P2 Gold Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell
Original announcement by jmn on
- Company
- P2 Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- PGLD
- Exchange
- TSXV
- Region
- Nevada
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Copper
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-14 10:23:26 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
P2 Gold announced drill results from six RC holes at its Gabbs Project in Nevada, extending gold-copper mineralization downdip in the Sullivan Zone. The program identified a new mineralized unit within the PEA pit shell, previously modeled as waste, which has the potential to reduce the strip ratio and enhance project economics. These results will contribute to an updated Mineral Resource estimate and a feasibility study targeted for completion in Q1 2027.
Reasoning: The drill results extend known mineralization and identify a new mineralized unit within the existing PEA pit shell, which could positively impact project economics by converting waste to resource and reducing the strip ratio. While the reported grades are not exceptionally high compared to historical averages, the strategic implications for resource expansion and the ongoing feasibility study are significant. QA/QC is well-disclosed, but the lack of true width determination introduces some uncertainty.
Positive factors
- Mineralization extended downdip in the Sullivan Zone
- New gold-copper mineralized unit identified within the PEA pit shell, previously modeled as waste
- Potential to reduce strip ratio and improve project economics
- Drill holes ended in mineralization, indicating potential for further extension
- QA/QC procedures disclosed, including certified lab and QP sign-off
Negative factors
- Grades are generally below the project's historical average for both gold and copper
- True thickness of intercepts is yet to be determined, which may overstate actual widths
- Copper grades are at the lower end of the typical range for porphyry deposits
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 24
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 24. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (24)
GBR-131Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 71.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-131
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 71.63 m
- From
- 92.96 m
- To
- 164.59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.96 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-131:92.96-164.59
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417453
- Northing
- 4292555
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (71.63 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.32 g/t) is weak for open pit gold (below 0.8 g/t economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 71.63
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-131Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 71.63 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-131
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 71.63 m
- From
- 92.96 m
- To
- 164.59 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.96 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-131:92.96-164.59
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417453
- Northing
- 4292555
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (71.63 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.17%) is weak for porphyry (below 0.25% economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: 71.63
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-131Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 19.81 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-131
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 19.81 m
- From
- 175.26 m
- To
- 195.07 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.96 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-131:175.26-195.07
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417453
- Northing
- 4292555
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.42 g/t) is weak for open pit gold (below 0.8 g/t economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 19.81
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-131Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 19.81 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-131
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 19.81 m
- From
- 175.26 m
- To
- 195.07 m
- Intercept Depth
- 92.96 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-131:175.26-195.07
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417453
- Northing
- 4292555
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.20%) is weak for porphyry (below 0.25% economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.20”
Context: 19.81
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-132Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-132
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 117.35 m
- To
- 149.35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.35 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-132:117.35-149.35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417386
- Northing
- 4292653
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.40 g/t) is weak for open pit gold (below 0.8 g/t economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.40”
Context: 32.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-132Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 32 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-132
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 32 m
- From
- 117.35 m
- To
- 149.35 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.35 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-132:117.35-149.35
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417386
- Northing
- 4292653
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.14%) is weak for porphyry (below 0.25% economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 32.00
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-132Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27.43 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-132
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27.43 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 185.93 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.35 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-132:158.5-185.93
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417386
- Northing
- 4292653
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with very weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.10 g/t) is very weak for open pit gold (below 0.3 g/t weak threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 27.43
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-132Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Intercept: 27.43 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-132
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.16
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 27.43 m
- From
- 158.5 m
- To
- 185.93 m
- Intercept Depth
- 117.35 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-132:158.5-185.93
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417386
- Northing
- 4292653
- Azimuth
- 45 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.16%) is weak for porphyry (below 0.25% economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.16”
Context: 27.43
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-133Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 70.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-133
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 70.1 m
- From
- 64.01 m
- To
- 134.11 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.01 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-133:64.01-134.11
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417386
- Northing
- 4292653
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (70.10 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.32 g/t) is weak for open pit gold (below 0.8 g/t economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: 70.10
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-133Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 70.1 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-133
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 70.1 m
- From
- 64.01 m
- To
- 134.11 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.01 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-133:64.01-134.11
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417386
- Northing
- 4292653
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (70.10 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.18%) is weak for porphyry (below 0.25% economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 70.10
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-133Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 59.44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-133
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.21
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 59.44 m
- From
- 198.12 m
- To
- 257.56 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.01 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-133:198.12-257.56
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417386
- Northing
- 4292653
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with very weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (59.44 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.21 g/t) is very weak for open pit gold (below 0.3 g/t weak threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.21”
Context: 59.44
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-133Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 59.44 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-133
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 59.44 m
- From
- 198.12 m
- To
- 257.56 m
- Intercept Depth
- 64.01 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-133:198.12-257.56
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417386
- Northing
- 4292653
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (59.44 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.14%) is weak for porphyry (below 0.25% economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 59.44
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-138Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18.29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-138
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 18.29 m
- From
- 141.73 m
