MMA: Sydney Mining Club Presentation
Original announcement by asx on
- Company
- Maronan Metals Limited
- Ticker
- MMA
- Exchange
- ASX
- Region
- Queensland
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Lead, Copper, Gold, Zinc
- Document categories
- Resource update, Capital raise, Permitting, Metallurgy
- Extracted
- 2026-10-01 02:24:01 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Maronan Metals Limited presented an investor update for its Maronan Silver Project in Queensland, highlighting a significant mineral endowment of 33.1 Mt Silver-Lead Resource (115 Moz Ag, 2 Mt Pb) and 32.0 Mt Copper-Gold Resource (271 kt Cu, 649 koz Au). The company reported compelling Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) results, with an NPV8% of A$908 million at spot prices, based on a small portion of the total resource. Recent achievements include a A$22 million strategic placement by Kinterra Capital, the granting of a Mineral Development Licence, and positive metallurgical testwork results for both silver-lead and copper-gold.
Reasoning: The presentation provides a highly positive overview of the Maronan Project, emphasizing its substantial resource base, strong economic potential, strategic investment, and significant progress in permitting and technical studies. While some data is re-presented, the overall update on project de-risking and advancement is very strong.
Positive factors
- Significant mineral endowment across silver-lead and copper-gold resources
- Compelling PEA economics, especially at spot prices, demonstrating project viability
- Strategic A$22M placement by Kinterra Capital, providing strong institutional validation and funding for PFS
- Mineral Development Licence granted, de-risking the project's pathway to production
- Positive metallurgical testwork results for both silver-lead and copper-gold, indicating high recoveries and good concentrate quality
- Ongoing 40,000m drill program aimed at upgrading resources and supporting a Prefeasibility Study
Negative factors
- Resource estimates and some metallurgical results are re-presented from earlier releases, limiting novelty of the data itself
- PEA is based on a small portion of the total resource, and the PFS is still underway, meaning full project economics are not yet finalized
Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.
Facts used in scoring: 30
Classification and evidence
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: the document describes a flotation route ("flotation")
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 30. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Resource Estimates (26)
indicatedMaronan Project · leadTonnes: 5300000Grade: 5.2Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 275000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:6b3692d9a7aaa55f1e2d
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5300000
- Grade
- 5.2
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 275000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This indicated lead resource represents a substantial and well-defined portion of the project, contributing positively to overall project confidence.
Positive factors
- Significant tonnage and grade for an indicated resource
- Indicated category provides good geological confidence
Negative factors
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“5.2”
Context: 5.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
indicatedMaronan Project · silverTonnes: 5300000Grade: 116Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 19.6Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:6b3692d9a7aaa55f1e2d
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- indicated
- Tonnes
- 5300000
- Grade
- 116
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 19.6
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This indicated silver resource is a key component of the project's value, with a high grade and substantial contained ounces, supporting the project's economic potential.
Positive factors
- High silver grade and significant contained metal for an indicated resource
- Indicated category provides good geological confidence
Negative factors
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“116”
Context: 5.3
Tags used in scoring
Indicated Resourcepositive
Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.
Why it applies: category is "indicated"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · leadTonnes: 6900000Grade: 4.8Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 335000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:22fa383521685cbed205
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 6900000
- Grade
- 4.8
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 335000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This inferred lead resource expands the project's scale, but its lower confidence category means further drilling is required to upgrade it.
Positive factors
- Adds significant tonnage and contained metal to the overall resource
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“4.8”
Context: 6.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · silverTonnes: 6900000Grade: 109Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 24.2Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:22fa383521685cbed205
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 6900000
- Grade
- 109
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 24.2
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This inferred silver resource significantly contributes to the project's overall silver endowment, but its lower confidence requires further work for de-risking.
Positive factors
- High silver grade and significant contained metal in the inferred category
- Adds substantial ounces to the overall resource
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“109”
Context: 6.9
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · leadTonnes: 21000000Grade: 6.5Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1370000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:07cc765f2bd078e5e94a
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 21000000
- Grade
- 6.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 1370000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This large inferred lead resource outside the Starter Zone highlights significant exploration upside and potential for future resource growth, though it requires further definition.
Positive factors
- Very large tonnage and contained metal, indicating significant potential outside the Starter Zone
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“6.5”
Context: 21.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · silverTonnes: 21000000Grade: 106Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 70.9Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:07cc765f2bd078e5e94a
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 21000000
- Grade
- 106
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 70.9
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This large inferred silver resource outside the Starter Zone represents substantial future potential, but its inferred status means it requires further drilling to improve confidence.
