Minaurum Announces Drill Results from New Vein Zone Target; Promontorio Sur at Alamos Silver Project
Original announcement by tmx on
- Company
- Minaurum Gold Inc.
- Ticker
- MGG
- Exchange
- TSX
- Region
- Sonora, Mexico
- Primary commodity
- Silver
- Secondary commodities
- Gold, Copper, Lead, Zinc
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-08-23 22:50:07 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Minaurum Gold announced drill results from the new Promontorio Sur vein zone target at its Alamos Silver Project in Mexico, revealing several high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including 0.40 m of 434 g/t AgEq in hole AL24-124. The exploratory drilling confirms the potential for significant mineralization at depth within an epithermal system, with additional carbonate replacement-type mineralization. While some results are historical, the new intercepts from this previously untapped zone are encouraging, supported by robust QA/QC and transparent metal equivalent calculations.
Reasoning: Minaurum Gold announced positive drill results from a new target at its Alamos Silver Project, with several high-grade silver equivalent intercepts, including some exceptional values. The new drilling expands the known mineralization footprint and indicates potential at depth, although some results are historical and true widths are not disclosed. Robust QA/QC and transparent metal equivalent calculations support the findings.
Positive factors
- High-grade silver equivalent intercepts, some exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
- New vein zone target (Promontorio Sur) identified, indicating potential for resource expansion.
- Polymetallic mineralization (Ag, Au, Cu, Pb, Zn) adds value.
- Detailed QA/QC procedures and QP sign-off enhance data credibility.
- Transparent disclosure of metal equivalent assumptions.
Negative factors
- Many high-grade intercepts are over narrow widths, impacting overall grade-thickness product.
- True width not disclosed for any intercept, leading to uncertainty about actual thickness.
- Some results are historical (from 2019), reducing the novelty of the overall release.
- Cut-off grade for compositing intervals is not explicitly stated.
Facts used in scoring: 94
Classification and evidence
Bonanza Interceptpositive
Exceptionally high-grade zone, well above the deposit-type norm.
Why it applies: Several silver equivalent intercepts, such as 617 g/t AgEq, 536 g/t AgEq, 434 g/t AgEq, and 300 g/t AgEq, are well above the exceptional threshold for epithermal silver deposits.
Evidence · table
“617”
Context: 0.20
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release includes a detailed section on 'Analytical Procedures and Quality Assurance/Quality Control' outlining protocols, QC samples (standards, blanks, duplicates), and laboratory information.
Evidence · text
“Preparation and assaying of drilling samples from Minaurum's Alamos project are done with strict adherence to a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) protocol.”
QP/CP Signedpositive · Story-specific tag
Qualified Person (QP) or Competent Person (CP) named and signed off — a member of a recognized professional association (e.g., AusIMM, SME, AIG, P.Geo) with relevant experience.
Why it applies: Stephen R. Maynard, Vice President of Exploration of Minaurum and a Qualified Person (QP) as defined by National Instrument 43-101, reviewed and verified the assay data and approved the disclosure.
Evidence · text
“Stephen R. Maynard, Vice President of Exploration of Minaurum and a Qualified Person (QP) as defined by National Instrument 43-101, reviewed and verified the assay data, and has approved the disclosure in this News Release.”
Apparent Width Onlynegative
Interval given as downhole width with no true width or drill orientation — apparent width may overstate true thickness.
Why it applies: The document reports 'Interval (m)' for all intercepts but does not provide true width or orientation information for any of the drill holes.
Evidence · table
“Interval (m)”
Stale Data Re-releasenegative
Historical results re-announced with no new assays or reinterpretation — low genuine novelty.
Why it applies: Results for holes AL19-020 and AL19-024 are explicitly stated to have been announced in a news release dated August 22, 2019.
Evidence · text
“Results of holes AL19-020 and -024 were announced in a Minaurum new release dated 22 August 2019.”
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: The document reports various drill intercepts but does not state the cut-off grade used for compositing these intervals.
Evidence · text
“Assay highlights of holes AL24-124, -127, and -128; and holes AL19-020 and -024.”
Step-Out Extensionpositive
Mineralization extended beyond the previously known limit.
Why it applies: The drilling targets the 'Promontorio Sur vein zone', described as a 'new vein zone target' and 'exploratory drilling', aiming to extend mineralization.
