New Pacific Metals Reports Results of Updated Carangas Preliminary Economic Assessment: Post-tax $2.65 Billion NPV (5%) and 35.9% IRR; 339.0 Million Oz of Silver Equivalent Produced
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- New Pacific Metals Corp.
- Ticker
- NUAG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Oruro Department, Bolivia
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- None reported
- Document categories
- Resource update
- Extracted
- 2026-08-20 20:22:58 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
New Pacific Metals has released an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for its Carangas project in Bolivia. The update highlights a post-tax NPV of $2.65 billion and a 35.9% IRR, with projected production of 339.0 million ounces of silver equivalent.
Reasoning: The update reports a substantial post-tax NPV of $2.65 billion and a high IRR of 35.9% for the Carangas project.
Positive factors
- High NPV and IRR
- Significant silver equivalent production
Facts used in scoring: 0

Classification and evidence
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: The announcement specifically reports the results of an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA).
Evidence · text
“results of its updated preliminary economic assessment technical report”
NI 43-101 Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: The technical report was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 standards.
Evidence · text
“prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 0. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
No stored fact records are available for this extraction.
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.