NexGold Intersects 3.08 g/t over 17.0 Metres, 4.80 g/t Gold over 5.6 Metres, 84.30 g/t over 1.0 Metres and Expands Drilling Program at the Goldlund Deposit, Ontario

Original announcement by globenewswire on

Company
NexGold Mining Corp.
Ticker
NEXG
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Ontario
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
None reported
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-08-25 12:45:09 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

NexGold Mining Corp. announced additional drill results from its Goldlund Deposit in Ontario, including high-grade intercepts such as 84.30 g/t gold over 1.0 metres and 3.08 g/t gold over 17.0 metres. These results demonstrate continuity of mineralization within Zone 4 and support future Mineral Resource studies, prompting the company to expand its drill program by an additional 10,000 metres.

Reasoning: NexGold's latest drill results from the Goldlund Deposit confirm and extend high-grade gold mineralization within Zone 4, supporting future resource evaluations, and have led to an expansion of the drill program.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercepts
  • Program expansion
  • Continuity confirmed
  • Supports future resource updates
  • Good QA/QC

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Facts used in scoring: 110

Atlas analysis — NexGold Mining Corp.: NexGold Intersects 3.08 g/t over 17.0 Metres, 4.80 g/t Gold over 5.6 Metres, 84.30 g/t over 1.0 Metres and Expands Drilling Program at the Goldlund Deposit, Ontario. 84.3 g/t over 1 m; 3.08 g/t over 17 m; 70.2 g/t over 0.5 m

Classification and evidence

Bonanza Interceptpositive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Why it applies: Several intercepts, including 84.30 g/t over 1.0 metres in GL-26-022 and 70.20 g/t over 0.5 metres in GL-26-026, exceed the exceptional threshold for open-pit gold.

Evidence · text

“84.30 g/t gold over 1.0 metres (from 287.0 to 288.0 metres) in drill hole GL-26-022”

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: The release details QA/QC procedures including the use of Activation Laboratories, insertion of blanks, standards, and duplicates, and check assays at an ISO certified laboratory (AGAT Laboratories), with sign-off by a Qualified Person.

Evidence · text

“The Company has implemented a quality assurance and quality control (“QA/QC”) program to ensure sampling and analysis of all exploration work is conducted in accordance with the CIM Exploration Best Practices Guidelines. The drill core is sawed in half with one-half of the core sample dispatched to Activation Laboratories Ltd. facility located in Dryden, Ontario. The other half of the core is retained for future assay verification and/or metallurgical testing. Other QA/QC procedures include the insertion of blanks and Canadian Reference Standards for every tenth sample in the sample stream. A quarter core duplicate is assayed every 20th sample. The laboratory has its own QA/QC protocols, running standards and blanks with duplicate samples in each batch stream. Additional checks are routinely run on anomalous values including gravimetric analysis and pulp metallic screen fire assays. Gold analysis is conducted by lead collection, fire assay with atomic absorption, and/or gravimetric finish on a 50-gram sample. Check assays are conducted at a secondary ISO certified laboratory (in this case AGAT Laboratories located in Mississauga, Ontario) following the completion of a program. Qualified Person Paul McNeill, P.Geo., VP Exploration of NexGold, is a “Qualified Person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and has reviewed the available data, composites and QA/QC information related to the drill program and approved the scientific and technical disclosure contained in this news release on behalf of NexGold.”

Infill Drillingneutral

Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.

Why it applies: The drill holes were designed to 'infill and test the extension of mineralization within Zone 4' and 'further evaluate the continuity and distribution of mineralization'.

Evidence · text

“These drill holes were designed to infill and test the extension of mineralization within Zone 4 of the Goldlund Deposit”

Step-Out Extensionpositive

Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.

Why it applies: The drill holes were designed to 'infill and test the extension of mineralization within Zone 4' and the expanded program is intended to 'further evaluate the continuity and distribution of mineralization'.

Evidence · text

“These drill holes were designed to infill and test the extension of mineralization within Zone 4 of the Goldlund Deposit”

Apparent Width Onlynegative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: The document explicitly states that 'Reported intervals are drilled core lengths and do not indicate true widths. True widths vary from 50 to 75% of the interval length.'

Evidence · text

“Reported intervals are drilled core lengths and do not indicate true widths. True widths vary from 50 to 75% of the interval length.”

