NMG: Quarterly Activities and Appendix 5B Cash Flow Report

Original announcement by asx on

Company
New Murchison Gold Limited
Ticker
NMG
Exchange
ASX
Region
Western Australia
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Other, Production, Resource update, Drill results
Extracted
2026-10-21 23:13:30 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

New Murchison Gold Limited reported a strong financial quarter with a $18.7 million cash increase to $220.4 million and declared a maiden fully franked dividend of 0.25 cents per share. The company announced new high-grade gold drill intercepts from Cloudkicker, Lydia, and Airstrip prospects, with significant strike extensions at Airstrip East. Production for the quarter was lower at 10,837 ounces of gold in ore due to planned waste stripping and weather, leading to higher All-in Sustaining Costs, but the annual Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve updates show overall growth.

Reasoning: New Murchison Gold reported a strong financial position, including a maiden dividend and substantial cash reserves. The company also announced new high-grade drill results from Cloudkicker and Lydia, with significant strike extensions at Airstrip, highlighting exploration success. While quarterly production was lower and costs higher due to operational phasing, the annual resource and reserve updates indicate overall growth and improved confidence in the project's future.

Positive factors

  • Maiden dividend declared, indicating financial health and shareholder returns.
  • Strong cash balance of $220.4 million with no debt or hedging.
  • High-grade gold intercepts from Cloudkicker and Lydia, including several bonanza grades, demonstrating exploration success.
  • Significant strike extension at Airstrip East, indicating potential for further resource growth.
  • Annual MRE/ORE updates show overall resource growth and grade improvement in key areas.
  • Strengthening of the management team with key appointments in health, safety, risk, and exploration.

Negative factors

  • Lower gold production and higher All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC) for the quarter due to planned waste stripping and weather delays.
  • A single Lost Time Injury (LTI) was recorded during the quarter.

Facts used in scoring: 80

Classification and evidence

QA/QC Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The document includes a 'Competent Person Statement' section which details the work undertaken by qualified professionals and references the JORC Code.

Evidence · text

“Competent Person Statement Exploration Results Information in this Announcement that relates to exploration results is based upon work undertaken by Mr. Alexander Johnston, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Johnston has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a ‘Competent Person’ as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (JORC Code). Mr Johnston is an employee of NMG Limited and consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Mineral Resources The information contained in this announcement that relates to Mineral Resources for Crown Prince, Cloudkicker and Lydia is based upon, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation compiled by Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM. Mr Stokes is a Principal Geologist with Stokes Geoscience with over 19 years in the mining industry and a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. The Competent Person has sufficient experience relevant to the style(s) of mineralisation and type(s) of deposit under consideration and to the activity which they are undertaking to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Stokes consents to the inclusion of information relating to the Mineral Resource Estimate as it appears in this report. The information contained in this announcement that relates to Mineral Resources for Abbotts is based upon, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation compiled by Mr Lynn Widenbar FAusIMM. Mr Widenbar is the Principal of Widenbar and Associates, a consultant resource geologist with over 50 years’ experience and a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. The Competent Person has sufficient experience relevant to the style(s) of mineralisation and type(s) of deposit under consideration and to the activity which they are undertaking to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Widenbar consents to the inclusion of information relating to the Mineral Resource Estimate as it appears in this report. Ore Reserves The Competent Person for the Ore Reserve estimate is Mr Hemal Patel, a mining engineer with more than 18 years’ experience in the mining industry. Mr Hemal is a Member of the AusIMM, a full-time employee of Has Holdings Pty Ltd and has sufficient open pit mining activity experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code. Mr Hemal consents to the inclusion of information relating to the Ore Reserve in the form and context in which it appears.”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The Competent Person Statement explicitly references the '2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (JORC Code)'.

Evidence · text

“2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (JORC Code)”

Bonanza Interceptpositive · Story-specific tag

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Several drill intercepts, particularly sub-intervals, report gold grades significantly above the orogenic gold exceptional threshold of 5 g/t Au, including 54.80 g/t, 47.20 g/t, 38.30 g/t, and 32.17 g/t.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 54.80g/t Au from 58m in CKGC062”

Apparent Width Onlynegative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: All reported drill intercepts are given as downhole lengths without disclosure of true width or drill orientation relative to mineralization.

Evidence · text

“10m @ 13.61g/t Au from 44m”

Step-Out Extensionpositive · Story-specific tag

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: Drilling at Airstrip Prospect 'more than doubled the interpreted mineralised strike extent at Airstrip East from approximately 310m to 730m, with mineralisation remaining open to the north-east, south-west and at depth'.

Evidence · text

“Drilling at Airstrip Prospect more than doubled the interpreted mineralised strike extent at Airstrip East from approximately 310m to 730m, with mineralisation remaining open to the north-east, south-west and at depth.”

