Mithril Lidar Study Reveals 1.5 Km Trend And Historic Mines At La Dura Gold-Silver Project, Durango, Mexico

Original announcement by tmx on

Company
Mithril Silver and Gold Limited
Ticker
MSG
Exchange
TSX
Region
Durango, Mexico
Primary commodity
Gold
Secondary commodities
Silver
Document categories
Drill results, Resource update
Extracted
2026-08-25 22:56:52 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Mithril Silver and Gold Limited announced new exploration progress at its La Dura Gold-Silver Project in Durango, Mexico, including results from a LiDAR survey that identified a 1.5 km structural trend with historic mines, marking a high-priority drill target. The company also reported ongoing drilling at its Copalquin District, with assays pending, and re-stated its maiden JORC resource estimate from 2021 for Target 1.

Reasoning: The company announced new exploration insights from a LiDAR survey identifying a significant structural trend and historic workings, which are now high-priority drill targets. While drilling is ongoing at other targets, no new assay results are reported, and the resource estimate presented is a re-statement of a 2021 estimate.

Positive factors

  • new_drill_target_identified
  • exploration_focus
  • high_grade_historic_resource

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • assays_pending

Low confidence — this extraction should be reviewed alongside the original source.

Facts used in scoring: 15

Classification and evidence

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is explicitly stated as being from 17 Nov 2021.

Evidence · text

“This maiden resource is detailed below (see ASX release 17 November 2021)”

JORC Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with JORC Code (Australia) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is prepared in compliance with the JORC Code.

Evidence · text

“MAIDEN JORC RESOURCE”

NI 43-101 Compliantpositive

Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 (Canada) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The resource estimate is prepared in compliance with NI 43-101.

Evidence · text

“NI 43-101 Technical Report filed on SEDAR+”

QP/CP Signedpositive

Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Mr John Skeet (FAUSIMM, CP) and Mr Rodney Webster (Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists) are named as Competent Persons/Qualified Persons.

Evidence · text

“Competent Persons Statement - JORC The information in this announcement that relates to the LiDAR survey results, sampling techniques and data, metallurgical test results, mineral processing and project development and study work has been compiled by Mr John Skeet who is Mithril’s CEO and Managing Director. Mr Skeet is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. This is a Recognised Professional Organisation (RPO) under the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Code. Mr Skeet has sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposits under consideration, and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Skeet consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears. The Australian Securities Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or adequacy of this release. The information in this announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is reported by Mr Rodney Webster, former Principal Geologist at AMC Consultants Pty Ltd (AMC), who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. The report was peer reviewed by Andrew Proudman, Principal Consultant at AMC. Mr Webster is acting as the Competent Person, as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, for the reporting of the Mineral Resource estimate. A site visit was carried out by Jose Olmedo a geological consultant with AMC, in September 2021 to observe the drilling, logging, sampling and assay database. Mr Webster consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears Qualified Persons – NI 43-101 Scientific and technical information in this Report has been reviewed and approved by Mr John Skeet (FAUSIMM, CP) Mithril’s Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer. Mr John Skeet is a qualified person within the meaning of NI 43-101.”

Cut-off Disclosedpositive

Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: The resource estimate explicitly states a cut-off grade of 2.0 g/t AuEq.

Evidence · text

“using a cut-off grade of 2.0 g/t AuEq*”

Metal Equivalent Assumptions Disclosedpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The document provides the gold:silver price ratio, metal prices, and recovery assumptions used for the gold equivalent calculation.

Evidence · text

“In determining the gold equivalent (AuEq.) grade for reporting, a gold:silver price ratio of 70:1 was determined, using the formula: AuEq grade = Au grade + ((Ag grade/70) x (Ag recovery/Au recovery)). The metal prices used to determine the 70:1 ratio are the cumulative average prices for 2021: gold USD1,798.34 and silver: USD25.32 (actual is 71:1) from kitco.com . For silver equivalent (AgEq.) grade reporting, the same factors as above are used with the formula AgEq grade = Ag grade + ((Au grade x 70) x (Au recovery/Ag recovery)) At this early stage, the metallurgical recoveries were assumed to be equal (93%).”

