News Release - Magno Drill Update
Original announcement by cse on
- Company
- GoldHaven Resources Corp.
- Ticker
- GOH
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- British Columbia
- Primary commodity
- Tungsten
- Secondary commodities
- Silver, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Other, Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-10-09 17:48:06 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
GoldHaven Resources has completed its 2026 drill program at the Kuhn tungsten-skarn target, with the final hole (GOH26-08) intersecting skarn at depth. The results suggest geological continuity of the skarn system between drill sections, though assay results are still pending. Drilling has now commenced at the D Zone to test historical silver-lead-zinc mineralization.
Reasoning: The announcement reports the completion of a drill program and the intersection of skarn (geological indicator) without providing new assay grades, though it provides significant geological context and continuity evidence.
Positive factors
- geological continuity suggested by skarn intersection in two separate drill sections
- completion of first modern systematic drill campaign at Kuhn
- identification of substantial skarn thickness (20-45m true width) in GOH26-04
Negative factors
- assays are pending so grade and economic significance are unknown
- historical D Zone results are not independently verified
Facts used in scoring: 4
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release names a Qualified Person (Raymond Wladichuk, P.Geo.) who reviewed and approved the technical information.
Evidence · text
“reviewed and approved by Raymond Wladichuk, P.Geo., B.Sc., a non-independent Qualified Person”
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: While a QP is named, the specific assay protocols, lab certification, or use of standards/blanks for the current Kuhn program are not disclosed in this release.
Evidence · text
“Assays from the Kuhn program are pending”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 4. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (4)
GOH26-04MagnoView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- GOH26-04
- Project
- Magno
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- True Width
- 32.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
- Mining Method
- unknown
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The hole intersected a significant skarn interval with an estimated true width of 20-45m, providing geological evidence for the system.
Positive factors
- substantial skarn development
- significant true width reported
Negative factors
- assays are pending
Evidence · text
“the lower skarn interval in GOH26-04 is estimated at approximately 20–45 metres true thickness”
Tags used in scoring
True Width Disclosedpositive
Actual thickness perpendicular to structure is stated, not just downhole length.
Why it applies: true_width_m is 32.5
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
historicalMagno · silverGrade: 240Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- historical
- Project
- Magno
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Grade
- 240
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical intercept reported at D Zone; provides context for current drilling but lacks modern verification.
Positive factors
- high grade silver
Negative factors
- not independently verified by a QP
- predates NI 43-101
Evidence · text
“7.6 metres grading 240 g/t Ag, 4.73% Pb and 4.74% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
historicalMagno · leadGrade: 4.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- historical
- Project
- Magno
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.73
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical intercept reported at D Zone.
Positive factors
- encouraging lead grade
Negative factors
- not independently verified by a QP
- predates NI 43-101
Evidence · text
“4.73% Pb”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
historicalMagno · zincGrade: 4.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 7.6 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- historical
- Project
- Magno
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- canada_bc
- Reported Region
- canada_bc
- Ticker
- GOH
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.74
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 7.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- skarn
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: Historical intercept reported at D Zone.
Positive factors
- encouraging zinc grade
Negative factors
- not independently verified by a QP
- predates NI 43-101
Evidence · text
“4.74% Zn”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.