Infill Drillingneutral · Story-specific tag

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The next steps for Lydia prospects include 'infill drilling of the high-grade shoots'.

Evidence · text

“The next steps for these prospects include infill drilling of the high-grade shoots”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The document reports on the 'Annual Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) and Annual Ore Reserve Estimate (“ORE”) updates' that were announced on 23 September 2026.

Evidence · text

“Annual Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) and Annual Ore Reserve Estimate (“ORE”) updates were announced to the ASX 23 September 2026.”

Maiden Resourceneutral

First formal MRE for the project — establishes baseline but typically exploration-stage with high Inferred component.

Why it applies: The MRE table includes Cloudkicker, Lydia, and Abbotts as new deposits within the overall Garden Gully MRE, for which no prior estimates were provided in RAG comparables.

Evidence · text

“Cloudkicker Indicated 0.5g/t 341,000 2.3 25,100”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The MRE includes significant portions of gold mineralization classified as Inferred, such as 361,000 tonnes at 1.9 g/t Au for Crown Prince UG and 789,000 tonnes at 1.8 g/t Au for Abbotts.

Evidence · table

“Inferred 0.5g/t 14,000 0.9 400”

Context: Crown Prince OP

All Inferrednegative

100% of resource is Inferred category — very early stage, no engineering confidence.

Why it applies: The Abbotts deposit is reported entirely as an Inferred resource (789,000 tonnes at 1.8 g/t Au), indicating very early-stage geological confidence.

Evidence · table

“Abbotts Inferred 0.5g/t 789,000 1.8 44,500”

Context: Abbotts

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: The Measured resource for Crown Prince OP shows an increase in grade from 3.5 g/t to 3.8 g/t Au compared to the prior estimate.

Evidence · table

“Measured 0.5g/t 263,000 3.8 38,900”

Context: Crown Prince OP

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: The Measured resource for Crown Prince OP shows an increase in contained metal from 29,400 oz to 38,900 oz compared to the prior estimate.

Evidence · table

“Measured 0.5g/t 263,000 3.8 38,900”

Context: Crown Prince OP

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: The Indicated resource for Crown Prince OP shows a decrease in grade from 3.3 g/t to 3.1 g/t Au compared to the prior estimate.

Evidence · table

“Indicated 0.5g/t 360,000 3.1 38,700”

Context: Crown Prince OP

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 73. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (57)

