OBT: Exploration Update - Lewis Ponds Project
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Orbit Resources Limited
- Ticker
- OBT
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- New South Wales, Australia
- Primary commodity
- Gold
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Zinc, Lead, Copper
- Document categories
- Drill results, Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-09-29 16:53:39 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Orbit Resources Limited provided an exploration update for its Lewis Ponds Project in New South Wales, Australia. The ongoing diamond drilling program intersected strong sulphide mineralization in drill hole GLPDD011 at Tom's Lode, including 12.9m of 20% semi-massive sulphides and 8.5m of 10% stringer sulphides. These visual results support the geological model and continuity, with assays expected in Q4 2026. The program aims to increase resource confidence and provide core for future metallurgical test work, alongside a recently completed drone aeromagnetic survey.
Reasoning: The exploration update reports encouraging visual sulphide mineralization in drill hole GLPDD011, supporting the geological model and continuity at Tom's Lode. While assays are pending, the program aims to increase resource confidence and gather metallurgical samples, indicating positive progress for the project.
Positive factors
- Strong sulphide mineralization observed
- Supports geological model and continuity
- Drilling aims to upgrade resource confidence
- Core being collected for metallurgical test work
- Drone aeromagnetic survey completed for targeting
Negative factors
- Visual estimates only, no assays reported for current drilling
- True width of visual intercepts exaggerated due to oblique drilling
- GLPDD010 did not explain EM conductor
- Cut-off grade undisclosed for resource and drill results
Facts used in scoring: 41
Classification and evidence
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document states that GLPDD011 was drilled oblique to the lode and visual sulphide estimate lengths are exaggerated, with true thickness shown in a cross section (Figure 2) which is not extractable.
Evidence · text
“GLPDD011 has been drilled oblique to the Tom’s Lode and visual sulphide estimate lengths are exaggerated. The cross section in Figure 2 shows the true thickness of Tom’s Lode”
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes extensive QA/QC disclosure in JORC Table 1, mentioning certified labs (ALS, Bureau Veritas), QP sign-off, and methods like blanks, standards, and duplicates.
Evidence · text
“Sawn half core samples from diamond drilling were sent for Industry standard sample preparation and analysis at a commercial laboratory. Sampling was at 1m intervals and/or based on geological control. No sample results are being reported for the current drill program.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: The document does not disclose the cut-off grade used for reporting the visual sulphide intercepts or the historical resource estimate.
Evidence · text
“No assays are reported for the Phase 2 drilling.”
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: The existing JORC 2012 Resource includes 8.43Mt in the Inferred category.
Evidence · text
“17.52Mt (9.09Mt Indicated & 8.43Mt Inferred)”
Category Upgradepositive
Resource confidence improved — Inferred upgraded to Indicated, or Indicated to Measured. De-risking signal.
Why it applies: The current drilling program is explicitly focused on increasing geological confidence within the existing Mineral Resource, including the potential conversion of Inferred tonnes to Indicated.
Evidence · text
“The current drilling program is focussed on increasing geological confidence within the existing Mineral Resource, including the potential conversion of Inferred tonnes to Indicated”
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The existing resource is stated to be JORC 2012 compliant, and the compliance statement confirms reporting in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.
Evidence · text
“JORC 2012 Resource of 17.52Mt”
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Ms Jeneta Owens, a Competent Person and Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, is named as responsible for the information in the report.
Evidence · text
“The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Ms Jeneta Owens, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists.”
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: Trace amounts of arsenopyrite are mentioned as present within the massive sulphide zones.
Evidence · text
“The dominant sulphide phases occur in decreasing abundance as pyrite > sphalerite > galena > chalcopyrite > pyrrhotite, with trace quantities of arsenopyrite.”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 41. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (31)
GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · zincIntercept: 8.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GLPDD011
- Project
- Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 326 m
- To
- 334.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 326 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GLPDD011:326-334.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710290
- Northing
- 6316133
- Elevation
- 792 m
- Azimuth
- 241 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.
