OUTCROP SILVER Launches Project Argentum: Technical Work Plan Approved for Santa Ana Pilot Operation, Targeted for Production in 2027

Original announcement by prospectors_exchange on

Company
Outcrop Silver & Gold Corporation
Ticker
OCG
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Tolima, Colombia
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Gold
Document categories
Permitting, Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-15 13:03:46 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Outcrop Silver has launched Project Argentum at its Santa Ana project in Colombia, following approval of a Technical Work Plan by the National Mining Agency. The project includes a 40 tpd pilot underground mining operation and an innovation center, with production targeted for 2027.

Reasoning: The announcement marks a transition from exploration to development via a pilot plant, supported by regulatory approval of the work plan, though it carries the inherent risks of a non-feasibility-based decision.

Positive factors

  • Technical Work Plan (PTO) approved by Colombian National Mining Agency
  • Launch of Project Argentum pilot operation
  • High-grade silver resource confirmed in recent MRE
  • Clear path to production in 2027

Negative factors

  • Pilot plant decision not based on feasibility study of Mineral Reserves
  • Environmental license still pending (expected early 2027)

Facts used in scoring: 4

Classification and evidence

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate was prepared by APEX Geoscience Ltd. in accordance with NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“The technical report prepared by APEX in accordance with NI 43-101 will be filed”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: A significant portion of the reported resource is in the Inferred category.

Evidence · text

“an Inferred resource of 2,352 thousand tonnes”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (4)

indicatedSanta Ana · silverTonnes: 1793000Grade: 376Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 29.9Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Ana
Commodity
silver
Region
colombia
Reported Region
Tolima, Colombia
Ticker
OCG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Carlos Torres
Resource group id
resource:5bad5f49a6323f40d165
Deposit or zone
Santa Ana
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1793000
Grade
376
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
29.9
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-10

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
519
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
APEX Geoscience Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong indicated resource component for a high-grade silver project.

Positive factors

  • High grade (519 g/t AgEq)
  • Large contained metal (29.9 Moz AgEq)

Evidence · text

“indicated resource of 1,793 thousand tonnes containing 29.9 million ounces silver-equivalent (“ AgEq ”¹) at a grade of 519 g/t AgEq¹ (376 g/t Ag and 1.80 g/t Au)”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedSanta Ana · goldTonnes: 1793000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Ana
Commodity
gold
Region
colombia
Reported Region
Tolima, Colombia
Ticker
OCG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Carlos Torres
Resource group id
resource:5bad5f49a6323f40d165
Deposit or zone
Santa Ana
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1793000
Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-10

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
519
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
APEX Geoscience Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold component of the indicated resource.

Evidence · text

“376 g/t Ag and 1.80 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Ana · silverTonnes: 2352000Grade: 266Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 27.9Contained Unit: mozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Ana
Commodity
silver
Region
colombia
Reported Region
Tolima, Colombia
Ticker
OCG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Carlos Torres
Resource group id
resource:a2e95d3e958441d3b47c
Deposit or zone
Santa Ana
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2352000
Grade
266
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
27.9
Contained Unit
moz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-10

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
368
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
APEX Geoscience Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant inferred resource component.

Evidence · text

“Inferred resource of 2,352 thousand tonnes containing 27.9 million ounces AgEq at a grade of 368 g/t AgEq (266 g/t Ag and 1.29 g/t Au)”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredSanta Ana · goldTonnes: 2352000Grade: 1.29Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Santa Ana
Commodity
gold
Region
colombia
Reported Region
Tolima, Colombia
Ticker
OCG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Carlos Torres
Resource group id
resource:a2e95d3e958441d3b47c
Deposit or zone
Santa Ana
Mining method
underground
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
2352000
Grade
1.29
Grade Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-10

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
368
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AgEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Lab

Laboratory
APEX Geoscience Ltd.

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-15T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Gold component of the inferred resource.

Evidence · text

“266 g/t Ag and 1.29 g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.