CKGC020Garden Gully · goldGrade: 13.61Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC020
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
13.61
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
44 m
To
54 m
Intercept Depth
44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC020:44-54
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade, good-width intercept at Cloudkicker is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and exceeding the project's average grade, supporting further growth potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (13.61 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (10m) for an open-pit target.
  • Supports potential for further growth at Cloudkicker.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“10m @ 13.61g/t Au from 44m incl. 3m @ 32.17g/t Au from 46m in CKGC020”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKGC020Garden Gully · goldGrade: 32.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC020
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
32.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
46 m
To
49 m
Intercept Depth
44 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC020:46-49
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval is an exceptional result, demonstrating very high-grade gold mineralization at Cloudkicker and significantly exceeding previous best grades, indicating strong potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (32.17 g/t Au) significantly above the project's best grade (47.2 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (96.51 g/t·m) indicates a very strong intercept.
  • Confirms very high-grade mineralization within the broader interval.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 32.17g/t Au from 46m in CKGC020”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKGC015Garden Gully · goldGrade: 9.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC015
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
9.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
3 m
To
12 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC015:3-12
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow, high-grade intercept at Cloudkicker is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization near surface and supporting open-pit potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (9.31 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au).
  • Shallow depth (from 3m) is favorable for open-pit mining.
  • Good intercept length (9m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“9m @ 9.31g/t Au from 3m incl. 3m @ 14.30g/t Au from 3m in CKGC015”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKGC015Garden Gully · goldGrade: 14.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC015
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
14.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
3 m
To
6 m
Intercept Depth
3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC015:3-6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval at shallow depth is an excellent result, confirming very high-grade mineralization near surface at Cloudkicker and enhancing open-pit potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (14.30 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Shallow depth (from 3m) is highly favorable for open-pit mining.
  • High grade-width product (42.9 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 14.30g/t Au from 3m in CKGC015”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD017Garden Gully · goldGrade: 9.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD017
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
9.22
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
62 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD017:62-70
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Cloudkicker is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and supporting the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (9.22 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (8m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“8m @ 9.22g/t Au from 62m incl. 3m @ 14.32g/t Au from 67m in CKRD017”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD017Garden Gully · goldGrade: 14.32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD017
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
14.32
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
67 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD017:67-70
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms very high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept at Cloudkicker, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (14.32 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (42.96 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 14.32g/t Au from 67m in CKRD017”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKGC045AGarden Gully · goldGrade: 8.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC045A
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
8.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
55 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC045A:55-62
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Cloudkicker is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and supporting the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (8.70 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (7m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“7m @ 8.70g/t Au from 55m incl. 1m @ 38.30g/t Au from 59m in CKGC045A”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKGC045AGarden Gully · goldGrade: 38.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC045A
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
38.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
59 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC045A:59-60
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms very high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept at Cloudkicker, significantly enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (38.30 g/t Au) significantly above the project's best grade (47.2 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (38.3 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 38.30g/t Au from 59m in CKGC045A”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKGC062Garden Gully · goldGrade: 54.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC062
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
54.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
58 m
To
59 m
Intercept Depth
58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC062:58-59
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept is the highest reported in the release, demonstrating exceptional gold mineralization at Cloudkicker and significantly exceeding previous best grades, indicating strong potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (54.80 g/t Au) significantly above the project's best grade (47.2 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Highest grade reported in this release, indicating exceptional mineralization.
  • High grade-width product (54.8 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 54.80g/t Au from 58m in CKGC062”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD008Garden Gully · goldGrade: 6.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD008
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
6.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
60 m
To
68 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD008:60-68
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Cloudkicker is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and supporting the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (6.47 g/t Au) above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (8m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“8m @ 6.47g/t Au from 60m incl. 3m @ 12.87g/t Au from 60m in CKRD008”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD008Garden Gully · goldGrade: 12.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD008
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
12.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
60 m
To
63 m
Intercept Depth
60 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD008:60-63
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval confirms significant gold mineralization within the broader intercept at Cloudkicker, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (12.87 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (38.61 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 12.87g/t Au from 60m in CKRD008”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD008Garden Gully · goldGrade: 5.86Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD008
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
5.86
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
72 m
To
81 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD008:72-81
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Cloudkicker is a positive result, indicating consistent gold mineralization and supporting the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (5.86 g/t Au) near the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (9m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“9m @ 5.86g/t Au from 72m incl. 3m @ 10.27g/t Au from 75m in CKRD008”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD008Garden Gully · goldGrade: 10.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD008
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
10.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
75 m
To
78 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD008:75-78
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval confirms significant gold mineralization within the broader intercept at Cloudkicker, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (10.27 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (30.81 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 10.27g/t Au from 75m in CKRD008”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD022Garden Gully · goldGrade: 7.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD022
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
7.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
91 m
To
96 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD022:91-96
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Cloudkicker is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and supporting the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (7.33 g/t Au) above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (5m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“5m @ 7.33g/t Au from 91m incl. 1m @ 11.10g/t Au from 91m in CKRD022”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD022Garden Gully · goldGrade: 11.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD022
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
11.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
91 m
To
92 m
Intercept Depth
91 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD022:91-92
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval confirms significant gold mineralization within the broader intercept at Cloudkicker, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (11.10 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (11.1 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 11.10g/t Au from 91m in CKRD022”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD019Garden Gully · goldGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD019
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7 m
From
72 m
To
79 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD019:72-79
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Cloudkicker is a positive result, indicating consistent gold mineralization and supporting the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (5.00 g/t Au) near the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and at the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (7m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“7m @ 5.00g/t Au from 72m incl. 2m @ 10.38g/t Au from 73m in CKRD019”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKRD019Garden Gully · goldGrade: 10.38Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKRD019
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
10.38
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
73 m
To
75 m
Intercept Depth
72 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKRD019:73-75
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval confirms significant gold mineralization within the broader intercept at Cloudkicker, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (10.38 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (20.76 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“2m @ 10.38g/t Au from 73m in CKRD019”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKGC018Garden Gully · goldGrade: 4.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC018
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
4.13
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
0 m
To
8 m
Intercept Depth
0 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC018:0-8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow, moderate-grade intercept at Cloudkicker is a positive result, indicating gold mineralization near surface and supporting open-pit potential.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade intercept (4.13 g/t Au) near the project average (5.937 g/t Au).
  • Shallow depth (from 0m) is favorable for open-pit mining.
  • Good intercept length (8m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“8m @ 4.13g/t Au from 0m in CKGC018”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKGC045Garden Gully · goldGrade: 7.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC045
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
7.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
58 m
To
62 m
Intercept Depth
58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC045:58-62
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Cloudkicker is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and supporting the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (7.76 g/t Au) above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (4m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“4m @ 7.76g/t Au from 58m incl. 1m @ 22.90g/t Au from 60m in CKGC045”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

