Morocco Strategic Minerals Advances Multiple High-Grade Copper Targets Across its Western High Atlas District

Original announcement by globenewswire on

Company
Morocco Strategic Minerals Corporation
Ticker
MCC
Exchange
Unavailable
Region
Morocco
Primary commodity
Copper
Secondary commodities
Silver, Gold
Document categories
Drill results, Other
Extracted
2026-08-20 17:16:49 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Morocco Strategic Minerals announced high-grade copper and silver results from systematic underground and surface channel sampling at Ouneine, alongside selective grab and historical stockpile samples from Tanfit and Ijoukak. These findings are being integrated with geological mapping to refine and prioritize drill targets across the Western High Atlas District in Morocco. The company aims to commence its first phase of drilling as rapidly as practicable, subject to technical validation and permitting.

Reasoning: Morocco Strategic Minerals reported multiple high-grade copper and silver results from systematic channel sampling at Ouneine and selective grab/stockpile samples at Tanfit and Ijoukak, which are being used to define priority drill targets, indicating strong exploration potential despite the preliminary nature of some samples.

Positive factors

  • Multiple high-grade copper and silver results from systematic channel sampling
  • Results are being integrated to define priority drill targets
  • QA/QC procedures are disclosed and a Qualified Person has approved the technical information

Negative factors

  • True widths of mineralized structures have not yet been determined for channel samples
  • Grab samples and historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Facts used in scoring: 113

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 113. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (113)

Fact 1Ouneine · silverGrade: 18Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
18
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 1A:0-2.00
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“18”

Context: 2.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 2Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 1A:0-2.00
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: 2.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 3Ouneine · silverGrade: 69Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
69
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 1A:0-0.40
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“69 g/t Ag”

Context: 0.40 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 4Ouneine · copperGrade: 5.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
5.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 1A:0-0.40
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, indicating high-grade mineralization and contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“5.38% Cu”

Context: 0.40 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 5.38% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · table

“5.38% Cu”

Context: 0.40 m

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 5Ouneine · silverGrade: 17Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
17
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 2A:0-2.20
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“17”

Context: 2.20

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 6Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.87Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.87
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 2A:0-2.20
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.87”

Context: 2.20

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 7Ouneine · silverGrade: 35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
35
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 2A:0-1.00
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“35 g/t Ag”

Context: 1.00 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 8Ouneine · copperGrade: 3.9Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
3.9
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 2A:0-1.00
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, indicating high-grade mineralization and contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“3.90% Cu”

Context: 1.00 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 3.90% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · table

“3.90% Cu”

Context: 1.00 m

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 9Ouneine · silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.78 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.78 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 3A:0-1.78
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“5”

Context: 1.78

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 10Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.78 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.78 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 3A:0-1.78
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 1.78

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 11Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.33 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.33 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 3A:0-0.33
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a very narrow interval within a broader channel, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a very narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.48% Cu”

Context: 0.33 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 12Ouneine · silverGrade: 39Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
39
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 4A:0-2.10
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“39”

Context: 2.10

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 13Ouneine · copperGrade: 5.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
5.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 4A:0-2.10
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, indicating high-grade mineralization and contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“5.74”

Context: 2.10

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 5.74% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · table

“5.74”

Context: 2.10

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 14Ouneine · silverGrade: 88Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
88
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 4A:0-0.90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong silver grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“88 g/t Ag”

Context: 0.90 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 15Ouneine · copperGrade: 13.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
13.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 4A:0-0.90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, indicating very high-grade mineralization and contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“13.18% Cu”

Context: 0.90 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 13.18% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · table

“13.18% Cu”

Context: 0.90 m

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 16Ouneine · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.75 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 5A:0-1.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1”

Context: 1.75

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 17Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.17Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.75 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.17
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.75 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 5A:0-1.75
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.17”

Context: 1.75

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 18Ouneine · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 6A:0-1.60
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: 1.60

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 19Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 6A:0-1.60
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 1.60

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 20Ouneine · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 7A:0-1.60
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“6”

Context: 1.60

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 21Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.23Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.23
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 7A:0-1.60
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.23”

Context: 1.60

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 22Ouneine · copperGrade: 4.62Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
4.62
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 7A:0-0.40
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval within a broader channel, indicating high-grade mineralization and contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“4.62% Cu”

Context: 0.40 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 4.62% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · table

“4.62% Cu”