Positive factors
- Strong sulphide mineralization observed
- Supports geological model and continuity
Negative factors
- Visual estimates only, no assays reported
- True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
- No cut-off grade disclosed
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: 326
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · copperIntercept: 8.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GLPDD011
- Project
- Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 8.5 m
- From
- 326 m
- To
- 334.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 326 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GLPDD011:326-334.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710290
- Northing
- 6316133
- Elevation
- 792 m
- Azimuth
- 241 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.
Positive factors
- Strong sulphide mineralization observed
- Supports geological model and continuity
Negative factors
- Visual estimates only, no assays reported
- True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
- No cut-off grade disclosed
Evidence · table
“8.5”
Context: 326
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · zincIntercept: 12.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GLPDD011
- Project
- Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 12.9 m
- From
- 347.6 m
- To
- 360.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 347.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GLPDD011:347.6-360.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710290
- Northing
- 6316133
- Elevation
- 792 m
- Azimuth
- 241 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.
Positive factors
- Strong sulphide mineralization observed
- Supports geological model and continuity
Negative factors
- Visual estimates only, no assays reported
- True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
- No cut-off grade disclosed
Evidence · table
“12.9”
Context: 347.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · copperIntercept: 12.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GLPDD011
- Project
- Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 12.9 m
- From
- 347.6 m
- To
- 360.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 347.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GLPDD011:347.6-360.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710290
- Northing
- 6316133
- Elevation
- 792 m
- Azimuth
- 241 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.
Positive factors
- Strong sulphide mineralization observed
- Supports geological model and continuity
Negative factors
- Visual estimates only, no assays reported
- True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
- No cut-off grade disclosed
Evidence · table
“12.9”
Context: 347.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
GLPDD011Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised · leadIntercept: 12.9 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GLPDD011
- Project
- Drilling continues to demonstrate continuity of the mineralised
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Intercept
- 12.9 m
- From
- 347.6 m
- To
- 360.5 m
- Intercept Depth
- 347.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GLPDD011:347.6-360.5
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710290
- Northing
- 6316133
- Elevation
- 792 m
- Azimuth
- 241 °
- Dip
- -63 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Visual inspection of drill core GLPDD011 revealed significant sulphide mineralization, supporting the geological model and continuity of Tom's Lode, though true width is exaggerated and assays are pending.
Positive factors
- Strong sulphide mineralization observed
- Supports geological model and continuity
Negative factors
- Visual estimates only, no assays reported
- True width exaggerated due to oblique drilling
- No cut-off grade disclosed
Evidence · table
“12.9”
Context: 347.6
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
GLPRCDD001Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 27 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GLPRCDD001
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.97
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 27 m
- From
- 83 m
- To
- 110 m
- Hole Depth
- 178 m
- Intercept Depth
- 83 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GLPRCDD001:83-110
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 709566
- Northing
- 6316613
- Elevation
- 849 m
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 0.97
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from August 2026, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“27m @ 0.97g/t AuEq from 83m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
GLPRCDD001Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GLPRCDD001
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.44
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 10 m
- From
- 89 m
- To
- 99 m
- Hole Depth
- 178 m
- Intercept Depth
- 89 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- GLPRCDD001:89-99
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 709566
- Northing
- 6316613
- Elevation
- 849 m
- Azimuth
- 277 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 1.44
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AuEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2026-08-24T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from August 2026, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“10m @ 1.44g/t AuEq from 89m”
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 7.92Grade Unit: AuEq_ppmIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-51AW2
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 7.92
- Grade Unit
- AuEq_ppm
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 385 m
- To
- 400 m
- Hole Depth
- 501 m
- Intercept Depth
- 385 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710273
- Northing
- 6316186
- Elevation
- 784 m
- Azimuth
- 238 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 7.92
- Metal Eq. Unit
- AuEq_ppm
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“7.92”
Context: TLPD-51AW2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-51AW2
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.09
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 385 m
- To
- 400 m
- Hole Depth
- 501 m
- Intercept Depth
- 385 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710273
- Northing
- 6316186
- Elevation
- 784 m
- Azimuth
- 238 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.09”
Context: TLPD-51AW2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · silverGrade: 105.47Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-51AW2
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 105.47
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 385 m
- To
- 400 m
- Hole Depth
- 501 m
- Intercept Depth
- 385 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710273
- Northing
- 6316186
- Elevation
- 784 m
- Azimuth
- 238 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“105.47”
Context: TLPD-51AW2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · copperGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-51AW2
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 385 m
- To
- 400 m
- Hole Depth
- 501 m
- Intercept Depth
- 385 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710273
- Northing
- 6316186
- Elevation
- 784 m
- Azimuth
- 238 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.15”
