NNL: Quarterly Activities Report & Appendix 5B

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Nordic Resources Ltd
Ticker
NNL
Exchange
ASX
Region
Central Finland
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Copper, Silver, Nickel, Cobalt
Document categories
Resource update, Metallurgy, Other
Extracted
2026-10-21 03:04:39 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Nordic Resources Ltd (NNL) released its September 2026 Quarterly Report, highlighting previously announced increases in the Kopsa gold-copper-silver resource to 1.52Moz AuEq and strong metallurgical results confirming high recoveries. The company's total central Finland gold resources now stand at 1.93Moz AuEq, with 80% in the Measured and Indicated categories. NNL remains well-funded with A$7.7 million at bank, and a new drill program is underway at Kopsa.

Reasoning: This quarterly report summarizes previously announced resource and metallurgical results, along with financial updates, but contains no new material technical information. The positive aspects are confirmations of prior good news.

Positive factors

  • Confirmation of strong resource base
  • Confirmation of high metallurgical recoveries
  • Company remains well-funded

Negative factors

  • No new material information disclosed in this report
  • All technical results are re-statements of prior announcements

Facts used in scoring: 30

Classification and evidence

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Kopsa resource is reported as JORC (2012) compliant.

Evidence · text

“pit-constrained JORC (2012) resource”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: The AuEq calculation for Kopsa was recommended by NNL’s consultant Mr Chris Martin, implying QP/CP sign-off.

Evidence · text

“recommended by NNL’s consultant Mr Chris Martin”

Metal Equivalent Opaquenegative · Story-specific tag

Metal equivalent grade reported without disclosing the price, recovery, or payability assumptions used.

Why it applies: Metal equivalent assumptions for Angesneva and Hirsikangas are not disclosed.

Evidence · table

“-”

Context: Angesneva, Indicated Resources, 3.85, 1.19, -, -, 1.19, 0.15, -, -, 0.15

Stale Data Re-releasenegative · Story-specific tag

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The report explicitly states 'No New Exploration Information' and refers to prior announcements for all technical results.

Evidence · text

“No New Exploration Information This announcement contains references to prior exploration results, which have been cross-referenced to previous market announcements made by the Company. There is no new Exploration Information in this announcement.”

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: Kopsa has a Measured Resource category, indicating high confidence.

Evidence · table

“Measured Resources”

Context: Kopsa

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: Kopsa, Angesneva, and Hirsikangas all have Indicated Resource categories, indicating good confidence.

Evidence · table

“Indicated Resources”

Context: Kopsa

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: Kopsa, Hirsikangas, and Pulju all have Inferred Resource categories, which is a speculative category.

Evidence · table

“Inferred Resources”

Context: Kopsa

High Recoverypositive

Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.

Why it applies: Gold recoveries up to 90% and copper recoveries up to 91% are high for the respective commodities and processing route.

Evidence · text

“Gold recoveries up to 90% and copper recoveries up to 91%.”

Multi-Domain Testedpositive

Variability across ore domains (oxide, transition, fresh) has been addressed.

Why it applies: Locked Cycle and Variability Testing was conducted on eleven geospatially diverse Kopsa samples.

Evidence · text

“Locked Cycle and Variability Testing on eleven geospatially diverse Kopsa samples confirmed high recoveries”

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: Metallurgical testwork confirmed high recoveries using a conventional ‘combined flotation and leach’ circuit.

Evidence · text

“conventional ‘combined flotation and leach’ circuit”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 30. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (18)

measuredKopsa · goldTonnes: 14150000Grade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.41Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:6f4093160855bfb44ce2

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
14150000
Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0.41
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.13
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured gold resource for Kopsa is a high-confidence category with a moderate grade for open-pit mining, but this information was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category (Measured)
  • Grade is moderate for open pit gold
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“0.90”

Context: 14.15

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

measuredKopsa · copperTonnes: 14150000Grade: 0.15Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 22Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
copper
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:6f4093160855bfb44ce2

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
14150000
Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
22
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured copper resource for Kopsa is a high-confidence category, but the grade is weak for copper, and this information was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category (Measured)
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for copper
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 14.15

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

measuredKopsa · silverTonnes: 14150000Grade: 2.34Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.06Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
silver
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:6f4093160855bfb44ce2