Context: 0.40 m

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 23Ouneine · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 8A:0-1.90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“7”

Context: 1.90

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 24Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.41
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 8A:0-1.90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a narrow channel length from systematic underground sampling
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.41”

Context: 1.90

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 25Ouneine · copperGrade: 2.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
2.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 8A:0-1.10
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.38% Cu”

Context: 1.10 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 26Ouneine · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 9A:0-2.10
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“11”

Context: 2.10

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 27Ouneine · copperGrade: 2.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
2.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 9A:0-2.10
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.29”

Context: 2.10

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 28Ouneine · copperGrade: 5.29Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
5.29
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 9A:0-0.90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, indicating high-grade mineralization and contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“5.29% Cu”

Context: 0.90 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 5.29% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · table

“5.29% Cu”

Context: 0.90 m

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 29Ouneine · silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.67 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
7
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 10A:0-2.67
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“7”

Context: 2.67

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 30Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.74Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.67 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.74
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.67 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 10A:0-2.67
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.74”

Context: 2.67

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 31Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.95 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.95 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 10A:0-0.95
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.31% Cu”

Context: 0.95 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 32Ouneine · silverGrade: 6Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
6
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.15 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 11A:0-2.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“6”

Context: 2.15

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 33Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.15 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.67
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.15 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 11A:0-2.15
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.67”

Context: 2.15

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 34Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 11A:0-1.10
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.18% Cu”

Context: 1.10 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 35Ouneine · silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
2
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 12A:0-2.40
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2”

Context: 2.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 36Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.38Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.38
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 12A:0-2.40
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.38”

Context: 2.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 37Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.18
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 12A:0-1.10
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.18% Cu”

Context: 1.10 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 38Ouneine · silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 13A:0-3.00
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“8”

Context: 3.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 39Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.12
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 13A:0-3.00
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.12”

Context: 3.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 40Ouneine · copperGrade: 3.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
3.55
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 13A:0-0.90
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, indicating high-grade mineralization and contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“3.55% Cu”

Context: 0.90 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 3.55% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · table

“3.55% Cu”

Context: 0.90 m

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 41Ouneine · silverGrade: 11Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
11
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 14A:0-2.00
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“11”

Context: 2.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 42Ouneine · copperGrade: 2.97Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
2.97
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 14A:0-2.00
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, indicating high-grade mineralization and contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.97”

Context: 2.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 2.97% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · table

“2.97”

Context: 2.00

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 43Ouneine · copperGrade: 9.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
9.6
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 14A:0-0.60
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval within a broader channel, indicating very high-grade mineralization and contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval within a broader channel
  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“9.60% Cu”

Context: 0.60 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 9.60% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · table

“9.60% Cu”

Context: 0.60 m

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 44Ouneine · silverGrade: 1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 15A:0-2.35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1”

Context: 2.35

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 45Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.35 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.21
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.35 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 15A:0-2.35
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a reasonable channel length from systematic underground sampling, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.21”

Context: 2.35

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 46Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.8 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.48
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.8 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
Section 15A:0-0.80
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper grade over a narrow interval within a broader channel, contributing to drill target definition.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.48% Cu”

Context: 0.80 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 47Ouneine · silverGrade: 116Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
116
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH1:0-1.20
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong silver grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“116”

Context: 1.20

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 48Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.84Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.84
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH1:0-1.20
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Moderate copper grade from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.84”

Context: 1.20

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 49Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.52
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH1:0-0.60
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a narrow interval from surface channel sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a narrow interval from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.52% Cu”

Context: 0.60 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 50Ouneine · silverGrade: 199Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
199
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH2:0-2.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong silver grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“199”

Context: 2.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 51Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.55
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH2:0-2.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.55”

Context: 2.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 52Ouneine · copperGrade: 3.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.6 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
3.07
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.6 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH2:0-0.60
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval from surface channel sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a narrow interval from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“3.07% Cu”

Context: 0.60 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 3.07% is exceptional for copper, especially in an open pit context.

Evidence · table

“3.07% Cu”

Context: 0.60 m

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 53Ouneine · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH3:0-1.40
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“10”

Context: 1.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 54Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.04
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH3:0-1.40
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.04”

Context: 1.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 55Ouneine · copperGrade: 3.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
3.45
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH3:0-0.40
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval from surface channel sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade over a very narrow interval from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“3.45% Cu”

Context: 0.40 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 3.45% is exceptional for copper, especially in an open pit context.

