Multiple High-Priority Drill Targets at Peak View Prospect 28 pages 2.7MB

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Exultant Mining Limited
Ticker
10X
Exchange
ASX
Region
New South Wales
Primary commodity
Silver
Secondary commodities
Copper, Lead, Zinc, Gold
Document categories
Drill results
Extracted
2026-10-01 02:03:09 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Exultant Mining Limited has identified multiple high-priority drill targets at its Peak View Prospect in New South Wales, Australia, following successful induced polarisation (IP) and ground gravity surveys. These new geophysical results, combined with reprocessed historical data, have significantly enhanced the understanding of the project's structural architecture, revealing several untested anomalies coincident with known mineralization. The company plans to commence a maiden drilling campaign in the coming weeks to test these compelling targets.

Reasoning: Exultant Mining has identified multiple high-priority, untested drill targets through new geophysical surveys, which are strongly supported by historical high-grade intercepts and a regional VMS context. The announcement of a maiden drill program to test these targets indicates significant progress and high prospectivity, despite the drill results themselves being historical.

Positive factors

  • New geophysical surveys (IP, gravity) successfully defined multiple high-priority, untested drill targets.
  • Coincident anomalies (chargeability-resistivity, gravity high) suggest sulphide accumulation.
  • Strong structural control interpreted, comparable to known VMS deposits.
  • Maiden drilling campaign announced to test new targets.
  • Historical high-grade intercepts provide strong context and support for the prospectivity of the new targets.
  • Reporting is JORC 2012 compliant with a Competent Person sign-off.

Negative factors

  • All drill results presented are historical, not new assays from the current program.
  • True widths are not known for the historical intercepts, which are reported as down-hole lengths.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented, limiting confidence in older data.
  • Data spacing for historical drilling is insufficient for resource estimation.
  • No specific cut-off grade for compositing the historical drill table is explicitly stated.

Facts used in scoring: 89

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 89. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (89)

PV001Peak View · silverGrade: 114Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV001
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
114
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
78.7 m
To
79.2 m
Hole Depth
109.5 m
Intercept Depth
78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV001:78.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713372
Northing
6007277
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept, while moderate in grade, is narrow and its novelty is low. It contributes to the overall prospectivity of the area by confirming mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 114.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept is part of a historical high-grade zone supporting current exploration targets.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.5m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“114.0”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · goldGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV001
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.5 m
From
78.7 m
To
79.2 m
Hole Depth
109.5 m
Intercept Depth
78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV001:78.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713372
Northing
6007277
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.17 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.5m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · copperGrade: 3.08Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV001
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3.08
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
78.7 m
To
79.2 m
Hole Depth
109.5 m
Intercept Depth
78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV001:78.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713372
Northing
6007277
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows exceptional grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system and supporting the overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 3.08% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.5m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“3.08”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · leadGrade: 8.28Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV001
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
8.28
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.5 m
From
78.7 m
To
79.2 m
Hole Depth
109.5 m
Intercept Depth
78.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV001:78.7-79.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713372
Northing
6007277
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows strong grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system and supporting the overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 8.28% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.5m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“8.28”

Context: 0.5

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · goldGrade: 0.46Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV001
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.46
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
79.2 m
To
80 m
Hole Depth
109.5 m
Intercept Depth
79.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV001:79.2-80
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713372
Northing
6007277
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.46 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.8m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.46”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV001Peak View · copperGrade: 1.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV001
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
79.2 m
To
80 m
Hole Depth
109.5 m
Intercept Depth
79.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV001:79.2-80
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713372
Northing
6007277
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
270 °
Dip
-60 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows strong grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system and supporting the overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 1.1% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.8m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.10”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
31
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.2 m
From
25 m
To
25.2 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:25-25.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 31.0 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.2m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“31.0”

Context: 0.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.2 m
From
25 m
To
25.2 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
25 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:25-25.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.25 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.2m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.2

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 95Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
95
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.7 m
From
164.1 m
To
164.8 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
164.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:164.1-164.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept, while moderate in grade, is narrow and its novelty is low. It contributes to the overall prospectivity of the area by confirming mineralization.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 95.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.7m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“95.0”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
164.1 m
To
164.8 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
164.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:164.1-164.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows exceptional grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system and supporting the overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 2.6% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.7m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“2.60”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · leadGrade: 2.09Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.7 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.09
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.7 m
From
164.1 m
To
164.8 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
164.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:164.1-164.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows weak grade over a narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 2.09% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.7m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“2.09”

