MGT: Equity Raising Investor Presentation

Original announcement by asx on

Company
Magnetite Mines Limited
Ticker
MGT
Exchange
ASX
Region
South Australia
Primary commodity
Iron ore
Secondary commodities
Gold, Copper, Silver, Rare earth elements
Document categories
Resource update, Capital raise
Extracted
2026-09-29 18:56:05 UTC

Analysis by Minestarters Atlas

Atlas analysis published:

Minestarters Atlas analysis

Summary

Magnetite Mines Limited (MGT) is conducting a capital raise of up to $1.5 million to advance its Razorback Iron Ore Project. The presentation highlights the project's massive scale, including 6.6 billion tonnes of resources and 2.0 billion tonnes of reserves, and a new development strategy focusing on saline water processing and higher-grade mining in early years.

Reasoning: The document is an investor presentation for a capital raise, highlighting significant iron ore assets and a revised, more capital-efficient development pathway for the Razorback project.

Positive factors

  • Capital raise to advance Razorback project
  • Large scale iron ore resources and reserves
  • Major Project Status awarded
  • Strategic shift to saline water processing to reduce CAPEX

Negative factors

  • High capital requirements for project development
  • Reliance on strategic partners
  • Commodity price volatility

Facts used in scoring: 10

Classification and evidence

Capital Raiseneutral · Story-specific tag

No canonical definition is currently available.

Why it applies: The presentation is specifically for an equity raising of up to $1.5 million.

Evidence · text

“Equity raising presentation”

Resource Updateneutral

Revised estimate for an existing resource — compare to prior to assess progress.

Why it applies: The presentation includes updated resource and reserve information for the Razorback project.

Evidence · text

“Razorback Project Mineral Resource Estimate and Ore Reserve is extracted from the Company’s ASX announcements”

Extracted facts

Stored fact records: 9. Some facts used in scoring do not have a stored record.

Resource Estimates (9)

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore Project · iron_oreTonnes: 1973000000Grade: 17.75Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:91b81f21951070e6739e

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1973000000
Grade
17.75
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource grade for Razorback Iron Ore Project.

Positive factors

  • High grade Fe content

Evidence · table

“17.75”

Context: 1,973

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore Project · iron_oreTonnes: 1864000000Grade: 17.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:79e9ea404feb475e848f

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1864000000
Grade
17.02
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource grade for Razorback Iron Ore Project.

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage

Evidence · table

“17.02”

Context: 1,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

probableRazorback Iron Ore Project · iron_oreTonnes: 1977000000Grade: 68.5Grade Unit: % ConcentrateHistorical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
reserve
Resource group id
resource:37a449174c5b8201048a

Resource Data

Category
probable
Tonnes
1977000000
Grade
68.5
Grade Unit
% Concentrate

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2023-06-09T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Probable ore reserve concentrate grade for Razorback.

Positive factors

  • High grade concentrate

Evidence · table

“68.5”

Context: 1,977

Tags used in scoring

Probable Reservepositive

Indicated Resource with demonstrated economic viability after applying modifying factors.

Why it applies: category is "probable"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.3 years before this release

inferredIronback Hill · iron_oreTonnes: 1187000000Grade: 23.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ironback Hill
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:9909f5cb2f7b1da409a5

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1187000000
Grade
23.2
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource grade for Ironback Hill.

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for Inferred resource

Evidence · table

“23.2”

Context: 1,187

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.9 years before this release

inferredMuster Dam Iron Ore Project · iron_oreTonnes: 1550000000Grade: 18.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Muster Dam Iron Ore Project
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:36f687116d88aaf4dc7d

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1550000000
Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource grade for Muster Dam.

Evidence · table

“18.7”

Context: 1,550

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

indicatedRazorback Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 1973000000Grade: 17.75Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:992208267f17fa9a7ec5

Resource Data

Category
indicated
Tonnes
1973000000
Grade
17.75
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Indicated resource grade for Razorback Iron Ore Project. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • High grade Fe content

Evidence · table

“17.75”

Context: 1,973

Tags used in scoring

Indicated Resourcepositive

Reasonable geological confidence based on adequate drilling; continuity can be assumed. Basis for Probable Reserves.

Why it applies: category is "indicated"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredRazorback Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 1864000000Grade: 17.02Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Razorback Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:c553ea607f7819ef4941

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1864000000
Grade
17.02
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2025-06-30T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource grade for Razorback Iron Ore Project. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Significant tonnage

Evidence · table

“17.02”

Context: 1,864

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

inferredIronback Hill · iron_oreTonnes: 1187000000Grade: 23.2Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Ironback Hill
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:9909f5cb2f7b1da409a5

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1187000000
Grade
23.2
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2018-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource grade for Ironback Hill. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Positive factors

  • Strong grade for Inferred resource

Evidence · table

“23.2”

Context: 1,187

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 7.9 years before this release

inferredMuster Dam Iron Ore · iron_oreTonnes: 1550000000Grade: 18.7Grade Unit: %Historical resultNeeds review: historical_restatementView all details
Link to this fact

Identity

Project
Muster Dam Iron Ore
Commodity
iron_ore
Region
australia_sa
Reported Region
South Australia
Ticker
MGT

Resource scope

Estimate type
resource
Resource group id
resource:07a5668b4b8d732cdf6c

Resource Data

Category
inferred
Tonnes
1550000000
Grade
18.7
Grade Unit
%

Review

Needs Review
Yes
Review Reason
historical_restatement
Historical
Yes
Historical Source Date
2022-11-03T00:00:00.000Z

Dates

Event date
2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z

Reasoning: Inferred resource grade for Muster Dam. (Expanded from multi-commodity resource table for completeness.)

Evidence · table

“18.7”

Context: 1,550

Tags used in scoring

Inferred Resourcenegative

Speculative category — limited drilling, geological continuity assumed but not confirmed. Cannot support economic studies alone.

Why it applies: category is "inferred"

Cut-off Undisclosednegative

High-grade interval reported without stating the cut-off grade used for compositing.

Why it applies: no cutoff_grade was stated

No Contained Metalnegative

Tonnage and grade reported but contained metal not calculated or disclosed — incomplete reporting.

Why it applies: contained_metal was not reported

Stale Estimatenegative

Effective date is >2 years old — data currency concern, may not reflect current geological understanding.

Why it applies: effective date is 3.9 years before this release

How Atlas produces this analysis

Minestarters Atlas uses automated extraction to summarize mining announcements, identify reported measurements, and classify supporting evidence. Sentiment reflects the extracted narrative and classification rules; it is an interpretation, not a reported measurement. Evidence quotes and context are provided where available. Missing data, low-confidence results, and review flags indicate limitations. Check the original publisher announcement before relying on an interpretation.