.

Evidence · text

“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project and has reviewed, verified, and approved the scientific and technical information.

Evidence · text

“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project. Mr. McNaughton has reviewed, verified, and approved the scientific and technical information in this news release.”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that true thickness is yet to be determined for the reported intervals.

Evidence · text

“True thickness to be determined.”

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The drill results are intended to support an updated Mineral Resource estimate which will form the basis of a feasibility study, following a positive preliminary economic assessment (PEA).

Evidence · text

“The updated Mineral Resource Estimate will form the basis of a feasibility study on placing Gabbs in production, which is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2027.”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The company states that an updated Mineral Resource estimate is targeted for completion later this quarter, incorporating the new drill results.

Evidence · text

“On completion of drilling, an updated Mineral Resource estimate will be prepared for Gabbs, which is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 28. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (28)

GBR-131Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 71.63 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-131
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
71.63 m
From
92.96 m
To
164.59 m
Intercept Depth
92.96 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-131:92.96-164.59
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417453
Northing
4292555
Azimuth
-900 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone, contributing to the overall positive program. The grade is moderate for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 71.63

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-131Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 71.63 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-131
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
71.63 m
From
92.96 m
To
164.59 m
Intercept Depth
92.96 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-131:92.96-164.59
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417453
Northing
4292555
Azimuth
-900 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for porphyry copper
  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 71.63

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-131Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-131
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
19.81 m
From
175.26 m
To
195.07 m
Intercept Depth
92.96 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-131:175.26-195.07
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417453
Northing
4292555
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is at the weak threshold for an open-pit porphyry setting and close to the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Grade at weak open-pit threshold
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.42”

Context: 19.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-131Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.81 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-131
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
19.81 m
From
175.26 m
To
195.07 m
Intercept Depth
92.96 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-131:175.26-195.07
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417453
Northing
4292555
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is at the weak threshold for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Grade at weak open-pit porphyry threshold
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 19.81

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-132Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-132
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
32 m
From
117.35 m
To
149.35 m
Intercept Depth
117.35 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-132:117.35-149.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417386
Northing
4292653
Azimuth
-7545 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is at the weak threshold for an open-pit porphyry setting and close to the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Grade at weak open-pit threshold
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.40”

Context: 32.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-132Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-132
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
32 m
From
117.35 m
To
149.35 m
Intercept Depth
117.35 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-132:117.35-149.35
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417386
Northing
4292653
Azimuth
-7545 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for porphyry copper
  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 32.00

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-132Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-132
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27.43 m
From
158.5 m
To
185.93 m
Intercept Depth
117.35 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-132:158.5-185.93
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417386
Northing
4292653
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for open-pit porphyry
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 27.43

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-132Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.43 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-132
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
27.43 m
From
158.5 m
To
185.93 m
Intercept Depth
117.35 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-132:158.5-185.93
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417386
Northing
4292653
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is at the weak threshold for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Grade at weak open-pit porphyry threshold
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 27.43

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-133Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 70.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-133
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
70.1 m
From
64.01 m
To
134.11 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-133:64.01-134.11
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417386
Northing
4292653
Azimuth
-75225 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is moderate for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 70.10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-133Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 70.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-133
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
70.1 m
From
64.01 m
To
134.11 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-133:64.01-134.11
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417386
Northing
4292653
Azimuth
-75225 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is at the weak threshold for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Grade at weak open-pit porphyry threshold
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.18”

Context: 70.10

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-133Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-133
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
59.44 m
From
198.12 m
To
257.56 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-133:198.12-257.56
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417386
Northing
4292653
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for open-pit porphyry
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 59.44

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-133Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 59.44 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-133
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
59.44 m
From
198.12 m
To
257.56 m
Intercept Depth
64.01 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-133:198.12-257.56
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417386
Northing
4292653
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for porphyry copper
  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 59.44

