# Minnova Announces Positive Preliminary Economic Assessment for the PL Gold Mine Restart: After-Tax NPV5% of US$181 Million and 111% IRR at US$3,000/oz Gold, Rising to US$439 Million at US$4,000/oz

Canonical Atlas analysis: https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d

Original source: https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/319014/Minnova-Announces-Positive-Preliminary-Economic-Assessment-for-the-PL-Gold-Mine-Restart-AfterTax-NPV5-of-US181-Million-and-111-IRR-at-US3000oz-Gold-Rising-to-US439-Million-at-US4000oz

Publisher: newsfile

Original announcement: 2026-10-14T21:15:00.000Z

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published: 2026-10-14T21:33:08.197Z

Atlas analysis updated: 2026-10-14T21:33:08.197Z

- Company: Minnova Corp.

- Ticker: MCI

- Exchange: Unavailable

- Region: Manitoba

- Primary commodity: Gold

- Secondary commodities: None reported

- Document categories: Other, Resource update

- Extracted: 2026-10-14 21:33:08 UTC

Narrative sentiment: 0.90 · Bullish

## Minestarters Atlas summary

Minnova Corp. announced a positive Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for the restart of its PL Gold Mine, projecting an after-tax NPV5% of US$180.6 million and an IRR of 111% at a base case gold price of US$3,000/oz. The study highlights low pre-production capital of US$53.4 million, a rapid payback of 0.68 years, and a 10-year mine life producing 621.5 thousand ounces of gold. The PEA is based on a 2026 Mineral Resource Estimate that includes high-grade Measured and Indicated resources.

Reasoning: The Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) for the PL Gold Mine restart demonstrates robust economics with a high after-tax NPV and IRR, driven by low pre-production capital and a short payback period. The project shows strong leverage to gold price, and the underlying resource includes high-grade components. However, the preliminary nature of the study and reliance on Inferred Resources introduce some risk.

- Positive factor: Strong after-tax NPV and IRR at base case gold price, indicating robust project economics.

- Positive factor: Low pre-production capital due to existing infrastructure, leading to a very short payback period.

- Positive factor: Significant leverage to higher gold prices, substantially increasing project value.

- Positive factor: High average annual gold production over a 10-year mine life.

- Positive factor: Resource estimate includes a high-grade open-pit component.

- Negative factor: PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources, which are speculative.

- Negative factor: Project is sensitive to gold price and recovered grade, posing market and geological risks.

- Negative factor: No Mineral Reserves have been estimated, indicating further studies are required.

Facts used in scoring: 12

## Classification and evidence

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: The resource estimate was prepared to support the Preliminary Economic Assessment.

Evidence · text

> The PEA is based on the 2026 MRE for the PL Gold Mine prepared by A&amp;B Global Mining \("ABGM"\) under the supervision of Nicholas Ross King, BSc \(Hons\) Geology, GDE \(Mining Engineering\), Pr.Sci.Nat., as announced on September 10, 2026 and summarised in Table 8.

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: The PEA and Mineral Resource Estimate were prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101.

Evidence · text

> The PEA was prepared by A&amp;B Global Mining \(Pty\) Ltd. \("ABGM"\) under the supervision of Nicholas Ross King, BSc \(Hons\) Geology, GDE \(Mining Engineering\), Pr.Sci Nat. in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects \("NI 43-101"\)

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: Independent Qualified Persons are named and responsible for the PEA and MRE.

Evidence · text

> The scientific and technical information in this news release relating to the Preliminary Economic Assessment \(PEA\) has been reviewed and approved by the following independent Qualified Persons of A&amp;B Global \(Pty\) Ltd., South Africa, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects \("NI 43-101"\).

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a significant Measured category for both open pit and underground.

Evidence · table

> Measured

Context: Category

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a significant Indicated category for both open pit and underground.

Evidence · table

> Indicated

Context: Category

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: The resource estimate includes a substantial Inferred category for both open pit and underground.

Evidence · table

> Inferred

Context: Category

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: Cut-off grades for both open pit and underground resources are clearly stated.

Evidence · text

> PL Deposit - Open Pit: cut-off grade 0.60 g/t Au

**Low Pre-production Capital**

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: Pre-production capital is estimated at a low US$53.4 million, reflecting refurbishment of existing infrastructure.

