# Osisko Metals to Create New Critical Minerals Company Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b Original source: https://orestocks.com/company/OM.V/press-releases/6732214845131845 Publisher: orestocks Original announcement: 2026-09-15T20:30:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-15T20:50:04.843Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-15T20:50:04.843Z - Company: Osisko Metals Incorporated - Ticker: OM - Exchange: Unavailable - Region: New Brunswick - Primary commodity: Copper - Secondary commodities: Silver, Gold, Zinc, Lead - Document categories: Resource update, Agreement transaction - Extracted: 2026-09-15 20:50:05 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.40 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary Osisko Metals has announced plans to spin out its non-core New Brunswick properties into a new entity, Osisko Critical Minerals Corporation \(OCMC\), led by CEO John Burzynski. The transaction aims to unlock value from copper, silver, and gold exploration targets, including the Key Anacon and Gilmour South resources. The company will retain a minority interest in the new vehicle. Reasoning: The announcement details a significant corporate restructuring via a spin-out of non-core critical mineral assets into a new entity, while also restating existing resource data for the Bathurst Mining Camp. - Positive factor: Creation of a dedicated critical minerals vehicle \(OCMC\) - Positive factor: Transfer of large-scale exploration targets in New Brunswick - Positive factor: Strategic spin-out to unlock non-core asset value - Positive factor: Presence of existing mineral resources in the Bathurst Mining Camp - Negative factor: Transaction subject to financing and regulatory approvals - Negative factor: Mount Fronsac resource is historical and non-compliant Facts used in scoring: 13 ## Classification and evidence **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: The document provides updated/restated resource figures for the Bathurst Mining Camp and Mount Fronsac. Evidence · text > The main assets within the Bathurst Mining Camp \(“BMC”\) holdings include the Key Anacon and Gilmour South Mineral Resource **Historical Estimate Only** Polarity: negative Definition: Estimate pre-dates or does not comply with current JORC/NI 43-101 standards — requires verification drilling. Why it applies: The Mount Fronsac resource is explicitly stated as historical and non-NI 43-101 compliant. Evidence · text > The Mount Fronsac deposit contains an historical, non-NI 43-101 compliant, unclassified mineral resource estimate **No QP/CP Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience. Why it applies: The Mount Fronsac historical estimate does not name a responsible QP/CP. Evidence · text > A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource. ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 13. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Resource Estimates (13) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-0) Bathurst Mining Camp · zinc #### Identity - Project: Bathurst Mining Camp - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:a6e5904d3e7b9eadd5d2 - Deposit or zone: Key Anacon and Gilmour South #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 1960000 - Grade: 5.77 - Grade Unit: % #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-02-20 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % ZnEq #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Indicated resource component of the Key Anacon and Gilmour South estimate. Evidence · table > 5.77 Context: 1.96 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.6 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-1) Bathurst Mining Camp · lead #### Identity - Project: Bathurst Mining Camp - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:a6e5904d3e7b9eadd5d2 - Deposit or zone: Key Anacon and Gilmour South #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 1960000 - Grade: 2.38 - Grade Unit: % #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-02-20 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % ZnEq #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Indicated resource component of the Key Anacon and Gilmour South estimate. Evidence · table > 2.38 Context: 1.96 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.6 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-2) Bathurst Mining Camp · copper #### Identity - Project: Bathurst Mining Camp - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:a6e5904d3e7b9eadd5d2 - Deposit or zone: Key Anacon and Gilmour South #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 1960000 - Grade: 0.22 - Grade Unit: % #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-02-20 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % ZnEq #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Indicated resource component of the Key Anacon and Gilmour South estimate. Evidence · table > 0.22 Context: 1.96 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.6 years before this release ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-3) Bathurst Mining Camp · silver #### Identity - Project: Bathurst Mining Camp - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:a6e5904d3e7b9eadd5d2 - Deposit or zone: Key Anacon and Gilmour South #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 1960000 - Grade: 68.9 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-02-20 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 9 - Metal Eq. Unit: % ZnEq #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Indicated resource component of the Key Anacon and Gilmour South estimate. Evidence · table > 68.9 Context: 1.96 #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.6 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-4) Bathurst Mining Camp · zinc #### Identity - Project: Bathurst Mining Camp - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:bb98190dd157a64e9107 - Deposit or zone: Key Anacon and Gilmour South #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3850000 - Grade: 5.34 - Grade Unit: % #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-02-20 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 7.96 - Metal Eq. Unit: % ZnEq #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Inferred resource component of the Key Anacon and Gilmour South estimate. Evidence · table > 5.34 Context: 3.85 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.6 