Nine Mile Metals Announces Certified Assays from DDH-WD-25-02 of 2.78% CUEQ over 32.10 METERS, Including 4.78% CUEQ over 11.52 Meters and 5.64% CUEQ over 6.02 Meters
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- NINE MILE METALS LTD.
- Ticker
- NINE
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- New Brunswick
- Primary commodity
- Copper
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-21 10:15:08 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Nine Mile Metals has announced high-grade certified drill assays from hole WD-25-02 at the Wedge Mine in New Brunswick. The hole returned a significant 32.10m intercept at 2.78% CuEq, including high-grade zones of up to 5.64% CuEq.
Reasoning: The intercept of 2.78% CuEq over 32.10m is a strong result for a VMS-style deposit, and the inclusion of high-grade sub-intervals (4.78% and 5.64% CuEq) demonstrates significant mineralization thickness.
Positive factors
- high grade CuEq intercept
- significant width
- certified assays
Facts used in scoring: 3
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The announcement explicitly states 'Certified Assays'.
Evidence · text
“Announces Certified Assays”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (3)
WD-25-02Wedge Mine · copperGrade: 2.78Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 32.1 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WD-25-02
- Project
- Wedge Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick
- Ticker
- NINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.78
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 32.1 m
- Hole Depth
- 203 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WD-25-02:0-32.1
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Azimuth
- 310 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 2.78% CuEq over 32.1m is a high-quality intercept for this deposit type.
Positive factors
- strong grade-width product
Evidence · text
“2.78% CUEQ over 32.10 METERS”
WD-25-02Wedge Mine · copperGrade: 4.78Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 11.52 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WD-25-02
- Project
- Wedge Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick
- Ticker
- NINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.78
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 11.52 m
- Hole Depth
- 203 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WD-25-02:0-11.52
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Azimuth
- 310 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: High-grade sub-interval within the main intercept.
Positive factors
- bonanza grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“4.78% CUEQ over 11.52 Meters”
WD-25-02Wedge Mine · copperGrade: 5.64Grade Unit: % CuEqIntercept: 6.02 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- WD-25-02
- Project
- Wedge Mine
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- canada_nb
- Reported Region
- New Brunswick
- Ticker
- NINE
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.64
- Grade Unit
- % CuEq
- Intercept
- 6.02 m
- Hole Depth
- 203 m
Classification
- Sample Type
- drill
- Group ID
- WD-25-02:0-6.02
- Mining Method
- unknown
Location
- Azimuth
- 310 °
- Dip
- -50 °
QA/QC
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-02-17T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Very high grade sub-interval.
Positive factors
- bonanza grade sub-interval
Evidence · text
“5.64% CUEQ over 6.02 Meters”
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.