# ONGOLD RESOURCES LTD. TO PARTICIPATE IN THE GENTILE MINING INVESTOR FORUM IN LONDON Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0 Original source: https://ongoldresources.com/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-london/ Publisher: prospectors\_exchange Original announcement: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Analysis by Minestarters Atlas Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-19T12:50:17.666Z Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-19T12:50:17.666Z - Company: ONGold Resources Ltd. - Ticker: ONAU - Exchange: Unavailable - Region: Manitoba - Primary commodity: Gold - Secondary commodities: Tungsten, Silver, Copper - Document categories: Drill results, Resource update, Other - Extracted: 2026-09-19 12:50:18 UTC Narrative sentiment: 0.20 · Bullish ## Minestarters Atlas summary ONGold Resources Ltd. announced its participation in the inaugural Gentile Mining Investor Forum in London on October 19, 2026. The release also reiterates the Monument Bay Mineral Resource Estimate and historical drill results from the TPK Project. Reasoning: The primary news is corporate participation in an investor forum; the resource and drill data provided are restatements of previously released information. - Positive factor: participation in high-profile investor forum - Positive factor: reiteration of Monument Bay resource scale Facts used in scoring: 13 ## Classification and evidence **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Story-specific tag Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: The drill results for TPK and the Monument Bay resource are restatements of previously released data. Evidence · text > The TPK drill results disclosed above were previously reported in ONGold’s news releases dated November 4, 2025 and January 19, 2026 ## Extracted facts Stored fact records: 13. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record. ## Drill Results (11) ### GR-25-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-2) TPK · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: GR-25-011 - Project: TPK - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 19.39 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 8.2 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High grade intercept, but previously reported in November 2025. - Positive factor: strong grade Evidence · text > GR-25-011: 19.39 g/t Au over 8.2 m \(incl. 308 g/t Au over 0.3 m\). #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### GR-25-011 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-3) TPK · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: GR-25-011 - Project: TPK - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 308 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.3 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2025-11-04T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Extremely high grade sub-interval, previously reported. - Positive factor: bonanza grade Evidence · text > 308 g/t Au over 0.3 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### GR-25-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-4) TPK · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: GR-25-012 - Project: TPK - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 3.06 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 1.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-19T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Strong copper grade, previously reported. Evidence · text > GR-25-012: 3.06% Cu, 60.3 g/t Ag & 1.5 g/t Au over 1.5 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### GR-25-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-5) TPK · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: GR-25-012 - Project: TPK - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 60.3 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-19T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Silver grade reported, previously reported. Evidence · text > 60.3 g/t Ag #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### GR-25-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-6) TPK · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: GR-25-012 - Project: TPK - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 1.5 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-19T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Gold grade reported, previously reported. Evidence · text > 1.5 g/t Au #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### GR-25-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-7) TPK · copper Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: GR-25-012 - Project: TPK - Commodity: copper - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 11.1 - Grade Unit: % - Intercept: 0.4 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-19T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Very high grade sub-interval, previously reported. - Positive factor: exceptional copper grade Evidence · text > 11.1% Cu #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### GR-25-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-8) TPK · silver Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: GR-25-012 - Project: TPK - Commodity: silver - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 218 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.4 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-19T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Silver grade reported, previously reported. - Positive factor: strong silver grade Evidence · text > 218 g/t Ag #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### GR-25-012 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-9) TPK · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: GR-25-012 - Project: TPK - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 4.45 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.4 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-01-19T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Gold grade reported, previously reported. Evidence · text > 4.45 g/t Au #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### TPK-10-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-10) TPK · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TPK-10-004 - Project: TPK - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 25.9 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 13.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-02-27T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: High grade intercept, but historical data from 2018. - Positive factor: strong gold grade Evidence · text > 25.90 g/t Au over 13.5 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### TPK-10-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-11) TPK · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TPK-10-004 - Project: TPK - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 46 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 0.5 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-02-27T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Extremely high grade sub-interval, historical. - Positive factor: bonanza grade Evidence · text > 46.0 g/t Au over 0.5m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ### TPK-10-004 [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-drill-facts-12) TPK · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Hole ID: TPK-10-004 - Project: TPK - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_on - Reported Region: canada\_on - Ticker: ONAU #### Geometry - Grade: 139.4 - Grade Unit: g/t - Intercept: 1.7 m #### Classification - Sample Type: drill #### QA/QC - QA/QC Methods: standards #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Interp. Status: scored - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2018-02-27T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Extremely high grade sub-interval, historical. - Positive factor: bonanza grade Evidence · text > 139.4 g/t Au over 1.7 m #### Tags used in scoring **No QA/QC Disclosure** Polarity: negative Definition: Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document. Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is not true **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Stale Data Re-release** Polarity: negative Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty. Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release ## Resource Estimates (2) ### indicated [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-resource-facts-0) Monument Bay · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Monument Bay - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_mb - Reported Region: Manitoba - Ticker: ONAU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:39be6177bfa575839593 #### Resource Data - Category: indicated - Tonnes: 74390000 - Grade: 0.84 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 2 - Contained Unit: moz #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of the September 14, 2026 resource update. Evidence · text > Monument Bay Deposit – Updated Mineral Resource Estimate: Open-pit-constrained Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources: 74.39 million tonnes at 0.84 g/t Au containing 2.0 million ounces of gold. #### Tags used in scoring **Indicated Resource** Polarity: positive Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves. Why it applies: category is "indicated" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated **Resource Update** Polarity: neutral Definition: Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress. Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate ### inferred [Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/ongold-resources-ltd-to-participate-in-the-gentile-mining-investor-forum-in-lond--45d1da68-c1eb-4f05-9fab-8b4b783a6cf0#fact-resource-facts-1) Monument Bay · gold Historical result Needs review: historical\_restatement #### Identity - Project: Monument Bay - Commodity: gold - Region: canada\_mb - Reported Region: Manitoba - Ticker: ONAU #### Resource scope - Estimate type: resource - Resource group id: resource:e74aefe471b4154bb856 #### Resource Data - Category: inferred - Tonnes: 24460000 - Grade: 0.62 - Grade Unit: g/t - Contained Metal: 0.49 - Contained Unit: moz #### Review - Needs Review: Yes - Review Reason: historical\_restatement - Historical: Yes - Historical Source Date: 2026-09-14T00:00:00.000Z #### Dates - Event date: 2026-09-18T00:00:00.000Z Reasoning: Restatement of the September 14, 2026 resource update. Evidence · text > Open-pit-constrained Inferred Mineral Resources: 24.46 million tonnes at 0.62 g/t Au containing 0.49 million ounces of gold. #### Tags used in scoring **Inferred Resource** Polarity: negative Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone. Why it applies: category is "inferred" **Cut-off Undisclosed** Polarity: negative Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing. Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated ## How Atlas produces this analysis Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.