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-5) Bathurst Mining Camp · lead #### Identity - Project: Bathurst Mining Camp - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:bb98190dd157a64e9107 - Deposit or zone: Key Anacon and Gilmour South #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3850000 - Grade: 1.49 - Grade Unit: % #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-02-20 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 7.96 - Metal Eq. Unit: % ZnEq #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Inferred resource component of the Key Anacon and Gilmour South estimate. Evidence · table > 1.49 Context: 3.85 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.6 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-6) Bathurst Mining Camp · copper #### Identity - Project: Bathurst Mining Camp - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:bb98190dd157a64e9107 - Deposit or zone: Key Anacon and Gilmour South #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3850000 - Grade: 0.32 - Grade Unit: % #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-02-20 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 7.96 - Metal Eq. Unit: % ZnEq #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Inferred resource component of the Key Anacon and Gilmour South estimate. Evidence · table > 0.32 Context: 3.85 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.6 years before this release ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-7) Bathurst Mining Camp · silver #### Identity - Project: Bathurst Mining Camp - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101 - Resource group id: resource:bb98190dd157a64e9107 - Deposit or zone: Key Anacon and Gilmour South #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 3850000 - Grade: 47.7 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Prior Estimate - Resource Date: 2019-02-20 #### Metal Equivalent - Metal Eq. Grade: 7.96 - Metal Eq. Unit: % ZnEq #### Review - Needs Review: No - Historical: No #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Inferred resource component of the Key Anacon and Gilmour South estimate. Evidence · table > 47.7 Context: 3.85 #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **NI 43-101 Compliant** Polarity: positive Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard. Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101 **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported **Stale Estimate** Polarity: negative Definition: Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding. Why it applies: effective date is 7.6 years before this release ### Mount Fronsac [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-8) Mount Fronsac · zinc Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Mount Fronsac - Commodity: zinc - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: other - Resource group id: resource:8e4c98ea5ed5350fff53 - Deposit or zone: Mount Fronsac #### Resource Data - Tonnes: 1260000 - Grade: 7.65 - Grade Unit: % #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical, non-compliant, unclassified resource estimate. - Negative factor: Non-NI 43-101 compliant - Negative factor: Unclassified resource Evidence · text > historical, non-NI 43-101 compliant, unclassified mineral resource estimate of 1.26 million tonnes averaging 7.65 % Zn #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported ### Mount Fronsac [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-9) Mount Fronsac · lead Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Mount Fronsac - Commodity: lead - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: other - Resource group id: resource:8e4c98ea5ed5350fff53 - Deposit or zone: Mount Fronsac #### Resource Data - Tonnes: 1260000 - Grade: 2.18 - Grade Unit: % #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical, non-compliant, unclassified resource estimate. - Negative factor: Non-NI 43-101 compliant - Negative factor: Unclassified resource Evidence · text > 2.18 % Pb #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported ### Mount Fronsac [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-10) Mount Fronsac · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Mount Fronsac - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: other - Resource group id: resource:8e4c98ea5ed5350fff53 - Deposit or zone: Mount Fronsac #### Resource Data - Tonnes: 1260000 - Grade: 0.14 - Grade Unit: % #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical, non-compliant, unclassified resource estimate. - Negative factor: Non-NI 43-101 compliant - Negative factor: Unclassified resource Evidence · text > 0.14% Cu #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported ### Mount Fronsac [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-11) Mount Fronsac · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Mount Fronsac - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: other - Resource group id: resource:8e4c98ea5ed5350fff53 - Deposit or zone: Mount Fronsac #### Resource Data - Tonnes: 1260000 - Grade: 40.3 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical, non-compliant, unclassified resource estimate. - Negative factor: Non-NI 43-101 compliant - Negative factor: Unclassified resource Evidence · text > 40.3 g/t Ag #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported ### Mount Fronsac [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/osisko-metals-to-create-new-critical-minerals-company--a83393dc-e4f5-48f2-a4af-9f25d03c4e4b#fact-resource-facts-12) Mount Fronsac · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Mount Fronsac - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_nb - Reported Region: New Brunswick - Ticker: OM #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Reporting standards: other - Resource group id: resource:8e4c98ea5ed5350fff53 - Deposit or zone: Mount Fronsac #### Resource Data - Tonnes: 1260000 - Grade: 0.4 - Grade Unit: g/t #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Historical, non-compliant, unclassified resource estimate. - Negative factor: Non-NI 43-101 compliant - Negative factor: Unclassified resource Evidence · text > 0.40 g/t Au #### Tags used in scoring **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **No Contained Metal** Polarity: negative Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting. Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.