Evidence · text
“Minaurum Announces Drill Results from New Vein Zone Target; Promontorio Sur at Alamos Silver Project”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 94. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (94)
AL24-124silverGrade: 32Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 32
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 185.85 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:185.85-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows moderate silver equivalent grade in a new target zone, but its narrow width and lack of true width disclosure temper its materiality.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade (134 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit.
- Part of a new vein zone target.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (2.25 m).
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“32”
Context: 2.25
AL24-124goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 185.85 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:185.85-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.12 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 2.25
AL24-124copperGrade: 0.18Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.18
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 185.85 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:185.85-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low copper grade (0.18%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.18”
Context: 2.25
AL24-124leadGrade: 0.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.73
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 185.85 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:185.85-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low lead grade (0.73%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.73”
Context: 2.25
AL24-124zincGrade: 1.86Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.86
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.25 m
- From
- 185.85 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:185.85-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 134
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The zinc grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low zinc grade (1.86%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“1.86”
Context: 2.25
AL24-124silverGrade: 89Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 89
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 187.7 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:187.70-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 434
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This sub-interval shows exceptional silver equivalent grade, significantly above the peer group, but its very narrow width limits its overall materiality despite being in a new target zone.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver equivalent grade (434 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
- High silver grade (89 g/t Ag).
- Part of a new vein zone target.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.40 m).
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“89”
Context: 0.40
AL24-124goldGrade: 0.22Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.22
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 187.7 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:187.70-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 434
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.22 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.22”
Context: 0.40
AL24-124copperGrade: 0.6Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.6
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 187.7 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:187.70-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 434
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate copper grade is a positive, but the very narrow width reduces its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.60%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.40 m).
Evidence · table
“0.60”
Context: 0.40
AL24-124leadGrade: 3.15Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.15
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 187.7 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:187.70-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 434
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate lead grade is a positive, but the very narrow width reduces its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade (3.15%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.40 m).
Evidence · table
“3.15”
Context: 0.40
AL24-124zincGrade: 6.49Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.49
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.4 m
- From
- 187.7 m
- To
- 188.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:187.70-188.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 434
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate zinc grade is a positive, but the very narrow width reduces its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade (6.49%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.40 m).
Evidence · table
“6.49”
Context: 0.40
AL24-124silverGrade: 187Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 187
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 218.7 m
- To
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:218.70-219.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 269
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong silver equivalent grade, but its very narrow width limits its overall materiality despite being in a new target zone.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade (269 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
- High silver grade (187 g/t Ag).
- Part of a new vein zone target.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.30 m).
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“187”
Context: 0.30
AL24-124goldGrade: 0.05Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.05
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 218.7 m
- To
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:218.70-219.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 269
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.05 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.05”
Context: 0.30
AL24-124copperGrade: 0.71Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.71
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 218.7 m
- To
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:218.70-219.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 269
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate copper grade is a positive, but the very narrow width reduces its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.71%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.30 m).
Evidence · table
“0.71”
Context: 0.30
AL24-124leadGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 218.7 m
- To
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:218.70-219.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 269
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low lead grade (0.12%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 0.30
AL24-124zincGrade: 0.45Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.45
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 218.7 m
- To
- 219 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:218.70-219.00
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 269
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The zinc grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low zinc grade (0.45%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.45”
Context: 0.30
AL24-124silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 333.35 m
- To
- 334.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:333.35-334.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver equivalent grade and narrow width, limiting its overall materiality despite being in a new target zone.
Positive factors
- Weak silver equivalent grade (88 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit.
- Part of a new vein zone target.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (1.40 m).
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 1.40
AL24-124goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 333.35 m
- To
- 334.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:333.35-334.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing negligibly to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade (0.01 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 1.40
AL24-124copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 333.35 m
- To
- 334.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:333.35-334.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade is very low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing negligibly to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.01%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 1.40
AL24-124leadGrade: 0.59Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.59
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 333.35 m
- To
- 334.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:333.35-334.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low lead grade (0.59%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.59”
Context: 1.40
AL24-124zincGrade: 2.07Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.4 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-124
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.07
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.4 m
- From
- 333.35 m
- To
- 334.75 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-124:333.35-334.75
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 88
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak zinc grade is a minor positive, but the narrow width limits its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade (2.07%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (1.40 m).
Evidence · table
“2.07”
Context: 1.40
AL24-127silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 206.7 m
- To
- 207.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:206.70-207.20
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 116
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver equivalent grade and very narrow width, limiting its overall materiality despite being in a new target zone.