Evidence · table

“3.45% Cu”

Context: 0.40 m

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 56Ouneine · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
0.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH4:0-0.90
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“10”

Context: 0.90

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 57Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.43Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.9 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.43
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
0.9 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH4:0-0.90
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.43”

Context: 0.90

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 58Ouneine · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH5:0-3.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“4”

Context: 3.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 59Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.14
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH5:0-3.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.14”

Context: 3.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 60Ouneine · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH6:0-1.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“4”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 61Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.59
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH6:0-1.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate copper grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.59”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 62Ouneine · silverGrade: 19Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
19
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH7:0-1.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“19”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 63Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.68Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.68
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH7:0-1.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.68”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 64Ouneine · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH8:0-1.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“4”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 65Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.19Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.19
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH8:0-1.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.19”

Context: 1.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 66Ouneine · silverGrade: 33Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
33
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.37 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH9:0-2.37
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“33”

Context: 2.37

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 67Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.37 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.61
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.37 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH9:0-2.37
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.61”

Context: 2.37

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 68Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.04 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.86
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.04 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH9:0-2.04
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a reasonable interval from surface channel sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a reasonable interval from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.86% Cu”

Context: 2.04 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 69Ouneine · silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
4
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
1.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH10:0-1.70
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“4”

Context: 1.70

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 70Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.31Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.7 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.31
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.7 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH10:0-1.70
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a narrow channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.31”

Context: 1.70

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 71Ouneine · silverGrade: 15Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
15
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH11:0-2.40
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“15”

Context: 2.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 72Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.33Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.33
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
2.4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH11:0-2.40
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a reasonable channel length from surface sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.33”

Context: 2.40

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 73Ouneine · copperGrade: 2.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.5 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
2.02
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
1.5 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH11:0-1.50
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a reasonable interval from surface channel sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a reasonable interval from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“2.02% Cu”

Context: 1.50 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 74Ouneine · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH12:0-4.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade over a good channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“10”

Context: 4.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 75Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.25Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.25
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH12:0-4.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a good channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a good channel length from surface sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.25”

Context: 4.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 76Ouneine · copperGrade: 1.64Grade Unit: %Intercept: 3 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.64
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
3 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH12:0-3.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade over a good interval from surface channel sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade over a good interval from surface channel sampling, providing additional targets

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“1.64% Cu”

Context: 3.00 m

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 77Ouneine · silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
3
Grade Unit
g/t
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH13:0-4.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade over a good channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“3”

Context: 4.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 78Ouneine · copperGrade: 0.26Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4 mView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ouneine
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.26
Grade Unit
%
Intercept
4 m

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
channel
Group ID
ON-CH13:0-4.00
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak copper grade over a good channel length from surface sampling, confirming mineralization and providing additional targets for follow-up.

Positive factors

  • Systematic channel sampling provides grade and width information for drill targeting

Negative factors

  • True width not determined

Evidence · table

“0.26”

Context: 4.00

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Apparent Width OnlyRejected · negative

Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.

Reason: The document explicitly states that the relationship between sampled lengths and true widths has not yet been determined.

Evidence · text

“All underground and surface channel lengths reported in this release are measured sample lengths. The relationship between the sampled lengths and the true widths of the mineralized structures has not yet been determined.”
Fact 79Tanfit · copperGrade: 7.76Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
7.76
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“7.76% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 7.76% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“7.76% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 80Tanfit · silverGrade: 42Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
42
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective grab sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“42 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 81Tanfit · copperGrade: 3.22Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
3.22
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“3.22% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 3.22% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“3.22% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 82Tanfit · silverGrade: 27Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
27
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective grab sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“27 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 83Tanfit · copperGrade: 2.39Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
2.39
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“2.39% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 84Tanfit · silverGrade: 39Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
39
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective grab sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“39 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 85Tanfit · copperGrade: 2.36Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
2.36
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“2.36% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 86Tanfit · silverGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
12
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective grab sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“12 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 87Tanfit · copperGrade: 2.01Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
2.01
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“2.01% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 88Tanfit · silverGrade: 8Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
8
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak silver grade from a selective grab sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Weak silver grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“8 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 89Tanfit · copperGrade: 23.6Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
23.6
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“23.60% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 23.60% is exceptional for copper, especially in an open pit context.