CKGC045Garden Gully · goldGrade: 22.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
CKGC045
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
22.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
60 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
58 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
CKGC045:60-61
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Cloudkicker
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms very high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept at Cloudkicker, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (22.90 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (22.9 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 22.90g/t Au from 60m in CKGC045”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGSRC1386Garden Gully · goldGrade: 24.36Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGSRC1386
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
24.36
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
46 m
To
48 m
Intercept Depth
46 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGSRC1386:46-48
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept at Lydia Main is an excellent result, indicating very high-grade gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (24.36 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (48.72 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“2m at 24.36g/t Au from 46m in NGGSRC1386 including 1m at 47.20g/t Au from 46m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGSRC1386Garden Gully · goldGrade: 47.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGSRC1386
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
47.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
46 m
To
47 m
Intercept Depth
46 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGSRC1386:46-47
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms exceptional gold mineralization at Lydia Main, matching the project's previous best grade and indicating strong potential for open-pit development.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (47.20 g/t Au) significantly above the project's best grade (47.2 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (47.2 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m at 47.20g/t Au from 46m in NGGSRC1386”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGSRC1362Garden Gully · goldGrade: 14.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGSRC1362
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
14.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
26 m
To
29 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGSRC1362:26-29
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept at Lydia Main is an excellent result, indicating very high-grade gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (14.53 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (43.59 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m at 14.53g/t Au from 26m in NGGSRC1362 including 1m at 37.40g/t Au from 27m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGSRC1362Garden Gully · goldGrade: 37.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGSRC1362
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
37.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
27 m
To
28 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGSRC1362:27-28
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms very high-grade mineralization at Lydia Main, enhancing the project's overall potential for open-pit development.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (37.40 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (37.4 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m at 37.40g/t Au from 27m in NGGSRC1362”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGRC1242Garden Gully · goldGrade: 12.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGRC1242
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
12.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
42 m
To
43 m
Intercept Depth
42 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGRC1242:42-43
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Lydia Main is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (12.10 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (12.1 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m at 12.10g/t Au from 42m in NGGRC1242”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LYRC003Garden Gully · goldGrade: 8.39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LYRC003
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
8.39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
103 m
To
107 m
Intercept Depth
103 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LYRC003:103-107
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Lydia Main is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (8.39 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (4m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“4m at 8.39g/t Au from 103m in LYRC003 including 1m at 20.80g/t Au from 103m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LYRC003Garden Gully · goldGrade: 20.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LYRC003
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
20.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
103 m
To
104 m
Intercept Depth
103 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LYRC003:103-104
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms very high-grade mineralization at Lydia Main, enhancing the project's overall potential for open-pit development.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (20.80 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (20.8 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m at 20.80g/t Au from 103m in LYRC003”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGRC1232Garden Gully · goldGrade: 7.5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGRC1232
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
7.5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
137 m
To
139 m
Intercept Depth
137 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGRC1232:137-139
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Lydia Main is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (7.50 g/t Au) above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (2m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“2m at 7.50g/t Au from 137m in NGGRC1232 including 1m at 14.00g/t Au from 137m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGRC1232Garden Gully · goldGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGRC1232
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
137 m
To
138 m
Intercept Depth
137 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGRC1232:137-138
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms very high-grade mineralization at Lydia Main, enhancing the project's overall potential for open-pit development.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (14.00 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (14.0 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m at 14.00g/t Au from 137m in NGGRC1232”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LSRC002Garden Gully · goldGrade: 5.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LSRC002
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
5.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
26 m
To
31 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LSRC002:26-31
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Lydia Main is a positive result, indicating consistent gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (5.41 g/t Au) near the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and above the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (5m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“5m at 5.41g/t Au from 26m in LSRC002 including 1m at 14.00g/t Au from 27m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LSRC002Garden Gully · goldGrade: 14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LSRC002
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
27 m
To
28 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LSRC002:27-28
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms very high-grade mineralization at Lydia Main, enhancing the project's overall potential for open-pit development.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (14.00 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (14.0 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m at 14.00g/t Au from 27m in LSRC002”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LYRC005Garden Gully · goldGrade: 5.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LYRC005
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
5.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
62 m
To
67 m
Intercept Depth
62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LYRC005:62-67
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Lydia Main is a positive result, indicating consistent gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (5.19 g/t Au) near the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and above the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (5m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“5m at 5.19g/t Au from 62m in LYRC005 including 1m at 19.40g/t Au from 63m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