Context: TLPD-51AW2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · leadGrade: 4.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-51AW2
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.28
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 385 m
- To
- 400 m
- Hole Depth
- 501 m
- Intercept Depth
- 385 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710273
- Northing
- 6316186
- Elevation
- 784 m
- Azimuth
- 238 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“4.28”
Context: TLPD-51AW2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-51AW2Lewis Ponds · zincGrade: 6.75Grade Unit: %Intercept: 15 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-51AW2
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.75
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 15 m
- From
- 385 m
- To
- 400 m
- Hole Depth
- 501 m
- Intercept Depth
- 385 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-51AW2:385-400
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710273
- Northing
- 6316186
- Elevation
- 784 m
- Azimuth
- 238 °
- Dip
- -70 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“6.75”
Context: TLPD-51AW2
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 4.02Grade Unit: AuEq_ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-52
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.02
- Grade Unit
- AuEq_ppm
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 170 m
- To
- 181 m
- Hole Depth
- 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710213
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 213 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 4.02
- Metal Eq. Unit
- AuEq_ppm
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“4.02”
Context: TLPD-52
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 0.83Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-52
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.83
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 170 m
- To
- 181 m
- Hole Depth
- 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710213
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 213 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.83”
Context: TLPD-52
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · silverGrade: 45.73Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-52
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 45.73
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 170 m
- To
- 181 m
- Hole Depth
- 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710213
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 213 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“45.73”
Context: TLPD-52
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · copperGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-52
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 170 m
- To
- 181 m
- Hole Depth
- 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710213
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 213 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: TLPD-52
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · leadGrade: 1.78Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-52
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.78
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 170 m
- To
- 181 m
- Hole Depth
- 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710213
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 213 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.78”
Context: TLPD-52
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-52Lewis Ponds · zincGrade: 3.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 11 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-52
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 11 m
- From
- 170 m
- To
- 181 m
- Hole Depth
- 232.2 m
- Intercept Depth
- 170 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-52:170-181
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710213
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 213 °
- Dip
- -55 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“3.24”
Context: TLPD-52
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 3.89Grade Unit: AuEq_ppmIntercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-53
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.89
- Grade Unit
- AuEq_ppm
- Intercept
- 51 m
- From
- 270 m
- To
- 321 m
- Hole Depth
- 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710211
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -68 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 3.89
- Metal Eq. Unit
- AuEq_ppm
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“3.89”
Context: TLPD-53
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-53
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.46
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 51 m
- From
- 270 m
- To
- 321 m
- Hole Depth
- 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710211
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -68 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.46”
Context: TLPD-53
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · silverGrade: 47.82Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-53
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 47.82
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 51 m
- From
- 270 m
- To
- 321 m
- Hole Depth
- 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710211
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -68 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“47.82”
Context: TLPD-53
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · copperGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-53
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 51 m
- From
- 270 m
- To
- 321 m
- Hole Depth
- 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710211
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -68 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: TLPD-53
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · leadGrade: 2.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-53
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 51 m
- From
- 270 m
- To
- 321 m
- Hole Depth
- 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710211
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -68 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results
- No new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“2.12”
Context: TLPD-53
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-53Lewis Ponds · zincGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 51 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-53
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 51 m
- From
- 270 m
- To
- 321 m
- Hole Depth
- 369.9 m
- Intercept Depth
- 270 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-53:270-321
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710211
- Northing
- 6316198
- Elevation
- 781 m
- Azimuth
- 222 °
- Dip
- -68 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results
- No new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“3.48”
Context: TLPD-53
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 5.77Grade Unit: AuEq_ppmIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-54
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.77
- Grade Unit
- AuEq_ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 189 m
- Hole Depth
- 241 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710302
- Northing
- 6316122
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -47 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 5.77