Evidence · text

“23.60% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 90Tanfit · silverGrade: 40Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
40
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“40 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 91Tanfit · copperGrade: 22Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
22
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“22.00% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 22.00% is exceptional for copper, especially in an open pit context.

Evidence · text

“22.00% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 92Tanfit · silverGrade: 50Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
50
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“50 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 93Tanfit · copperGrade: 16.32Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
16.32
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“16.32% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 16.32% is exceptional for copper, especially in an open pit context.

Evidence · text

“16.32% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 94Tanfit · silverGrade: 115Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
115
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong silver grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Strong silver grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“115 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 95Tanfit · copperGrade: 14.97Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
14.97
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“14.97% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 14.97% is exceptional for copper, especially in an open pit context.

Evidence · text

“14.97% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 96Tanfit · silverGrade: 70Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
70
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“70 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 97Tanfit · goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
0.12
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Weak gold grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating trace mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Weak gold grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“0.12 g/t Au”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 98Tanfit · copperGrade: 5Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
5
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“5.00% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 5.00% is exceptional for copper, especially in an open pit context.

Evidence · text

“5.00% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 99Tanfit · silverGrade: 21Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
21
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“21 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 100Tanfit · copperGrade: 3.02Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
3.02
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“3.02% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 3.02% is exceptional for copper, especially in an open pit context.

Evidence · text

“3.02% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 101Tanfit · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“10 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 102Tanfit · copperGrade: 1.79Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.79
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“1.79% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 103Tanfit · silverGrade: 37Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
37
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“37 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 104Tanfit · copperGrade: 1.44Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
1.44
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Strong copper grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Strong copper grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“1.44% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 105Tanfit · silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Tanfit
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
10
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
unknown

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Moderate silver grade from a selective historical stockpile sample, indicating mineralization but with limited representativeness and novelty.

Positive factors

  • Moderate silver grade from historical stockpile sampling

Negative factors

  • Historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative of in-situ mineralization

Evidence · text

“10 g/t Ag”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that historical stockpile samples are selective and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Historical stockpile samples are also selective and may consist of historically extracted or sorted material and may therefore not be representative of the average grade, volume or economic potential of either the stockpiled material or the underlying in-situ mineralization.”
Fact 106Ijoukak · copperGrade: 27.68Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ijoukak
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
27.68
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“27.68% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 27.68% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“27.68% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 107Ijoukak · copperGrade: 26.43Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ijoukak
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
26.43
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“26.43% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 26.43% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“26.43% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 108Ijoukak · copperGrade: 23.47Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ijoukak
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
23.47
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“23.47% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 23.47% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“23.47% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 109Ijoukak · copperGrade: 13.28Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ijoukak
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
13.28
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“13.28% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 13.28% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“13.28% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 110Ijoukak · copperGrade: 12.12Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ijoukak
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
12.12
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“12.12% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 12.12% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“12.12% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 111Ijoukak · copperGrade: 10.81Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ijoukak
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
10.81
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating very high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“10.81% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 10.81% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“10.81% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 112Ijoukak · copperGrade: 8.16Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ijoukak
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
8.16
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“8.16% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 8.16% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“8.16% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”
Fact 113Ijoukak · copperGrade: 8.08Grade Unit: %View all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ijoukak
Commodity
copper
Ticker
MCC

Geometry

Grade
8.08
Grade Unit
%

Classification

Program
exploration
Sample Type
surface
Mining Method
underground

QA/QC

Laboratory
African Laboratory for Mining and Environment (Afrilab)
QA/QC Disclosed
Yes
QP Signed
Yes
QA/QC Methods
blanks, standards, duplicates

Review

Needs Review
No
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
No

Dates

Event date
2026-08-20T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Exceptional copper grade from a selective grab sample, indicating high-grade mineralization but with limited representativeness.

Positive factors

  • Exceptional copper grade from initial exploration sampling

Negative factors

  • Grab samples are selective and may not be representative

Evidence · text

“8.08% Cu”

Rejected tags

Rejected tags — excluded from scoring because their label or evidence could not be verified.

Bonanza InterceptRejected · positive

Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.

Reason: The copper grade of 8.08% is exceptional for copper, especially in an underground context.

Evidence · text

“8.08% Cu”

Selective SamplingRejected · negative · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Reason: The document explicitly states that grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative.

Evidence · text

“Grab samples are selective in nature and may not be representative of the average grade, width or continuity of the underlying mineralization.”

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.