LYRC005Garden Gully · goldGrade: 19.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
LYRC005
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
19.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
63 m
To
64 m
Intercept Depth
62 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
LYRC005:63-64
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms very high-grade mineralization at Lydia Main, enhancing the project's overall potential for open-pit development.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (19.40 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (19.4 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m at 19.40g/t Au from 63m in LYRC005”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGRC1236Garden Gully · goldGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGRC1236
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
4.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
51 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
51 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGRC1236:51-56
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept at Lydia Main is a positive result, indicating consistent gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade intercept (4.10 g/t Au) near the project average (5.937 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (5m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“5m at 4.10g/t Au from 51m in NGGRC1236 including 1m at 10.20g/t Au from 52m”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGRC1236Garden Gully · goldGrade: 10.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGRC1236
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
10.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
52 m
To
53 m
Intercept Depth
51 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGRC1236:52-53
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval confirms significant gold mineralization within the broader intercept at Lydia Main, enhancing the project's overall potential for open-pit development.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (10.20 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (10.2 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m at 10.20g/t Au from 52m in NGGRC1236”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGSRC1385Garden Gully · goldGrade: 4.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGSRC1385
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
4.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
20 m
To
22 m
Intercept Depth
20 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGSRC1385:20-22
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept at Lydia Main is a positive result, indicating consistent gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade intercept (4.91 g/t Au) near the project average (5.937 g/t Au).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“2m at 4.91g/t Au from 20m in NGGSRC1385”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

NGGRC1249Garden Gully · goldGrade: 4.53Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
NGGRC1249
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
4.53
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
40 m
To
44 m
Intercept Depth
40 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
NGGRC1249:40-44
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Location
Lydia Main
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept at Lydia Main is a positive result, indicating consistent gold mineralization and supporting open-pit opportunities.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade intercept (4.53 g/t Au) near the project average (5.937 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (4m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“4m at 4.53g/t Au from 40m in NGGRC1249”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC118Garden Gully · goldGrade: 2.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC118
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
2.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
50 m
To
70 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC118:50-70
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade, good-width intercept at Airstrip East is a positive result, indicating significant gold mineralization and contributing to the interpreted strike extension.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length (20m) indicating significant mineralization width.
  • Moderate-grade (2.51 g/t Au) for an exploration target.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“20m @ 2.51 g/t Au from 50m including 2m @ 9.83 g/t Au from 53m in APSRC118”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC118Garden Gully · goldGrade: 9.83Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC118
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
9.83
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
53 m
To
55 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC118:53-55
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval confirms significant gold mineralization within the broader intercept at Airstrip East, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (9.83 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (19.66 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“2m @ 9.83 g/t Au from 53m in APSRC118”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APRC006Garden Gully · goldGrade: 3.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 13 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APRC006
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
3.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
13 m
From
46 m
To
59 m
Intercept Depth
46 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APRC006:46-59
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade, good-width intercept at Airstrip East is a positive result, indicating significant gold mineralization and contributing to the interpreted strike extension.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length (13m) indicating significant mineralization width.
  • Moderate-grade (3.03 g/t Au) for an exploration target.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“13m @ 3.03 g/t Au from 46m including 1m @ 22.1 g/t Au from 50m, and 10m @ 1.74 g/t Au from 27m in APRC006”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APRC006Garden Gully · goldGrade: 22.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APRC006
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
22.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
50 m
To
51 m
Intercept Depth
46 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APRC006:50-51
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval confirms very high-grade mineralization within the broader intercept at Airstrip East, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (22.10 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (22.1 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 22.1 g/t Au from 50m in APRC006”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APRC006Garden Gully · goldGrade: 1.74Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APRC006
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
1.74
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
27 m
To
37 m
Intercept Depth
27 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APRC006:27-37
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade, good-width intercept at Airstrip East is a positive result, indicating significant gold mineralization and contributing to the interpreted strike extension.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length (10m) indicating significant mineralization width.
  • Moderate-grade (1.74 g/t Au) for an exploration target.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“10m @ 1.74 g/t Au from 27m in APRC006”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC070Garden Gully · goldGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC070
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
7.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m
From
50 m
To
54 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC070:50-54
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Airstrip East is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and supporting the interpreted strike extension.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (7.40 g/t Au) above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Good intercept length (4m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“4m @ 7.40 g/t Au from 50m including 3m @ 9.37 g/t Au from 51m in APSRC070”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC070Garden Gully · goldGrade: 9.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC070
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
9.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
51 m
To
54 m
Intercept Depth
50 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC070:51-54
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval confirms significant gold mineralization within the broader intercept at Airstrip East, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (9.37 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (28.11 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 9.37 g/t Au from 51m in APSRC070”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC069Garden Gully · goldGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC069
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
7.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
2 m
To
5 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC069:2-5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow, high-grade intercept at Airstrip East is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization near surface and supporting open-pit potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (7.90 g/t Au) above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Shallow depth (from 2m) is favorable for open-pit mining.
  • Good intercept length (3m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 7.90 g/t Au from 2m including 1m @ 21.9 g/t Au from 4m in APSRC069”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC069Garden Gully · goldGrade: 21.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC069
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
21.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
4 m
To
5 m
Intercept Depth
2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC069:4-5
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval at shallow depth confirms very high-grade mineralization near surface at Airstrip East, enhancing open-pit potential.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept (21.90 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • Shallow depth (from 4m) is highly favorable for open-pit mining.
  • High grade-width product (21.9 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 21.9 g/t Au from 4m in APSRC069”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC117Garden Gully · goldGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC117
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
2.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
6 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC117:6-14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This shallow, moderate-grade intercept at Airstrip East is a positive result, indicating gold mineralization near surface and contributing to the interpreted strike extension.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade intercept (2.24 g/t Au) for an exploration target.
  • Shallow depth (from 6m) is favorable for open-pit mining.
  • Good intercept length (8m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“8m @ 2.24 g/t Au from 6m including 1m @ 9.42 g/t Au from 13m in APSRC117”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC117Garden Gully · goldGrade: 9.42Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC117
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
9.42
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
13 m
To
14 m
Intercept Depth
6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC117:13-14
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval confirms significant gold mineralization within the broader intercept at Airstrip East, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (9.42 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (9.42 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 9.42 g/t Au from 13m in APSRC117”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APRC021Garden Gully · goldGrade: 1.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 18 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APRC021
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
1.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
18 m
From
26 m
To
44 m
Intercept Depth
26 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APRC021:26-44
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade, good-width intercept at Airstrip East is a positive result, indicating significant gold mineralization and contributing to the interpreted strike extension.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length (18m) indicating significant mineralization width.
  • Moderate-grade (1.19 g/t Au) for an exploration target.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“18m @ 1.19 g/t Au from 26m and 2m @ 3.73 g/t Au from 55m in APRC021”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APRC021Garden Gully · goldGrade: 3.73Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APRC021
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
3.73
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m
From
55 m
To
57 m
Intercept Depth
55 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APRC021:55-57
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept at Airstrip East is a positive result, indicating gold mineralization and contributing to the interpreted strike extension.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade intercept (3.73 g/t Au) for an exploration target.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“2m @ 3.73 g/t Au from 55m in APRC021”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC039Garden Gully · goldGrade: 13.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC039
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
13.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
59 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
59 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC039:59-60
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept at Airstrip East is a strong positive, indicating significant gold mineralization and contributing to the interpreted strike extension.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (13.20 g/t Au) significantly above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (13.2 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 13.2 g/t Au from 59m to end of hole in APSRC039”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC113Garden Gully · goldGrade: 1.4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC113
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
1.4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
48 m
To
56 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC113:48-56
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade, good-width intercept at Airstrip East contributes to the interpreted south-west extension of mineralization, indicating further growth potential.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length (8m) indicating significant mineralization width.
  • Moderate-grade (1.40 g/t Au) for an exploration target.
  • Contributes to the south-west extension of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“8m @ 1.40 g/t Au from 48m in APSRC113”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC114Garden Gully · goldGrade: 1.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC114
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
1.01
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12 m
From
48 m
To
60 m
Intercept Depth
48 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC114:48-60
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade, good-width intercept at Airstrip East contributes to the interpreted south-west extension of mineralization, indicating further growth potential.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length (12m) indicating significant mineralization width.
  • Moderate-grade (1.01 g/t Au) for an exploration target.
  • Contributes to the south-west extension of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“12m @ 1.01 g/t Au from 48m in APSRC114”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC103Garden Gully · goldGrade: 1.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC103
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
1.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
53 m
To
61 m
Intercept Depth
53 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC103:53-61
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade, good-width intercept at Airstrip East contributes to the interpreted north-east extension of mineralization, indicating further growth potential.