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: The release includes a section detailing 'previously reported drill intersections' from a news release dated February 2, 2026, which are presented as historical context rather than new results.

Evidence · text

“These drill results are in the same general area of Zone 4 mineralization where previously reported drill intersections were announced (see NexGold news release dated February 2, 2026)”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 110. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (110)

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17.1 m
From
15.9 m
To
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:15.9-33.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization within the Goldlund Deposit, contributing to the overall understanding of the deposit.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.70”

Context: 17.1

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 9.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
9.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
32.5 m
To
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:32.5-33.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval demonstrates strong gold mineralization within the broader intercept, enhancing the overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“9.51”

Context: 0.5

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.5 m
From
262.5 m
To
275 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:262.5-275.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept over a significant width contributes positively to the understanding of mineralization continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.85”

Context: 12.5

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
264.4 m
To
265.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:264.4-265.2
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval further confirms the presence of strong gold mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7.88”

Context: 0.8

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 9.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
9.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
267.5 m
To
268.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:267.5-268.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates strong gold mineralization, supporting the overall positive results.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“9.17”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-020Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-020
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
274.1 m
To
275 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-020:274.1-275.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval contributes to the positive overall picture of gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.55”

Context: 0.9

GL-26-021Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-021
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
70.5 m
To
80.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-021:70.5-80.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a moderate width, providing additional data for the deposit model.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 10.0

GL-26-021Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-021
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
78 m
To
79.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-021:78.0-79.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade sub-interval indicates localized higher-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 1.5

GL-26-021Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-021
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
300.7 m
To
316 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-021:300.7-316.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept over a significant width contributes to the understanding of mineralization continuity in Zone 4.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.44”

Context: 15.3

GL-26-021Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-021
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
307 m
To
308 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-021:307.0-308.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval indicates strong gold mineralization, supporting the overall positive results from the drilling program.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7.69”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 84.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
84.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
287 m
To
288 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:287.0-288.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade intercept is exceptionally high for an open-pit gold deposit, indicating significant localized mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“84.30”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
334 m
To
340.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:334.0-340.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept over a good width adds to the understanding of mineralization continuity at depth.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: 6.5

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
334 m
To
335 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:334.0-335.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval further highlights the presence of higher-grade zones within the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
340 m
To
340.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:340.0-340.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval contributes to the overall positive results and understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.37”

Context: 0.5

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
351.5 m
To
359 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:351.5-359.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept over a good width provides further evidence of mineralization continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 7.5

GL-26-022Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-022
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
351.5 m
To
352.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-022:351.5-352.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval contributes to the overall positive results and understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.68”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.28Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.28
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3.3 m
From
86.7 m
To
90 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:86.7-90.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade intercept over a narrow width indicates good localized gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.28”

Context: 3.3

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
86.7 m
To
88 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:86.7-88.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade sub-interval highlights very high-grade gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7.12”

Context: 1.3

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
145.5 m
To
147 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:145.5-147.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade intercept over a narrow width indicates significant localized gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.00”

Context: 1.5

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.1 m
From
309 m
To
313.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:309.0-313.1
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade intercept over a narrow width contributes positively to the understanding of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.03”

Context: 4.1

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
309 m
To
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:309.0-310.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade sub-interval further confirms the presence of strong gold mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7.95”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
324 m
To
335 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:324.0-335.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept over a significant width provides additional data for resource modeling.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: 11.0

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
324 m
To
325 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:324.0-325.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval contributes to the overall positive results and understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.90”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
332.3 m
To
333 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:332.3-333.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval contributes to the overall positive results and understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.12”

Context: 0.7

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
349 m
To
357 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:349.0-357.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a moderate width, providing additional data for the deposit model.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: 8.0

GL-26-023Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-023
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
365 m
To
370 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-023:365.0-370.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a narrow width, contributing to the overall geological understanding.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: 5.0

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.91
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
217.5 m
To
219 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:217.5-219.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade intercept over a narrow width indicates significant localized gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.91”

Context: 1.5

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.4 m
From
428.1 m
To
444.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:428.1-444.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept over a significant width provides valuable data for resource modeling and continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: 16.4

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
438.2 m
To
438.8 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:438.2-438.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval contributes to the overall positive results and understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.58”

Context: 0.6

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
443.5 m
To
444.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:443.5-444.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade sub-interval highlights very high-grade gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.51”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-024Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-024
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
471.5 m
To
472.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-024:471.5-472.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This high-grade intercept indicates strong localized gold mineralization at depth.

