News Release - Multi-Target Drill Opportunity Highlighted at Magno

Original announcement by cse on

Company
GoldHaven Resources Corp.
Ticker
GOH
Exchange
CSE
Region
British Columbia
Primary commodity
Tungsten
Secondary commodities
Silver, Lead, Zinc, Copper
Document categories
Drill results, Permitting, Other
Extracted
2026-09-30 15:33:31 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

GoldHaven Resources has secured an amended Mines Act Permit for its Magno Project, authorizing up to 93 drill pads across seven distinct work zones. This permit provides the company with significant flexibility to evaluate multiple targets, including tungsten-skarn at Kuhn and polymetallic mineralization at D Zone.

Reasoning: The announcement of an amended permit with expanded drill pad capacity and multiple work zones significantly de-risks the exploration program and increases the potential for discovery across the Magno Project.

Positive factors

  • Amended Mines Act Permit provides significant operational flexibility
  • Authorization for 93 drill pads across seven work zones
  • Expansion of permitted footprint to multiple high-priority targets

Facts used in scoring: 3

Classification and evidence

Permitting Milestonepositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Company announced an amended Mines Act Permit providing significant flexibility for exploration.

Evidence · text

“GoldHaven’s amended Mines Act Permit provides the Company with significant flexibility”

Apparent Width Onlynegative · Story-specific tag

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Why it applies: Historical silver-lead-zinc intercept is reported without drill orientation or true width.

Evidence · text

“7.6 metres grading 240 g/t Ag, 4.73% Pb and 4.74% Zn”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 3. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (3)

Fact 1Magno · silverGrade: 240Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magno
Commodity
silver
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOH

Geometry

Grade
240
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
7.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: High-grade silver intercept reported from historical drilling, but lacks modern verification.

Positive factors

  • High-grade silver intercept

Negative factors

  • Historical result not independently verified by a QP for GoldHaven

Evidence · text

“7.6 metres grading 240 g/t Ag”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 2Magno · leadGrade: 4.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magno
Commodity
lead
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOH

Geometry

Grade
4.73
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical lead grade reported as part of a polymetallic intercept.

Positive factors

  • Significant lead grade

Negative factors

  • Historical result not independently verified by a QP for GoldHaven

Evidence · text

“4.73% Pb”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Fact 3Magno · zincGrade: 4.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Magno
Commodity
zinc
Region
canada_bc
Reported Region
canada_bc
Ticker
GOH

Geometry

Grade
4.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
7.6 m

Classification

Sample Type
drill

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
drill_no_hole_id
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes

Dates

Event date
2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Historical zinc grade reported as part of a polymetallic intercept.

Positive factors

  • Significant zinc grade

Negative factors

  • Historical result not independently verified by a QP for GoldHaven

Evidence · text

“4.74% Zn”

Tags used in scoring

No QA/QC Disclosurenegative

Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.