OBT: Exploration Update - Lewis Ponds Project

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Orbit Resources Limited
Ticker
OBT
Exchange
ASX
Region
New South Wales, Australia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver, Zinc, Lead, Copper
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-09-29 16:53:39 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Orbit Resources Limited provided an exploration update for its Lewis Ponds Project in New South Wales, Australia. The ongoing diamond drilling program intersected strong sulphide mineralization in drill hole GLPDD011 at Tom's Lode, including 12.9m of 20% semi-massive sulphides and 8.5m of 10% stringer sulphides. These visual results support the geological model and continuity, with assays expected in Q4 2026. The program aims to increase resource confidence and provide core for future metallurgical test work, alongside a recently completed drone aeromagnetic survey.

Reasoning: The exploration update reports encouraging visual sulphide mineralization in drill hole GLPDD011, supporting the geological model and continuity at Tom's Lode. While assays are pending, the program aims to increase resource confidence and gather metallurgical samples, indicating positive progress for the project.

Positive factors

  • Strong sulphide mineralization observed
  • Supports geological model and continuity
  • Drilling aims to upgrade resource confidence
  • Core being collected for metallurgical test work
  • Drone aeromagnetic survey completed for targeting

Negative factors

  • Visual estimates only, no assays reported for current drilling
  • True width of visual intercepts exaggerated due to oblique drilling
  • GLPDD010 did not explain EM conductor
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed for resource and drill results

Facts used in scoring: 41

Classification and evidence

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document states that GLPDD011 was drilled oblique to the lode and visual sulphide estimate lengths are exaggerated, with true thickness shown in a cross section (Figure 2) which is not extractable.

Evidence · text

“GLPDD011 has been drilled oblique to the Tom’s Lode and visual sulphide estimate lengths are exaggerated. The cross section in Figure 2 shows the true thickness of Tom’s Lode”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, mentioning certified labs (ALS, Bureau Veritas), QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.

Evidence · text

“Sawn half core samples from diamond drilling were sent for Industry standard sample preparation and analysis at a commercial laboratory. Sampling was at 1m intervals and/or based on geological control. No sample results are being reported for the current drill program.”

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: The document does not disclose the cut-off grade used for reporting the visual sulphide intercepts or the historical resource estimate.

Evidence · text

“No assays are reported for the Phase 2 drilling.”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The existing JORC 2012 Resource includes 8.43Mt in the Inferred category.

Evidence · text

“17.52Mt (9.09Mt Indicated & 8.43Mt Inferred)”

Category Upgradepositive

Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.

Why it applies: The current drilling program is explicitly focused on increasing geological confidence within the existing Mineral Resource, including the potential conversion of Inferred tonnes to Indicated.

Evidence · text

“The current drilling program is focussed on increasing geological confidence within the existing Mineral Resource, including the potential conversion of Inferred tonnes to Indicated”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The existing resource is stated to be JORC 2012 compliant, and the compliance statement confirms reporting in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.

Evidence · text

“JORC 2012 Resource of 17.52Mt”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Ms Jeneta Owens, a Competent Person and Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, is named as responsible for the information in the report.

Evidence · text

“The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Ms Jeneta Owens, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: Trace amounts of arsenopyrite are mentioned as present within the massive sulphide zones.

Evidence · text

“The dominant sulphide phases occur in decreasing abundance as pyrite > sphalerite > galena > chalcopyrite > pyrrhotite, with trace quantities of arsenopyrite.”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 41. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (31)

GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · zincIntercept: 8.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GLPDD011
Project
Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Intercept
8.5 m
From
326 m
To
334.5 m
Intercept Depth
326 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GLPDD011:326-334.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710290
Northing
6316133
Elevation
792 m
Azimuth
241 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

Positive factors

  • Strong sulphide mineralization observed
  • Supports geological model and continuity

Negative factors

  • Visual estimates only, no assays reported
  • True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
  • No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“8.5”

Context: 326

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · copperIntercept: 8.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GLPDD011
Project
Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Intercept
8.5 m
From
326 m
To
334.5 m
Intercept Depth
326 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GLPDD011:326-334.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710290
Northing
6316133
Elevation
792 m
Azimuth
241 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

Positive factors

  • Strong sulphide mineralization observed
  • Supports geological model and continuity

Negative factors

  • Visual estimates only, no assays reported
  • True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
  • No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“8.5”

Context: 326

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · zincIntercept: 12.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GLPDD011
Project
Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Intercept
12.9 m
From
347.6 m
To
360.5 m
Intercept Depth
347.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GLPDD011:347.6-360.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710290
Northing
6316133
Elevation
792 m
Azimuth
241 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

Positive factors

  • Strong sulphide mineralization observed
  • Supports geological model and continuity

Negative factors

  • Visual estimates only, no assays reported
  • True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
  • No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“12.9”