Positive factors
- Weak silver equivalent grade (116 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit.
- Part of a new vein zone target.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.50 m).
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 0.50
AL24-127goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 206.7 m
- To
- 207.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:206.70-207.20
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 116
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing negligibly to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade (0.01 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.50
AL24-127copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 206.7 m
- To
- 207.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:206.70-207.20
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 116
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No copper grade was reported for this interval, indicating it does not contribute to the overall value.
Negative factors
- No copper grade (0.00%) reported for this interval.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.50
AL24-127leadGrade: 0.94Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.94
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 206.7 m
- To
- 207.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:206.70-207.20
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 116
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low lead grade (0.94%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.94”
Context: 0.50
AL24-127zincGrade: 2.65Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.65
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 206.7 m
- To
- 207.2 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:206.70-207.20
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 116
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak zinc grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width limits its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade (2.65%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.50 m).
Evidence · table
“2.65”
Context: 0.50
AL24-127silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 221.85 m
- To
- 222.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:221.85-222.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2025-02-27T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows weak silver equivalent grade and very narrow width, limiting its overall materiality despite being in a new target zone.
Positive factors
- Weak silver equivalent grade (95 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit.
- Part of a new vein zone target.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.65 m).
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 0.65
AL24-127goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 221.85 m
- To
- 222.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:221.85-222.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing negligibly to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade (0.01 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.65
AL24-127copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 221.85 m
- To
- 222.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:221.85-222.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No copper grade was reported for this interval, indicating it does not contribute to the overall value.
Negative factors
- No copper grade (0.00%) reported for this interval.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.65
AL24-127leadGrade: 0.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 221.85 m
- To
- 222.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:221.85-222.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low lead grade (0.52%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.52”
Context: 0.65
AL24-127zincGrade: 2.52Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.65 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.52
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.65 m
- From
- 221.85 m
- To
- 222.5 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:221.85-222.50
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 95
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak zinc grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width limits its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade (2.52%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.65 m).
Evidence · table
“2.52”
Context: 0.65
AL24-127goldGrade: 0.06Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.06
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 227.45 m
- To
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:227.45-227.70
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong silver equivalent grade, but its very narrow width and lack of reported silver grade limit its overall materiality despite being in a new target zone.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade (258 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
- Part of a new vein zone target.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.25 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- No silver grade reported for this interval.
Evidence · table
“0.06”
Context: 0.25
AL24-127copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 227.45 m
- To
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:227.45-227.70
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade is very low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing negligibly to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.01%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.25
AL24-127leadGrade: 3.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 227.45 m
- To
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:227.45-227.70
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate lead grade is a positive, but the very narrow width reduces its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade (3.61%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.25 m).
Evidence · table
“3.61”
Context: 0.25
AL24-127zincGrade: 5.51Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.25 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-127
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.51
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.25 m
- From
- 227.45 m
- To
- 227.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-127:227.45-227.70
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 258
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate zinc grade is a positive, but the very narrow width reduces its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade (5.51%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.25 m).
Evidence · table
“5.51”
Context: 0.25
AL24-128silverGrade: 12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 176.8 m
- To
- 177.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:176.80-177.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong silver equivalent grade, but its very narrow width limits its overall materiality despite being in a new target zone.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade (250 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
- Part of a new vein zone target.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.30 m).
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“12”
Context: 0.30
AL24-128goldGrade: 0.37Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.37
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 176.8 m
- To
- 177.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:176.80-177.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.37 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.37”
Context: 0.30
AL24-128copperGrade: 0.58Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.58
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 176.8 m
- To
- 177.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:176.80-177.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate copper grade is a positive, but the very narrow width reduces its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.58%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.30 m).
Evidence · table
“0.58”
Context: 0.30
AL24-128leadGrade: 0.42Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.42
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 176.8 m
- To
- 177.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:176.80-177.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low lead grade (0.42%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.42”
Context: 0.30
AL24-128zincGrade: 4.55Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.55
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 176.8 m
- To
- 177.1 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:176.80-177.10
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 250
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak zinc grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width limits its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade (4.55%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.30 m).
