# OBT: Exploration Update - Lewis Ponds Project

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1

Original source: https://www.asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=03145029

Publisher: asx

Original announcement: 2026-09-28T22:11:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-09-29T16:53:38.565Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-09-29T16:53:38.565Z

- Company: Orbit Resources Limited

- Ticker: OBT

- Exchange: ASX

- Region: New South Wales, Australia

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: Silver, Zinc, Lead, Copper

- Document categories: Drill results, Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-09-29 16:53:39 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.50 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Orbit Resources Limited provided an exploration update for its Lewis Ponds Project in New South Wales, Australia. The ongoing diamond drilling program intersected strong sulphide mineralization in drill hole GLPDD011 at Tom's Lode, including 12.9m of 20% semi-massive sulphides and 8.5m of 10% stringer sulphides. These visual results support the geological model and continuity, with assays expected in Q4 2026. The program aims to increase resource confidence and provide core for future metallurgical test work, alongside a recently completed drone aeromagnetic survey.

Reasoning: The exploration update reports encouraging visual sulphide mineralization in drill hole GLPDD011, supporting the geological model and continuity at Tom's Lode. While assays are pending, the program aims to increase resource confidence and gather metallurgical samples, indicating positive progress for the project.

- Positive factor: Strong sulphide mineralization observed

- Positive factor: Supports geological model and continuity

- Positive factor: Drilling aims to upgrade resource confidence

- Positive factor: Core being collected for metallurgical test work

- Positive factor: Drone aeromagnetic survey completed for targeting

- Negative factor: Visual estimates only, no assays reported for current drilling

- Negative factor: True width of visual intercepts exaggerated due to oblique drilling

- Negative factor: GLPDD010 did not explain EM conductor

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed for resource and drill results

Facts used in scoring: 41

## Classification and evidence

**Apparent Width Only**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states that GLPDD011 was drilled oblique to the lode and visual sulphide estimate lengths are exaggerated, with true thickness shown in a cross section \(Figure 2\) which is not extractable.

Evidence · text

> GLPDD011 has been drilled oblique to the Tom’s Lode and visual sulphide estimate lengths are exaggerated. The cross section in Figure 2 shows the true thickness of Tom’s Lode

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: The release includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, mentioning certified labs \(ALS, Bureau Veritas\), QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

> Sawn half core samples from diamond drilling were sent for Industry standard sample preparation and analysis at a commercial laboratory. Sampling was at 1m intervals and/or based on geological control. No sample results are being reported for the current drill program.

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: The document does not disclose the cut-off grade used for reporting the visual sulphide intercepts or the historical resource estimate.

Evidence · text

> No assays are reported for the Phase 2 drilling.

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The existing JORC 2012 Resource includes 8.43Mt in the Inferred category.

Evidence · text

> 17.52Mt \(9.09Mt Indicated & 8.43Mt Inferred\)

**Category Upgrade**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: The current drilling program is explicitly focused on increasing geological confidence within the existing Mineral Resource, including the potential conversion of Inferred tonnes to Indicated.

Evidence · text

> The current drilling program is focussed on increasing geological confidence within the existing Mineral Resource, including the potential conversion of Inferred tonnes to Indicated

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The existing resource is stated to be JORC 2012 compliant, and the compliance statement confirms reporting in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.

Evidence · text

> JORC 2012 Resource of 17.52Mt

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Ms Jeneta Owens, a Competent Person and Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, is named as responsible for the information in the report.

Evidence · text

> The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Ms Jeneta Owens, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: Trace amounts of arsenopyrite are mentioned as present within the massive sulphide zones.

Evidence · text

> The dominant sulphide phases occur in decreasing abundance as pyrite > sphalerite > galena > chalcopyrite > pyrrhotite, with trace quantities of arsenopyrite.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 41. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Drill Results (31)

### GLPDD011

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-0)

Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · zinc

#### Identity

- Hole ID: GLPDD011
- Project: Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Intercept: 8.5 m
- From: 326 m
- To: 334.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 326 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: GLPDD011:326-334.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710290
- Northing: 6316133
- Elevation: 792 m
- Azimuth: 241 °
- Dip: -63 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

- Positive factor: Strong sulphide mineralization observed

- Positive factor: Supports geological model and continuity

- Negative factor: Visual estimates only, no assays reported

- Negative factor: True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling

- Negative factor: No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 8.5

Context: 326

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

### GLPDD011

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-1)

Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · copper

#### Identity

- Hole ID: GLPDD011
- Project: Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Intercept: 8.5 m
- From: 326 m
- To: 334.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 326 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: GLPDD011:326-334.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710290
- Northing: 6316133
- Elevation: 792 m
- Azimuth: 241 °
- Dip: -63 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