Evidence · text

> Low pre-production capital of US$53.4 million \(2026-2027, including a 15% contingency\), reflecting the refurbishment of the existing PL mill and site infrastructure

**Short Payback Period**

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The after-tax payback period is very short at 0.68 years from the start of production.

Evidence · table

> 0.68

Context: After-tax payback from start of production \(years\)

**High IRR**

Polarity: positive

Story-specific tag

Definition: No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The after-tax IRR is 111% at the base case, indicating a highly profitable project.

Evidence · table

> 111.0%

Context: After-tax IRR

**Sensitivity Analysis Disclosed**

Polarity: neutral

Story-specific tag

Definition: No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The document provides a detailed sensitivity analysis to key variables like gold price, recovered gold, operating cost, and capital cost.

Evidence · text

> The after-tax NPV5% and IRR were tested for changes of ±10% and ±20% in gold price, recovered gold \(head grade/recovery\), operating costs and capital costs, one variable at a time.

## Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 9. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

## Resource Estimates (9)

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d#fact-resource-facts-3)

PL Gold Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: PL Gold Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba
- Ticker: MCI

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Nicholas Ross King, Ettienne Jaques Oosthuizen
- Resource group id: resource:e7df98ea0ef70d184d5d
- Deposit or zone: PL Deposit - Open Pit
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 1288360
- Grade: 5.35
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 221575
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.6
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-09-10

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The open pit Measured resource shows high grade and confidence, contributing significantly to the project's early production.

- Positive factor: High-grade Measured resource for the open pit.

- Positive factor: Measured category indicates high geological confidence.

Evidence · table

> 1,288,360

Context: Measured

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d#fact-resource-facts-4)

PL Gold Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: PL Gold Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba
- Ticker: MCI

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Nicholas Ross King, Ettienne Jaques Oosthuizen
- Resource group id: resource:8bde4ca5c0432e2dd814
- Deposit or zone: PL Deposit - Open Pit
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 289750
- Grade: 4.99
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 46516
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.6
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-09-10

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The open pit Indicated resource adds to the project's high-grade profile with reasonable geological confidence.

- Positive factor: High-grade Indicated resource for the open pit.

Evidence · table

> 289,750

Context: Indicated

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d#fact-resource-facts-5)

PL Gold Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: PL Gold Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba
- Ticker: MCI

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Nicholas Ross King, Ettienne Jaques Oosthuizen
- Resource group id: resource:63834cf8a0c0cd38c1e4
- Deposit or zone: PL Deposit - Open Pit
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 118689
- Grade: 5.75
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 21955
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.6
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-09-10

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The open pit Inferred resource shows high grade but requires further drilling to upgrade confidence for economic studies.

- Positive factor: High-grade Inferred resource for the open pit, indicating potential for future conversion.

- Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

> 118,689

Context: Inferred

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d#fact-resource-facts-6)

PL Gold Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: PL Gold Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba
- Ticker: MCI

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Nicholas Ross King, Ettienne Jaques Oosthuizen
- Resource group id: resource:5f81d6fb78282442868d
- Deposit or zone: PL Deposit - Underground
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 1343678
- Grade: 5.06
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 218603
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 1.92
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-09-10

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The underground Measured resource shows high grade and confidence, supporting the long-term mine plan.

- Positive factor: High-grade Measured resource for the underground portion.

- Positive factor: Measured category indicates high geological confidence.

Evidence · table

> 1,343,678

Context: Measured

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d#fact-resource-facts-7)

PL Gold Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: PL Gold Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba
- Ticker: MCI

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Nicholas Ross King, Ettienne Jaques Oosthuizen
- Resource group id: resource:c20a03029671188a074d
- Deposit or zone: PL Deposit - Underground
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 835239
- Grade: 4.26
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 114464
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 1.92
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-09-10

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The underground Indicated resource adds to the project's high-grade profile with reasonable geological confidence.

- Positive factor: High-grade Indicated resource for the underground portion.

Evidence · table

> 835,239

Context: Indicated

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d#fact-resource-facts-8)

PL Gold Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: PL Gold Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba
- Ticker: MCI

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Nicholas Ross King, Ettienne Jaques Oosthuizen
- Resource group id: resource:a454295eef9a9d3c2186
- Deposit or zone: PL Deposit - Underground
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 1548443
- Grade: 3.63
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 180855
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 1.92
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-09-10

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The underground Inferred resource provides substantial tonnage for future exploration and potential conversion, despite its lower confidence category.