Positive factors

  • Good intercept length (8m) indicating significant mineralization width.
  • Moderate-grade (1.21 g/t Au) for an exploration target.
  • Contributes to the north-east extension of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“8m @ 1.21 g/t Au from 53m in APSRC103”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APSRC102Garden Gully · goldGrade: 2.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APSRC102
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
2.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
32 m
To
35 m
Intercept Depth
32 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APSRC102:32-35
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip East
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept at Airstrip East contributes to the interpreted north-east extension of mineralization, indicating further growth potential.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade intercept (2.69 g/t Au) for an exploration target.
  • Good intercept length (3m).
  • Contributes to the north-east extension of mineralization.

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 2.69 g/t Au from 32m in APSRC102”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APRC014Garden Gully · goldGrade: 2.64Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APRC014
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
2.64
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m
From
64 m
To
67 m
Intercept Depth
64 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APRC014:64-67
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip West
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept at Airstrip West is a positive result, indicating gold mineralization and contributing to the overall understanding of the prospect.

Positive factors

  • Moderate-grade intercept (2.64 g/t Au) for an exploration target.
  • Good intercept length (3m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“3m @ 2.64 g/t Au from 64m including 1m @ 5.47 g/t Au from 65m in APRC014”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

APRC014Garden Gully · goldGrade: 5.47Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
APRC014
Project
Garden Gully
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
australia_wa
Ticker
NMG

Geometry

Grade
5.47
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
65 m
To
66 m
Intercept Depth
64 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
APRC014:65-66
Mining Method
unknown

Location

Location
Airstrip West
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval confirms significant gold mineralization within the broader intercept at Airstrip West, enhancing the project's overall potential.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept (5.47 g/t Au) above the project average (5.937 g/t Au) and the orogenic gold exceptional threshold (5 g/t Au).
  • High grade-width product (5.47 g/t·m).

