Omai Gold Increases Indicated Mineral Resources to 2.5 Moz Au at 2.04 g/t Au (38.1 Mt) and Inferred to 5.5 Moz Au at 1.59 g/t Au (106.6 Mt) with Expansion of Wenot and Gilt Deposits

Original announcement by orestocks on

Company
Omai Gold Mines Corp.
Ticker
OMG
Exchange
TSXV
Region
Guyana
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Resource update
Extracted
2026-10-01 04:20:19 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Omai Gold has announced an updated Mineral Resource Estimate for its Omai Gold Property in Guyana, significantly increasing total project ounces. The update features a 49.8% increase in Wenot Indicated gold ounces and a 120.3% increase in Gilt Inferred gold ounces, supported by a higher gold price assumption of $3,000/oz.

Reasoning: The update delivers substantial scale increases in gold ounces across the project, driven by both expansion and category conversion, despite some grade dilution in the Inferred categories.

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage and ounce growth in both Indicated and Inferred categories
  • Successful conversion of Inferred to Indicated at Wenot (+49.8% ounces)
  • Major expansion of Gilt Inferred resource (+120.3% ounces)
  • Increased gold price assumption used in modeling ($3,000/oz)
  • QA/QC disclosed with certified labs and QP sign-off

Negative factors

  • Grade decline in Wenot Inferred (-25.8%)
  • Grade decline in Gilt Inferred (-3.9%)
  • Indicated tonnage decrease at Gilt (-9.5%)

Facts used in scoring: 6

Classification and evidence

Category Upgradepositive

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: Wenot Indicated MRE increased by 49.8% through conversion of Inferred ounces.

Evidence · text

“The recent drilling successfully added 483,000 ounces to bring Wenot's Indicated MRE to 1.45 million ounces, representing a 49% increase.”

Tonnage Growthpositive

Significant tonnage increase (≥15%) vs prior estimate with grade maintained or improved.

Why it applies: Combined project Indicated tonnage increased significantly.

Evidence · text

“combined updated MRE ... 2,495,000 ounces of gold (Indicated MRE), a 17.6% increase”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Alan J. San Martin, P.Eng. is named as the Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“Mr. Alan J. San Martin, P.Eng., Principal Resource Geologist of SLR, is the Qualified Person (QP)”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 standards.

Evidence · text

“The Mineral Resources were estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves Definitions (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019).”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: Cut-off grades for different mining methods and rock types are explicitly stated.

Evidence · text

“Mineral Resources are reported at cut-off grades of 0.20 g/t Au for soft rock, 0.30 g/t Au for hard rock within the open pit, and 1.70 g/t Au for underground shapes.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 6. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (6)

indicatedgoldTonnes: 38100000Grade: 2.04Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 2495000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alan J. San Martin, Elaine Ellingham
Resource group id
resource:320e4b7ecb28549ea2ef
Deposit or zone
Omai Gold Property
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
38100000
Grade
2.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
2495000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-07

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Significant growth in total project Indicated gold ounces.

Positive factors

  • 17.6% increase in ounces vs August 2025 MRE

Evidence · text

“combined updated MRE (over the August 2025 MRE) of: 2,495,000 ounces of gold (Indicated MRE), a 17.6% increase, averaging 2.04 g/t Au in 38.1Mt”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredgoldTonnes: 106600000Grade: 1.59Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 5465000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alan J. San Martin, Elaine Ellingham
Resource group id
resource:68019521063ec2c0c464
Deposit or zone
Omai Gold Property
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %
Resource basis
gross

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
106600000
Grade
1.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
5465000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-07

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Substantial increase in total project Inferred gold ounces.

Positive factors

  • 24.7% increase in ounces vs August 2025 MRE

Evidence · text

“5,465,000 ounces of gold (Inferred MRE), a 24.7% increase, averaging 1.59 g/t Au in 106.6 Mt”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedgoldTonnes: 28400000Grade: 1.59Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1453000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alan J. San Martin, Elaine Ellingham
Resource group id
resource:4f590d3dfaf3eecca5d4
Deposit or zone
Wenot Deposit
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
28400000
Grade
1.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1453000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-07

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong growth in Indicated ounces and grade due to conversion and infill.

Positive factors

  • 49.8% increase in ounces
  • 8.9% increase in grade

Evidence · text

“Wenot Indicated MRE increased 49.8% to 1,453,000 ounces ("oz") of gold with an average grade of 1.59 g/t Au, contained in 28.4 million tonnes ("Mt")”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredgoldTonnes: 92400000Grade: 1.35Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 3999000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alan J. San Martin, Elaine Ellingham
Resource group id
resource:89f1d589bdf3d6cbc0f7
Deposit or zone
Wenot Deposit
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
92400000
Grade
1.35
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
3999000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-07

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Ounce growth offset by significant grade dilution from new extensions.

Positive factors

  • 7.6% increase in ounces

Negative factors

  • 25.8% decrease in grade

Evidence · text

“Wenot Inferred MRE increased 7.6% to 3,999,000 oz grading 1.35 g/t Au, contained in 92.4 Mt”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

indicatedgoldTonnes: 9700000Grade: 3.33Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1042000Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alan J. San Martin, Elaine Ellingham
Resource group id
resource:ef6a04a5f35765e6cb6d
Deposit or zone
Gilt Deposit
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9700000
Grade
3.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1042000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-07

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource tonnage decreased due to more restrictive classification criteria.

Positive factors

  • 3.4% increase in grade

Negative factors

  • 9.5% decrease in ounces

Evidence · text

“Gilt's ... Indicated MRE decreased by 9.5% to 1,042,000 oz averaging 3.33 g/t Au (in 9.7 Mt)”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

inferredgoldTonnes: 14200000Grade: 3.22Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1465000Contained Unit: ozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Commodity
gold
Region
guyana
Reported Region
Guyana
Ticker
OMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
ni_43_101
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Alan J. San Martin, Elaine Ellingham
Resource group id
resource:2f10cea4d07cec34f2b5
Deposit or zone
Gilt Deposit
Mining method
combined
Ownership percent
100 %

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
14200000
Grade
3.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1465000
Contained Unit
oz

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-04-07

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Massive expansion of Inferred resource through depth drilling and re-examination of upper zones.

Positive factors

  • 120.3% increase in ounces

Negative factors

  • 3.9% decrease in grade

Evidence · text

“Gilt's Inferred MRE increased 120% to 1,465,000 oz averaging 3.22 g/t Au (in 14.2 Mt)”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes ni_43_101

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate

PEA-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

DFS-Supportingneutral

Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.