Positive factors
- Very large tonnage and contained silver, indicating significant potential outside the Starter Zone
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“106”
Context: 21.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · leadTonnes: 33100000Grade: 6Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 1970000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:9467284c520a95405c75
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 33100000
- Grade
- 6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 1970000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The global silver-lead resource demonstrates substantial scale, with a large contained lead component, providing a strong foundation for future development.
Positive factors
- Very large total contained lead, indicating a significant project scale
Negative factors
- A significant portion is in the inferred category, requiring further de-risking
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“6.0”
Context: 33.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · silverTonnes: 33100000Grade: 108Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 114.5Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:9467284c520a95405c75
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 33100000
- Grade
- 108
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 114.5
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The global silver-lead resource highlights the project's world-class silver endowment, with a very large contained silver component, underpinning its economic potential.
Positive factors
- Very large total contained silver, indicating a significant project scale and high value potential
Negative factors
- A significant portion is in the inferred category, requiring further de-risking
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“108”
Context: 33.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · leadTonnes: 12200000Grade: 5Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 610000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:d2f5e8276611db56d13a
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12200000
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 610000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Starter Zone lead resource provides a solid foundation for initial economic studies, but its combined category suggests a need for further confidence building.
Positive factors
- Significant contained lead in the Starter Zone, forming the basis for the PEA
Negative factors
- Combined Indicated + Inferred category is treated as inferred, indicating lower confidence for a portion
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“5.0”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · silverTonnes: 12200000Grade: 112Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 43.8Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:d2f5e8276611db56d13a
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12200000
- Grade
- 112
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 43.8
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The Starter Zone silver resource is a high-grade component of the project, providing strong support for the initial economic assessment.
Positive factors
- High silver grade and significant contained metal in the Starter Zone, underpinning the PEA
Negative factors
- Combined Indicated + Inferred category is treated as inferred, indicating lower confidence for a portion
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“112”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · goldTonnes: 12200000Grade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 39000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:d2f5e8276611db56d13a
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12200000
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 39000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold component in the Starter Zone is a minor byproduct, contributing to the polymetallic nature but not a primary driver of value.
Positive factors
- Adds a gold credit to the polymetallic Starter Zone resource
Negative factors
- Low gold grade, indicating it's a minor byproduct
- Combined Indicated + Inferred category is treated as inferred, indicating lower confidence for a portion
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.1”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · zincTonnes: 12200000Grade: 0.14Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 17.7Contained Unit: ktView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- zinc
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:d2f5e8276611db56d13a
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 12200000
- Grade
- 0.14
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 17.7
- Contained Unit
- kt
- Cutoff Grade
- 3
- Cutoff Unit
- % Lead
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The zinc component in the Starter Zone is a minor byproduct, adding to the polymetallic nature but not a primary value driver.
Positive factors
- Adds a zinc credit to the polymetallic Starter Zone resource
Negative factors
- Low zinc grade, indicating it's a minor byproduct
- Combined Indicated + Inferred category is treated as inferred, indicating lower confidence for a portion
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.14”
Context: 12.2
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · copperTonnes: 1100000Grade: 0.79Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 9000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:772751a3413bf398515c
- Material type
- Leached
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1100000
- Grade
- 0.79
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 9000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This leached copper resource provides a valuable component to the overall copper-gold resource, with a reasonable grade for its material type.
Positive factors
- Good copper grade for a leached material type
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.79”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · goldTonnes: 1100000Grade: 0.71Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 26000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:772751a3413bf398515c
- Material type
- Leached
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1100000
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 26000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold component in the leached material adds a valuable credit to the copper resource, enhancing its overall economic potential.
Positive factors
- Good gold grade for a leached material type, adding value to the copper resource
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · silverTonnes: 1100000Grade: 9Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.3Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:772751a3413bf398515c
- Material type
- Leached
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1100000
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 0.3
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver component in the leached material is a minor byproduct, contributing to the polymetallic nature but not a primary driver of value.
Positive factors
- Adds a silver credit to the leached copper-gold resource
Negative factors
- Low silver grade, indicating it's a minor byproduct
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: 1.1
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · copperTonnes: 2300000Grade: 0.63Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 14000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:90e6cd88ba850ff96cb8
- Material type
- transitional
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 14000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This transitional copper resource contributes to the project's overall copper endowment, but its inferred status and lower grade compared to fresh material indicate a need for further definition.