Context: 0.7

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · silverGrade: 269Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
269
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
164.8 m
To
165.5 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
164.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:164.8-165.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows strong grade over a narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system and supporting the overall prospectivity.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 269.0 g/t is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.8m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“269.0”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · goldGrade: 0.75Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.75
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.8 m
From
164.8 m
To
165.5 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
164.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:164.8-165.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept shows weak grade over a narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade of 0.75 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.8m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.75”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · leadGrade: 3.82Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3.82
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
164.8 m
To
165.5 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
164.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:164.8-165.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows moderate grade over a narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 3.82% is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.8m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“3.82”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · zincGrade: 7.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
7.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m
From
164.8 m
To
165.5 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
164.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:164.8-165.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows moderate grade over a narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 7.74% is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.8m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“7.74”

Context: 0.8

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m
From
165.5 m
To
166.5 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
165.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:165.5-166.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.12 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 1.0m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.12”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · copperGrade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
165.5 m
To
166.5 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
165.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:165.5-166.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows moderate grade over a narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 0.63% is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 1.0m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.63”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PV002Peak View · leadGrade: 1.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PV002
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.51
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m
From
165.5 m
To
166.5 m
Hole Depth
181.5 m
Intercept Depth
165.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PV002:165.5-166.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713368
Northing
6007269
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
998 m
Azimuth
0 °
Dip
-90 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1996-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows weak grade over a narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 1.51% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 1.0m is narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.51”

Context: 1.0

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 90Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
90
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.2 m
To
32.3 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 90.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“90.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.2 m
To
32.3 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is very low grade and very narrow, offering negligible individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.05 g/t is very weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 3.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.2 m
To
32.3 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows exceptional grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 3.4% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“3.40”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 1.39Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.39
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.2 m
To
32.3 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows weak grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 1.39% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.39”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.2 m
To
32.3 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.2-32.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows weak grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 3.6% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“3.60”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 70Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
70
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.3 m
To
32.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 70.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“70.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.3 m
To
32.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is very low grade and very narrow, offering negligible individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.05 g/t is very weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.55
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.3 m
To
32.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 1.55% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.55”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.3 m
To
32.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows weak grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 1.61% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.61”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.3 m
To
32.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.3-32.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows weak grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 4.5% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“4.50”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 70Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
70
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.4 m
To
32.5 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.4-32.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 70.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“70.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 2.3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.4 m
To
32.5 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.4-32.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Gold grade of 2.3 g/t is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“2.30”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.56Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.56
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.4 m
To
32.5 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.4-32.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 1.56% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.56”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 4.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
4.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.4 m
To
32.5 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.4-32.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows weak grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 4.2% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“4.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 80Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
80
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.5 m
To
32.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 80.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“80.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.05
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.5 m
To
32.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is very low grade and very narrow, offering negligible individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.05 g/t is very weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.05”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.53
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.5 m
To
32.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 1.53% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.53”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 1.83Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.83
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.5 m
To
32.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows weak grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 1.83% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.83”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 4.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
4.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.5 m
To
32.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.5-32.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows weak grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 4.9% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“4.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
100
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.6 m
To
32.7 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 100.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“100.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.6 m
To
32.7 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.15 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.15”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.79
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.6 m
To
32.7 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 1.79% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.79”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 7.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
7.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.6 m
To
32.7 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 7.4% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“7.40”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 6.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
6.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.6 m
To
32.7 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.6-32.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows moderate grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 6.9% is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“6.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
110
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.7 m
To
32.8 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 110.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“110.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.7 m
To
32.8 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.1 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.76Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.76
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.7 m
To
32.8 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 1.76% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.76”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 4.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
4.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.7 m
To
32.8 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows moderate grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 4.5% is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“4.50”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 10.3Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
10.3
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.7 m
To
32.8 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.7 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.7-32.8
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 10.3% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“10.30”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 140Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
140
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.8 m
To
32.9 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 140.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“140.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.8 m
To
32.9 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.1 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 2.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.8 m
To
32.9 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows exceptional grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 2.8% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“2.80”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 2.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.8 m
To
32.9 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows weak grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 2.2% is weak for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“2.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 6.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
6.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.8 m
To
32.9 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.8 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.8-32.9
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows moderate grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 6.1% is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“6.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
100
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.9 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 100.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“100.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.9 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.1 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 2.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
2.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.9 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows exceptional grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 2.6% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“2.60”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 5.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
5.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.9 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows moderate grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 5.1% is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“5.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 11.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
11.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
32.9 m
To
33 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
32.9 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:32.9-33
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 11.2% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“11.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
110
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33 m
To
33.1 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 110.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“110.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33 m
To
33.1 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.25 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33 m
To
33.1 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 1.02% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.02”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 10.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
10.1
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33 m
To
33.1 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows exceptional grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 10.1% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“10.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 18.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
18.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33 m
To
33.1 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33-33.1
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows exceptional grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 18.9% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“18.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
110
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.1 m
To
33.2 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.1-33.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 110.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“110.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.1 m
To
33.2 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.1-33.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.25 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 9.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
9.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.1 m
To
33.2 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.1-33.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 9.5% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“9.50”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 17.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
17.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.1 m
To
33.2 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.1 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.1-33.2
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 17.9% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“17.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 110Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
110
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.2 m
To
33.3 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.2-33.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 110.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“110.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.2 m
To
33.3 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.2-33.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.2 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 10.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
10.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.2 m
To
33.3 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.2-33.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows exceptional grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 10.9% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“10.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 18.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
18.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.2 m
To
33.3 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.2 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.2-33.3
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows exceptional grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 18.2% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“18.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 90Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
90
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.3 m
To
33.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.3-33.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 90.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“90.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.3 m
To
33.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.3-33.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.2 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.06Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.06
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.3 m
To
33.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.3-33.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 1.06% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.06”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 7.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
7.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.3 m
To
33.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.3-33.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 7.6% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“7.60”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 15.2Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
15.2
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.3 m
To
33.4 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.3 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.3-33.4
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 15.2% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“15.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
100
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.4 m
To
33.5 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.4-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 100.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“100.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.4 m
To
33.5 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.4-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.2 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.20”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 1.63Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
1.63
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.4 m
To
33.5 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.4-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 1.63% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“1.63”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 7.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
7.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.4 m
To
33.5 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.4-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 7.9% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“7.90”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 15.8Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
15.8
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.4 m
To
33.5 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.4 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.4-33.5
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 15.8% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“15.80”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 100Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
100
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.5 m
To
33.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.5-33.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 100.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“100.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.25Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.25
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.5 m
To
33.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.5-33.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.25 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.25”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 4.4Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
4.4
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.5 m
To
33.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.5-33.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows exceptional grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 4.4% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“4.40”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 6.7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
6.7
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.5 m
To
33.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.5-33.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 6.7% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“6.70”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · zincGrade: 14.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
zinc
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
14.5
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.5 m
To
33.6 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.5 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.5-33.6
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical zinc intercept shows strong grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Zinc grade of 14.5% is strong for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“14.50”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · silverGrade: 90Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
silver
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
90
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.6 m
To
33.7 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.6-33.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical silver intercept shows moderate grade but is very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Silver grade of 90.0 g/t is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“90.0”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
gold
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
0.1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.6 m
To
33.7 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.6-33.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical gold intercept is low grade and very narrow, offering limited individual materiality, but contributes to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Negative factors