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
14150000
Grade
2.34
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.06
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured silver resource for Kopsa is a high-confidence category, but the grade is weak for silver, and this information was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • High confidence resource category (Measured)
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“2.34”

Context: 14.15

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedKopsa · goldTonnes: 23090000Grade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.61Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:4013129f6ab55fb68e45

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
23090000
Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0.61
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated gold resource for Kopsa is a good confidence category with a moderate grade for open-pit mining, but this information was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence resource category (Indicated)
  • Grade is moderate for open pit gold
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 23.09

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedKopsa · copperTonnes: 23090000Grade: 0.16Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 37Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
copper
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:4013129f6ab55fb68e45

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
23090000
Grade
0.16
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
37
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated copper resource for Kopsa is a good confidence category, but the grade is weak for copper, and this information was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence resource category (Indicated)
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for copper
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“0.16”

Context: 23.09

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedKopsa · silverTonnes: 23090000Grade: 2.41Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1.79Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
silver
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:4013129f6ab55fb68e45

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
23090000
Grade
2.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1.79
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated silver resource for Kopsa is a good confidence category, but the grade is weak for silver, and this information was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence resource category (Indicated)
  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for silver
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“2.41”

Context: 23.09

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredKopsa · goldTonnes: 6790000Grade: 0.73Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.16Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:713274ff9b1885e19175

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6790000
Grade
0.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0.16
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.01
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred gold resource for Kopsa is a low-confidence category with a weak grade for open-pit mining, and this information was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Low confidence resource category (Inferred)
  • Grade is weak for open pit gold
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“0.73”

Context: 6.79

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredKopsa · copperTonnes: 6790000Grade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 13Contained Unit: ktHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
copper
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:713274ff9b1885e19175

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6790000
Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Contained Metal
13
Contained Unit
kt
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource for Kopsa is a low-confidence category with a weak grade for copper, and this information was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Low confidence resource category (Inferred)
  • Grade is weak for copper
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 6.79

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredKopsa · silverTonnes: 6790000Grade: 2.96Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.65Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
silver
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:713274ff9b1885e19175

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
6790000
Grade
2.96
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0.65
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.4
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred silver resource for Kopsa is a low-confidence category with a weak grade for silver, and this information was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Metal equivalent assumptions disclosed

Negative factors

  • Low confidence resource category (Inferred)
  • Grade is weak for silver
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“2.96”

Context: 6.79

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedAngesneva · goldTonnes: 3850000Grade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.15Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Angesneva
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:23bc08e5147d6152bd72

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
3850000
Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0.15
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.19
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-05-29T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated gold resource for Angesneva is a good confidence category with a moderate grade for open-pit mining, but this information was previously announced and metal equivalent assumptions are not disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence resource category (Indicated)
  • Grade is moderate for open pit gold

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“1.19”

Context: 3.85

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedHirsikangas · goldTonnes: 2690000Grade: 1.17Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.1Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Hirsikangas
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:5dba848a6d88287c536f

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
2690000
Grade
1.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0.1
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.17
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated gold resource for Hirsikangas is a good confidence category with a moderate grade for open-pit mining, but this information was previously announced and metal equivalent assumptions are not disclosed.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence resource category (Indicated)
  • Grade is moderate for open pit gold

Negative factors

  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“1.17”

Context: 2.69

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredHirsikangas · goldTonnes: 4600000Grade: 1.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.16Contained Unit: mozHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Hirsikangas
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Chris Martin
Resource group id
resource:0c7ab1d90de2196f59ca

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
4600000
Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
0.16
Contained Unit
moz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
1.1
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
No

Location

CRS
ETRS-TM35FIN
EPSG
3067
Loc. Confidence
medium

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-07-14T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred gold resource for Hirsikangas is a low-confidence category with a moderate grade for open-pit mining, but this information was previously announced and metal equivalent assumptions are not disclosed.

