Military Metals Drills 4.6 Meters of 4.1% Antimony Including 2.6 Meters of 7.0% Antimony - Maiden Resource Forthcoming at Flagship Trojarova Project, Europe
Original announcement by yahoo_press on
- Company
- Military Metals Corp.
- Ticker
- MILI
- Exchange
- CSE
- Region
- Slovakia
- Primary commodity
- Antimony
- Secondary commodities
- Gold
- Document categories
- Drill results
- Extracted
- 2026-09-22 02:59:27 UTC
Analysis by Minestarters Atlas
Atlas analysis published:
Minestarters Atlas analysis
Summary
Military Metals Corp. has reported final analytical results from its 2025 definition drilling campaign at the Trojárová Antimony-Gold Project in Slovakia. The results include a notable 4.6 meter intercept at 4.1% antimony, featuring a higher-grade 2.6 meter zone at 7.0% antimony.
Reasoning: The announcement reports high-grade antimony intercepts (4.1% and 7.0%) which are significant for an antimony project, though the campaign was designed to confirm historical results.
Positive factors
- high-grade antimony intercept
- sub-interval enrichment
Facts used in scoring: 2
Classification and evidence
QA/QC Disclosedpositive
Release includes QA/QC disclosure — certified lab, QP sign-off, or stated methods (blanks, standards, duplicates).
Why it applies: The release mentions final analytical results from a definition drilling campaign, implying assaying was completed.
Evidence · text
“report the final analytical results”
Extracted facts
Stored fact records: 2. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.
Drill Results (2)
Fact 1Trojárová Antimony-Gold · antimonyGrade: 4.1Grade Unit: %Intercept: 4.6 mNeeds review: drill_no_hole_idView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Trojárová Antimony-Gold
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- slovakia
- Reported Region
- slovakia
- Ticker
- MILI
Geometry
- Grade
- 4.1
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 4.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- drill_no_hole_id
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 4.1% antimony is a strong intercept for this commodity.
Positive factors
- strong antimony grade
Evidence · text
“4.6 Meters of 4.1% Antimony”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
Fact 2Trojárová Antimony-Gold · antimonyGrade: 7Grade Unit: %Intercept: 2.6 mNeeds review: ungroundedView all detailsHide details
Identity
- Project
- Trojárová Antimony-Gold
- Commodity
- antimony
- Region
- slovakia
- Reported Region
- slovakia
- Ticker
- MILI
Geometry
- Grade
- 7
- Grade Unit
- %
- Intercept
- 2.6 m
Classification
- Program
- resource
- Sample Type
- drill
Review
- Needs Review
- Yes
- Review Reason
- ungrounded
- Interp. Status
- scored
- Historical
- No
Dates
- Event date
- 2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z
Reasoning: 7.0% antimony represents a significant high-grade sub-interval.
Positive factors
- bonanza-style enrichment
Evidence · text
“2.6 Meters of 7.0% Antimony”
Tags used in scoring
No QA/QC Disclosurenegative
Release does not disclose QA/QC — lab certification, CP/QP sign-off and assay protocols cannot be checked from this document.
Why it applies: qaqc_disclosed is not true
Cut-off Undisclosednegative
High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.
Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated
Infill Drillingneutral
Confirmatory drilling to raise resource confidence, not new discovery.
Why it applies: drill_program_type is "resource"
How Atlas produces this analysis
Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.