Context: 347.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · copperIntercept: 12.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GLPDD011
Project
Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Intercept
12.9 m
From
347.6 m
To
360.5 m
Intercept Depth
347.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GLPDD011:347.6-360.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710290
Northing
6316133
Elevation
792 m
Azimuth
241 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

Positive factors

  • Strong sulphide mineralization observed
  • Supports geological model and continuity

Negative factors

  • Visual estimates only, no assays reported
  • True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
  • No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“12.9”

Context: 347.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · leadIntercept: 12.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GLPDD011
Project
Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Intercept
12.9 m
From
347.6 m
To
360.5 m
Intercept Depth
347.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
resource
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GLPDD011:347.6-360.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710290
Northing
6316133
Elevation
792 m
Azimuth
241 °
Dip
-63 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.

Positive factors

  • Strong sulphide mineralization observed
  • Supports geological model and continuity

Negative factors

  • Visual estimates only, no assays reported
  • True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
  • No cut-off grade disclosed

Evidence · table

“12.9”

Context: 347.6

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"

GLPRCDD001Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GLPRCDD001
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
27 m
From
83 m
To
110 m
Hole Depth
178 m
Intercept Depth
83 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GLPRCDD001:83-110
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
709566
Northing
6316613
Elevation
849 m
Azimuth
277 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
0.97
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from August 2026, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“27m @ 0.97g/t AuEq from 83m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

GLPRCDD001Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GLPRCDD001
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
89 m
To
99 m
Hole Depth
178 m
Intercept Depth
89 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GLPRCDD001:89-99
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
709566
Northing
6316613
Elevation
849 m
Azimuth
277 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.44
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from August 2026, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“10m @ 1.44g/t AuEq from 89m”

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 7.92Grade Unit: AuEq_ppmIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-51AW2
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
7.92
Grade Unit
AuEq_ppm
Intercept
15 m
From
385 m
To
400 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
385 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-51AW2:385-400
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710273
Northing
6316186
Elevation
784 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.92
Metal Eq. Unit
AuEq_ppm
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“7.92”

Context: TLPD-51AW2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-51AW2
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
15 m
From
385 m
To
400 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
385 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-51AW2:385-400
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710273
Northing
6316186
Elevation
784 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: TLPD-51AW2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · silverGrade: 105.47Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-51AW2
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
105.47
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
15 m
From
385 m
To
400 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
385 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-51AW2:385-400
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710273
Northing
6316186
Elevation
784 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“105.47”

Context: TLPD-51AW2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-51AW2
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
385 m
To
400 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
385 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-51AW2:385-400
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710273
Northing
6316186
Elevation
784 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: TLPD-51AW2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · leadGrade: 4.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-51AW2
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
4.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
385 m
To
400 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
385 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-51AW2:385-400
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710273
Northing
6316186
Elevation
784 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“4.28”

Context: TLPD-51AW2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · zincGrade: 6.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-51AW2
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
6.75
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
15 m
From
385 m
To
400 m
Hole Depth
501 m
Intercept Depth
385 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-51AW2:385-400
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710273
Northing
6316186
Elevation
784 m
Azimuth
238 °
Dip
-70 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“6.75”

Context: TLPD-51AW2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 4.02Grade Unit: AuEq_ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-52
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
4.02
Grade Unit
AuEq_ppm
Intercept
11 m
From
170 m
To
181 m
Hole Depth
232.2 m
Intercept Depth
170 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-52:170-181
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710213
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
213 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
4.02
Metal Eq. Unit
AuEq_ppm
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“4.02”

Context: TLPD-52

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-52
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
0.83
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
11 m
From
170 m
To
181 m
Hole Depth
232.2 m
Intercept Depth
170 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-52:170-181
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710213
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
213 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.83”

Context: TLPD-52

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · silverGrade: 45.73Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-52
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
45.73
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
11 m
From
170 m
To
181 m
Hole Depth
232.2 m
Intercept Depth
170 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-52:170-181
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710213
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
213 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“45.73”

Context: TLPD-52

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-52
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
0.13
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
170 m
To
181 m
Hole Depth
232.2 m
Intercept Depth
170 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-52:170-181
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710213
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
213 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.13”

Context: TLPD-52

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · leadGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-52
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
1.78
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
170 m
To
181 m
Hole Depth
232.2 m
Intercept Depth
170 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-52:170-181
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710213
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
213 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.78”

Context: TLPD-52

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · zincGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-52
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
3.24
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
11 m
From
170 m
To
181 m
Hole Depth
232.2 m
Intercept Depth
170 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-52:170-181
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710213
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
213 °
Dip
-55 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.24”

Context: TLPD-52

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 3.89Grade Unit: AuEq_ppmIntercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-53
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
3.89
Grade Unit
AuEq_ppm
Intercept
51 m
From
270 m
To
321 m
Hole Depth
369.9 m
Intercept Depth
270 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-53:270-321
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710211
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
3.89
Metal Eq. Unit
AuEq_ppm
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.89”