Negative factors

  • Low confidence resource category (Inferred)
  • Grade is moderate for open pit gold
  • Metal equivalent assumptions not disclosed
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 4.60

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedPulju Project · nickelTonnes: 42000000Grade: 0.22Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Pulju Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
finland
Reported Region
Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:c6274de7c3344a67c8d2
Deposit or zone
Hotinvaara

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
42000000
Grade
0.22
Grade Unit
%

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated nickel resource for Hotinvaara is a good confidence category, but the grade is weak for nickel, and this information was previously announced with no contained metal specified for this category.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence resource category (Indicated)

Negative factors

  • Grade is weak for nickel
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement
  • Contained metal not disclosed for this category

Evidence · text

“Indicated Resource of 42Mt @ 0.22% Ni”

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

indicatedPulju Project · cobaltTonnes: 42000000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Pulju Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
finland
Reported Region
Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:c6274de7c3344a67c8d2
Deposit or zone
Hotinvaara

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
42000000
Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated cobalt resource for Hotinvaara is a good confidence category, but the grade is very low, and this information was previously announced with no contained metal specified for this category.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence resource category (Indicated)

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for cobalt
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement
  • Contained metal not disclosed for this category

Evidence · text

“0.01% Co”

Context: Indicated Resource of 42Mt @ 0.22% Ni

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

indicatedPulju Project · copperTonnes: 42000000Grade: 56Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Pulju Project
Commodity
copper
Region
finland
Reported Region
Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:c6274de7c3344a67c8d2
Deposit or zone
Hotinvaara

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
42000000
Grade
56
Grade Unit
ppm

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated copper resource for Hotinvaara is a good confidence category, but the grade is very low, and this information was previously announced with no contained metal specified for this category.

Positive factors

  • Good confidence resource category (Indicated)

Negative factors

  • Grade is very low for copper
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement
  • Contained metal not disclosed for this category

Evidence · text

“56ppm Cu”

Context: Indicated Resource of 42Mt @ 0.22% Ni, 0.01% Co,

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

inferredPulju Project · nickelTonnes: 376000000Grade: 0.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Pulju Project
Commodity
nickel
Region
finland
Reported Region
Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:26fc649d2feae7ff5f4f
Deposit or zone
Hotinvaara

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
376000000
Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
%

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred nickel resource for Hotinvaara is a low-confidence category with a weak grade for nickel, and this information was previously announced with no contained metal specified for this category.

Negative factors

  • Low confidence resource category (Inferred)
  • Grade is weak for nickel
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement
  • Contained metal not disclosed for this category

Evidence · text

“Inferred Resource of 376Mt @ 0.20% Ni”

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

inferredPulju Project · cobaltTonnes: 376000000Grade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Pulju Project
Commodity
cobalt
Region
finland
Reported Region
Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:26fc649d2feae7ff5f4f
Deposit or zone
Hotinvaara

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
376000000
Grade
0.01
Grade Unit
%

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred cobalt resource for Hotinvaara is a low-confidence category, but the grade is very low, and this information was previously announced with no contained metal specified for this category.

Negative factors

  • Low confidence resource category (Inferred)
  • Grade is very low for cobalt
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement
  • Contained metal not disclosed for this category

Evidence · text

“0.01% Co”

Context: Inferred Resource of 376Mt @ 0.20% Ni,

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

inferredPulju Project · copperTonnes: 376000000Grade: 52Grade Unit: ppmHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Pulju Project
Commodity
copper
Region
finland
Reported Region
Finland
Ticker
NNL

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Resource group id
resource:26fc649d2feae7ff5f4f
Deposit or zone
Hotinvaara

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
376000000
Grade
52
Grade Unit
ppm

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2024-03-11T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred copper resource for Hotinvaara is a low-confidence category, but the grade is very low, and this information was previously announced with no contained metal specified for this category.

Negative factors

  • Low confidence resource category (Inferred)
  • Grade is very low for copper
  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement
  • Contained metal not disclosed for this category

Evidence · text

“52ppm Cu”

Context: Inferred Resource of 376Mt @ 0.20% Ni, 0.01% Co,

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release

Metallurgical Results (12)

locked-cycleKopsa · goldRecovery: 90 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Higher Grade 'Stockwork' Samples (LCT-1)

Recovery

Recovery
90 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High gold recovery of 90% from locked-cycle tests on higher-grade stockwork samples using a conventional circuit is a strong result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • High recovery for gold
  • Locked-cycle test indicates good test maturity
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“90%”

Context: Gold

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

variabilityKopsa · goldRecovery: 90 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
variability
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Higher Grade 'Stockwork' Samples (VT Average)

Recovery

Recovery
90 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High gold recovery of 90% from variability tests on higher-grade stockwork samples using a conventional circuit is a strong result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • High recovery for gold
  • Variability testwork indicates good domain coverage
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“90%”