- Metal Eq. Unit
- AuEq_ppm
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
- Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed
Negative factors
- Historical drill results
- No new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“5.77”
Context: TLPD-54
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · goldGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-54
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.31
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 189 m
- Hole Depth
- 241 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710302
- Northing
- 6316122
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -47 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results
- No new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“1.31”
Context: TLPD-54
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · silverGrade: 133Grade Unit: ppmIntercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-54
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 133
- Grade Unit
- ppm
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 189 m
- Hole Depth
- 241 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710302
- Northing
- 6316122
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -47 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results
- No new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“133.00”
Context: TLPD-54
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-54
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 189 m
- Hole Depth
- 241 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710302
- Northing
- 6316122
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -47 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results
- No new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“0.17”
Context: TLPD-54
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · leadGrade: 2.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-54
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.17
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 189 m
- Hole Depth
- 241 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710302
- Northing
- 6316122
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -47 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results
- No new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“2.17”
Context: TLPD-54
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
TLPD-54Lewis Ponds · zincGrade: 2.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- TLPD-54
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- australia_nsw
- Ticker
- OBT
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.82
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4 m
- From
- 185 m
- To
- 189 m
- Hole Depth
- 241 m
- Intercept Depth
- 185 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- vms
- Program
- exploration
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- TLPD-54:185-189
- Mining Method
- underground
Location
- Location
- Main Zone
- Easting
- 710302
- Northing
- 6316122
- Elevation
- 795 m
- Azimuth
- 240 °
- Dip
- -47 °
- Loc. Confidence
- medium
- Loc. Source
- document
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ALS and Bureau Veritas
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Deleterious
- Deleterious Flag
- Yes
- Deleterious Elements
- arsenopyrite
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 1995-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: These are historical drill results from 1995, restated for context, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- Grades reported
Negative factors
- Historical drill results
- No new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · table
“2.82”
Context: TLPD-54
Tags used in scoring
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Deleterious Elements Presentnegative
Penalty elements (arsenic, antimony, etc.) or refractory concerns noted in the release.
Why it applies: deleterious_flag is true
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
Resource Estimates (10)
indicatedLewis Ponds · goldTonnes: 9090000Grade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 9090000
- Grade
- 1.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“9.09Mt Indicated & 8.43Mt Inferred) @ 1.12g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedLewis Ponds · silverTonnes: 9090000Grade: 53.34Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 9090000
- Grade
- 53.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“53.34g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedLewis Ponds · zincTonnes: 9090000Grade: 2.06Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 9090000
- Grade
- 2.06
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“2.06% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedLewis Ponds · leadTonnes: 9090000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 9090000
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“1.10% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
indicatedLewis Ponds · copperTonnes: 9090000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:ee271faafd89275e053a
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 9090000
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“0.14% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredLewis Ponds · goldTonnes: 8430000Grade: 1.12Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8430000
- Grade
- 1.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“9.09Mt Indicated & 8.43Mt Inferred) @ 1.12g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredLewis Ponds · silverTonnes: 8430000Grade: 53.34Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8430000
- Grade
- 53.34
- Grade Unit
- g/t
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“53.34g/t Ag”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredLewis Ponds · zincTonnes: 8430000Grade: 2.06Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8430000
- Grade
- 2.06
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“2.06% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredLewis Ponds · leadTonnes: 8430000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8430000
- Grade
- 1.1
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“1.10% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
inferredLewis Ponds · copperTonnes: 8430000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Lewis Ponds
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_nsw
- Reported Region
- New South Wales
- Ticker
- OBT
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- QP Signed
- Yes
- Qualified person names
- Ms Jeneta Owens
- Resource group id
- resource:8ddae4ad9f9a1e318ee1
- Deposit or zone
- Lewis Ponds
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 8430000
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-12-15
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-12-15T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-09-28T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This is a restatement of a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate from December 2025, with no new information provided in this announcement.
Positive factors
- JORC 2012 compliant
- QP signed
Negative factors
- Historical estimate, no new information
- Cut-off grade undisclosed
Evidence · text
“0.14% Cu”
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
QP/CP Signedpositive
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: qp_signed is true
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.