Negative factors

  • True width not disclosed, so apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Evidence · text

“1m @ 5.47 g/t Au from 65m in APRC014”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Resource Estimates (16)

measuredGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 263000Grade: 3.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 38900Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:dc3e937ba6ca11dee715
Deposit or zone
Crown Prince OP
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
263000
Grade
3.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
38900
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23
Prior Tonnes
263000
Prior Grade
3.5
Prior Contained Metal
29400

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured resource for Crown Prince OP shows an increase in grade and contained gold, indicating improved confidence and value for this high-confidence category.

Positive factors

  • Grade improvement (3.5 g/t to 3.8 g/t) for Measured resources.
  • Contained metal growth (29,400 oz to 38,900 oz) for Measured resources.

Evidence · table

“263,000”

Context: Crown Prince OP Measured

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: 3.8 against 3.5 previously

Contained Metal Growthpositive

True scale improvement — contained metal ounces/tonnes increased vs prior, accounting for both tonnage and grade changes.

Why it applies: 38900 against 29400 previously

indicatedGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 360000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 38700Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:b46d1088cb70ff9d9bd6
Deposit or zone
Crown Prince OP
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
360000
Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
38700
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23
Prior Tonnes
360000
Prior Grade
3.3
Prior Contained Metal
37900

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Indicated resource for Crown Prince OP shows a slight decrease in grade but a small increase in contained gold, indicating a minor shift in the resource characteristics.

Positive factors

  • Contained metal growth (37,900 oz to 38,700 oz) for Indicated resources.

Negative factors

  • Grade decline (3.3 g/t to 3.1 g/t) for Indicated resources.

Evidence · table

“360,000”

Context: Crown Prince OP Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Grade Declinenegative

Average grade dropped >5% vs prior estimate — deposit economics worsening. May indicate high-grading in early drilling.

Why it applies: 3.1 against 3.3 previously

inferredGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 14000Grade: 0.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 400Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:232ee901037e8766cdc0
Deposit or zone
Crown Prince OP
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
14000
Grade
0.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
400
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23
Prior Tonnes
14000
Prior Grade
0.8
Prior Contained Metal
400

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred resource for Crown Prince OP shows a minor grade improvement, but its small size limits its overall impact.

Positive factors

  • Grade improvement (0.8 g/t to 0.9 g/t) for Inferred resources.

Evidence · table

“14,000”

Context: Crown Prince OP Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

Grade Improvementpositive

Average resource grade improved vs prior estimate — better deposit economics.

Why it applies: 0.9 against 0.8 previously

measuredGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 190000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4800Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:07f5a83df1c33c9722f2
Deposit or zone
Crown Prince OP Stockpiles
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
190000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4800
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23
Prior Tonnes
190000
Prior Grade
0.8
Prior Contained Metal
4800

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The stockpiles resource remains consistent with prior estimates, providing a stable, low-grade inventory.

Evidence · table

“190,000”

Context: Stockpiles

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

measuredGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 12000Grade: 3.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1300Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:e0fd2e2fab74f0847daa
Deposit or zone
Crown Prince UG
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
12000
Grade
3.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1300
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23
Prior Tonnes
12000
Prior Grade
3.3
Prior Contained Metal
1300

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Measured resource for Crown Prince UG remains consistent, providing a small, high-grade component for potential underground development.

Evidence · table

“12,000”

Context: Crown Prince UG Measured

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 1081000Grade: 3.6Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 126700Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:8fe4e7828b4b9add852f
Deposit or zone
Crown Prince UG
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1081000
Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
126700
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: A substantial Indicated resource for Crown Prince UG provides a strong basis for evaluating underground mining potential, with good grade and contained metal.

Positive factors

  • Significant Indicated resource for underground potential, supporting future studies.

Evidence · table

“1,081,000”

Context: Crown Prince UG Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 361000Grade: 1.9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 22400Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:1ae51382be8c34725e04
Deposit or zone
Crown Prince UG
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
361000
Grade
1.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
22400
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
1.2
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred resource for Crown Prince UG, while adding to the overall potential, has lower confidence and requires additional work to be upgraded.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence, requiring further drilling for upgrade.

Evidence · table

“361,000”

Context: Crown Prince UG Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 341000Grade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 25100Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:fcf32c69fc87edd7a041
Deposit or zone
Cloudkicker
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
341000
Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
25100
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The maiden Indicated resource for Cloudkicker provides a solid foundation for the new open pit operation, adding significant ounces to the project.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Indicated resource for Cloudkicker, establishing a new source of gold.
  • Supports the newly commenced open pit operation at Cloudkicker.