- Positive factor: Strong sulphide mineralization observed

- Positive factor: Supports geological model and continuity

- Negative factor: Visual estimates only, no assays reported

- Negative factor: True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling

- Negative factor: No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 8.5

Context: 326

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

### GLPDD011

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-2)

Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · zinc

#### Identity

- Hole ID: GLPDD011
- Project: Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Intercept: 12.9 m
- From: 347.6 m
- To: 360.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 347.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: GLPDD011:347.6-360.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710290
- Northing: 6316133
- Elevation: 792 m
- Azimuth: 241 °
- Dip: -63 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

- Positive factor: Strong sulphide mineralization observed

- Positive factor: Supports geological model and continuity

- Negative factor: Visual estimates only, no assays reported

- Negative factor: True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling

- Negative factor: No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 12.9

Context: 347.6

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

### GLPDD011

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-3)

Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · copper

#### Identity

- Hole ID: GLPDD011
- Project: Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Intercept: 12.9 m
- From: 347.6 m
- To: 360.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 347.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: GLPDD011:347.6-360.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710290
- Northing: 6316133
- Elevation: 792 m
- Azimuth: 241 °
- Dip: -63 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

- Positive factor: Strong sulphide mineralization observed

- Positive factor: Supports geological model and continuity

- Negative factor: Visual estimates only, no assays reported

- Negative factor: True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling

- Negative factor: No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 12.9

Context: 347.6

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

### GLPDD011

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-4)

Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · lead

#### Identity

- Hole ID: GLPDD011
- Project: Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Intercept: 12.9 m
- From: 347.6 m
- To: 360.5 m
- Intercept Depth: 347.6 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: resource
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: GLPDD011:347.6-360.5
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710290
- Northing: 6316133
- Elevation: 792 m
- Azimuth: 241 °
- Dip: -63 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

- Positive factor: Strong sulphide mineralization observed

- Positive factor: Supports geological model and continuity

- Negative factor: Visual estimates only, no assays reported

- Negative factor: True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling

- Negative factor: No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

> 12.9

Context: 347.6

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Infill Drilling**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill\_program\_type is "resource"

### GLPRCDD001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-5)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: GLPRCDD001
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.97
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 27 m
- From: 83 m
- To: 110 m
- Hole Depth: 178 m
- Intercept Depth: 83 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: GLPRCDD001:83-110
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 709566
- Northing: 6316613
- Elevation: 849 m
- Azimuth: 277 °
- Dip: -70 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 0.97
- Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from August 2026, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 27m @ 0.97g/t AuEq from 83m

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### GLPRCDD001

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-6)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: GLPRCDD001
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.44
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Intercept: 10 m
- From: 89 m
- To: 99 m
- Hole Depth: 178 m
- Intercept Depth: 89 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: GLPRCDD001:89-99
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 709566
- Northing: 6316613
- Elevation: 849 m
- Azimuth: 277 °
- Dip: -70 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 1.44
- Metal Eq. Unit: g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from August 2026, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 10m @ 1.44g/t AuEq from 89m

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-51AW2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-7)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-51AW2
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 7.92
- Grade Unit: AuEq\_ppm
- Intercept: 15 m
- From: 385 m
- To: 400 m
- Hole Depth: 501 m
- Intercept Depth: 385 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710273
- Northing: 6316186
- Elevation: 784 m
- Azimuth: 238 °
- Dip: -70 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 7.92
- Metal Eq. Unit: AuEq\_ppm
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 7.92

Context: TLPD-51AW2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-51AW2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-8)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-51AW2
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.09
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 15 m
- From: 385 m
- To: 400 m
- Hole Depth: 501 m
- Intercept Depth: 385 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710273
- Northing: 6316186
- Elevation: 784 m
- Azimuth: 238 °
- Dip: -70 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.09

Context: TLPD-51AW2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-51AW2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-9)

Lewis Ponds · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-51AW2
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 105.47
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 15 m
- From: 385 m
- To: 400 m
- Hole Depth: 501 m
- Intercept Depth: 385 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710273
- Northing: 6316186
- Elevation: 784 m
- Azimuth: 238 °
- Dip: -70 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 105.47

Context: TLPD-51AW2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-51AW2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-10)

Lewis Ponds · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-51AW2
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.15
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 15 m
- From: 385 m
- To: 400 m
- Hole Depth: 501 m
- Intercept Depth: 385 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710273
- Northing: 6316186
- Elevation: 784 m
- Azimuth: 238 °
- Dip: -70 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.15

Context: TLPD-51AW2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-51AW2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-11)

Lewis Ponds · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-51AW2
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.28
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 15 m
- From: 385 m
- To: 400 m
- Hole Depth: 501 m
- Intercept Depth: 385 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710273
- Northing: 6316186
- Elevation: 784 m
- Azimuth: 238 °
- Dip: -70 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 4.28