Evidence · table
“4.55”
Context: 0.30
AL24-128silverGrade: 31Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 31
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 307.6 m
- To
- 307.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:307.60-307.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 283
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This intercept shows strong silver equivalent grade, but its very narrow width limits its overall materiality despite being in a new target zone.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade (283 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
- Part of a new vein zone target.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.20 m).
- True width not disclosed.
Evidence · table
“31”
Context: 0.20
AL24-128goldGrade: 0.12Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.12
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 307.6 m
- To
- 307.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:307.60-307.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 283
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing minimally to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.12 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.12”
Context: 0.20
AL24-128copperGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 307.6 m
- To
- 307.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:307.60-307.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 283
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade is very low for an epithermal underground deposit, contributing negligibly to the overall value of this intercept.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.02%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 0.20
AL24-128leadGrade: 2.24Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.24
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 307.6 m
- To
- 307.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:307.60-307.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 283
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak lead grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width limits its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade (2.24%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.20 m).
Evidence · table
“2.24”
Context: 0.20
AL24-128zincGrade: 6.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL24-128
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 6.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 307.6 m
- To
- 307.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL24-128:307.60-307.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 283
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- No
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate zinc grade is a positive, but the very narrow width reduces its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate zinc grade (6.04%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.20 m).
Evidence · table
“6.04”
Context: 0.20
AL19-020silverGrade: 7Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 226 m
- To
- 226.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:226.00-226.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 271
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows strong silver equivalent grade but its very narrow width and lack of novelty limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade (271 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.30 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“7”
Context: 0.30
AL19-020goldGrade: 2.91Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.91
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 226 m
- To
- 226.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:226.00-226.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 271
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak gold grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (2.91 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.30 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“2.91”
Context: 0.30
AL19-020copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 226 m
- To
- 226.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:226.00-226.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 271
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No copper grade was reported for this historical interval, indicating it does not contribute to the overall value.
Negative factors
- No copper grade (0.00%) reported for this interval.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.30
AL19-020leadGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 226 m
- To
- 226.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:226.00-226.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 271
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.01%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.30
AL19-020zincGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.3 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.3 m
- From
- 226 m
- To
- 226.3 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:226.00-226.30
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 271
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.01%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.30
AL19-020silverGrade: 146Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 146
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 235.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-235.70
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 272
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows strong silver equivalent grade and high silver grade, but its narrow width and lack of novelty limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Strong silver equivalent grade (272 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
- High silver grade (146 g/t Ag).
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (1.05 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“146”
Context: 1.05
AL19-020goldGrade: 0.1Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 1.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.1
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 235.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-235.70
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 272
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical interval, contributing minimally to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.10 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.10”
Context: 1.05
AL19-020copperGrade: 0.93Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.93
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 235.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-235.70
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 272
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate copper grade is a positive, but the narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate copper grade (0.93%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (1.05 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.93”
Context: 1.05
AL19-020leadGrade: 0.53Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.53
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 235.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-235.70
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 272
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is low for this historical interval, contributing minimally to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Low lead grade (0.53%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.53”
Context: 1.05
AL19-020zincGrade: 0.81Grade Unit: %Intercept: 1.05 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.81
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 1.05 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 235.7 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-235.70
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 272
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The zinc grade is low for this historical interval, contributing minimally to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Low zinc grade (0.81%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.81”
Context: 1.05
AL19-020silverGrade: 304Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 304
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 234.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-234.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 617
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows exceptional silver equivalent grade and high silver grade, but its very narrow width and lack of novelty limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver equivalent grade (617 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
- High silver grade (304 g/t Ag).