Evidence · table

“341,000”

Context: Cloudkicker Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 159000Grade: 1.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6100Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:bc089bb52d5256d69180
Deposit or zone
Cloudkicker
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
159000
Grade
1.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
6100
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred resource for Cloudkicker adds to the overall potential but requires further work to improve confidence and support future mine planning.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence, requiring further drilling for upgrade.

Evidence · table

“159,000”

Context: Cloudkicker Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

measuredGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 2000Grade: 17.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 1100Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:2ee512241276571e050f
Deposit or zone
Lydia
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
measured
Tonnes
2000
Grade
17.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
1100
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The maiden Measured resource at Lydia, though small, boasts an exceptionally high grade, highlighting a valuable, well-defined zone for potential open-pit development.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Measured resource for Lydia, indicating high confidence in a small, very high-grade zone.

Evidence · table

“2,000”

Context: Lydia Measured

Tags used in scoring

Measured Resourcepositive

Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

indicatedGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 474000Grade: 1.7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 26400Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:09508a4027765d49febb
Deposit or zone
Lydia
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
474000
Grade
1.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
26400
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The maiden Indicated resource at Lydia contributes to the project's overall gold inventory, supporting future open-pit development opportunities.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Indicated resource for Lydia, adding to the project's overall resource base.

Evidence · table

“474,000”

Context: Lydia Indicated

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 486000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 27600Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Craig Stokes MAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:cb736be675d8f7c05526
Deposit or zone
Lydia
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
486000
Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
27600
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Inferred resource at Lydia adds to the overall potential but requires additional work to increase confidence for mine planning.

Negative factors

  • Inferred category indicates lower geological confidence, requiring further drilling for upgrade.

Evidence · table

“486,000”

Context: Lydia Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

inferredGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 789000Grade: 1.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 44500Contained Unit: ozView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Lynn Widenbar FAusIMM
Resource group id
resource:23fc1c758bb4cfd0c738
Deposit or zone
Abbotts
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
789000
Grade
1.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
44500
Contained Unit
oz
Cutoff Grade
0.5
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The maiden resource for Abbotts is entirely in the Inferred category, representing early-stage potential that needs substantial additional work to establish geological confidence.

Negative factors

  • The entire resource is in the Inferred category, indicating very low geological confidence.
  • Requires significant further drilling to upgrade confidence for economic studies.

Evidence · table

“789,000”

Context: Abbotts Inferred

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

probableGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 640000Grade: 3.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 65000Contained Unit: ounces auView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Hemal Patel
Resource group id
resource:b6b77462367afddc2b46
Deposit or zone
Crown Prince OP
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
640000
Grade
3.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
65000
Contained Unit
ounces au
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Probable Reserve for Crown Prince OP confirms a significant economically viable portion of the resource, supporting ongoing open-pit operations.

Positive factors

  • Probable Reserve for Crown Prince OP provides a robust basis for mine planning and operations.

Evidence · table

“640,000”

Context: Crown Prince OP Probable

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

probableGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 310000Grade: 2.2Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 21000Contained Unit: ounces auView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Hemal Patel
Resource group id
resource:bf13f88dd7170278db82
Deposit or zone
Cloudkicker OP
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
310000
Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
21000
Contained Unit
ounces au
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The maiden Probable Reserve for Cloudkicker OP provides economic confidence for the new open pit, adding to the project's production profile.

Positive factors

  • Maiden Probable Reserve for Cloudkicker OP, supporting the newly commenced open pit operation.

Evidence · table

“310,000”

Context: Cloudkicker OP Probable

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

provenGarden Gully Gold Project · goldTonnes: 190000Grade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 4800Contained Unit: ounces auView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Garden Gully Gold Project
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_wa
Reported Region
Western Australia
Ticker
NMG

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Reporting standards
jorc
QP Signed
Yes
Qualified person names
Mr Hemal Patel
Resource group id
resource:ceb91bdd82872cd6e744
Deposit or zone
Crown Prince stockpiles
Mining method
combined

Resource Data

Category
proven
Tonnes
190000
Grade
0.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Contained Metal
4800
Contained Unit
ounces au
Cutoff Grade
0.7
Cutoff Unit
g/t Au

Prior Estimate

Resource Date
2026-09-23

Review

Needs Review
No
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-10-21T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The Proved Reserve for Crown Prince stockpiles ensures a reliable, albeit low-grade, feed source for future processing.

Positive factors

  • Proved Reserve for stockpiles provides a high-confidence, readily available source of low-grade ore.

Evidence · table

“190,000”

Context: Crown Prince stockpiles Proved

Tags used in scoring

Proven Reservepositive

Measured Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "proven"

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp_signed is true

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.