Positive factors

  • High-grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“7.97”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.3 m
From
375.5 m
To
382.8 m
Hole Depth
447 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:375.5-382.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept over a good width contributes to the understanding of mineralization continuity.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.46”

Context: 7.3

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
378.3 m
To
379 m
Hole Depth
447 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:378.3-379.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval further confirms the presence of higher-grade zones within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.54”

Context: 0.7

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.6 m
From
388.5 m
To
394.1 m
Hole Depth
447 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:388.5-394.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade intercept over a narrow width indicates good localized gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.80”

Context: 5.6

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
16.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
389.5 m
To
390.4 m
Hole Depth
447 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:389.5-390.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval highlights very high-grade gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“16.30”

Context: 0.9

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
391.3 m
To
392.3 m
Hole Depth
447 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:391.3-392.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade sub-interval highlights very high-grade gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“6.09”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-025Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 12.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-025
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
12.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
420.7 m
To
421.2 m
Hole Depth
447 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-025:420.7-421.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547133
Northing
5527943
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
128 °
Dip
-46 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade intercept over a very narrow width indicates significant localized gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.90”

Context: 0.5

GL-26-026Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 17 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-026
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.08
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
17 m
From
426.5 m
To
443.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-026:426.5-443.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
126 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade intercept over a significant width is a very positive result, indicating robust mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.08”

Context: 17.0

GL-26-026Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 70.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-026
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
70.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
426.5 m
To
427 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-026:426.5-427.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
126 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This bonanza-grade sub-interval is exceptionally high, indicating significant localized gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Bonanza intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“70.20”

Context: 0.5

GL-26-026Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 12.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-026
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
12.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
443 m
To
443.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-026:443.0-443.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
126 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade sub-interval highlights very high-grade gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“12.60”

Context: 0.5

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.76Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.76
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10 m
From
407.5 m
To
417.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:407.5-417.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a moderate width, providing additional data for the deposit model.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.76”

Context: 10.0

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
407.5 m
To
408.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:407.5-408.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval further confirms the presence of higher-grade zones within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.90”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
441 m
To
447.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:441.0-447.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a moderate width, providing additional data for the deposit model.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: 6.5

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
441 m
To
441.5 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:441.0-441.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval contributes to the overall positive results and understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.27”

Context: 0.5

GL-26-027BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-027B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
442.3 m
To
443 m
Hole Depth
501 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-027B:442.3-443.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547102
Northing
5527952
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
132 °
Dip
-51 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval contributes to the overall positive results and understanding of the deposit.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.21”

Context: 0.7

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 11.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
11.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
32 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
375 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:32.0-33.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade intercept over a narrow width indicates significant localized gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“11.80”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.5 m
From
56 m
To
66.5 m
Hole Depth
375 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:56.0-66.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a moderate width, providing additional data for the deposit model.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: 10.5

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
62.5 m
To
63.5 m
Hole Depth
375 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:62.5-63.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval indicates localized higher-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.4 m
From
284.9 m
To
295.3 m
Hole Depth
375 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:284.9-295.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a moderate width, providing additional data for the deposit model.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: 10.4

GL-26-028Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-028
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
294.2 m
To
295.3 m
Hole Depth
375 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-028:294.2-295.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547404
Northing
5527956
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
121 °
Dip
-50 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval indicates localized higher-grade mineralization within the broader zone.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“2.94”

Context: 1.1

GL-26-029Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-029
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
217 m
To
222 m
Hole Depth
327 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-029:217.0-222.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547416
Northing
5527918
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
118 °
Dip
-47 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This intercept shows weak gold mineralization over a narrow width, providing additional data for the deposit model.