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: A significant portion of the total resource (1,725 kt out of 2,416 kt total) is classified as Inferred.

Evidence · table

“1,725”

Context: Total

Exploration Focuspositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The document details a LiDAR study for exploration, ongoing drilling at new targets, and an aggressive exploration program for 2026.

Evidence · text

“Mithril is undertaking an aggressive exploration program in 2026, with up to 25,000 metres of drilling planned during the first 8 months of the year across the Copalquin District.”

New Drill Target Identifiedpositive · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: A LiDAR survey identified a 1.5 km long structural corridor with historic workings as a high-priority drill target at La Dura.

Evidence · text

“The identification of a 1.5 kilometre long structural corridor hosting multiple historic shafts and adits, including the four-level La Dura mine, defines an obvious high-priority drill target.”

Assays Pendingneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Maiden drilling at Target 3 has intersected mineralised quartz veins, but assays are pending.

Evidence · text

“Early signs are highly encouraging, with mineralised quartz vein structures intercepted at predicted depths (assays pending).”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 15. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Drill Results (15)

Fact 1El Refugio · goldGrade: 5.43Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
El Refugio
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
5.43
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“5.43”

Context: 691

Fact 2El Refugio · silverGrade: 114.2Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
El Refugio
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
114.2
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“114.2”

Context: 691

Fact 3El Refugio · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
El Refugio
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“7.06”

Context: 691

Fact 4El Refugio · goldGrade: 4.63Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
El Refugio
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
4.63
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“4.63”

Context: 1,447

Fact 5El Refugio · silverGrade: 137.1Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
El Refugio
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
137.1
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“137.1”

Context: 1,447

Fact 6El Refugio · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
El Refugio
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.59
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“6.59”

Context: 1,447

Fact 7La Soledad · goldGrade: 4.12Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
La Soledad
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
4.12
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“4.12”

Context: 278

Fact 8La Soledad · silverGrade: 228.2Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
La Soledad
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
228.2
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“228.2”

Context: 278

Fact 9La Soledad · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
La Soledad
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.38
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“7.38”

Context: 278

Fact 10Target 1 · goldGrade: 5.43Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Target 1
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
5.43
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“5.43”

Context: 691

Fact 11Target 1 · silverGrade: 114.2Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Target 1
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
114.2
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“114.2”

Context: 691

Fact 12Target 1 · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Target 1
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
7.06
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“7.06”

Context: 691

Fact 13Target 1 · goldGrade: 4.55Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Target 1
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
4.55
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“4.55”

Context: 1,725

Fact 14Target 1 · silverGrade: 151.7Grade Unit: g/tHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Target 1
Commodity
silver
Ticker
MSG

Geometry

Grade
151.7
Grade Unit
g/t

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“151.7”

Context: 1,725

Fact 15Target 1 · goldHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Target 1
Commodity
gold
Ticker
MSG

Classification

Deposit Type
epithermal
Mining Method
underground

Metal Equivalent

Metal Eq. Grade
6.72
Metal Eq. Unit
g/t AuEq
Assumptions Disclosed
Yes

Compositing

Cutoff Grade
2
Cutoff Unit
g/t AuEq

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Interp. Status
scored
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2021-11-17T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-02-25T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: This resource estimate is a re-statement of a 2021 maiden resource, thus having low novelty, but it is JORC and NI 43-101 compliant with disclosed cut-off and metal equivalent assumptions, indicating good reporting standards. A significant portion remains in the inferred category.

Positive factors

  • high_grade_historic_resource
  • jorc_compliant
  • ni_43_101_compliant
  • qp_signed
  • cut_off_disclosed
  • metal_equivalent_assumptions_disclosed

Negative factors

  • stale_resource_estimate
  • inferred_resource

Evidence · table

“6.72”

Context: 1,725

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.