- Positive factor: Significant tonnage in the Inferred category for the underground portion, indicating future potential.

- Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

> 1,548,443

Context: Inferred

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### measured

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d#fact-resource-facts-9)

PL Gold Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: PL Gold Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba
- Ticker: MCI

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Nicholas Ross King, Ettienne Jaques Oosthuizen
- Resource group id: resource:b8330c8183abfe459714
- Deposit or zone: PL Deposit - Open Pit and Underground
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: measured
- Tonnes: 2632038
- Grade: 5.2
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 440178
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.6
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-09-10

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined Measured resource provides a substantial high-confidence base for the project's production plan.

- Positive factor: Large Measured resource with high grade, indicating strong geological confidence for combined operations.

Evidence · table

> 2,632,038

Context: Measured

#### Tags used in scoring

**Measured Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Highest confidence category — tonnage, grade, shape well-established from closely-spaced drilling. Basis for Proven Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "measured"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### indicated

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d#fact-resource-facts-10)

PL Gold Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: PL Gold Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba
- Ticker: MCI

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Nicholas Ross King, Ettienne Jaques Oosthuizen
- Resource group id: resource:8dac286fc7579fbabd85
- Deposit or zone: PL Deposit - Open Pit and Underground
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: indicated
- Tonnes: 1124989
- Grade: 4.45
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 160980
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.6
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-09-10

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined Indicated resource adds to the project's overall resource base with reasonable geological confidence.

- Positive factor: Significant Indicated resource with good grade for combined operations.

Evidence · table

> 1,124,989

Context: Indicated

#### Tags used in scoring

**Indicated Resource**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

### inferred

[Link to this fact](https://atlas-staging.minestarters.com/news/minnova-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-pl-gold-mine--785140f2-24da-44a2-9f1b-a32c09636e6d#fact-resource-facts-11)

PL Gold Mine · gold

#### Identity

- Project: PL Gold Mine
- Commodity: gold
- Region: canada\_mb
- Reported Region: Manitoba
- Ticker: MCI

#### Resource scope

- Estimate type: resource
- Effective date: 2026-09-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Reporting standards: ni\_43\_101
- QP Signed: Yes
- Qualified person names: Nicholas Ross King, Ettienne Jaques Oosthuizen
- Resource group id: resource:fe343543a17df8ff0f66
- Deposit or zone: PL Deposit - Open Pit and Underground
- Mining method: combined
- Ownership percent: 100 %

#### Resource Data

- Category: inferred
- Tonnes: 1667132
- Grade: 3.78
- Grade Unit: g/t
- Contained Metal: 202810
- Contained Unit: oz
- Cutoff Grade: 0.6
- Cutoff Unit: g/t Au

#### Prior Estimate

- Resource Date: 2026-09-10

#### Review

- Needs Review: No
- Historical: No

#### Dates

- Event date: 2026-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: The combined Inferred resource provides a large target for future drilling and potential resource conversion, despite its lower confidence.

- Positive factor: Substantial Inferred resource for combined operations, indicating significant exploration potential.

- Negative factor: Inferred category has lower geological confidence.

Evidence · table

> 1,667,132

Context: Inferred

#### Tags used in scoring

**Inferred Resource**

Polarity: negative

Definition: Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

**Cut-off Disclosed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Cut-off grade used for resource reporting is clearly stated, enabling like-for-like comparison.

Why it applies: cutoff\_grade is stated

**QP/CP Signed**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Qualified Person \(QP\) or Competent Person \(CP\) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association \(e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo\) with relevant experience.

Why it applies: qp\_signed is true

**NI 43-101 Compliant**

Polarity: positive

Definition: Resource estimate prepared in compliance with NI 43-101 \(Canada\) — high reporting standard.

Why it applies: reporting\_standards includes ni\_43\_101

**PEA-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Preliminary Economic Assessment — early-stage study.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**PFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Pre-Feasibility Study — requires adequate M&amp;I component.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

**DFS-Supporting**

Polarity: neutral

Definition: Resource estimate prepared to support a Definitive Feasibility Study — requires high M&amp;I confidence.

Why it applies: the release names the study this estimate supports

## How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.