Positive factors
- Adds to the overall copper resource in the transitional zone
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · goldTonnes: 2300000Grade: 0.45Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 33000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:90e6cd88ba850ff96cb8
- Material type
- transitional
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 33000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold component in the transitional material adds to the overall gold resource, but its inferred status and moderate grade suggest it's a secondary contributor.
Positive factors
- Adds to the overall gold resource in the transitional zone
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · silverTonnes: 2300000Grade: 7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 0.5Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:90e6cd88ba850ff96cb8
- Material type
- transitional
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 2300000
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 0.5
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver component in the transitional material is a minor byproduct, contributing to the polymetallic nature but not a primary driver of value.
Positive factors
- Adds a silver credit to the transitional copper-gold resource
Negative factors
- Low silver grade, indicating it's a minor byproduct
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 2.3
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · copperTonnes: 28600000Grade: 0.87Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 248000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:fbffba32e07d7b697832
- Material type
- fresh
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 28600000
- Grade
- 0.87
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 248000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This large inferred fresh copper resource is the most significant component of the copper-gold endowment, providing substantial scale and grade for future development.
Positive factors
- Very large tonnage and contained copper in the fresh material, forming the bulk of the copper-gold resource
- Good copper grade for a fresh material type
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.87”
Context: 28.6
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · goldTonnes: 28600000Grade: 0.64Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 591000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:fbffba32e07d7b697832
- Material type
- fresh
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 28600000
- Grade
- 0.64
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 591000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold component in the fresh material is a significant credit, enhancing the overall value of the copper-gold resource.
Positive factors
- Significant contained gold in the fresh material, adding substantial value to the copper resource
- Good gold grade for a fresh material type
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.64”
Context: 28.6
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · silverTonnes: 28600000Grade: 7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 6.6Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:fbffba32e07d7b697832
- Material type
- fresh
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 28600000
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 6.6
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver component in the fresh material is a minor byproduct, contributing to the polymetallic nature but not a primary driver of value.
Positive factors
- Adds a silver credit to the fresh copper-gold resource
Negative factors
- Low silver grade, indicating it's a minor byproduct
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 28.6
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · copperTonnes: 32000000Grade: 0.85Grade Unit: %Contained Metal: 271000Contained Unit: tView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:c9d6b6ade5c8da0c594b
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 32000000
- Grade
- 0.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Contained Metal
- 271000
- Contained Unit
- t
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The global copper-gold resource demonstrates substantial scale, with a large contained copper component, providing a strong foundation for future development.
Positive factors
- Very large total contained copper, indicating a significant project scale
- Good overall copper grade
Negative factors
- A significant portion is in the inferred category, requiring further de-risking
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.85”
Context: 32.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · goldTonnes: 32000000Grade: 0.63Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 649000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:c9d6b6ade5c8da0c594b
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 32000000
- Grade
- 0.63
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 649000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The global copper-gold resource includes a substantial gold component, significantly enhancing the project's overall value proposition.
Positive factors
- Very large total contained gold, adding significant value to the copper resource
- Good overall gold grade
Negative factors
- A significant portion is in the inferred category, requiring further de-risking
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“0.63”
Context: 32.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · silverTonnes: 32000000Grade: 7Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 7.4Contained Unit: mozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:c9d6b6ade5c8da0c594b
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 32000000
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 7.4
- Contained Unit
- moz
- Cutoff Grade
- 0.4
- Cutoff Unit
- % Copper
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2025-06-06
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver component in the global copper-gold resource is a minor byproduct, contributing to the polymetallic nature but not a primary driver of value.
Positive factors
- Adds a silver credit to the global copper-gold resource
Negative factors
- Low silver grade, indicating it's a minor byproduct
- A significant portion is in the inferred category, requiring further de-risking
- Estimate is from June 2025, limiting novelty
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 32.0
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
inferredMaronan Project · goldTonnes: 1800000Grade: 1.24Grade Unit: g/tContained Metal: 72000Contained Unit: ozView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Estimate type
- resource
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:479137efc4e5bcbfd96c
- Material type
- fresh
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Resource Data
- Category
- inferred
- Tonnes
- 1800000
- Grade
- 1.24
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Contained Metal
- 72000
- Contained Unit
- oz
- Cutoff Grade
- 1
- Cutoff Unit
- g/t Gold
Prior Estimate
- Resource Date
- 2024-03-12
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This inferred gold-only resource provides an additional gold component, but its smaller scale and inferred status suggest it's a secondary focus compared to the larger polymetallic resources.