  • Gold grade of 0.1 g/t is weak for a VMS deposit.
  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“0.10”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · copperGrade: 5.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
copper
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
5.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.6 m
To
33.7 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.6-33.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical copper intercept shows exceptional grade over a very narrow width, indicating high-grade mineralization within the system.

Positive factors

  • Copper grade of 5.6% is exceptional for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“5.60”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

PVD003Peak View · leadGrade: 3.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.1 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Hole ID
PVD003
Project
Peak View
Commodity
lead
Region
australia_nsw
Reported Region
australia_nsw
Ticker
10X

Geometry

Grade
3.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.1 m
From
33.6 m
To
33.7 m
Hole Depth
118.5 m
Intercept Depth
33.6 m

Classification

Deposit Type
vms
Program
exploration
Sample Type
drill
Group ID
PVD003:33.6-33.7
Mining Method
underground

Location

Easting
713351
Northing
6007164
CRS
MGA94 Zone 55
Elevation
988 m
Azimuth
255 °
Dip
-75 °
Loc. Confidence
high
Loc. Source
document

QA/QC

QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
Lab Certified
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
standards, blanks, duplicates

Deleterious

Deleterious Flag
No

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
No

Compositing

Max Dilution
0.2 m

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
1982-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-04-09T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This historical lead intercept shows moderate grade over a very narrow width, contributing to the polymetallic nature of the system.

Positive factors

  • Lead grade of 3.6% is moderate for a VMS deposit.

Negative factors

  • Intercept length of 0.1m is very narrow.
  • Result is historical, reducing its novelty.
  • True width is not known.
  • QA/QC protocols for early historical drilling are not consistently documented.

Evidence · table

“3.60”

Context: 0.1

Tags used in scoring

QA/QC Disclosedpositive

Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).

Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is true

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

Stale Data Re-releasenegative

Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.

Why it applies: the fact restates a prior release

Nearology Playneutral

Value premise rests on proximity to a known deposit rather than own results.

Why it applies: proximity is offered as the value premise: "o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of h"

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.