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-138Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-138
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18.29 m
From
141.73 m
To
160.02 m
Intercept Depth
141.73 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-138:141.73-160.02
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Azimuth
-900 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for open-pit porphyry
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 18.29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-138Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.29 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-138
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
18.29 m
From
141.73 m
To
160.02 m
Intercept Depth
141.73 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-138:141.73-160.02
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Azimuth
-900 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is at the weak threshold for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Grade at weak open-pit porphyry threshold
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 18.29

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-138Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-138
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13.72 m
From
208.79 m
To
222.5 m
Intercept Depth
141.73 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-138:208.79-222.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for open-pit porphyry
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 13.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-138Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-138
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
13.72 m
From
208.79 m
To
222.5 m
Intercept Depth
141.73 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-138:208.79-222.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is very weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Very weak grade for porphyry copper
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 13.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-138Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-138
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.45
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9.14 m
From
234.7 m
To
243.84 m
Intercept Depth
141.73 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-138:234.7-243.84
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is above the weak threshold for an open-pit porphyry setting and close to the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Grade above weak open-pit threshold
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.45”

Context: 9.14

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-138Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.14 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-138
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
9.14 m
From
234.7 m
To
243.84 m
Intercept Depth
141.73 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-138:234.7-243.84
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is very weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Very weak grade for porphyry copper
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.08”

Context: 9.14

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-139Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 65.53 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-139
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
65.53 m
From
111.25 m
To
176.78 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-139:111.25-176.78
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Azimuth
-75225 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is moderate for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.34”

Context: 65.53

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-139Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 65.53 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-139
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
65.53 m
From
111.25 m
To
176.78 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-139:111.25-176.78
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Azimuth
-75225 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is at the weak threshold for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Grade at weak open-pit porphyry threshold
  • Moderate intercept length
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 65.53

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-139Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 77.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-139
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
77.72 m
From
188.98 m
To
266.7 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-139:188.98-266.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Long intercept length
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for open-pit porphyry
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 77.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-139Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 77.72 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-139
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
77.72 m
From
188.98 m
To
266.7 m
Intercept Depth
111.25 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-139:188.98-266.7
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept extends mineralization downdip at the Sullivan Zone. The grade is at the weak threshold for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Grade at weak open-pit porphyry threshold
  • Long intercept length
  • Extension of mineralization downdip
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 77.72

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-140Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.82 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-140
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
51.82 m
From
94.49 m
To
146.3 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-140:94.49-146.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Azimuth
-60225 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is moderate for an open-pit porphyry setting but below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.32”

Context: 51.82

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-140Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51.82 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-140
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51.82 m
From
94.49 m
To
146.3 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-140:94.49-146.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Azimuth
-60225 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for porphyry copper
  • Grade below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: 51.82

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-140Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 54.86 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-140
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
54.86 m
From
160.02 m
To
214.88 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-140:160.02-214.88
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for open-pit porphyry
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 54.86

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-140Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.11Grade Unit: %Intercept: 54.86 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-140
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.11
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
54.86 m
From
160.02 m
To
214.88 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-140:160.02-214.88
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for porphyry copper
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.11”

Context: 54.86

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-140Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 30.48 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-140
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
gold
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
30.48 m
From
228.6 m
To
259.08 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-140:228.6-259.08
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This gold intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for open-pit porphyry
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 30.48

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

GBR-140Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 30.48 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GBR-140
Project
Gabbs
Commodity
copper
Region
usa_nv
Reported Region
usa_nv
Ticker
PGLD

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
30.48 m
From
228.6 m
To
259.08 m
Intercept Depth
94.49 m

Classification

Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GBR-140:228.6-259.08
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Sullivan Zone
Easting
417551
Northing
4292548
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS Global
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This copper intercept is part of a newly identified mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, which is a significant positive for project economics. The grade is weak for an open-pit porphyry setting and significantly below the project's historical average. QA/QC is well-disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Moderate intercept length
  • Identification of new mineralized unit within PEA pit shell
  • Potential to reduce strip ratio
  • QA/QC disclosed
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Weak grade for porphyry copper
  • Grade significantly below project average
  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 30.48

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "mixed"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.