Context: TLPD-51AW2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-51AW2

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-12)

Lewis Ponds · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-51AW2
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 6.75
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 15 m
- From: 385 m
- To: 400 m
- Hole Depth: 501 m
- Intercept Depth: 385 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710273
- Northing: 6316186
- Elevation: 784 m
- Azimuth: 238 °
- Dip: -70 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 6.75

Context: TLPD-51AW2

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-52

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-13)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-52
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 4.02
- Grade Unit: AuEq\_ppm
- Intercept: 11 m
- From: 170 m
- To: 181 m
- Hole Depth: 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth: 170 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710213
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 213 °
- Dip: -55 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 4.02
- Metal Eq. Unit: AuEq\_ppm
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 4.02

Context: TLPD-52

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-52

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-14)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-52
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.83
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 11 m
- From: 170 m
- To: 181 m
- Hole Depth: 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth: 170 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710213
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 213 °
- Dip: -55 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.83

Context: TLPD-52

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-52

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-15)

Lewis Ponds · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-52
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 45.73
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 11 m
- From: 170 m
- To: 181 m
- Hole Depth: 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth: 170 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710213
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 213 °
- Dip: -55 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 45.73

Context: TLPD-52

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-52

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-16)

Lewis Ponds · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-52
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.13
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 11 m
- From: 170 m
- To: 181 m
- Hole Depth: 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth: 170 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710213
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 213 °
- Dip: -55 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.13

Context: TLPD-52

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-52

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-17)

Lewis Ponds · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-52
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.78
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 11 m
- From: 170 m
- To: 181 m
- Hole Depth: 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth: 170 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710213
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 213 °
- Dip: -55 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.78

Context: TLPD-52

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-52

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-18)

Lewis Ponds · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-52
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.24
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 11 m
- From: 170 m
- To: 181 m
- Hole Depth: 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth: 170 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710213
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 213 °
- Dip: -55 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 3.24

Context: TLPD-52

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-53

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-19)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-53
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.89
- Grade Unit: AuEq\_ppm
- Intercept: 51 m
- From: 270 m
- To: 321 m
- Hole Depth: 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth: 270 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710211
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 222 °
- Dip: -68 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 3.89
- Metal Eq. Unit: AuEq\_ppm
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 3.89

Context: TLPD-53

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-53

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-20)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-53
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.46
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 51 m
- From: 270 m
- To: 321 m
- Hole Depth: 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth: 270 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710211
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 222 °
- Dip: -68 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.46

Context: TLPD-53

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-53

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-21)

Lewis Ponds · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-53
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 47.82
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 51 m
- From: 270 m
- To: 321 m
- Hole Depth: 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth: 270 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710211
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 222 °
- Dip: -68 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 47.82

Context: TLPD-53

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-53

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-22)

Lewis Ponds · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-53
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.1
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 51 m
- From: 270 m
- To: 321 m
- Hole Depth: 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth: 270 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710211
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 222 °
- Dip: -68 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.10

Context: TLPD-53

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-53

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-23)

Lewis Ponds · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-53
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.12
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 51 m
- From: 270 m
- To: 321 m
- Hole Depth: 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth: 270 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710211
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 222 °
- Dip: -68 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results

- Negative factor: No new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 2.12

Context: TLPD-53

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-53

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-24)

Lewis Ponds · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-53
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 3.48
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 51 m
- From: 270 m
- To: 321 m
- Hole Depth: 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth: 270 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710211
- Northing: 6316198
- Elevation: 781 m
- Azimuth: 222 °
- Dip: -68 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results

- Negative factor: No new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 3.48

Context: TLPD-53

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-54

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-25)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-54
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 5.77
- Grade Unit: AuEq\_ppm
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 185 m
- To: 189 m
- Hole Depth: 241 m
- Intercept Depth: 185 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710302
- Northing: 6316122
- Elevation: 795 m
- Azimuth: 240 °
- Dip: -47 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Metal Eq. Grade: 5.77
- Metal Eq. Unit: AuEq\_ppm
- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Positive factor: Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

- Negative factor: Historical drill results

- Negative factor: No new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 5.77

Context: TLPD-54

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-54

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-26)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-54
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 1.31
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 185 m
- To: 189 m
- Hole Depth: 241 m
- Intercept Depth: 185 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710302
- Northing: 6316122
- Elevation: 795 m
- Azimuth: 240 °
- Dip: -47 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results

- Negative factor: No new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 1.31

Context: TLPD-54

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-54

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-27)

