Operational Performance for Period Ended 31 Aug 26
Original announcement by lse on
- Company
- Andrada Mining Limited
- Ticker
- ATM
- Exchange
- LSE
- Region
- Namibia
- Primary commodity
- Tin
- Secondary commodities
- Lithium, Tantalum, Tungsten, Copper
- Document categories
- Production, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-29 18:24:06 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Andrada Mining reported strong H1 FY2027 operational performance at the Uis Mine, with contained tin production increasing 13% year-on-year to 576 tonnes. The growth was driven by higher feed grades and improved plant processing rates. The company has also secured NAD98 million in funding to implement ore-sorting upgrades aimed at significantly increasing future production.
Reasoning: Strong H1 FY2027 production growth driven by higher grades and throughput, supported by secured funding for expansion.
Positive factors
- Year-on-year production growth in contained tin and concentrate
- Improved feed grades and plant processing rates
- Successful securing of NAD98 million funding for upgrades
- Planned ore-sorting circuit to significantly boost future output
Facts used in scoring: 4
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The document does not explicitly detail QA/QC protocols or lab certifications in this operational update.
Evidence · text
“Unaudited figures for the period ended 31 August 2026”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Fact 1Uis Mine · tinGrade: 0.152Grade Unit: %Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Uis Mine
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- namibia
- Reported Region
- namibia
- Ticker
- ATM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.152
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Q2 FY2027 feed grade of 0.152% Sn represents a year-on-year increase.
Positive factors
- Higher feed grade for Q2 FY2027
Evidence · table
“0.152”
Context: 268 741
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Fact 2Uis Mine · tinGrade: 0.149Grade Unit: %Needs review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Uis Mine
- Commodity
- tin
- Region
- namibia
- Reported Region
- namibia
- Ticker
- ATM
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.149
- Grade Unit
- %
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: H1 FY2027 average feed grade increased 9% to 0.149% Sn.
Positive factors
- Higher H1 FY2027 feed grade
Evidence · table
“0.149”
Context: 538 810
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.