Positive factors
- Adds a standalone gold resource component
Negative factors
- Inferred category has lower geological confidence
- Estimate is from March 2024, limiting novelty
- Relatively small tonnage compared to other resources
Evidence · table
“1.24”
Context: 1.8
Tags used in scoring
Inferred Resourcenegative
Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.
Why it applies: category is "inferred"
Cut-off Disclosedpositive
Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.
Why it applies: cutoff_grade is stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Stale Estimatenegative
Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.
Why it applies: effective date is 2.6 years before this release
Fact 26Maronan ProjectView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Resource scope
- Reporting standards
- jorc
- Resource group id
- resource:c5e41460729cba618466
- Ownership percent
- 100 %
Metal Equivalent
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The progress towards lodging the Mining Licence application is a positive step, showing continued advancement of the project through the regulatory process.
Positive factors
- Mining Licence application is on track for lodgement, indicating continued progress towards production
- Engagement with Queensland Office of the Coordinator General for Coordinated Project Status
Negative factors
- Application is still in preparation, not yet lodged or approved
Evidence · text
“Mining Licence application on track for submitting by end of 2026”
Tags used in scoring
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
JORC Compliantpositive
Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.
Why it applies: reporting_standards includes jorc
No Contained Metalnegative
Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.
Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported
No QP/CP Disclosurenegative
No Qualified Person or Competent Person named — lower credibility for the estimate. A QP/CP should be a member of a recognized professional association with relevant experience.
Why it applies: no Qualified or Competent Person is named anywhere in the release
Resource Updateneutral
Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.
Why it applies: the release compares against a previous estimate
PEA-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
PFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&I component.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
DFS-Supportingneutral
Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&I confidence.
Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports
Metallurgical Results (4)
flotationMaronan Project · leadRecovery: 90 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- lead
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- Lead Flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 90 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 70
- Conc. Grade Unit
- %
Lab
- Laboratory
- AMML Lab in Gosford
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead flotation testwork demonstrates exceptional recovery and concentrate quality, significantly de-risking the processing pathway for the silver-lead resource.
Positive factors
- Very high lead recovery, indicating efficient processing
- Very high-grade concentrate, which is highly desirable for smelters
Evidence · text
“Pb Rec > 90 % • Very High-Grade Concentrate – > 70% Lead”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
flotationMaronan Project · silverRecovery: 90 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- silver
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- Lead Flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 90 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 1500
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Lab
- Laboratory
- AMML Lab in Gosford
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The silver recovery in the lead flotation circuit is excellent, producing a very high-grade silver concentrate, which is a strong positive for project economics.
Positive factors
- Very high silver recovery, indicating efficient processing
- Very high-grade silver in concentrate, adding significant value
Evidence · text
“Ag Rec > 90 % • Very High-Grade Concentrate – > 1,500 g/t Silver”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
High Recoverypositive
Recovery at or above the exceptional band for the commodity and processing route.
Why it applies: 90% is at or above the exceptional band (90%)
flotationMaronan Project · copperRecovery: 90 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- copper
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- Copper Flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 90 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 25
- Conc. Grade Unit
- %
Lab
- Laboratory
- AMML Lab in Gosford
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper flotation testwork shows strong recovery and a good quality concentrate, supporting the viability of the copper-gold resource.
Positive factors
- High copper recovery, indicating efficient processing
- Good quality concentrate grade, desirable for smelters
Evidence · text
“Cu Rec > 90% • Good quality concentrates – 23 – 27 % Cu”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
flotationMaronan Project · goldRecovery: 84 %View all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Maronan Project
- Commodity
- gold
- Region
- australia_qld
- Reported Region
- Queensland
- Ticker
- MMA
Test Work
- Program Status
- detailed
- Test Type
- flotation
- Processing Route
- Copper Flotation
Recovery
- Recovery
- 84 %
- Recovery Basis
- actual_test
- Conc. Grade
- 12.5
- Conc. Grade Unit
- g/t
Lab
- Laboratory
- AMML Lab in Gosford
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-10-01T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold recovery in the copper flotation circuit is strong, producing a valuable gold credit in the concentrate and enhancing overall project economics.
Positive factors
- Strong gold recovery, adding significant value to the copper concentrate
- Good gold grade in concentrate
Evidence · text
“Au Rec 80 – 88 % Rec • Good quality concentrates – 10 – 15 g/t Au”
Tags used in scoring
Mill Routeneutral
Processing via mill or concentrator (CIL, CIP, tank leach, flotation).
Why it applies: processing_route matches the flotation signal
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.