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.20 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“304”
Context: 0.20
AL19-020goldGrade: 0.35Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.35
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 234.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-234.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 617
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical interval, contributing minimally to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.35 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.35”
Context: 0.20
AL19-020copperGrade: 1.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 234.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-234.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 617
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The strong copper grade is a positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Strong copper grade (1.41%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.20 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“1.41”
Context: 0.20
AL19-020leadGrade: 2.5Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.5
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 234.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-234.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 617
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak lead grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade (2.50%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.20 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“2.50”
Context: 0.20
AL19-020zincGrade: 3.36Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.36
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 234.65 m
- To
- 234.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:234.65-234.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 617
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak zinc grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade (3.36%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.20 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“3.36”
Context: 0.20
AL19-020silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 142
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate silver equivalent grade, but its narrow width and lack of novelty limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade (142 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (2.65 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: 2.65
AL19-020goldGrade: 0.8Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.8
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 142
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical interval, contributing minimally to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.80 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.80”
Context: 2.65
AL19-020copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 142
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.01%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 2.65
AL19-020leadGrade: 0.92Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.92
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 142
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is low for this historical interval, contributing minimally to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Low lead grade (0.92%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.92”
Context: 2.65
AL19-020zincGrade: 1.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.65 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.65 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 142
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The zinc grade is low for this historical interval, contributing minimally to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Low zinc grade (1.41%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“1.41”
Context: 2.65
AL19-020silverGrade: 4Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 237.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-237.60
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 300
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows exceptional silver equivalent grade, but its very narrow width and lack of novelty limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver equivalent grade (300 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.45 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“4”
Context: 0.45
AL19-020goldGrade: 3.26Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.26
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 237.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-237.60
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 300
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak gold grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak gold grade (3.26 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.45 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“3.26”
Context: 0.45
AL19-020copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 237.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-237.60
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 300
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No copper grade was reported for this historical interval, indicating it does not contribute to the overall value.
Negative factors
- No copper grade (0.00%) reported for this interval.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 0.45
AL19-020leadGrade: 0.04Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.04
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 237.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-237.60
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 300
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The lead grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low lead grade (0.04%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.04”
Context: 0.45
AL19-020zincGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 237.15 m
- To
- 237.6 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:237.15-237.60
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 300
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The zinc grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low zinc grade (0.02%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 0.45
AL19-020silverGrade: 10Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 10
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 239.3 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:239.30-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 183
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate silver equivalent grade, but its very narrow width and lack of novelty limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade (183 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.50 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“10”
Context: 0.50
AL19-020goldGrade: 0.13Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.13
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 239.3 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:239.30-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 183
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is low for this historical interval, contributing minimally to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Low gold grade (0.13 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.13”
Context: 0.50
AL19-020copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 239.3 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:239.30-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 183
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.01%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.50
AL19-020leadGrade: 2.34Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.34
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 239.3 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:239.30-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 183
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak lead grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade (2.34%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.50 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“2.34”
Context: 0.50
AL19-020zincGrade: 3.48Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.5 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.48
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.5 m
- From
- 239.3 m
- To
- 239.8 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:239.30-239.80
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 183
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak zinc grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade (3.48%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.50 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“3.48”
Context: 0.50
AL19-020silverGrade: 2Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.35 m
- From
- 242 m
- To
- 244.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:242.00-244.35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 109
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows weak silver equivalent grade and narrow width, limiting its overall materiality and novelty.
Positive factors
- Weak silver equivalent grade (109 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (2.35 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“2”
Context: 2.35
AL19-020goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 2.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 2.35 m
- From
- 242 m
- To
- 244.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:242.00-244.35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 109
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade (0.01 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 2.35
AL19-020copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.35 m
- From
- 242 m
- To
- 244.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:242.00-244.35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 109
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No copper grade was reported for this historical interval, indicating it does not contribute to the overall value.
Negative factors
- No copper grade (0.00%) reported for this interval.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 2.35
AL19-020leadGrade: 1.03Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.03
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.35 m
- From
- 242 m
- To
- 244.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:242.00-244.35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 109
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak lead grade is a minor positive, but the narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade (1.03%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (2.35 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“1.03”
Context: 2.35
AL19-020zincGrade: 2.61Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.35 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 2.61
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.35 m
- From
- 242 m
- To
- 244.35 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:242.00-244.35
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 109
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak zinc grade is a minor positive, but the narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade (2.61%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Narrow intercept length (2.35 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“2.61”
Context: 2.35
AL19-020silverGrade: 3Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.95 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.95 m
- From
- 247.5 m
- To
- 252.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:247.50-252.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 174
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate silver equivalent grade over a moderate width, but its lack of novelty and true width disclosure limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade (174 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit.
- Moderate intercept length (4.95 m).
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“3”
Context: 4.95
AL19-020goldGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 4.95 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 4.95 m
- From
- 247.5 m
- To
- 252.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:247.50-252.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 174
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade (0.01 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 4.95
AL19-020copperGrade: 0Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.95 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.95 m
- From
- 247.5 m
- To
- 252.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:247.50-252.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 174
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: No copper grade was reported for this historical interval, indicating it does not contribute to the overall value.