Lewis Ponds · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-54
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 133
- Grade Unit: ppm
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 185 m
- To: 189 m
- Hole Depth: 241 m
- Intercept Depth: 185 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710302
- Northing: 6316122
- Elevation: 795 m
- Azimuth: 240 °
- Dip: -47 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results

- Negative factor: No new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 133.00

Context: TLPD-54

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-54

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-28)

Lewis Ponds · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-54
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 0.17
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 185 m
- To: 189 m
- Hole Depth: 241 m
- Intercept Depth: 185 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710302
- Northing: 6316122
- Elevation: 795 m
- Azimuth: 240 °
- Dip: -47 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results

- Negative factor: No new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 0.17

Context: TLPD-54

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-54

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-29)

Lewis Ponds · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-54
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.17
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 185 m
- To: 189 m
- Hole Depth: 241 m
- Intercept Depth: 185 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710302
- Northing: 6316122
- Elevation: 795 m
- Azimuth: 240 °
- Dip: -47 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results

- Negative factor: No new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 2.17

Context: TLPD-54

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

### TLPD-54

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-drill-facts-30)

Lewis Ponds · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Hole ID: TLPD-54
- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: australia\_nsw
- Ticker: OBT

#### Geometry

- Grade: 2.82
- Grade Unit: %
- Intercept: 4 m
- From: 185 m
- To: 189 m
- Hole Depth: 241 m
- Intercept Depth: 185 m

#### Classification

- Deposit Type: vms
- Program: exploration
- Sample Type: drill
- Group ID: TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method: underground

#### Location

- Location: Main Zone
- Easting: 710302
- Northing: 6316122
- Elevation: 795 m
- Azimuth: 240 °
- Dip: -47 °
- Loc. Confidence: medium
- Loc. Source: document

#### QA/QC

- Laboratory: ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed: Yes
- QP Signed: Yes
- QA/QC Methods: standards, blanks, duplicates

#### Deleterious

- Deleterious Flag: Yes
- Deleterious Elements: arsenopyrite

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Interp. Status: scored
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: Grades reported

- Negative factor: Historical drill results

- Negative factor: No new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

> 2.82

Context: TLPD-54

#### Tags used in scoring

**QA/QC Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods \(blanks, standards, duplicates\).

Why it applies: qaqc\_disclosed is true

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**Deleterious Elements Present**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Penalty elements \(arsenic, antimony, etc.\) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious\_flag is true

**Stale Data Re-release**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

## Resource Estimates (10)

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-31)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 9090000
- Grade: 1.12
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 9.09Mt Indicated & 8.43Mt Inferred\) @ 1.12g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-32)

Lewis Ponds · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 9090000
- Grade: 53.34
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 53.34g/t Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-33)

Lewis Ponds · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 9090000
- Grade: 2.06
- Grade Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 2.06% Zn

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-34)

Lewis Ponds · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 9090000
- Grade: 1.1
- Grade Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 1.10% Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-35)

Lewis Ponds · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 9090000
- Grade: 0.14
- Grade Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 0.14% Cu

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-36)

Lewis Ponds · gold

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: gold
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 8430000
- Grade: 1.12
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 9.09Mt Indicated & 8.43Mt Inferred\) @ 1.12g/t Au

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-37)

Lewis Ponds · silver

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: silver
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 8430000
- Grade: 53.34
- Grade Unit: g/t

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 53.34g/t Ag

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-38)

Lewis Ponds · zinc

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: zinc
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 8430000
- Grade: 2.06
- Grade Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 2.06% Zn

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-39)

Lewis Ponds · lead

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: lead
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 8430000
- Grade: 1.1
- Grade Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 1.10% Pb

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/obt-exploration-update-lewis-ponds-project--dc1abf50-f02f-45e2-9e02-ec76c82ff6d1#fact-resource-facts-40)

Lewis Ponds · copper

Historical result

Needs review: historical\_restatement

#### Identity

- Project: Lewis Ponds
- Commodity: copper
- Region: australia\_nsw
- Reported Region: New South Wales
- Ticker: OBT

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Reporting standards: jorc
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id: resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone: Lewis Ponds

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 8430000
- Grade: 0.14
- Grade Unit: %

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2025-12-15

#### Metal Equivalent

- Assumptions Disclosed: Yes

#### Review

- Needs Review: Yes
- Review Reason: historical\_restatement
- Historical: Yes
- Historical Source Date: 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

- Positive factor: JORC 2012 compliant

- Positive factor: QP signed

- Negative factor: Historical estimate, no new information

- Negative factor: Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

> 0.14% Cu

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Undisclosed**

Polarity: negative

Definition: High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff\_grade was stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**JORC Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code \(Australia\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes jorc

**No Contained Metal**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained\_metal was not reported

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.