- To
- 160.02 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.73 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-138:141.73-160.02
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with very weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.15 g/t) is very weak for open pit gold (below 0.3 g/t weak threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 18.29
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-138Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 18.29 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-138
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 18.29 m
- From
- 141.73 m
- To
- 160.02 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.73 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-138:141.73-160.02
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.15%) is weak for porphyry (below 0.25% economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: 18.29
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-138Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13.72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-138
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 13.72 m
- From
- 208.79 m
- To
- 222.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.73 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-138:208.79-222.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with very weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.14 g/t) is very weak for open pit gold (below 0.3 g/t weak threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 13.72
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-138Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: %Intercept: 13.72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-138
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 13.72 m
- From
- 208.79 m
- To
- 222.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.73 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-138:208.79-222.5
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with very weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.05%) is very weak for porphyry (below 0.15% weak threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 13.72
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-138Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-138
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 9.14 m
- From
- 234.7 m
- To
- 243.84 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.73 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-138:234.7-243.84
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Gold grade (0.45 g/t) is within the weak range for open pit gold (0.3-0.8 g/t)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 9.14
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-138Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 9.14 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-138
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.08
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 9.14 m
- From
- 234.7 m
- To
- 243.84 m
- Intercept Depth
- 141.73 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-138:234.7-243.84
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 0 °
- Dip
- -90 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A narrow intercept with very weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.08%) is very weak for porphyry (below 0.15% weak threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.08”
Context: 9.14
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-139Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.34Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 65.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-139
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 65.53 m
- From
- 111.25 m
- To
- 176.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.25 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-139:111.25-176.78
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (65.53 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.34 g/t) is weak for open pit gold (below 0.8 g/t economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.34”
Context: 65.53
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-139Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 65.53 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-139
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 65.53 m
- From
- 111.25 m
- To
- 176.78 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.25 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-139:111.25-176.78
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (65.53 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.19%) is weak for porphyry (below 0.25% economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 65.53
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-139Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 77.72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-139
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 77.72 m
- From
- 188.98 m
- To
- 266.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.25 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-139:188.98-266.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with very weak gold grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (77.72 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Gold grade (0.10 g/t) is very weak for open pit gold (below 0.3 g/t weak threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 77.72
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-139Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 77.72 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-139
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.19
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 77.72 m
- From
- 188.98 m
- To
- 266.7 m
- Intercept Depth
- 111.25 m
Classification
- Program
- mixed
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-139:188.98-266.7
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Location
- Sullivan Zone
- Easting
- 417551
- Northing
- 4292548
- Azimuth
- 225 °
- Dip
- -75 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: A moderate length intercept with weak copper grade, but the hole ended in mineralization, suggesting potential for further extension. The true thickness is not yet determined.
Positive factors
- Intercept length is moderate (77.72 m)
- Drill hole ended in mineralization
Negative factors
- Copper grade (0.19%) is weak for porphyry (below 0.25% economic threshold)
- True thickness is not determined
Evidence · table
“0.19”
Context: 77.72
Tags used in scoring
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: The drilling is part of an 'Infill and Expansion Drill Program'.
Evidence · text
“Infill and Expansion Drill Program”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Rejected tags
Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.
Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Reason: The document states that true thickness is to be determined for the reported intervals.
Evidence · table
“True thickness to be determined.”
QA/QC DisclosedRejected · positive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Reason: The release includes QA/QC disclosure mentioning certified lab, multi-digestion with ICP finish, fire assay, blanks, standards, and field duplicates.
Evidence · table
“All samples were submitted for preparation by ALS Global at its facilities in Reno, Nevada, with the analysis completed at ALS Global facilities in Reno, Nevada, and North Vancouver, British Columbia. All samples were analyzed using multi-digestion with ICP finish and fire assay with AA finish for gold. Samples with over 10 ppm gold were fire assayed with a gravimetric finish. One in 20 samples was blank, one in 20 was a standard sample, and one in 20 samples had a sample cut from assay rejects assayed as a field duplicate.”
QP/CP SignedRejected · positive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Reason: Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is named as the Qualified Person responsible for the Gabbs Project.
Evidence · text
“Ken McNaughton, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., Chief Exploration Officer, P2 Gold, is the Qualified Person, as defined by National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the Gabbs Project.”
Step-Out ExtensionRejected · positive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Reason: The drilling extends mineralization 'downdip' and identifies a 'new unit'.
Evidence · text
“Extends Sullivan Zone Mineralization Downdip and Identifies New Mineralized Unit”
PEA-SupportingRejected · neutral · Story-specific tag
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Reason: The new mineralization is within the 'Sullivan PEA Pit Shell' and has potential to reduce the strip ratio for the Sullivan Zone.
Evidence · text
“Identifies New Mineralized Unit within Sullivan PEA Pit Shell”
GBR-140Gabbs · goldGrade: 0.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 51.82 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-140
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 51.82 m
- From
- 94.49 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.49 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-140:94.49-146.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- -60225 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.32 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 16.6 g/t·m is weak.
Negative factors
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.32”
Context: GBR-140
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
GBR-140Gabbs · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51.82 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GBR-140
- Project
- Gabbs
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- usa_nv
- Reported Region
- usa_nv
- Ticker
- PGLD
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 51.82 m
- From
- 94.49 m
- To
- 146.3 m
- Intercept Depth
- 94.49 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GBR-140:94.49-146.3
- Mining Method
- open_pit
Location
- Azimuth
- -60225 °
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS Global
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.13 % copper is below against the default band [2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.25] %. Grade×width 6.7 %·m is below.
Negative factors
- 0.13 % copper is below the weak threshold (0.25 %) on the default band.
- Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: GBR-140
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.