Negative factors
- No copper grade (0.00%) reported for this interval.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.00”
Context: 4.95
AL19-020leadGrade: 1.67Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.95 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.67
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.95 m
- From
- 247.5 m
- To
- 252.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:247.50-252.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 174
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak lead grade is a minor positive, but the historical nature and lack of true width limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak lead grade (1.67%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“1.67”
Context: 4.95
AL19-020zincGrade: 4.21Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.95 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.21
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.95 m
- From
- 247.5 m
- To
- 252.45 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:247.50-252.45
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 174
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The weak zinc grade is a minor positive, but the historical nature and lack of true width limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Weak zinc grade (4.21%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“4.21”
Context: 4.95
AL19-020silverGrade: 9Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 9
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 250.95 m
- To
- 251.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:250.95-251.40
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 536
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical sub-interval shows exceptional silver equivalent grade, but its very narrow width and lack of novelty limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Exceptional silver equivalent grade (536 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit, exceeding 75th percentile of peer group.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.45 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“9”
Context: 0.45
AL19-020goldGrade: 0.03Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.03
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 250.95 m
- To
- 251.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:250.95-251.40
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 536
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade (0.03 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.03”
Context: 0.45
AL19-020copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 250.95 m
- To
- 251.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:250.95-251.40
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 536
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.01%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.45
AL19-020leadGrade: 5.41Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5.41
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 250.95 m
- To
- 251.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:250.95-251.40
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 536
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate lead grade is a positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade (5.41%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.45 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“5.41”
Context: 0.45
AL19-020zincGrade: 12.85Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.45 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-020
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 12.85
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.45 m
- From
- 250.95 m
- To
- 251.4 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-020:250.95-251.40
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 536
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The strong zinc grade is a positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Strong zinc grade (12.85%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.45 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“12.85”
Context: 0.45
AL19-024silverGrade: 5Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-024
- Commodity
- silver
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 5
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 150.65 m
- To
- 150.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-024:150.65-150.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 146
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: This historical intercept shows moderate silver equivalent grade, but its very narrow width and lack of novelty limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate silver equivalent grade (146 g/t AgEq) for epithermal deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.20 m).
- True width not disclosed.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“5”
Context: 0.20
AL19-024goldGrade: 0.02Grade Unit: g/tIntercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-024
- Commodity
- gold
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.02
- Grade Unit
- g/t
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 150.65 m
- To
- 150.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-024:150.65-150.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 146
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The gold grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low gold grade (0.02 g/t) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.02”
Context: 0.20
AL19-024copperGrade: 0.01Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-024
- Commodity
- copper
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 0.01
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 150.65 m
- To
- 150.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-024:150.65-150.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 146
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The copper grade is very low for this historical interval, contributing negligibly to the overall value.
Negative factors
- Very low copper grade (0.01%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“0.01”
Context: 0.20
AL19-024leadGrade: 3.98Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-024
- Commodity
- lead
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 3.98
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 150.65 m
- To
- 150.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-024:150.65-150.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 146
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The moderate lead grade is a positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Positive factors
- Moderate lead grade (3.98%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
Negative factors
- Very narrow intercept length (0.20 m).
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“3.98”
Context: 0.20
AL19-024zincGrade: 1.73Grade Unit: %Intercept: 0.2 mHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Hole ID
- AL19-024
- Commodity
- zinc
- Ticker
- MGG
Geometry
- Grade
- 1.73
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 0.2 m
- From
- 150.65 m
- To
- 150.85 m
Classification
- Deposit Type
- epithermal
- Program
- exploration
- Group ID
- AL19-024:150.65-150.85
- Mining Method
- underground
QA/QC
- Laboratory
- ActLabs
- QA/QC Disclosed
- Yes
- Lab Certified
- Yes
- QP Signed
- Yes
- QA/QC Methods
- standards, blanks, duplicates
Metal Equivalent
- Metal Eq. Grade
- 146
- Metal Eq. Unit
- g/t AgEq
- Assumptions Disclosed
- Yes
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- historical_restatement
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- Yes
- Historical Source Date
- 2019-08-22T00:00:00.000Z
Dates
- Event date
- 2025-07-15T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: The low zinc grade is a minor positive, but the very narrow width and historical nature limit its overall impact.
Negative factors
- Low zinc grade (1.73%) for an epithermal underground deposit.
- Historical data, reducing novelty.
Evidence · table
“1.73”
Context: 0.20
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.