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“0.97”

Context: 5.0

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.2 m
From
287.3 m
To
291.5 m
Hole Depth
402 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:287.3-291.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This moderate-grade intercept over a narrow width contributes positively to the understanding of mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“1.54”

Context: 4.2

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
289.6 m
To
290.5 m
Hole Depth
402 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:289.6-290.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade sub-interval further confirms the presence of higher-grade zones within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.80”

Context: 0.9

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
328 m
To
329.6 m
Hole Depth
402 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:328.0-329.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade intercept over a narrow width indicates good localized gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“4.62”

Context: 1.6

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
328 m
To
329 m
Hole Depth
402 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:328.0-329.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade sub-interval highlights very high-grade gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“6.55”

Context: 1.0

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
354.3 m
To
357 m
Hole Depth
402 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:354.3-357.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This strong-grade intercept over a narrow width indicates good localized gold mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“3.41”

Context: 2.7

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
354.3 m
To
355 m
Hole Depth
402 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:354.3-355.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade sub-interval highlights very high-grade gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“5.48”

Context: 0.7

GL-26-030BGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-26-030B
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
356.2 m
To
357 m
Hole Depth
402 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-26-030B:356.2-357.0
Mining Method
open_pit

Location

Easting
547038
Northing
5527796
CRS
NAD83 Zone 15N
Azimuth
122 °
Dip
-56 °
Loc. Confidence
high

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This exceptional-grade sub-interval highlights very high-grade gold mineralization within the broader intercept.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only

Evidence · table

“6.27”

Context: 0.8

GL-25-003Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 20 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-003
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
20 m
From
279 m
To
299 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-25-003:279.0-299.0
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows strong gold mineralization over a significant width, but is not new information from this release.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Stale data re-release

Evidence · text

“3.31 g/t gold over 20.0 metres (from 279.0 to 299.0 metres)”
GL-25-003Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-003
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.89
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows strong gold mineralization, but is not new information from this release.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Stale data re-release

Evidence · text

“3.89 g/t gold over 1.0 metres”
GL-25-002Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.59Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-002
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.59
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
9 m
From
345.5 m
To
354.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-25-002:345.5-354.5
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows exceptional gold mineralization, but is not new information from this release.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Stale data re-release

Evidence · text

“7.59 g/t gold over 9.0 metres (from 345.5 to 354.5 metres)”
GL-25-002Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 9.49Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-002
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
9.49
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows exceptional gold mineralization, but is not new information from this release.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Stale data re-release

Evidence · text

“9.49 g/t gold over 1.0 metres”
GL-25-002Goldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.9 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
GL-25-002
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.9 m
From
362 m
To
372.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Program
mixed
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
GL-25-002:362.0-372.9
Mining Method
open_pit

QA/QC

Laboratory
Activation Laboratories Ltd.
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2026-02-02T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate gold mineralization, but is not new information from this release.

Positive factors

  • Moderate grade intercept

Negative factors

  • Apparent width only
  • Stale data re-release

Evidence · text

“1.87 g/t gold over 10.9 metres (from 362.0 to 372.9 metres)”
IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 9.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
9.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
32.5 m
To
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:32.5-33
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.51 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.51 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.51”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 12.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
12.5 m
From
262.5 m
To
275 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:262.5-275
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.85 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 23.1 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.85”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
264.4 m
To
265.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:264.4-265.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.88 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.88 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.88”

Context: Including

and includingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 9.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
9.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
267.5 m
To
268.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and including:267.5-268.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 9.17 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 9.17 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“9.17”

Context: and including

and includingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
274.1 m
To
275 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and including:274.1-275
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.55 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.55 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.55”

Context: and including

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
78 m
To
79.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:78-79.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.33 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 15.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
15.3 m
From
300.7 m
To
316 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:300.7-316
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.44 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 22.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.44”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
307 m
To
308 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:307-308
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.69 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.69 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.69”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.14Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.14
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
334 m
To
340.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:334-340.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.14 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.14”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.85Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.85
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
334 m
To
335 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:334-335
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.85 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.85 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.85”

Context: Including

and includingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.37
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
340 m
To
340.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and including:340-340.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.37 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.37 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.37”

Context: and including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.5 m
From
351.5 m
To
359 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:351.5-359
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.04 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.68Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.68
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
351.5 m
To
352.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:351.5-352.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.68 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.68 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.68”

Context: Including

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.3 m
From
86.7 m
To
88 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:86.7-88
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.12 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.12 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.12”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.5 m
From
145.5 m
To
147 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:145.5-147
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 11 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 16.5 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 11 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“11.00”

Context: And

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.03
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4.1 m
From
309 m
To
313.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:309-313.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.03 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.03 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.03”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
309 m
To
310 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:309-310
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.95 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.95 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.95”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 11 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
11 m
From
324 m
To
335 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:324-335
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.09 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 12.0 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.09”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
324 m
To
325 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:324-325
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.9 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.9 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.90”

Context: Including

and includingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
332.3 m
To
333 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and including:332.3-333
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.12 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.12 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.12”