Context: Gold

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

locked-cycleKopsa · copperRecovery: 91 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
copper
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Higher Grade 'Stockwork' Samples (LCT-1)

Recovery

Recovery
91 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High copper recovery of 91% from locked-cycle tests on higher-grade stockwork samples using a conventional circuit is a strong result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • High recovery for copper
  • Locked-cycle test indicates good test maturity
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“91%”

Context: Copper

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

variabilityKopsa · copperRecovery: 86 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
copper
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
variability
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Higher Grade 'Stockwork' Samples (VT Average)

Recovery

Recovery
86 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper recovery of 86% from variability tests on higher-grade stockwork samples using a conventional circuit is a positive result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good recovery for copper
  • Variability testwork indicates good domain coverage
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“86%”

Context: Copper

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

locked-cycleKopsa · silverRecovery: 76 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
silver
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Higher Grade 'Stockwork' Samples (LCT-1)

Recovery

Recovery
76 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 76% from locked-cycle tests on higher-grade stockwork samples using a conventional circuit is a positive result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good recovery for silver
  • Locked-cycle test indicates good test maturity
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“76%”

Context: Silver

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

variabilityKopsa · silverRecovery: 82 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
silver
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
variability
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Higher Grade 'Stockwork' Samples (VT Average)

Recovery

Recovery
82 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High silver recovery of 82% from variability tests on higher-grade stockwork samples using a conventional circuit is a strong result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • High recovery for silver
  • Variability testwork indicates good domain coverage
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“82%”

Context: Silver

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

locked-cycleKopsa · goldRecovery: 86 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Standard 'Tonalite' Samples (LCT-2)

Recovery

Recovery
86 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 86% from locked-cycle tests on standard tonalite samples using a conventional circuit is a positive result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good recovery for gold
  • Locked-cycle test indicates good test maturity
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“86%”

Context: Gold

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

variabilityKopsa · goldRecovery: 88 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
gold
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
variability
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Standard 'Tonalite' Samples (VT Average)

Recovery

Recovery
88 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good gold recovery of 88% from variability tests on standard tonalite samples using a conventional circuit is a positive result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good recovery for gold
  • Variability testwork indicates good domain coverage
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“88%”

Context: Gold

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

locked-cycleKopsa · copperRecovery: 88 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
copper
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Standard 'Tonalite' Samples (LCT-2)

Recovery

Recovery
88 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper recovery of 88% from locked-cycle tests on standard tonalite samples using a conventional circuit is a positive result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good recovery for copper
  • Locked-cycle test indicates good test maturity
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“88%”

Context: Copper

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

variabilityKopsa · copperRecovery: 85 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
copper
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
variability
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Standard 'Tonalite' Samples (VT Average)

Recovery

Recovery
85 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good copper recovery of 85% from variability tests on standard tonalite samples using a conventional circuit is a positive result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good recovery for copper
  • Variability testwork indicates good domain coverage
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“85%”

Context: Copper

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

locked-cycleKopsa · silverRecovery: 82 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
silver
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
locked-cycle
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Standard 'Tonalite' Samples (LCT-2)

Recovery

Recovery
82 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High silver recovery of 82% from locked-cycle tests on standard tonalite samples using a conventional circuit is a strong result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • High recovery for silver
  • Locked-cycle test indicates good test maturity
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“82%”

Context: Silver

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

variabilityKopsa · silverRecovery: 76 %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Kopsa
Commodity
silver
Region
finland
Reported Region
Central Finland
Ticker
NNL

Test Work

Program Status
preliminary
Test Type
variability
Processing Route
conventional combined flotation and leach circuit
Sample
Standard 'Tonalite' Samples (VT Average)

Recovery

Recovery
76 %
Recovery Basis
actual_test

Lab

Consultant
Mr Chris Martin

Location

Loc. Confidence
low

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Good silver recovery of 76% from variability tests on standard tonalite samples using a conventional circuit is a positive result, but it was previously announced.

Positive factors

  • Good recovery for silver
  • Variability testwork indicates good domain coverage
  • Conventional processing route

Negative factors

  • Result is a re-statement of prior announcement

Evidence · table

“76%”

Context: Silver

Tags used in scoring

Mill Routeneutral

Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).

Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.