Context: TLPD-53

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-53
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
51 m
From
270 m
To
321 m
Hole Depth
369.9 m
Intercept Depth
270 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-53:270-321
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710211
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: TLPD-53

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · silverGrade: 47.82Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-53
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
47.82
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
51 m
From
270 m
To
321 m
Hole Depth
369.9 m
Intercept Depth
270 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-53:270-321
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710211
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“47.82”

Context: TLPD-53

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-53
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51 m
From
270 m
To
321 m
Hole Depth
369.9 m
Intercept Depth
270 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-53:270-321
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710211
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: TLPD-53

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · leadGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-53
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
2.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51 m
From
270 m
To
321 m
Hole Depth
369.9 m
Intercept Depth
270 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-53:270-321
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710211
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results
  • No new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.12”

Context: TLPD-53

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · zincGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-53
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
3.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
51 m
From
270 m
To
321 m
Hole Depth
369.9 m
Intercept Depth
270 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-53:270-321
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710211
Northing
6316198
Elevation
781 m
Azimuth
222 °
Dip
-68 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results
  • No new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“3.48”

Context: TLPD-53

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 5.77Grade Unit: AuEq_ppmIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-54
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
5.77
Grade Unit
AuEq_ppm
Intercept
4 m
From
185 m
To
189 m
Hole Depth
241 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-54:185-189
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710302
Northing
6316122
Elevation
795 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
5.77
Metal Eq. Unit
AuEq_ppm
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results
  • No new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“5.77”

Context: TLPD-54

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-54
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
1.31
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4 m
From
185 m
To
189 m
Hole Depth
241 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-54:185-189
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710302
Northing
6316122
Elevation
795 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results
  • No new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“1.31”

Context: TLPD-54

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · silverGrade: 133Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-54
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
133
Grade Unit
ppm
Intercept
4 m
From
185 m
To
189 m
Hole Depth
241 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-54:185-189
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710302
Northing
6316122
Elevation
795 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results
  • No new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“133.00”

Context: TLPD-54

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-54
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
185 m
To
189 m
Hole Depth
241 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-54:185-189
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710302
Northing
6316122
Elevation
795 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results
  • No new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: TLPD-54

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · leadGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-54
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
2.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
185 m
To
189 m
Hole Depth
241 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-54:185-189
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710302
Northing
6316122
Elevation
795 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results
  • No new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.17”

Context: TLPD-54

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · zincGrade: 2.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
TLPD-54
Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
OBT

Geometry

Grade
2.82
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m
From
185 m
To
189 m
Hole Depth
241 m
Intercept Depth
185 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
TLPD-54:185-189
Mining Method
underground

Location

Location
Main Zone
Easting
710302
Northing
6316122
Elevation
795 m
Azimuth
240 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
medium
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

Laboratory
ALS and Bureau Veritas
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
Yes
Deleterious Elements
arsenopyrite

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • Grades reported

Negative factors

  • Historical drill results
  • No new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · table

“2.82”

Context: TLPD-54

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Deleterious Elements Presentnegative

Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.

Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Resource Estimates (10)

indicatedLewis Ponds · goldTonnes: 9090000Grade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9090000
Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“9.09Mt Indicated & 8.43Mt Inferred) @ 1.12g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedLewis Ponds · silverTonnes: 9090000Grade: 53.34Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9090000
Grade
53.34
Grade Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“53.34g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedLewis Ponds · zincTonnes: 9090000Grade: 2.06Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9090000
Grade
2.06
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“2.06% Zn”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedLewis Ponds · leadTonnes: 9090000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9090000
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“1.10% Pb”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

indicatedLewis Ponds · copperTonnes: 9090000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
9090000
Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“0.14% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLewis Ponds · goldTonnes: 8430000Grade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8430000
Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“9.09Mt Indicated & 8.43Mt Inferred) @ 1.12g/t Au”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLewis Ponds · silverTonnes: 8430000Grade: 53.34Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8430000
Grade
53.34
Grade Unit
g/t

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“53.34g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLewis Ponds · zincTonnes: 8430000Grade: 2.06Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8430000
Grade
2.06
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“2.06% Zn”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLewis Ponds · leadTonnes: 8430000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8430000
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“1.10% Pb”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredLewis Ponds · copperTonnes: 8430000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Lewis Ponds
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
New South Wales
Ticker
OBT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Ms Jeneta Owens
Resource group id
resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
Deposit or zone
Lewis Ponds

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
8430000
Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2025-12-15

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.

Positive factors

  • JORC 2012 compliant
  • QP signed

Negative factors

  • Historical estimate, no new information
  • Cut-off grade undisclosed

Evidence · text

“0.14% Cu”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.