Context: and including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
8 m
From
349 m
To
357 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:349-357
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.51 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.51”

Context: And

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.81
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5 m
From
365 m
To
370 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:365-370
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.81 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.81”

Context: And

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 16.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
1.24
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
16.4 m
From
428.1 m
To
444.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:428.1-444.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 1.24 g/t gold is moderate against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 20.3 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is moderate; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“1.24”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.58Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.58
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.6 m
From
438.2 m
To
438.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:438.2-438.8
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.58 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.58 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.58”

Context: Including

and includingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.51
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
443.5 m
To
444.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and including:443.5-444.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.51 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5.51 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.51”

Context: and including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 7.97Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
7.97
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
471.5 m
To
472.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:471.5-472.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 7.97 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 7.97 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“7.97”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.54Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.54
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
378.3 m
To
379 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:378.3-379
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.54 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.54 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.54”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 5.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
5.6 m
From
388.5 m
To
394.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:388.5-394.1
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.8 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 26.9 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.8 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.80”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 16.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
16.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
389.5 m
To
390.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:389.5-390.4
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 16.3 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 14.7 g/t·m is weak (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 16.3 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“16.30”

Context: Including

and includingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.09Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.09
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
391.3 m
To
392.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and including:391.3-392.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.09 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.1 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6.09 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.09”

Context: and including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 12.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
12.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
420.7 m
To
421.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:420.7-421.2
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.9 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.9 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.90”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 70.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
70.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
426.5 m
To
427 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:426.5-427
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 70.2 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 35.1 g/t·m is moderate (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 70.2 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“70.20”

Context: Including

and includingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 12.6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
12.6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
443 m
To
443.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and including:443-443.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 12.6 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 12.6 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“12.60”

Context: and including

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
407.5 m
To
408.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:407.5-408.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.9 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.9 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.9 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.90”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 6.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
6.5 m
From
441 m
To
447.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:441-447.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.88 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.7 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.88”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
441 m
To
441.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:441-441.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.27 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 1.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.27 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.27”

Context: Including

and includingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.21Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.21
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
442.3 m
To
443 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and including:442.3-443
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.21 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.21 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.21”

Context: and including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.82Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.82
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.5 m
From
56 m
To
66.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:56-66.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.82 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.6 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.82”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
62.5 m
To
63.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:62.5-63.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.19 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 2.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.19 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.19”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 0.79Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 10.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
0.79
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
10.4 m
From
284.9 m
To
295.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:284.9-295.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 0.79 g/t gold is weak against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 8.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is weak; the better of the two is used).

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“0.79”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 2.94Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
2.94
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.1 m
From
294.2 m
To
295.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:294.2-295.3
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 2.94 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 2.94 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“2.94”

Context: Including

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m
From
289.6 m
To
290.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:289.6-290.5
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.8 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 4.3 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.8 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.80”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 4.62Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
4.62
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m
From
328 m
To
329.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:328-329.6
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 4.62 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 7.4 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 4.62 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“4.62”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.55Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.55
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
328 m
To
329 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:328-329
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.55 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 6.5 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6.55 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.55”

Context: Including

AndGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 3.41Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
And
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
3.41
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.7 m
From
354.3 m
To
357 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
And:354.3-357
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 3.41 g/t gold is strong against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 9.2 g/t·m is below (grade alone is strong; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 3.41 g/t gold is strong on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“3.41”

Context: And

IncludingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 5.48Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
Including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
5.48
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
354.3 m
To
355 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
Including:354.3-355
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 5.48 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 3.8 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 5.48 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“5.48”

Context: Including

and includingGoldlund Deposit · goldGrade: 6.27Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
and including
Project
Goldlund Deposit
Commodity
gold
Region
canada_on
Reported Region
Ontario
Ticker
NEXG

Geometry

Grade
6.27
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
356.2 m
To
357 m

Classification

Deposit Type
orogenic
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
and including:356.2-357
Mining Method
open_pit

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Expanded from assay table. 6.27 g/t gold is exceptional against the open_pit mining band [5, 2, 1, 0.3] g/t. Grade×width 5.0 g/t·m is below (grade alone is exceptional; the better of the two is used).

Positive factors

  • 6.27 g/t gold is exceptional on the open_pit mining band.

Negative factors

  • Scored from rubric bands during table expansion, not from document context.

Evidence · table

“6.27”

Context: and including

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.